Volume 86, Issue 6, Pages (September 1996)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
18-Wheeler in Innate Immunity By Joe Peraza California State University, Long Beach.
Advertisements

Skin Commensals Amplify the Innate Immune Response to Pathogens by Activation of Distinct Signaling Pathways  Ines Wanke, Heiko Steffen, Christina Christ,
Volume 60, Issue 2, Pages (August 2001)
Volume 9, Issue 5, Pages (November 1998)
Volume 11, Issue 6, Pages (June 2003)
Volume 88, Issue 4, Pages (February 1997)
Volume 69, Issue 4, Pages e6 (February 2018)
PGRP-SD, an Extracellular Pattern-Recognition Receptor, Enhances Peptidoglycan- Mediated Activation of the Drosophila Imd Pathway  Igor Iatsenko, Shu Kondo,
Volume 8, Issue 1, Pages (January 1998)
Volume 6, Issue 2, Pages (February 1997)
Negative Regulation by Amidase PGRPs Shapes the Drosophila Antibacterial Response and Protects the Fly from Innocuous Infection  Juan C. Paredes, David P.
Lorri R. Marek, Jonathan C. Kagan  Immunity 
Volume 23, Issue 12, Pages e6 (June 2018)
Volume 13, Issue 3, Pages (February 2004)
Volume 13, Issue 5, Pages (November 2000)
Volume 4, Issue 5, Pages (November 1999)
Volume 11, Issue 6, Pages (June 2003)
Ranjiv S. Khush, William D. Cornwell, Jennifer N. Uram, Bruno Lemaitre 
Volume 115, Issue 4, Pages (October 1998)
Volume 127, Issue 1, Pages (July 2004)
Shelley Chu, Ira Herskowitz  Molecular Cell 
Matthew H. Sieber, Carl S. Thummel  Cell Metabolism 
Inducible Expression of Double-Stranded RNA Reveals a Role for dFADD in the Regulation of the Antibacterial Response in Drosophila Adults  François Leulier,
MUC1 Oncoprotein Stabilizes and Activates Estrogen Receptor α
Cell-Density-Dependent Regulation of Expression and Glycosylation of Dopachrome Tautomerase/Tyrosinase-Related Protein-2  Thomas J. Hornyak, Daniel J.
Mohan Viswanathan, Stuart K. Kim, Ala Berdichevsky, Leonard Guarente 
Initiation of RPS2-Specified Disease Resistance in Arabidopsis Is Coupled to the AvrRpt2-Directed Elimination of RIN4  Michael J. Axtell, Brian J. Staskawicz 
Andrew J Henderson, Ruth I Connor, Kathryn L Calame  Immunity 
Volume 36, Issue 4, Pages (April 2012)
Volume 93, Issue 7, Pages (June 1998)
Volume 20, Issue 5, Pages (May 2004)
Inducible Antibacterial Defense System in C. elegans
Michael Boutros, Hervé Agaisse, Norbert Perrimon  Developmental Cell 
Volume 3, Issue 5, Pages (May 2008)
Volume 3, Issue 4, Pages (October 2002)
Stratifin-Induced Matrix Metalloproteinase-1 in Fibroblast Is Mediated by c-fos and p38 Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Activation  Eugene Lam, Runhangiz.
Volume 21, Issue 19, Pages (October 2011)
MUC1 Oncoprotein Stabilizes and Activates Estrogen Receptor α
Volume 127, Issue 7, Pages (December 2006)
Drosophila Immune Responses as Models for Human Immunity
Histone-like TAFs Are Essential for Transcription In Vivo
Keratinocyte growth factor promotes goblet cell differentiation through regulation of goblet cell silencer inhibitor  Dai Iwakiri, Daniel K. Podolsky 
Volume 13, Issue 1, Pages (January 2004)
Mosquito Defense Strategies against Viral Infection
Nuclear Retention Prevents Premature Cytoplasmic Appearance of mRNA
Drosophila Sex-Peptide Stimulates Female Innate Immune System after Mating via the Toll and Imd Pathways  Jing Peng, Peder Zipperlen, Eric Kubli  Current.
The SREBP Pathway in Drosophila
A Major Role for Capsule-Independent Phagocytosis-Inhibitory Mechanisms in Mammalian Infection by Cryptococcus neoformans  Cheryl D. Chun, Jessica C.S.
Volume 119, Issue 5, Pages (November 2004)
Volume 21, Issue 8, Pages (November 2017)
Chunli Ren, Paul Webster, Steven E. Finkel, John Tower  Cell Metabolism 
Volume 30, Issue 4, Pages (April 2009)
Volume 48, Issue 5, Pages e3 (May 2018)
Kirst King-Jones, Michael A. Horner, Geanette Lam, Carl S. Thummel 
Volume 55, Issue 2, Pages (February 1999)
Systemic infection in Drosophila larvae by septic injury with a fine tungsten needle. Systemic infection in Drosophila larvae by septic injury with a fine.
Negative Regulation by Amidase PGRPs Shapes the Drosophila Antibacterial Response and Protects the Fly from Innocuous Infection  Juan C. Paredes, David P.
Volume 13, Issue 3, Pages (February 2004)
Zebrafish as a Model Organism for the Identification and Characterization of Drugs and Genes Affecting p53 Signaling  Ulrike Langheinrich, Elisabeth Hennen,
Matthew H. Sieber, Carl S. Thummel  Cell Metabolism 
Volume 17, Issue 20, Pages (October 2007)
Spatial Regulation of Developmental Signaling by a Serpin
Volume 1, Issue 4, Pages (March 1998)
Volume 5, Issue 3, Pages (September 2003)
Transcriptional Termination Factors for RNA Polymerase II in Yeast
Volume 16, Issue 8, Pages (April 2006)
Volume 8, Issue 1, Pages (January 1998)
Volume 3, Issue 2, Pages (August 2002)
Volume 6, Issue 3, Pages (March 1997)
Acetylation Regulates Transcription Factor Activity at Multiple Levels
Presentation transcript:

Volume 86, Issue 6, Pages 973-983 (September 1996) The Dorsoventral Regulatory Gene Cassette spätzle/Toll/cactus Controls the Potent Antifungal Response in Drosophila Adults  Bruno Lemaitre, Emmanuelle Nicolas, Lydia Michaut, Jean-Marc Reichhart, Jules A Hoffmann  Cell  Volume 86, Issue 6, Pages 973-983 (September 1996) DOI: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80172-5

Figure 1 Transcriptional Profile of Antimicrobial Genes in Wild-Type and Dorsoventral Mutant Adults A representative Northern blot of total RNA extracted from bacteria-challenged wild-type and mutant adults. The blot was successively hybridized with the following nick-translated cDNA probes: Drom, drosomycin; Cec A, cecropin A1; Dipt, diptericin; Drc, drosocin; Att, attacin; Def, defensin; rp49. C, control; uc, unchallenged. Lanes are as follows: 1 and 2, OregonR (OrR); 3, dl1/dl1; 4, dlT/Df(dl); 5, tub238/tub118; 6, tub3/tub118; 7, pll078/pll21; 9, Tlr632/Tl1-RXA (29°C); 10, Tlr444/Tl9QURE (29°C); 12, spzrm7/spzrm7; 13, ea1/ea1; 16, snk073/snk073; 18, gd7/gd7; 22, cactA2/cactA2; 23, Tl10b/+. Cell 1996 86, 973-983DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80172-5)

Figure 2 Expression of Antimicrobial Genes in Wild-Type and Dorsoventral Mutant Adults The signals on several Northern blots similar to that presented in Figure 1 were quantified by a Bio-Imager system. In each experiment, the signals of the immune gene expression were normalized with the corresponding value of the rp49 signal. The levels of expression in 6 hr bacteria-challenged wild-type adults were standardized as 100 and the results are given as relative activity (percent). Each bar corresponds to an independent experiment. Analyses of Northern blots for drosomycin (Drom), cecropin A1 (Cec A), diptericin (Dipt), and defensin (Def) gene expression are presented. Results obtained for drosocin and attacin were similar to those for diptericin and defensin, respectively (data not shown). C, control; uc, unchallenged. Lanes are as follows: 1 and 2, OrR; 3, dl1/dl1; 4, dlT/Df(dl); 5, tub238/tub118; 6, tub3/tub118; 7, pll078/pll21; 8, pll078/pllrm8; 9, Tlr632/Tl1-RXA (29°C); 10, Tlr444/Tl9QURE (29°C); 11, spz197/spz197; 12, spzrm7/spzrm7; 13, ea1/ea1; 14, ea818/ea818 (29°C); 15, ea7/ea2; 16, snk073/snk073; 17, snkrm4/snk229; 18, gd7/gd7; 19, gd8/gd8; 20, Tl1-RXA/+; 21, imd/imd; 22, cactA2/cactA2; 23, Tl10b/+; 24, Tl9Q/+. Cell 1996 86, 973-983DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80172-5)

Figure 3 Time Course Analysis of Antimicrobial Gene Expression in Wild-Type and Mutant Adults Northern blot analysis of total RNA extracted at different time intervals after challenge (as indicated). Flies were bacteria challenged and processed together. (A) and (B) were obtained separately. (A) OrR, dl1/dl1 (dl−), Tl10b/+ (Tl10b), Tlr632/Tl1-RXA (Tl−). (B) OrR, imd/imd (imd) and imd/imd; Tl632/Tl9QURE (imd; Tl−). Cell 1996 86, 973-983DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80172-5)

Figure 4 Survival of Wild-Type and Mutant Adults to Bacterial and Fungal Infections The survival rates of infected imd/imd (imd); Tlr632/Tl1-RXA (Tl-), imd/imd; Tlr632/Tl1-RXA (imd; Tl−) mutants and wild-type (OrR) flies are presented with their confidence interval (p < 0.05). Groups of 20 adults, aged 2–4 days, were pricked and transferred to a fresh vial every 4 days. The survival rates of untreated mutants were identical to those observed with wild type (>95% after 6 days; data not shown). At least five replicates were used for the determination of the survival rates. Adults were pricked with a needle previously dipped into either water (A), a concentrated solution of spores of A. fumiga- tus (109 spores per milliliter) (B), or a concentrated solution of E. coli (C). Cell 1996 86, 973-983DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80172-5)

Figure 5 Germinating Hyphes of A. fumigatus on a Dead Drosophila Scanning electron micrograph of a Drosophila adult that succumbed to infection by A. fumigatus and is covered with germinating hyphae (200× magnification). Cell 1996 86, 973-983DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80172-5)

Figure 6 Bacterial Growth in Challenged Wild-Type and Mutant Adults Infected with E. coli imd/imd, Tl632/Tl1-RXA, and imd/imd; Tlr632/Tl9QURE mutants and wild-type (OrR) flies were pricked with a needle dipped into a concentrated solution of E. coli carrying an ampicillin-resistant plasmid. Bacterial counts were obtained by plating an appropriate dilution of homogenates of five adults in phosphate-buffered saline on ampicillin medium. This experiment was repeated several times and yielded similar results. Cell 1996 86, 973-983DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80172-5)

Figure 7 Expression of Dorsoventral Genes in Control and Challenged Adults Aliquots containing 5 μg of poly(A) RNA from uninduced (0 hr) or bacteria-challenged male adults were fractionated on an agarose–formaldehyde gel and subsequently hybridized with cDNA from the dorsoventral genes and from rp49 as a control. (A) and (B) were obtained from distinct experiments. Equivalent levels of rp49 signals were obtained for each experiment (data not shown). The sizes of the transcripts were similar to published values: Tl, 5.3 kb (Hashimoto et al. 1988); dif, 2.8 kb (Ip et al. 1993); dl, 2.6 and 4.6 kb (Steward 1987; Reichhart et al. 1993); cact, 2.2 kb (Geisler et al. 1992; Kidd 1992); pll, 1.9 kb (Shelton and Wasserman 1993); tub, 2 kb (Letsou et al. 1991); spz, 2.2 kb (Morisato and Anderson 1994). The separating capacity of the gel was not sufficient to distinguish the two splicing isoforms of cactus RNA (Geisler et al. 1992; Kidd 1992). Cell 1996 86, 973-983DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80172-5)

Figure 8 Model for the Control of Expression of Genes Encoding Antimicrobial Peptides in the Drosophila Fat Body of Adults Two distinct pathways activate the expression of antimicrobial peptide genes in adults. Drosomycin is induced via a Rel protein (possibly Dif or an as yet unidentified protein, but not dl), which is retained in the cytoplasm of the fat body by cact. The dissociation of the cact–RelX complex is mediated by the intracellular Tl, tub, and pll gene products. By analogy with the embryonic system in which spz is present in the perivitelline fluid (reviewed byMorisato and Anderson 1995), it is proposed that spz is present in the hemolymph, is processed by a protease of a proteolytic cascade induced upon septic injury (e.g., coagulation or phenoloxidase cascades), and acts as a ligand to activate the Tl receptor. The imd gene product has not been characterized and its precise role remains an open question. All the genes encoding antibacterial peptides require the imd gene product for their induction. In contrast with diptericin and drosocin, the full induction of the cecropin A, defensin, and attacin genes also depends on the Tl pathway. We leave open the question of whether these two regulatory pathways act on the same or distinct transcriptional activator(s). Cell 1996 86, 973-983DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80172-5)