Comparison of the P-value significance between Wild Type and ΔGLN3

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
KNOWING WHICH TYPE OF GRAPH TO USE IN RESEARCH A foolproof guide to selecting the right image to convey your important message!
Advertisements

ANOVA WTdZAP1 p < /6189 (31.42%)2264/6189 (36.58%) p < /6189 (24.67%)1445/6189 (23.35%) p < /6189 (13.90%)792/6189 (12.80%) p
Modeling the Gene Expression of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Δcin5 Under Cold Shock Conditions Kevin McKay Laura Terada Department of Biology Loyola Marymount.
Determining the Identity and Dynamics of the Gene Regulatory Network Controlling the Response to Cold Shock in Saccharomyces cerevisiae June 24, 2015.
Deletion of ZAP1 as a transcriptional factor has minor effects on S. cerevisiae regulatory network in cold shock KARA DISMUKE AND KRISTEN HORSTMANN MAY.
GRNmap Testing Analysis Grace Johnson and Natalie Williams June 10, 2015.
GRNmap Testing Grace Johnson and Natalie Williams June 3, 2015.
SURP 2015 Presentation draft 15 minutes. Wt, initial weight 1 run.
GRNmap and GRNsight June 24, Systems Biology Workflow DNA microarray data: wet lab-generated or published Generate gene regulatory network Modeling.
Data Analysis and GRNmap Testing Grace Johnson and Natalie Williams June 24, 2015.
Creating a Gene Regulatory Network Comparing a Wild Type Strain with a Mutant ΔGLN3 Deletion in S. cerevisiae Showed that ΔGLN3 Exhibits No Meaningful.
Index Slide 2-5: Statistical testing results 6-14: Clustering results 15-17: GRNsight visualization of YEASTRACT results 18-20: GRNmap output visualization.
GRNmap Testing Grace Johnson and Natalie Williams June 17, 2015.
Within Strain ANOVA WTdHAP4 p < (38.4%)2387 (38.6%) p < (24.7%)1489 (24.1 %) p < (13.8%)679 (11.0%) p < (7.25%)240.
Comparison of the wild type of S. cerevisiae and S. paradoxus Karina Alvarez and Natalie Williams.
Outline S. cerevisiae, a eukaryote known for cold-shock adaption, used in cold-shock experiments Deletion strand HMO1 and the comparison of microarray.
Comparison of the wild type of S. cerevisiae and S. paradoxus Karina Alvarez and Natalie Williams.
Chapter 8.1 vocabulary Relation Is a pairing of numbers or a set of ordered pair {(2,1) (3,5) (6, 3)} Domain: first set of numbers Range: Second set of.
PLUS.
Parameter WT Rnd3+/- n 7 Body weight (g) 25.59± ±2.11
Eddie Azinge, John Lopez, and Corinne Wong
Algebra 1 Section 1.7 Identify functions and their parts
Week 14 Assignment Kara Dismuke.
Final Presentation [work in progress… work completed for Week 11 Journal Assignment] Kara Dismuke.
Deletion of ZAP1 as a transcriptional factor has minor effects on S
See if you can write an equation from this table.
Week 14 Assignment Kara Dismuke.
Notes Over 2.1 Function {- 3, - 1, 1, 2 } { 0, 2, 5 }
Body weight at harvest (g) Left kidney:body weight ratio (g/kg)
Figure Results from First Run
Lauren Kelly April 19th, 2017 BIOL398-05
Biomathematical Modeling: The Deletion of HMO1 and its Effect on Cold Shock Reaction in S. cerevisiae Lauren Magee & Lucia Ramirez Department of Mathematics.
ANOVA Within Strain P-values
dCIN5 and Wildtype Transcription Factor Mapping in Cold Shock
Change in Expression after modifying fix_b?
Week 14 Output Figures Kristen Horstmann.
Change in Expression after modifying fix_b?
Change in Expression after modifying fix_b?
Within Strain ANOVA for All Strains
Significance Table from Anova Test
GRNmap Testing and Results
Change in Expression after modifying fix_b?
Final Presentation [work in progress… work completed for Week 11 Journal Assignment] Kara Dismuke.
Week 11 Assignment Figures
dCIN5 and Wildtype Transcription Factor Mapping in Cold Shock
Comparison of the P-value significance between Wild Type and ΔGLN3
Loyola Marymount Unviersity
ANOVA Within Strain P-values
Percentages of specific p-value data
Within-strain ANOVA for dCIN5
Week 11 Assignment Figures
(Within-Strain ANOVA)
Comparison of the P-value significance between Wild Type and dGLN3
1.)Simplify [7 • (7 + 3)] + 3 [7 •(10)] + 3 [ 70]
Week 14 – Network Modeling
 ANOVA WT STRAIN p < 0.05 number (%) p < 0.01 p < p <
Jeffrey Crosson and William Gendron
Objective- To graph a relationship in a table.
GLN3.
There are 16 Different Combinations for the Test Inputs
Verification of NEUROD2 binding to the conserved element within Stim1 intron 2. Verification of NEUROD2 binding to the conserved element within Stim1 intron.
Relation (a set of ordered pairs)
Supplementary Figure 5: Effect of S48168 on normalized organ and skeletal muscle weights after 12 weeks of treatment for all the experimental groups from.
Percentages of specific p-value data
Biphasic ambulatory activity and reduced avoidance in Id2−/− mice.
Benjamini & Hochberg-corrected p < 0.05 Bonferroni-corrected
Link between MHC Fiber Type and Restoration of Dystrophin Expression and Key Components of the DAPC by Tricyclo-DNA-Mediated Exon Skipping  Saleh Omairi,
CPPED1 (A) and PPARγ2 (B) mRNA expressions in cultured SGBS cells during adipocyte differentiation. CPPED1 (A) and PPARγ2 (B) mRNA expressions in cultured.
Jeffrey Crosson and William Gendron
Jeffrey Crosson and William Gendron
Presentation transcript:

Comparison of the P-value significance between Wild Type and ΔGLN3  ANOVA WT ΔGLN3 p < 0.05 38.42% 30.11% p < 0.01 24.67% 16.29% p < 0.001 13.90% 6.53% p < 0.0001 7.43% 2.04% B-H p < 0.05 26.76% Bonferroni p < 0.05 3.68% 0.42%

ΔGLN3 STEM Significance Profiles

ΔGLN3 Profile 45

ΔGLN3 Profile 9

ΔGLN3Profile 2

ΔGLN3Profile 22

ΔGLN3Profile 48

ΔGLN3Profile 31

Wild Type Clusters

Wild Type Profile 45

Wild Type Profile 22

Wild Type Profile 9

Wild Type Profile 28

Wild Type Profile 48

Wild Type Profile 0

Only DNA Binding Degree Distribution

GRNSight Only DNA Binding Degree Distribution

Binding AND Expression Distribution

GRNSight Binding AND Expression

Binding PLUS Expression Distribution

GRNSight Binding PLUS Expression

Compared Parameter Mappings for b=0 and b=1

ACE2 (b=0 on the left, b=1 right)

ASG1 (b=0 on the left, b=1 right)

CIN5 (b=0 on the left, b=1 right)

CYC8 (b=0 on the left, r=1 right)

FKH2 (b=0 on the left, r=1 right)

GCR2(b=0 on the left, r=1 right)

GLN3 (b=0 on the left, r=1 right)

HMO1(b=0 on the left, r=1 right)

INO4 (b=0 on the left, r=1 right)

MCM1 (b=0 on the left, r=1 right)

MIG1 (b=0 on the left, r=1 right)

MSN2(b=0 on the left, r=1 right)

MSN4(b=0 on the left, r=1 right)

PDR1(b=0 on the left, r=1 right)

RIF1(b=0 on the left, r=1 right)

SFP1(b=0 on the left, r=1 right)

SNF5(b=0 on the left, r=1 right)

SNF6(b=0 on the left, r=1 right)

STB5(b=0 on the left, r=1 right)

SWI5(b=0 on the left, r=1 right)

YHP1(b=0 on the left, r=1 right)

YLR278C(b=0 on the left, r=1 right)

YOX1(b=0 on the left, r=1 right)

ZAP1(b=0 on the left, r=1 right)

GRNsight Map for both Inputs

GRNsight Map for output b=0

GRNsight Map for b=1

Comparison of GRNsight outputs b=1 on the left, b=0 on the right

Bar Graph comparing fixed and estimated weights ControllerGeneA->TargetGeneB

Production Rates of Fixed vs. Estimated b By standard name