2017 Administration and Finance Conference

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Organizational Governance
Advertisements

VALUE OF INTERNAL AUDITING: ASSURANCE, INSIGHT, OBJECTIVITY A PRESENTATION TO STAKEHOLDERS ABOUT THE VALUE OF INTERNAL AUDITING.
IMFO Audit & Risk Indaba June 2012
Continuous Auditing Global Technology Auditing Guide 3 Twelfth Continuous Auditing and Reporting Symposium Rutgers Business School November.
Internal Audit Awareness
Effective Internal Control, Establishing an Internal Audit Function, and Compliance Plans 2014 Governmental Accounting For Local Public Health September.
It’s Time to Talk About Risk and Control
Sodexo.com Group Internal Audit. page 2 helps an organization accomplish its objectives by bringing a systematic, disciplined approach to evaluate and.
Institute of Municipal Finance Officers & Related Professions
Internal Control. COSO’s Framework Committee of Sponsoring Organizations 1992 issued a white paper on internal control Since this time, this framework.
The Role of Risk Management and Assurance in Effective Organizational Governance Urton Anderson The University of Texas at Austin.
Session 4: Good Governance: How SAIs influence Good Governance in Public Administration Zahira Ravat 27 & 28 May 2014.
Control environment and control activities. Day II Session III and IV.
Information Technology Audit
Corporate Governance in Financial Institutions OCDE/IAIS/ASSAL Conference on Insurance Regulation & Supervision in Latin America Punta Cana, Dominican.
DAA and GEP Orlando Audit & Compliance or Audit vs. Compliance.
Central Piedmont Community College Internal Audit.
Developing and Implementing an Effective Compliance Program Mary Sacilotto,BA,CHC Chief Compliance Officer Alliance, Inc.
Chapter 5 Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Monitoring Internal Control Systems Johann Rieser Senior Auditor, Ministry of Finance, Vienna.
Introduction In 1992, the Committee Of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) published Internal Control-Integrated Framework (1992.
Internal Control in a Financial Statement Audit
Learning Objectives LO5 Illustrate how business risk analysis is used to assess the risk of material misstatement at the financial statement level and.
The Institute and the Profession: 1 Personalize your title and presenter here. The Institute and the Profession The Institute and the Profession: 1.
Private & Confidential1 (SIA) 13 Enterprise Risk Management The Standard should be read in the conjunction with the "Preface to the Standards on Internal.
1 The Auditor’s Role in Governance: Emulate, Evaluate, Educate Lori Cox, CIA, CGAP IIA Tucson Chapter President Director – Internal Audit, Pima Community.
Divisional Chief Executives Supported by Divisional Risk Committees Executive Committee Group Chief Executive Group Functions Group Finance Director Group.
IT Controls Global Technology Auditing Guide 1.
Page 1 Fundamental elements of internal control. 2 Reputation promise/mission The Auditor-General has a constitutional mandate and, as the Supreme Audit.
Chapter 3 Governance.
DAY 1: OVERVIEW The nature of internal auditing
“The Role of CPSB and CASB in the Transformation and Growth of Counties” By CS Peterson Mwangi.
SUNY Maritime Internal Control Program. New York State Internal Control Act of 1987 Establish and maintain guidelines for a system of internal controls.
Getting to Know Internal Auditing
The Importance of an AML Programme
Asset Management Accountability Framework
Fundamental elements of internal control
IIASA Governance Review
Fundamental elements of internal control
Getting to Know Internal Auditing
Briefing to the Portfolio Committee on Health Audit outcomes of the health portfolio and health sector for the financial year October 2014.
Getting to Know Internal Auditing
VALUE OF INTERNAL AUDITING: ASSURANCE, INSIGHT, OBJECTIVITY
Audit & Risk Management
Chapter 9 Control, security and audit
Office of Internal Audits
A Framework for Control
Value of internal auditing: Assurance, Insight, objectivity
SAPS Audit Committee 26 October 2016.
VALUE OF INTERNAL AUDITING: ASSURANCE, INSIGHT, OBJECTIVITY
IA Reform Progress… Where we now?
Internal control - the IA perspective
Value of internal auditing: Assurance, Insight, objectivity
Getting to Know Internal Auditing
Value of internal auditing: Assurance, Insight, objectivity
Response to Report on Local Government new risk management and internal audit framework for NSW councils.
Corporate Governance It is a system by which companies are managed and directed in the best interests of the owners and shareholders. It refers to the.
Adding Value Across the Board
QUALITY ASSURANCE AND IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
CORPORATE & ACADEMIC GOVERNANCE STRUCTURE
Value of internal auditing: Assurance, Insight, objectivity
Taking the STANDARDS Seriously
Plan your journey.
Penn State University Change Initiatives Presented By: Matthew Bell Anjaih Clemons Obie Evans Bruce Kastner.
Briefing to the Portfolio Committee on Defence on the audit outcomes for the 2013/2014 financial year.
Briefing to the Portfolio Committee on Police Audit outcomes of the Police portfolio for the financial year 13 October 2015.
An overview of Internal Controls Structure & Mechanism
Briefing to the Portfolio Committee on Department of Correctional Services on the audit outcomes for the 2013/2014 financial year Presenter: Solly Jiyana.
Portfolio Committee on Communications
Presentation transcript:

2017 Administration and Finance Conference Lines of Defense Model Scott Lawlor, Senior Internal Auditor, Office of University Audit

Understanding the Lines of Defense Model Internal controls are a set of systems and processes that help to ensure that the University achieves its: Operational goals Internal and external financial reporting goals Legal and regulatory compliance goals In order to achieve these goals, we need to have in place an effective model across the institution and this is the Lines of Defense Model

Lines of Defense Model

Lines of Defense Model Board of Trustees, Audit and Risk Committees & Executive Management Perform an essential role in the Lines of Defense model Ensures model is reflected in the University’s risk management and control processes Responsible and accountable for: Setting objectives Defining strategies to achieve those objectives Establishing governance structures and processes to best manage the risks in accomplishing those objectives Implementing an Enterprise Risk Management function Provides active support and guidance when implementing the model

Lines of Defense Model 1st Line of Defense - Business Operations: Departmental, Operational and Functional Management Maintain effective internal controls within a defined area; risks are owned Execute risk and control procedures on a day-to-day basis Identify, assess, control and mitigate risks Guide the development and implementation of internal policies and procedures Ensure activities are consistent with goals and objectives Managerial and Supervisory review

Lines of Defense Model 2nd Line of Defense - Oversight Functions: Risk Assurance Functions (Academic and Medical) Ensure Business Operation controls are properly designed, in place and operating as intended. Typically include: Internal Control Assurance Processes Controllership for financial risks and reporting Provide guidance and training on the risk management process Monitor the adequacy and effectiveness of internal control, accuracy of reporting, compliance and timely remediation of deficiencies Program Audits of grants and contributions Management oversight committees (IT, HR, Program) Report risk-related information organization-wide

Lines of Defense Model 3rd Line of Defense - Independent and Objective Assurance: Internal Audit Act in accordance with recognized audit standards Perform duties independently and objectively Active and effective reporting line to the Governing Body Ethics, Investigations, Whistleblower, etc. Key is independence and reporting lines Must report internally to the Governing Body Utilize “best practices” approach based on assessing risks to focus audits Flexible process to adapt to the specific of each engagement

Lines of Defense Model Key Takeaways Not a standalone solution to effective risk management, but rather a component of the overall process. Enhances the University’s risk management strategy with greater efficiency and effectiveness Model needs to be supported by an active, ongoing initiative and an appropriate organizational mandate Appropriate leadership, accountability, clearly articulated objectives and active performance measures Oversight by both Executive Management, the Board of Trustees and Audit/Risk Committees Continuous fine tuning and improvements must be implemented