Implementation of Data-Based Decision-Making in an Urban Elementary School Doug Marston Jane Thompson Minneapolis Public Schools March 26, 2009.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Response to Intervention (RtI) & The IST Process
Advertisements

Consensus Building Infrastructure Developing Implementation Doing & Refining Guiding Principles of RtI Provide working knowledge & understanding of: -
RtI Response to Intervention
PERSONAL LITERACY PLANS AT THE SECONDARY LEVEL December 12, 2003.
RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION Policy & Practice Institute June 25, 2008 Mike Stetter and Lori Duerr Delaware Department of Education.
Instructional Decision Making
1 R-2 Report: Read and write at the end of third grade Work session on Strategies to meet Results Targets A presentation to the Board of Education by Brad.
PAYS FOR: Literacy Coach, Power Hour Aides, LTM's, Literacy Trainings, Kindergarten Teacher Training, Materials.
A collaborative project between the Florida Department of Education and the University of South Florida Y3D1 SBLT Tier 3 Problem Identification & Problem.
Monitoring Student Progress: Administrative Issues Part I – History of Using Progress Monitoring in Minneapolis Schools Doug Marston John Hintze July 8,
What We’re Learning Building & Improving an RTI System Seven Key Foundations RISS 2009.
RTI … What do the regs say?. What is “it?” Response To Intervention is a systematic process for providing preventive, supplementary, and interventional.
*This is a small school district of fewer than 1000 students located in northern Illinois. *The district consists of: an Elementary School (Pre-K--4 th.
General Universal Level Targeted Level Intensive Level Bonus
An Introduction to Response to Intervention MN Response to Intervention Center Ann Casey, Ph.D. Director St. Croix River Ed. District
Response to Intervention (RTI) Lindenhurst Schools
1 Visions of Community 2011 March 12, 2011 The Massachusetts Tiered System of Support Madeline Levine - Shawn Connelly.
Eugene Field Elementary School “Inspiring and empowering each other to positively impact our community and our world.” Our Journey to Responsive Intervention.
Creating an RTI Culture at the Building Level in Order to Make Sound Eligibility Decisions Oak Hills Local School District Cincinnati, Ohio UC Summer Institute.
Dayton’s Bluff Achievement Plus Elementary School Saint Paul, MN Presenter: Andrew Collins, Principal.
Developing School-Based Systems of Support: Ohio’s Integrated Systems Model Y.S.U. March 30, 2006.
RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION A schoolwide, systematic, collaborative process in which ALL school resources are seamlessly integrated and singularly focused.
Response to Intervention
Elementary & Middle School 2014 ELA MCAS Evaluation & Strategy.
Response to Intervention (RTI) at Mary Lin Elementary Principal’s Coffee August 30, 2013.
Response to Intervention: Improving Achievement for ALL Students Understanding the Response to Intervention Process: A Parent’s Guide Presented by: Dori.
Parent Academy Topic: Support for All Learners 1.
Harry Wong Says Procedures are the Way to Go… Response to Intervention is a procedure-based system. It is also a problem solving system. Something isn’t.
Effective Grade Level Teams Minnesota RtI Center Conference March 26, 2009 Kerry Bollman St Croix River Education District.
School-wide Data Team Meeting Winter NSIF Extended Cohort February 10, 2012.
Response to Intervention (RtI) & The IST Process Jennifer Maichin Patricia Molloy Special Education Teacher Principal IST Chairperson Meadow Drive Elementary.
RtII & Title 1 Dr. Diane Barrie Director of Curriculum, Instruction, and Assessment October 4, 2012.
Keystone Educational Consulting Dr. Ashlea Rineer-Hershey Dr. Richael Barger-Anderson.
Response to Intervention in KPS Linda Campbell
Special Education Referral and Evaluation Report Oregon RTI Project Sustaining Districts Trainings
RTI Response To Intervention. What is RTI ? Response to intervention is a multi – tier approach to the early identification and support of students with.
Lori Wolfe October 9, Definition of RTI according to NCRTI ( National Center on Response to Intervention) Response to intervention integrates assessment.
RtI 2 /ExCEL Update RtI 2 /ExCEL Update Cambrian School District February 9,
RtI.  Learn: ◦ What is RtI ◦ Why schools need RtI ◦ What are the components that comprise an RtI system - must haves ◦ Underlying assumptions for the.
DSAC Leadership Meeting 1/24/12 Massachusetts Tiered System of Support (MTSS)
Interventions Identifying and Implementing. What is the purpose of providing interventions? To verify that the students difficulties are not due to a.
Response To Intervention “Collaborative Data Driven Instruction at Lewis & Clark Elementary” Owen Stockdill.
Vision: Every child in every district receives the instruction that they need and deserve…every day. Oregon Response to Intervention Vision: Every child.
Teaming/Data/Interventions RtI Infrastructure: Teaming RtI Partnership Coaches meeting January 6, 2011 Terry Schuster, RtI Partnership Lead Coach.
MASSACHUSETTS TIERED SYSTEM OF SUPPORT Melrose Public Schools July 9, 2013.
Response to Intervention for PST Dr. Kenneth P. Oliver Macon County Schools’ Fall Leadership Retreat November 15, 2013.
The Continuum of Interventions in a 3 Tier Model Oakland Schools 3 Tier Literacy Leadership Team Training November
Middle School Training: Ensuring a Strong Foundation of Supports
Response to Intervention (RTI)
Welcome PLEASE COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING TASKS WHILE WAITING FOR THE CLASS TO BEGIN: Rate your knowledge of the MTSS process using the colored dot. Rate.
Rochester Community Schools Understanding Michigan’s 3rd Grade Reading Law Parent Presentation PA 306 of 2016 (HB 4822)
Going Deeper with Individual Problem Solving: Evaluating ICE
The Continuum of Interventions in a 3 Tier Model
Massachusetts Tiered System of Support
RTI & SRBI What Are They and How Can We Use Them?
Visions of Community 2012 March 10, 2012
Rochester Community Schools Understanding Michigan’s 3rd Grade Reading Law Parent Presentation PA 306 of 2016 (HB 4822)
Response to Intervention (RtI) What is a Teacher’s Role?
Curriculum, Instruction, and Assessment Summit Massachusetts Tiered System of Support MTSS – Non Academic.
English Language Arts Program Update
Extending RTI to School-wide Behavior Support
Bull Run Middle School School Advisory Meeting, 6:30 – 8:00 p.m. Library.
RTI Response to Intervention (RTI) is a multi-tier approach to the early identification and support of students with learning and behavior needs. Struggling.
Response to Intervention in Illinois
RtI Strategies and Interventions
State of the School Title I Meeting Folwell School, Performing Arts Magnet October 9, /8/2019.
School Improvement Planning that increases CCRPI Scores
School Improvement Planning that increases CCRPI Scores
RTI Procedures Tigard Tualatin School District EBIS / RTI Project
Presentation transcript:

Implementation of Data-Based Decision-Making in an Urban Elementary School Doug Marston Jane Thompson Minneapolis Public Schools March 26, 2009

History in Minneapolis of Data-Based Program Modification, Problem Solving Model and RTI Curriculum-Based Measurement (1982) Problem Solving Model (1993) Web-based Student Data System (1999) Demonstration of Progress Monitoring Grant (2006)

MPS Problem-Solving Model Building-wide Screening Teacher/Parent Concerns Academics Stage 1: Classroom Intervention Student Remains Discrepant from School and/or Parent Expectation Stage 2: Team Intervention Student Remains Discrepant from School and/or Parent Expectation Stage 3: Special Ed. Evaluation

Using Data for Instructional Decision-Making TIER 3 Students not making adequate progress receive more intensive intervention Intensive Intervention Few students High Intensity 1-5% Evidenced-based interventions delivered and progress monitored weekly Targeted Group Interventions Some students Higher intensity 15-20% Students identified through screening receive more intensive literacy support in Targeted Group Intervention TIER 2 All students screened with benchmarks Concept borrowed from public health. It’s all about strategic use of resources It makes no sense to structure a system in which you use your deep end resources for a large percentage of the population that you serve. Note that in this model, it is structured so that you can focus your intensive resources on a small percentage of children who need it the most. Core Literacy Instruction All students 75-80% TIER 1 All students receive strong Core Curriculum with rigor (high and clear expectations) 4

Loring School (K-5): 372 Students . American Indian 5% African American 43% Asian American 10% Hispanic American 16% White American 25% Students in Poverty 77% English Language Learners 20% Special Education 8%

Response to Intervention High quality, scientifically based classroom instruction Ongoing student assessment Tiered instruction

High quality, scientifically based classroom instruction Reading Excellence Act/Reading First Teacher Advancement Program (TAP) Professional Learning Communities Demonstration of Progress Monitoring Project

Ongoing student assessment Summative Data: MCA Benchmark Data: NALT/MAP/CBM Formative Data: Weekly CBM

Screening in Fall, Winter, and Spring On Words Read Correctly on Student Words Read Names Correctly Screening in Fall, Winter, and Spring On Words Read Correctly on Grade Level

Progress Monitoring is viewed on the OCR Website

Tiered instruction Use monthly grade level teams to review data Match student needs based on data with appropriate instructional strategies Focused on NRP areas

Tier 1-Core Tier 2 Tier 3 Kindergarten Houghton-Mifflin; Core Materials Leveled Library PALS Program Reading Mastery Phonemic Awareness Grade 1 Houghton-Mifflin Collins Writing EIR Read Naturally Grade 2 Houghton-Mifflin Core Materials Grade 3 Grade 4 Soar To Success Corrective Reading

Typical Grade Level Instructional Groupings for Teaching Reading Classroom Teacher # 1 Core or Tier 1 Classroom Teacher # 2 Core or Tier 1 60 Minutes Tier 1 Tier 2 Tier 2 Tier 3 Tier 3 60 Minutes

Monthly Progress Monitoring and Instructional Planning Meetings Meetings for each grade level Participants include: general education teachers, ELL, Title 1, Special Education, Associate Educators, EAs, Principal, Project Facilitator Meetings 120 minutes in length Initial tier of instruction defined by student performance on Fall screening Review student progress monitoring data (Weekly graphs) Review instructional groupings and discuss intervention strategies Move students needing more intensive or less intensive instruction

August January Training on progress monitoring School-wide screening: Winter Tier 2 & 3 intervention training Progress monitoring Student data meetings September Study groups School-wide screening: Fall Formation of groups for Tier 2 and 3 February Begin progress monitoring October March November April MCA TESTING May December School-Wide screening: Spring

Fidelity of Implementation for RTI RTI Data Meetings for Grade Level Teams Fidelity of Interventions EBASS – Student Engaged Time Reading Instruction Checklist

Summary of Year 1 Results

Instructional changes for students In Year 1 41 of 273 students moved up a tier (more intensive) or 15% 45 of 273 students moved down a tier (less intensive) or 16.5% 86 students out of 273 students moved up or down a tier or 31.5%

Impact of RTI on Special Education Eligibility In 2006-7 seven students were eligible for special education (2.5%)

Year 1: MCA changes for All Student at Loring School

Year 1: MCA Changes for African American Students at Loring School

Summary of Year 2 Results

Instructional changes for students in Year 2 17 of 283 students moved up a tier (more intensive) or 6% 25 of 283 students moved down a tier (less intensive) or 8.8% 42 students out of 283 students moved up or down a tier or 14.8%

Impact of RTI on Special Education Eligibility: Year 2 In 2007-8 two students were eligible for special education (1%)

Elements of Successful Reading Instruction (Percentage of Occurrence) Tier 1 Tier 2 1 Phonemic awareness is taught 50 57 2 Phonics is used 42 65 3 Students have opportunities to read aloud 49 83 4 Reading instruction includes explicit vocabulary instruction 59 77 5 Reading instruction includes sight word instruction 55 48 6 Comprehension strategies are used 85 52 7 Teacher modeling and guided practice are used 93 92 8 Writing component is evident as part of literacy block 79 9 Classroom is rich with reading materials of high interest and varied reading levels 98 10 Clear classroom rules are reinforced by the teacher 95 94 11 Behavior disruptions are handled consistently and promptly 90 12 Interactions with students are positive, encouraging, and emphasize the importance of student effort

Ecobehavioral Assessment Software System (EBASS) Greenwood (1991) Student Academic Responses (Active Engaged Time) Writing Task Participation Read Aloud Read Silently Talk Academic

Year 1 & 2: MCA Reading - All Students

Year 1 & 2: MCA Reading Percent Proficient - Loring White and African-American Student Gap Comparisons

Observations from Principal Teacher repertoire increases Instructional time maximized Student performance formatively evaluated which informs instruction Students continually challenged at their instructional level Behavior issues reduced Special education referrals reduced School enrollment growing Culture of school becomes more professional and positive Joy of teaching is restored

Words of Experience These must be in place: Establishing a belief system Strengthening core instruction Strengthening behavior and classroom climate Concern would be that if the above are not in place, too many students would be placed in Tier 2 interventions. Principal’s Responsibilities: Create a team who can develop, promote, and monitor the work Schedules to ensure 120 minutes of Reading Schedule Progress Monitoring Quality of instruction Fidelity of interventions Choice of research-based interventions and appropriateness