Volume 74, Issue 6, Pages (June 2012)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Date of download: 6/9/2016 Copyright © 2016 SPIE. All rights reserved. Raman spectra of sciatic nerve tissue. (a) Epi-illumination image of Raman spectra.
Advertisements

Figure Legend: From: B-RAF signaling promotes optic nerve regeneration
The chemokine CCL2 activates p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway in cultured rat hippocampal cells  Jungsook Cho, Donna L. Gruol  Journal of.
Sophie Croizier, Vincent Prevot, Sebastien G. Bouret  Cell Reports 
Volume 70, Issue 4, Pages (May 2011)
Volume 18, Issue 3, Pages (September 2013)
Injury induces HDAC5 phosphorylation and the formation of an HDAC5 gradient. Injury induces HDAC5 phosphorylation and the formation of an HDAC5 gradient.
Volume 23, Issue 3, Pages (April 2018)
Volume 86, Issue 4, Pages (May 2015)
Volume 15, Issue 2, Pages (April 2016)
Volume 3, Issue 4, Pages (April 2013)
Regeneration of Sensory Axons within the Injured Spinal Cord Induced by Intraganglionic cAMP Elevation  Simona Neumann, Frank Bradke, Marc Tessier-Lavigne,
Kinesin-13 and Tubulin Posttranslational Modifications Regulate Microtubule Growth in Axon Regeneration  Anindya Ghosh-Roy, Alexandr Goncharov, Yishi.
Volume 46, Issue 4, Pages (May 2005)
Regeneration of Dorsal Column Fibers into and beyond the Lesion Site following Adult Spinal Cord Injury  Simona Neumann, Clifford J Woolf  Neuron  Volume.
A Surviving Intact Branch Stabilizes Remaining Axon Architecture after Injury as Revealed by In Vivo Imaging in the Mouse Spinal Cord  Ariana O. Lorenzana,
Molecular Therapy - Methods & Clinical Development
Volume 97, Issue 2, Pages e6 (January 2018)
Volume 88, Issue 4, Pages (November 2015)
Volume 45, Issue 5, Pages (March 2005)
Volume 83, Issue 2, Pages (July 2014)
Volume 43, Issue 5, Pages e3 (December 2017)
Volume 75, Issue 2, Pages (July 2012)
Volume 148, Issue 5, Pages (March 2012)
Volume 10, Issue 19, Pages (October 2000)
Volume 73, Issue 3, Pages (February 2012)
Volume 73, Issue 4, Pages (February 2012)
Volume 70, Issue 4, Pages (May 2011)
Death Receptor 6 Promotes Wallerian Degeneration in Peripheral Axons
Two Clathrin Adaptor Protein Complexes Instruct Axon-Dendrite Polarity
Jungmook Lyu, Vicky Yamamoto, Wange Lu  Developmental Cell 
Clustering and Functional Coupling of Diverse Ion Channels and Signaling Proteins Revealed by Super-resolution STORM Microscopy in Neurons  Jie Zhang,
Volume 90, Issue 3, Pages (May 2016)
Volume 88, Issue 4, Pages (November 2015)
Volume 94, Issue 6, Pages e4 (June 2017)
Volume 88, Issue 4, Pages (November 2015)
Volume 85, Issue 6, Pages (March 2015)
Sympathetic Neuro-adipose Connections Mediate Leptin-Driven Lipolysis
Volume 19, Issue 11, Pages (June 2009)
Volume 86, Issue 6, Pages (June 2015)
Volume 18, Issue 11, Pages (March 2017)
Volume 70, Issue 5, Pages (June 2011)
Volume 7, Issue 1, Pages (January 2008)
Volume 1, Issue 1, Pages (June 2013)
Molecular Therapy - Methods & Clinical Development
GRM7 Regulates Embryonic Neurogenesis via CREB and YAP
SOCS3 Deletion Promotes Optic Nerve Regeneration In Vivo
Volume 12, Issue 4, Pages (April 2007)
An Intrinsic Epigenetic Barrier for Functional Axon Regeneration
Elizabeth J. Fry, Carole Ho, Samuel David  Neuron 
Intrinsic Control of Axon Regeneration
Neuroprotection from Stroke in the Absence of MHCI or PirB
Bonnie E. Lonze, Antonella Riccio, Sonia Cohen, David D. Ginty  Neuron 
Pranav Sharma, Hollis T. Cline  Neuron 
Volume 19, Issue 4, Pages (April 2017)
Volume 92, Issue 6, Pages (December 2016)
Volume 16, Issue 6, Pages (June 1996)
Evidence for an Age-Dependent Decline in Axon Regeneration in the Adult Mammalian Central Nervous System  Cédric G. Geoffroy, Brett J. Hilton, Wolfram.
Volume 13, Issue 12, Pages (December 2015)
Volume 59, Issue 6, Pages (September 2008)
Toshiyuki Araki, Jeffrey Milbrandt  Neuron 
Volume 15, Issue 23, Pages (December 2005)
Spinal Axon Regeneration Induced by Elevation of Cyclic AMP
Volume 23, Issue 6, Pages (May 2018)
SOCS3 Deletion Promotes Optic Nerve Regeneration In Vivo
Global levels of AcH4 are increased in DRG neurons after peripheral axotomy. Global levels of AcH4 are increased in DRG neurons after peripheral axotomy.
AAV8-mediated deletion of Tsc2 improves initial axon regeneration but not functional recovery after sciatic nerve crush injury. AAV8-mediated deletion.
Notch Signaling Inhibits Axon Regeneration
Brent Neumann, Massimo A. Hilliard  Cell Reports 
Elizabeth J. Fry, Carole Ho, Samuel David  Neuron 
Presentation transcript:

Volume 74, Issue 6, Pages 1015-1022 (June 2012) Dual Leucine Zipper Kinase Is Required for Retrograde Injury Signaling and Axonal Regeneration  Jung Eun Shin, Yongcheol Cho, Bogdan Beirowski, Jeffrey Milbrandt, Valeria Cavalli, Aaron DiAntonio  Neuron  Volume 74, Issue 6, Pages 1015-1022 (June 2012) DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2012.04.028 Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Peripheral Axon Regeneration Is Inhibited in DLK KO Mice (A) Confocal images of whole-mounted EHL muscles after crush injury of the sciatic nerve. In WT, YFP-labeled (green) axons degenerate by 1 week after injury and robustly regenerate to the endplates labeled with α-bungarotoxin (BTX; red) by 2 weeks after injury. The axon retargeting is significantly attenuated in HB9-Cre conditional DLK KO mice. WT (DLKF/WT; HB9-Cre; Thy-STOP-YFP15), n = 5; DLK KO (DLKF/F; HB9-Cre; Thy-STOP-YFP15), n = 4; ∗p < 0.001. Scale bar represents 50 μm. (B) Longitudinal sections of sciatic nerves from WT or Wnt1-Cre conditional DLK KO mice were immunolabeled for SCG10 and neuron-specific β3 tubulin (Tuj1) 3 days after crush injury. Axon regeneration from the crush site (dotted line) is significantly reduced in the DLK KO mice. SCG10 labels regenerating axons (red arrowheads). WT (DLKF/F), n = 4; DLK KO (DLKF/F; Wnt1-Cre), n = 3; ∗p < 0.05. Scale bar represents 500 μm. Data are presented as means ± SEM. See also Figures S1 and S2. Neuron 2012 74, 1015-1022DOI: (10.1016/j.neuron.2012.04.028) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 DLK Is Required for the Accelerated Axon Regeneration Induced by a Preconditioning Injury (A and B) Longitudinal sections of sciatic nerves of WT or Wnt1-Cre conditional DLK KO mice were immunolabeled for SCG10 and β3 tubulin (Tuj1) 1 day after either single-crush injury (A) or double-crush injury (B). Axon regeneration 1 day after crush injury is comparable between WT and DLK KO (A). Double-crushed mice were given a preconditioning crush injury (prelesion) for 3 days, subsequently subjected to another crush injury, and allowed to regrow for 1 day (B). A prelesion significantly potentiates axon regeneration in WT (red arrowhead), but this effect is abolished in DLK KO. White arrow indicates the crush site. Scale bar represents 500 μm. (C) Results from (A) and (B) were quantified to generate a regeneration index. WT (DLKF/F), n = 4; DLK KO (DLKF/F; Wnt1-Cre), n = 4 for single crush, n = 5 for double crush; ∗p < 0.005. (D) Cultured DRG neurons from WT or DLK KO were immunostained for β3 tubulin (Tuj1). A prior lesion of the sciatic nerve promotes axon regeneration in WT DRG neurons cultured for 16 hr; however, this effect is abolished in DLK KO. Scale bar represents 100 μm. (E) Axon regrowth shown in (D) was quantified by percentage of neurons with longest axon in each range: <75 μm, 75–400 μm, or ≥400 μm. WT (DLKF/F or DLKF/WT; Wnt1-Cre); DLK KO (DLKF/F; Wnt1-Cre); n = 5; ∗∗p < 0.001 versus WT, control and DLK KO, prelesioned. Data are presented as means ± SEM. See also Figure S3. Neuron 2012 74, 1015-1022DOI: (10.1016/j.neuron.2012.04.028) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 DLK Is Required for Retrograde Transport of an Injury-Induced Proregenerative Signal (A) Immunoblot analysis of p-STAT3 in cell bodies after axon injury. Sciatic nerves of WT or DLK KO mice were unilaterally injured for 3 days and DRGs from either control (co) or injured (ax) side were subjected to immunoblot for p-STAT3. p-STAT3 levels are significantly elevated by axotomy (ax) in WT DRG, but this increase is abolished in DLK KO DRG. Total STAT3 levels are comparable between conditions. GAPDH is shown as a loading control. (B) Quantification of results shown in (A). p-STAT3 levels were quantified by normalizing the levels in the DRGs on the injured side to those in the uninjured contralateral DRGs. WT (DLKF/F); DLK KO (DLKF/F; Wnt1-Cre); n = 4; ∗p < 0.05. (C) Sciatic nerves of WT or DLK KO mice were unilaterally injured for 1 day and the proximal nerve segments from either control (co) or injured (ax) side were subjected to immunoblot analysis of p-STAT3. p-STAT3 levels are significantly elevated in injured nerve (ax) and this increase is similar between WT and DLK KO mice, showing that DLK is not required for the local activation of STAT3. Total STAT3 levels are comparable between conditions. GAPDH is shown as a loading control. WT (DLKF/F); DLK KO (DLKF/F; Wnt1-Cre); n = 3. (D) Longitudinal sections of the sciatic nerves of WT or DLK KO mice were immunostained for p-STAT3 1 day after crush injury. Confocal images visualize the proximal segments of the injured nerve and show that p-STAT3 localizes in axons. β3 tubulin (Tuj1) labels axons. WT (DLKF/F); DLK KO (DLKF/F; Wnt1-Cre). Scale bar represents 50 μm. (E) Schematic diagram of double-ligation experiment shows that double-ligation injury induces concentration of retrogradely transported cargoes (R) in the proximal segment and anterogradely transported cargoes (A) in the distal segment. In WT, p-STAT3 and JIP3 accumulate in the retrograde pool 6 hr after ligation (Lig). The accumulation of both proteins is blocked in the absence of DLK, showing that DLK is required for injury-induced retrograde transport of p-STAT3 and JIP3. Total STAT3 and JIP3 are similarly distributed in the proximal and distal segments in uninjured control nerve. GAPDH is shown as a loading control. (F) Quantification of the results shown in (E). Retrograde protein accumulation is quantified as ratio of the protein levels in retrograde pool to the levels in anterograde pool. WT (DLKF/F); DLK KO (DLKF/F; Wnt1-Cre); n = 3; ∗p < 0.05. Data are presented as means ± SEM. See also Figure S4. Neuron 2012 74, 1015-1022DOI: (10.1016/j.neuron.2012.04.028) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions