doc.: IEEE <doc#>

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Submission March, 2010 Adrian Jennings, Time Domain doc.: IEEE f Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal.
Advertisements

doc.: IEEE <doc#>
<month year> doc.: IEEE /271r0 September, 2000
Submission Title: [Add name of submission]
<month year> <doc.: IEEE doc> May 2015
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
Name - WirelessHD doc.: IEEE g July 2010
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
<month year> doc.: IEEE < e>
June 2006 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Proposed Scenarios for Usage Model Document.
May, 2010 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: Long-range mode preamble design for f.
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
March 2008 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Toumaz response to TG6 Call for Applications]
fdoc.: IEEE <doc#>
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
Submission Title: [DecaWave UWB SFD Proposal]
Submission Title: [Rate one over four code for TG4a]
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
<month year> doc.: IEEE <xyz> January 2001
Submission Title: [Errors in a] Date Submitted: [18 March, 2010]
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
<month year> <doc.: IEEE doc> March 2015
Project: IEEE P WG for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs)
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
Submission Title: Monterey e/ Liaison Report.
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
Sept 2004 doc.: IEEE b Sept 2004 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title:
<month year> <doc.: IEEE doc> March 2015
<month year> doc.: IEEE <xyz> November 2000
<month year> <doc.: IEEE doc> November 2015
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
doc.: IEEE /XXXr0 Sep 19, 2007 June 2009
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
November 2006 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Simplified geometry for the usage model.
<month year>20 Jan 2006
<month year> doc.: IEEE <030158r0> January 2004
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
Submission Title: [Preamble structures for 4a]
<month year> <doc.: IEEE doc> January 2016
<month year> <doc.: IEEE doc> March 2015
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
<month year> <doc.: IEEE doc> March 2015
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
doc.: IEEE <doc g>
July 2010 <month year> doc.: IEEE g Doc.: IEEE g
<month year> doc.: IEEE <030158r0> <March 2003>
<author>, <company>
January 2008 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [TG3c Project Plan] Date Submitted: [17.
June, 2010 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [OFDM PHY Mode Representation] Date Submitted:
September 2008 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Suggested TG3c PAR Changes] Date Submitted:
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
Mar 2008 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Resolution for Comment 70 ] Date Submitted:
Mar 2008 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Resolution for Comment 70 ] Date Submitted:
Submission Title: [Consolidation of Ranging Results]
Doc.: IEEE Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Summary.
<month year> <doc.: IEEE doc> March 2015
Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: TG4h Closing Report for Orlando Mar 2010.
Submission Title: TG9ma Agenda for September Meeting
August 2019 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: CID 422 Proposal Date Submitted: 14 August,
Jan 2008 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: TeraHertz Closing Report Date Submitted: January.
Presentation transcript:

doc.: IEEE 802.15-<doc#> <month year> doc.: IEEE 802.15-<doc#> Project: IEEE P802.15 Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [UWB Enhanced Mode Performance and Encoding Proposal] Date Submitted: [17 Mar, 2010] Source: [Adrian Jennings] Company [Time Domain] Address [330 Wynn Drive, Suite 300, Huntsville, AL. 35805. USA] Voice:[+1 256 759 4708], FAX: [+1 256 922 0387], E-Mail:[adrian.jennings@timedomain.com] Re: [Simple FEC scheme for UWB RFID PHY] Abstract: [This document describes a simple triple-voting error correction scheme for the UWB RFID PHY] Purpose: [To resolve outstanding issues on the current baseline proposal] Notice: This document has been prepared to assist the IEEE P802.15. It is offered as a basis for discussion and is not binding on the contributing individual(s) or organization(s). The material in this document is subject to change in form and content after further study. The contributor(s) reserve(s) the right to add, amend or withdraw material contained herein. Release: The contributor acknowledges and accepts that this contribution becomes the property of IEEE and may be made publicly available by P802.15. <author>, <company>

UWB Enhanced Mode Performance and Encoding Proposal <month year> doc.: IEEE 802.15-<doc#> UWB Enhanced Mode Performance and Encoding Proposal Adrian Jennings adrian.jennings@timedomain.com +1 256 759 4708 <author>, <company>

doc.: IEEE 802.15-<doc#> <month year> doc.: IEEE 802.15-<doc#> Background The current baseline draft has a question mark over the effectiveness of the “Enhanced Mode” This document presents data showing the value of triple-voting redundancy This document also proposes a modified encoding scheme to aid ease of implementation. <author>, <company>

doc.: IEEE 802.15-<doc#> <month year> doc.: IEEE 802.15-<doc#> Experimental Data ~2dB gain at 50% PER <author>, <company>

doc.: IEEE 802.15-<doc#> <month year> doc.: IEEE 802.15-<doc#> Notes About Data The top plot shows that triple voting redundancy has 2dB or more advantage at the fringes of coverage The bottom plot shows how this simple FEC allows the energy detect threshold to be pushed further into the noise However, caution should be read when reading this distance between curves as system gain, since pushing the threshold into the noise will break other system parameters (e.g. TOA robustness) <author>, <company>

doc.: IEEE 802.15-<doc#> <month year> doc.: IEEE 802.15-<doc#> Encoding Scheme Rather than 3 pulses per bit, it is proposed that the payload and CRC are repeated three times This has two advantages Main advantage: very simple implementation in tag Peripheral advantage: the CRC is also protected Base Mode: Preamble SFD PHR Payload CRC Enhanced Mode: Preamble SFD PHR Payload CRC Payload CRC Payload CRC <author>, <company>

doc.: IEEE 802.15-<doc#> <month year> doc.: IEEE 802.15-<doc#> Decoding Scheme The specifics of the decoding scheme are out of scope of the standard However, the standard can give guidance The data can be evaluated using “best of 3” voting This might be done at the bit level, symbol level, or at some other intermediate level, according to the implementer’s discretion <author>, <company>

doc.: IEEE 802.15-<doc#> <month year> doc.: IEEE 802.15-<doc#> Proposal It is proposed that Enhanced Mode be retained in the 4f standard with the encoding scheme as described on slide 6 of this presentation <author>, <company>