TKR to CAL for 16 Towers The usual TKR extrapolation to CAL study, for the 16 tower data. Check calibrations, look for problems, etc. Today -- “work in.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Exponential Functions Logarithmic Functions
Advertisements

Bill Atwood, Dec GLAST 1 GLAST Energy or Humpty-Dumpty’s Revenge A Statement of the Problem Divide and Conquer strategy Easiest: Leakage (Depth)
Gamma-ray Large Area Space Telescope Understanding SVAC CalMip Variables Monica Pepe Stefano Germani INFN Perugia Instrument Analysis Meeting December.
Preshower 15/03/2005 P.Kokkas Preshower September Run Data Analysis P. Kokkas.
1 Study of the Tail Catcher Muon Tracker (TCMT) Scintillator Strips and Leakage with Simulated Coil Rick Salcido Northern Illinois University For CALICE.
SVAC/ISOCInstrument Analysis Meeting, April 14, 2006 Anders W. Borgland 1 The LAT In Every Which Way You Want It! Anders W. Borgland Science Verification,
GLAST LAT ProjectIA Workshop 6 – Feb28,2006 Preliminary Studies on the dependence of Arrival Time distributions in the LAT using CAL Low Energy Trigger.
GLAST LAT Project Apr 1, 2005 E. do Couto e Silva 1/31 Overview of End to End Runs Eduardo do Couto e Silva April 1, 2005 ( not it is not a joke, we finally.
SVAC/ISOCInstrument Analysis Workshop, February 27, 2006 Anders W. Borgland 1 Overview Of LAT Data Taking Anders W. Borgland Science Verification, Analysis.
GLAST LAT Project Instrument Analysis Workshop 6 – 06/02/27 F. Piron & E. Nuss (LPTA) 1 Trending CAL performance and mapping crystals Gamma-ray Large Area.
1Calice-UK Cambridge 9/9/05D.R. Ward David Ward Compare Feb’05 DESY data with Geant4 and Geant3 Monte Carlos. Work in progress – no definitive conclusions.
Looking for effects of PDT state changes on Pedestals (or Pedestal Adjustments) during 14-Jan Feb-2008.
SVACInstrument Analysis Workshop, July 21-22, 2005 N.Giglietto 1 ToT saturated events: a preliminary study N.Giglietto-M. Brigida F.Giordano Science Verification,
GLAST LAT Project Instrument Analysis Workshop 5 – 05/08/29 F. Piron & E. Nuss (IN2P3/LPTA – Montpellier) 1 Comprehensive review of CAL calibrations Gamma-ray.
1 May 27, 2005 Comparison tower A data and Montecarlo OVERVIEW Comparison of MC (EM- v 4r060302p18 ) and tower A data using the “baseline” run (Run )
GLAST LAT Project Software vrvs meeting X. Chen 1 GLAST LAT Project Software vrvs meeting X. Chen 1 Analyses of Muon Calibration Data Xin Chen.
A.Chekhtman1 GLAST LAT ProjectCAL Recon rewriting meeting, May, 11, 2005 In what cases we need external position estimation ? Alexandre Chekhtman NRL/GMU.
Modeling TKR Readout Effects Leon R. Analysis Group 14 March 2005.
GLAST LAT Project IA Workshop 4 July 15, 2005 E. do Couto e Silva 1/7 Overview of Data Taking Anders W. Borgland Science Verification, Analysis and Calibrations.
1 ACD studies: 1. Light Yield Determination for top ACD Tiles 2. Looking for holes (screws) in the ACD data Instrument Analysis Workshop VI Luis C. Reyes.
Tracker Reconstruction SoftwarePerformance Review, Oct 16, 2002 Summary of Core “Performance Review” for TkrRecon How do we know the Tracking is working?
GLAST LAT Project IA meeting, 21 April 2006 David Smith Bordeaux 1 Muons from Flight SoftWare (= “FSW”) See my WorkShopSix presentation to understand.
GLAST LAT Project Instrument Analysis Workshop #4, 14 July 2005 David Smith CAL calib at SLAC SVAC1 Stability of the CAL Calibrations Online script “suites”
CalRecon Moments Analysis Studies I Tracy Usher1/17 A Brief History of Glast Release GR (Friday, July 15) –Effectively, the first DC-2 2M all-gamma.
Tests with JT0623 & JT0947 at Indiana University Nagoya PMT database test results for JT0623 at 3220V: This tube has somewhat higher than usual gain. 5×10.
Energy Flow Technique and *where I am Lily Have been looking at the technique developed by Mark Hodgkinson, Rob Duxfield of Sheffield. Here is a summary.
14/02/2007 Paolo Walter Cattaneo 1 1.Trigger analysis 2.Muon rate 3.Q distribution 4.Baseline 5.Pulse shape 6.Z measurement 7.Att measurement OUTLINE.
Outrigger Timing Calibration & Reconstruction Milagro – 11/17/03 Shoup – 1 Purpose: To incorporate outrigger hits in event angle fitting Additionally incorporated.
GLAST LAT Project Instrument Analysis Meeting August 6, 2004 David Smith w. Benoît Lott Muons in photodiodes1 MIPs in your Photodiodes David’s Instr. Ana.
1 Energy loss correction for a crystal calorimeter He Miao Institute of High Energy Physics Beijing, P.R.China.
A.Chekhtman1 GLAST LAT ProjectInstrument Analysis meeting, February, 27, 2006 CAL features and idiosyncrasies. Alexandre Chekhtman NRL/GMU Gamma-ray Large.
Feb. 7, 2007First GLAST symposium1 Measuring the PSF and the energy resolution with the GLAST-LAT Calibration Unit Ph. Bruel on behalf of the beam test.
© Imperial College LondonPage 1 Tracking & Ecal Positional/Angular Resolution Hakan Yilmaz.
1ECFA/Vienna 16/11/05D.R. Ward David Ward Compare these test beam data with Geant4 and Geant3 Monte Carlos. CALICE has tested an (incomplete) prototype.
GLAST Calorimeter Crystal Position Measurement Zach Fewtrell, NRL/Praxis GLAST Integration & Test Workshop SLAC July 14, 2005.
D. Jason Koskinen FNAL Collaboration mtg. 10/ Near Detector Efficiency.
STAR Analysis Meeting, BNL – oct 2002 Alexandre A. P. Suaide Wayne State University Slide 1 EMC update Status of EMC analysis –Calibration –Transverse.
Search for High-Mass Resonances in e + e - Jia Liu Madelyne Greene, Lana Muniz, Jane Nachtman Goal for the summer Searching for new particle Z’ --- a massive.
Calice Meeting Argonne Muon identification with the hadron calorimeter Nicola D’Ascenzo.
Overview of PHENIX Muon Tracker Data Analysis PHENIX Muon Tracker Muon Tracker Software Muon Tracker Database Muon Event Display Performance Muon Reconstruction.
The dimuon physics continuum An update June 21, 2004, Sébastien Gadrat for the LPC, Clermont-Ferrand. The contributions to the dimuon spectrum above 1.5.
Comparison of MC and data Abelardo Moralejo Padova.
Feb. 3, 2007IFC meeting1 Beam test report Ph. Bruel on behalf of the beam test working group Gamma-ray Large Area Space Telescope.
Plots of RPC performance G. Cattani, University of Rome “Tor Vergata” & INFN Roma 2 on behalf of ATLAS Muon Collaboration.
GLAST LAT Project LAT Instrument Analysis Meeting– Aug 29, 2005 Hiro Tajima, TKR Updates at SLAC 1 GLAST Large Area Telescope: TKR Updates at SLAC Hiro.
New zero suppression in simulation: current status David Adams BNL November 25, 2015 DUNE 35-ton simulation, reconstruction and analysis.
1 Methods of PSD energy calibration. 2 Dependence of energy resolution on many factors Constant term is essential only for energy measurement of single.
Beam test Analysis Micromegas TPC by Wenxin Wang.
Brunel University London Field-off LiH Energy Loss Rhys Gardener CM45 – July 28th.
June 4, 2009 STAR TPC review Estimation of TPC Aging Based on dE/dx Measurements Yuri Fisyak.
First Look at Housekeeping Data
Solving pedestal problem
Panagiotis Kokkas Univ. of Ioannina
Calorimeter calibrations with Flight Software.
Overview Goal Study GEM variables in SVAC ntuple
Gamma-ray Large Area Space Telescope
Using Single Photons for WIMP Searches at the ILC
Testing some CAL specs Level 3 CAL requirement 5.5.5:
Rick Salcido Northern Illinois University For CALICE Collaboration
Imaging crystals with TKR
Charge diffusion model (again)
Mini Tower Preliminary Results
Tower A: A First Look Finding the Data: Login: THIS ONE! user: glast
CR Photon Working Group
Eduardo do Couto e Silva Feb 28, 2006
Current status Minjung Kim
Studies of the Time over Threshold
Shaped Digital Readout Noise in CAL
Rick Salcido Northern Illinois University For CALICE Collaboration
Overview of Beam Test Benoit, Ronaldo and Eduardo Nov 8 , 2005 thanks to Steve and Bill for helping to consolidate all the information.
Presentation transcript:

TKR to CAL for 16 Towers The usual TKR extrapolation to CAL study, for the 16 tower data. Check calibrations, look for problems, etc. Today -- “work in progress”, leading to WorkShopSixⓒ. HIGHLIGHTS -- Histograms of same old quantities (due to popular demand). Good uniformity of CAL response ; good simulation agreement The CalTuple had problems, now it don’t ADC distributions from CalTuple where you can see the LAC edge. Towards Level 3 requirements and IA workshop #6

The Method [Review my IA Workshop #4 presentation if you like (14 July 2005).] Extrapolate TKR track to CAL, predict which crystals get hit. Look at energy deposits, positions. Use Tkr1EndPos, Dir. Stay a few cm away from crystal ends. Require: TkrNumTracks == 1 Tkr1KalThetaMs < 0.03 Tkr1NumHits > 15 <2 MeV in adjacent crystals Extrapolation of track must traverse top & bottom of crystal. Energy corrected for cosq.

Yellow: 4M Surface Muons (v5r0703p5) A typical crystal: tower 9 Layer 7 Column 5 Red: six B30 runs (135005404 to 14) Blue: eight B2 runs (135005345 to 59) Yellow: 4M Surface Muons (v5r0703p5)

Energy deposit vs crystal index Most uniform ever! (MC width < true width is an old problem)

Un-zoom y-axis of energy deposit vs crystal Red: six B30 runs (135005404 to 14) Blue: eight B2 runs (135005345 to 59) Yellow: 4M Surface Muons (v5r0703p5) 2 of the 3 channels with LAC DAC = 127. Note that simulation (nearly) reproduces the effect. 11.2 MeV by design and in MC, but 11.3 MeV in data, both B2 and B30. (B30 used for calibration.)

Energy deposit histograms Here, B2. B30 looks same, MC looks real similar.

Fraction of events where expected energy deposit is absent, per crystal. “Empty” means <7 MeV. Tower 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Same 2 channels have 0.2 and 0.4, data and simulation (zoom here).

CAL position vs extrapolated TKR position (Even layers similar.) Here, odd layers.

Histograms of position differences dX, odd layers dY, even layers rmsX, odd layers rmsY, even layers Demonstration of Level 3 CAL position req’ts will come from this. CalMIPDir gives direction req’t nicely.

Single diode pedestal-subtracted ADC counts LAC threshold.

CalTuple is A.O.K. Preceding plot took a while to make: the CalTuple a) dropped empty events, fouling up the correspondence between Merit<->SVAC<->CalTuple b) Had different root structure from other tuples, and different versions between MC and real data. Thanks to Zach and Anders and Heather it is now “A #1”. To express LAC in MeV: Landau fit gives MPV in ADC counts, then say LAC_MeV = 11.2 * LAC_adc/MPV

Observed LAC thresholds for all channels Find the LAC turn on, in ADC counts, crystal-by-crystal. Tuning in progress -- presently what I find is (maybe) 2x too high.

For the workshop… Lots already done. No big problems in 16-tower CAL reconstruction, and the calibrations uniform, which didn’t use to be true, even if at 11.3 instead of 11.2 MeV. B2 and B30 give the same results. The simulation is pretty darn good for most (but not all) parameters. Improve the LAC finder, compare with LacDac settings in more detail. Spell out Level 3 requirements fulfillment more clearly. Et cetera and so forth.