INPO Perspective of Industry CM Performance

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
2007 CMBG Conference Keith Reinsmith PPL Susquehanna, LLC June 17-20, 2007 Charleston, SC Engineering Change Impact Evaluation Process.
Advertisements

CM HOW-TO GENERAL OVERVIEW AND DELTAS FROM E2. OBJECTIVE u Upon completion of this training you will demonstrate an understanding of major differences.
INPO Update CMBG Meeting June 2013
Ensure Vendor/Engineer of Choice Product Quality
NRC Perspective of Recent Configuration Management Issues Tom Farnholtz Chief, Engineering Branch 1 Division of Reactor Safety, Region IV June 2014 CMBG.
2007 CMBG Conference Temporary Configuration Changes Tony Hathcock Duke Energy - Oconee June 18-20, 2007 Charleston, SC.
SAE AS9100 Quality Systems - Aerospace Model for Quality Assurance
Temporary Configuration Change Mike Hayes Exelon Nuclear.
Lindy Hughes Fleet Fire Protection Program Engineer Southern Nuclear Operating Company June 4, 2013 Fire Protection.
PROCESS AND PRODUCT QUALITY ASSURANCE
Software life cycle processes Purpose n A new international standard (ISO/IEC 12207:1995(E) that –establishes a common framework for software life cycle.
Pertemuan 16 Matakuliah: A0214/Audit Sistem Informasi Tahun: 2007.
Systems Engineering Management
Purpose of the Standards
Construction Industry Development Board development through partnership Construction Procurement documents 2c.
4. Quality Management System (QMS)
BUILD WITH US. ™ Contractors
Seafood HACCP Alliance for Training and Education Chapter 10 Principle 6: Establish Verification Procedures.
Oconee RPS/ESPS Digital Upgrade Presented by: Michael Bailey June 3,
1 Configuration Management 101 ITS Professional Capacity Building Program T3 Webinar February 21, 2008.
QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM ACCORDING TO ISO
The Key Process Areas for Level 2: Repeatable Ralph Covington David Wang.
Configuration Management Benchmarking Group Conference June 6 – 9, 2004 Kansas City, MO © 2004 CMBG Deployment of a Margin Model at Comanche Peak Presented.
The Role of the Internal Auditor for Maintaining System Compliance and Promoting Continuous Improvement Wayne M. Uttke
Configuration Management Benchmarking Group Conference June 6 – 9, 2004 Kansas City, MO © 2004 CMBG Configuration Management Fundamentals including Margin.
2007 CMBG Conference David Hembree Institute of Nuclear Power Operations June 20, 2007 Charleston, SC INPO Perspective on Configuration Management.
SENG521 (Fall SENG 521 Software Reliability & Testing Software Product & process Improvement using ISO (Part 3d) Department.
INPO Update Operational Excellence Outcomes and Configuration Management Glenn J. Neises, INPO Sr. Evaluator June 2004 CMBG Glenn J. Neises, INPO Sr. Evaluator.
Margin Management. PAGE 2 Margin Management Plant Shutdowns 1.Late 1990’s – numerous “surprise” long-term plant shutdowns 2.Shutdowns resulted when a.
2007 CMBG Conference Bill Kline FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company (FENOC) June 19, 2006 Charleston, SC Latent Issues and Lessons Learned Discussion.
PAGE 1 New Plant - CM Configuration Management For The Next Generation Of Nuclear Facilities Joseph Burack Consulting Engineer Configuration Management.
Configuration Management of Post-Fukushima Regulations CMBG June 2013 David Gambrell Director, Severe Accident Management Southern Nuclear.
1 | 2010 Lecture 3: Project processes. Covered in this lecture Project processes Project Planning (PP) Project Assessment & Control (PAC) Risk Management.
Configuration Management Fundamentals including Margin Management Bill Kline FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company (FENOC) June 2, 2008 Shell Beach, CA.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Methodology and Responsibilities for Periodic Safety Review for Research Reactors William Kennedy Research Reactor.
2006 CMBG Conference Keith A. Reinsmith PPL Susquehanna 2006 CMBG Conference June 11-14, 2006 Richmond, VA Configuration Management Awareness Training.
Maintaining and Sustaining System Integrity Configuration Management for Transportation Management Systems Configuration management (CM) describes a series.
2010 CMBG Conference Temporary Design Changes Tony Hathcock Duke Energy - Oconee June , 2010 Charlotte, NC.
State of Georgia Release Management Training
Evaluating Configuration Management
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Development of the Basis Document for Periodic Safety Review for Research Reactors William Kennedy Research Reactor.
2006 CMBG Conference BREAKOUT 1: Component Design Basis Inspection Facilitators: Bill Kline/FENOC Sonya Myers/NMC June 11-14, 2006 Richmond, VA.
Office of Pipeline Safety Remedial Action Review Protocol Integrity Management Workshop July 23-24, 2002.
IAEA Training Course on Safety Assessment of NPPs to Assist Decision Making Diablo Canyon NPP Maintenance Rule Program Workshop Information IAEA Workshop.
Standard Design Process Overview
 SOFTCON SYSTEMS PVT. LTD. (SSPL) offers unique, creative and practical automation solutions in the field of Process & Power on an LSTK / EPC basis with.
A LOOK AT AMENDMENTS TO ISO/IEC (1999) Presented at NCSLI Conference Washington DC August 11, 2005 by Roxanne Robinson.
Introduction for the Implementation of Software Configuration Management I thought I knew it all !
DNP Initiative ENG-003 Standard Design Process Overview Configuration Management Benchmarking Group June 12, 2017.
Software Project Configuration Management
Testing the System.
Software and Systems Integration
NEI Configuration Control Benchmark – Palo Verde
(Additional materials)
Development Projects / Analysis Projects / On-site Service Projects
NRC CM Pilot Inspections Methodology and Results
Presented By: Mike Stout – PPL Glenn Neises - INPO
Maintaining Plant Configuration
Fast Track Modifications Keith Reinsmith PPL Susquehanna
Results of Design Reviews
Instrument PDR Summary of Objectives
Margin Management Configuration Management Benchmarking Group
Analyzing CM-Related Condition Reports
Temporary Alterations in Support of Maintenance and Temporary Modifications Beth Kernes Krause - Cooper Station February 24, 2019 Cleveland 2005.
Jim Powers - Director, Fleet Engineering
How to conduct Effective Stage-1 Audit
Deconstructing Standard 2a Dr. Julie Reffel Valdosta State University
QA Reviews Lecture # 6.
Vendor Technical Information
I&C requirements and configuration management
Presentation transcript:

INPO Perspective of Industry CM Performance Steve Nichols Manager, Engineering and Configuration Management

Evaluating CM PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVE (CM.2) Plant activities are conducted in a manner that maintains configuration control and operating and design margins. PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVE (CM.3) Processes used to maintain consistency of plant configuration, design, and licensing bases are clearly defined and are implemented properly. Changes to plant configuration and design and licensing bases are effectively analyzed, controlled, and implemented.

INPO Evaluation Results

CM Areas for Improvement

CM.2 AFI Issues Caution tags for longstanding equipment conditions in lieu of modification process Temporary shielding installations in place for years without engineering evaluation No actions taken to resolve a nonconservative instrument setpoint for more than a year Operability evaluations recorded basis of inputs and assumptions not well-supported

CM.2 Causes Personnel are not sensitive to what constitutes a plant change resulting in unapproved changes Management not sufficiently involved in the review and approval of operability evaluations Expectations for addressing degraded and nonconforming conditions are not clearly established or reinforced

CM.3 AFI Issues DC supply in-rush current for inverter too high for breaker Engineers are not consistently accounting for field performance data, validating test acceptance criteria, and considering outstanding changes to design calculations Engineering did not evaluate temporary changes to the plant before installation

CM.3 Causes Incomplete design verification by the responsible engineer and reviewers due to, in part, ineffective engineering work management, prioritization and scheduling of major projects Design engineers not fully addressing underlying causes of equipment problems in developing and implementing some important modifications Management not reinforcing procedure constraints placed on temporary configuration changes

INPO Perspective CM issues continue to impact plant performance CM lessons learned vital to new plant designs Continued focus important