FEAD Mid-Term Evaluation

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Date: in 12 pts 28 th Meeting EQF Advisory Group Brussels 2 -3 December 2014.
Advertisements

SUPPLY, DEMAND AND EXPENDITURE ON LONG TERM CARE IN EU Dr. Valentina Prevolnik Rupel Institute for Economic Research, Slovenia.
Session 1: Child poverty outcomes and main factors behind International benchmarking and key challenges for Member States András Gábos TARKI Social Research.
Introduction to the training dataset Alexander Mack.
Eurostat Ag.no "Annex 2" supplement to Eurostat Annual Report, October 2015 Working Group on Article 64 and Article 65 of the Staff Regulations Meeting.
Gender Equality is key towards the eradication of Violence against Women.
EQAVET Secretariat Survey Draft analysis NRPs meeting Oct 2014 NRPs meeting, Brussels October 2014.
Women in company boards. An issue for ETUC? Cinzia Sechi, Policy Advisor, ETUC ETUC Participation WG 16 February 2012, Brussels.
Progress of European integration
Programme for International Student Assessment
All Roads Lead to Rome Km 923 Km 489 Km 0 Km 989 Km 518 Km 898 Km 811
Insurance Comparison Websites: EIOPA Good Practices
Highlights of 2016 and the outlook for 2017
Economic benefits of gender equality in the EU
Eurojust cases involving crimes against children
Weighting issues in EU-LFS
GÉANT Planned Topology
Point 5. Countries plans on Time Use Surveys
Phasing out the use of lead shot in wetlands (1)
Statistical indicators for the Bologna implementation report
ESF FINANCIAL EXECUTION PART 1 STATE OF PLAY END 2016
Experience of the MAs with the structured survey on end recipients
Natura 2000 – SCI Union Lists
2.1. ESS Agreement on Learning Mobility (IVET & Youth)
MANUFACTURER SURVEY GIRP-IPF STUDY 2016.
Transmission, processing and publication of the HBS 2015 data
Collection legislation
State of legal transposition (1)
Bovine Movements within EU/EFTA
Table 1. Number and rate of reported confirmed gonorrhoea cases per population, EU/EEA, 2010–2014 Country Cases Rate Austria.
3C. Update of Summary of WISE electronic delivery
Update on the status of RBMP reporting
Report on WISE Art.8 and GIS issues
Habides update (May 2011).
State of play Article 5 reports
MISSOC NETWORK MEETING Amsterdam, 6-7 June 2016
ESF FINANCIAL EXECUTION ESF Technical Working Group Meeting June 2018
Education and Training Statistics Working Group
PRODUCTION RETAIL SALES CONSUMER PRICES
Prof. Dr. John Ditch, Academic expert
Representative sampling questionnaire
Marine Strategy Framework Directive: Transposition and Implementation
Marine Strategy Framework Directive: Status of reporting
ECONOMIC BENEFITS OF GENDER EQUALITY IN THE EUROPEAN UNION
ESF FINANCIAL EXECUTION ESF Technical Working Group Meeting June 2018
Reporting – Art 17 of HD and Art 12 of BD
Programme adoptions Cohesion Policy:
Preliminary results from frequency tables and national quality reports
ETS Working Group meeting 24-25/9/2007 Agenda point 7 CVTS3 brief update /09/ 2007 ETS working group.
State of play: data transmission, validation and dissemination
Proposal for granting access to HOUSEHOLD BUDGET SURVEYS (HBS)
Textile. Clothing. Leather. Shoes.
ESF FINANCIAL EXECUTION ESF Technical Working Group Meeting June 2018
LAMAS Working Group 7 – 8 December 2016
WFD River Basin Management Plans :
3.6. Impact of population and housing census results on population stocks and on LFS and SILC–follow-up DSS Meeting September 2012.
2015 Update of Union Lists of Sites of Community Interest
State of Play RBMPs and WISE reporting (9/07/10)
Update on implementation WG F 27 April 2010 Maria Brättemark
European Statistical Training Programme (ESTP)
Update on legal issues Strategic Coordination Group 23 February 2010
Update on status of reporting and validation process
Overview of the implementation of the SEA directive
People with disabilities
Transposition and implementation of WFD
LAMAS Working Group June 2015
WP3 – Current and Future Data Collection Systems in the ESS
Input Presentation for Working Group 6
LAMAS Working Group June 2018
Draft Guidance note on monitoring and indicators under FEAD
Presentation transcript:

FEAD Mid-Term Evaluation Overview of the structured survey on end recipients FEAD Evaluation Partnership Meeting Isabel Naylon, Brussels, 27.04.18

Structured surveys Receipt of 22 structured surveys to date: AT, BE, CY, CZ, EE, ES, FI, FR, GR, HR, HU, IE, IT, LT, LU, LV, MT, PL, PT, RO, SI, SK Inclusion of nine in the DFR. Others will be included in FR Aggregation and analysis of the structured surveys Inclusion in Excel table Cleaning of the data Aggregation of data

Structured survey – A1 Type of FEAD assistance distributed to end recipients and how often is it distributed Food packages tend to be distributed monthly or less frequently. Meals tend to be provided on a daily basis. Goods for children and the homeless on a less frequent basis Other products tend to be distributed either daily or at longerintervals.

Structured survey – A2 Types of accompanying measures offered to end recipients

Structured surveys – A2 The most common accompanying measures are: Direction to competent social and administrative services Advice on food preparation and storage, cooking workshops, educational activities to promote healthy nutrition, or advice on how to reduce food waste

Structured surveys – A3 and A3a In all 22 Member States at least some POs provide material assistance to the respondents that is not financed by the FEAD. A3a Food packages AT, BE, CY, CZ, EE, ES, FI, GR, HR, HU, IE, MT, SK, IT, RO, SI, LU, LV, PL, PT Meals AT, BE, CY, CZ, ES, FI, HR, HU, IE, MT, SK, IT, RO, SI, LU, LV, PL, PT Goods distributed to children AT, BE, CY, CZ, ES, FI, HR, IE, MT, SK, IT, RO, SI, LU, LV, PL, PT Goods distributed to the homeless AT, BE, CZ, EE, ES, FI, HR, HU, IE, MT, SK, IT, RO, SI, LU, PL, PT Other goods AT, BE, CZ, ES, FI, GR, HR, HU, IE, MT, SK, IT, RO, SI, LU, PL, PT

Structured surveys – B1 Gender proportion of respondents In almost all countries except Cyprus and Hungary, most participants in the structured survey are female.

Structured survey – B2 Respondents by age group

Structured surveys – B2 In many Member States, those picking up the food packages or material assistance are between the ages of 25 and 49 or over 50. However, a large percentage of those receiving the assistance are other people of all age groups, but especially children. 31% of the end recipients surveyed are single parents. The breakdown by age and gender gives the following profile:

Structured survey – B5 and B6 Who is receiving the assistance and what is their age?

Structured surveys – B10 and B11 The provision of the food and material assistance seems to be working well in most of the MS with the most common difficulties being registration with the authorities and the need to travel long distances. In most MS, end recipients clearly state that FEAD has made a difference, while in one (Spain) most of the end recipients stated that the FEAD partially made a difference.

Structured survey B11 Could you tell me whether the assistance provided by the FEAD has made a difference to you or to the members of your household?

Structured surveys – B13 End recipient and/or other members of their household receiving assistance from other organisations

Structured surveys – B15 The advice or guidance offered under the accompanying measures was considered useful in most MS. A small proportion do not find it useful and in five Member States a large percentage of the respondents did not know or did not wish to answer. In some MS the accompanying measures fail to reach a relatively large proportion of end recipients.

Structured surveys – B15 Usefulness of the accompanying measures

Structured surveys – B16-B23 Characteristics of the respondents

Structured surveys – key findings Most end recipients have the nationality of the country (except in LU and AT), have a place to live, receive other benefits (except in ES, GR and LU) and do not have an income from work (except in LU).