Modified Stage 2 Meaningful Use: Objective #10 – Public Health Reporting Massachusetts Medicaid EHR Incentive Payment Program July 21, 2016 Today’s presenter:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Presenting on behalf of the Stage 2 MU PH Reporting Requirements Task Force.
Advertisements

Health and Wellness for all Arizonans azdhs.gov Arizona Department of Health Services (ADHS) & Meaningful Use Sara Imholte Arizona Department of Health.
Understanding Meaningful Use Presented by: Allison Bryan MS, CHES December 7, 2012 Purdue Research Foundation 2012 Review of Stage 1 and Stage 2.
Purdue Research Foundation © MU Hot Topics for January 2015.
TWS July2011 Stimulation Part 2. TWS July 2011 Objective: Implement drug formulary checks. Measure: The EP has enabled this functionality and has access.
CMS Proposals for Quality Reporting Programs Under the 2015 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule Proposed Rule PQRS, EHR Incentive Program, Physician Compare,
Series 1: Meaningful Use for Behavioral Health Providers From the CIHS Video Series “Ten Minutes at a Time” Module 2: The Role of the Certified Complete.
MEANINGFUL USE UPDATE 2014 Mark Huang, M.D. Chief Medical Information Officer Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago Associate Professor Department of PM.
Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs HIT Policy Committee June 5, 2013.
Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs
Montana Medicaid Electronic Health Records Incentive Program for Eligible Hospitals This presentation will focus on information related to your registration.
August 12, Meaningful Use *** UDOH Informatics Brown Bag Robert T Rolfs, MD, MPH.
CMS Proposed Changes for Meaningful Use in Mark Segal, Vice President, Government and Industry Affairs, GE Healthcare IT May 1, 2015.
Medicaid EHR Incentive Program For Eligible Professionals Overview of the Proposed 2015 Modification Rule Kim Davis-Allen Outreach Coordinator
Meaningful Use Elizabeth W. Woodcock, MBA, FACMPE, CPC Update: 2015 Sponsored by.
Making better healthcare possible ® Meaningful Use Stage 2 The Changing Seasons of Healthcare Conference WV-HFMA/WV-HIMSS September 27, 2012.
Stage 2 Meaningful Use Improve Population and Public Health 1.
Syndromic Surveillance Configuring RPMS-EHR for Meaningful Use Resource Patient Management System.
Meaningful Use Workgroup Population and Public Health – Subgroup 4 Art Davidson, Chair September 11, 2012.
Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs Jason McNamara Technical Director for Health IT.
Syndromic Surveillance Data Submission EHR & MU for HIM Professionals Resource Patient Management System.
Meaningful Use: Stage 2 Changes An overall simplification of the program aligned to the overarching goals of sustainability as discussed in the Stage.
Meaningful Use Measures Series – Session 3 Objectives related to interoperability and exchanging data to outside entity 1.
Physician Quality Reporting System (PQRS) Reporting with MeHI’s Registry and Services February 10, 2015 Today’s presenters: Al Wroblewski, Client Services.
New Jersey Institute of Technology Enterprise Development Center (EDC) 211 Warren Street, Newark, NJ Phone: Fax:
Medicaid EHR Incentive Program Updates eHealth Services and Support September 24, 2014 Today’s presenter: Nicole Bennett, Provider Enrollment and Verification.
The Impact of Proposed Meaningful Use Modifications for June 23, 2015 Today’s presenters: Al Wroblewski, Client Services Relationship Manager.
Final Rule Regarding EHR Certification Flexibility for 2014 Today’s presenters: Al Wroblewski, Client Services Relationship Manager Thomas Bennett, Client.
Medicaid EHR Incentive Program for Eligible Professionals attesting to Adopt, Implement, Upgrade (AIU) or Modified Stage 2 Meaningful Use (MU) for Program.
Meaningful Use Syndromic Surveillance DHSC March 3, 2016.
MAPIR 5.7 Walk-Through Vermont Medicaid Electronic Health Record (EHR) Incentive Program May 25, 2016.
MAINE PRIMARY CARE ASSOCIATION JUNE 27, 2016 PRESENTED BY PATTI CHUBBUCK MaineCare Medicaid 2016 Meaningful Use Program.
Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs HIT Policy Committee July 9, 2013.
Stage 2 Beyond the First Year on MU in 2014 Presenters: Randy Marsden – Chief Client Officer Leo Vilenskiy – Senior Customer Support Representative Rebecca.
CMS Final Rule: Stage 3 Meaningful Use and Modifications to MU for November 3, 2015 Today’s presenters: Thomas Bennett, Client Services Relationship.
Modified Stage 2 Meaningful Use Program Year 2015: Attestation 101 Massachusetts Medicaid EHR Incentive Payment Program July 5, 2016 Today’s presenter:
Psychiatric Clinical Nurse Specialists: Adopt, Implement, Upgrade (AIU) Massachusetts Medicaid EHR Incentive Program August 3, 2016 Today’s presenter:
Last Chance to Get Started with the Medicaid EHR Incentive Program September 27, 2016 Today’s presenters: Al Wroblewski, PCMH CCE, Client Services Relationship.
Modified Stage 2 Meaningful Use: Objective #8 – Patient Electronic Access Massachusetts Medicaid EHR Incentive Payment Program July 19, 2016 Today’s presenter:
Psychiatric Clinical Nurse Specialists How to Get Your Medicaid EHR Incentive for 2016 November 21, 2016 Today’s presenters: Al Wroblewski, Client.
Meaningful Use Objectives Overview Massachusetts Medicaid EHR Incentive Program September 16, 2016 Today’s presenters: Brendan Gallagher Thomas.
Modified Stage 2 Meaningful Use: Objective #9 – Secure Electronic Messaging Massachusetts Medicaid EHR Incentive Payment Program July 19, 2016 Today’s.
Public Health IT Unit 3: Interoperability Standards in Public Health IT Welcome to Public Health IT, Unit 3. This unit discusses interoperability standards.
Advancing Care Information
EHR Incentive Program 2017 Program Requirements
Florida’s Medicaid EHR Incentive Program
Psychiatric Clinical Nurse Specialists: Patient Volume Threshold (PVT) Massachusetts Medicaid EHR Incentive Program August 2, 2016 Today’s presenter:
Stage 3 and ACI’s Relationship to Medicaid MU Massachusetts Medicaid EHR Incentive Program September 19 & 20, 2017 Today’s presenters: Brendan Gallagher.
Modified Stage 2 Meaningful Use: Objective #7– Medication Reconciliation Massachusetts Medicaid EHR Incentive Payment Program July 14, 2016 Today’s presenter:
Modified Stage 2 Meaningful Use: Objective #4 – ePrescribing (eRx) Massachusetts Medicaid EHR Incentive Payment Program July 12, 2016 Today’s presenter:
Interoperability and Patient Engagement: Health Information Exchange (HIE), Secure Messaging, and Patient Portals for Modified Stage 2 September.
Introduction to the Quality Payment Program & MIPS
Modified Stage 2 Meaningful Use: Objective #2 – Clinical Decision Support Massachusetts Medicaid EHR Incentive Payment Program July 7, 2016 Today’s presenter:
EHR Incentive Program 2017 Program Requirements
Modified Stage 2 Meaningful Use: Objective #1 – Protect Electronic Health Information July 5, 2016 Today’s presenter: Al Wroblewski, PCMH CCE, Client.
Meaningful Use Overview for Program Year 2017 Massachusetts Medicaid EHR Incentive Program October 23 & 24, 2017 Presenters: Elisabeth Renczkowski,
Praxis EMR Training Seminar
Meaningful Use Boot Camp Webinar Massachusetts Medicaid EHR Incentive Program September 18 & 19, 2018 Today’s presenters: Brendan Gallagher and.
Modified Stage 2 Meaningful Use Program Year 2015: Attestation 101 Massachusetts Medicaid EHR Incentive Payment Program July 5, 2016 Today’s presenter:
EHR Incentive Program 2018 Program Requirements
Modified Stage 2 Meaningful Use: Objective #6 – Patient Specific Education Massachusetts Medicaid EHR Incentive Payment Program July 14, 2016 Today’s.
2017 Supporting Documentation Requirements Massachusetts Medicaid EHR Incentive Program September 19 & 20, 2017 Good Morning Everyone My name is.
2017 Modified Stage 2 Meaningful Use Objectives Overview Massachusetts Medicaid EHR Incentive Program September 19 & 20, 2017 September 19,
Modified Stage 2 Meaningful Use: Objective #1 – Protect Electronic Health Information July 5, 2016 Today’s presenter: Al Wroblewski, PCMH CCE, Client.
An Overview of Meaningful Use Proposed Rules in 2015
Meaningful use Financial Incentives for Eligible Professionals and Hospitals.
Syndromic Surveillance and EHR Incentive Programs
Modified Stage 2 Meaningful Use: Objective #5 – Health Information Exchange (Summary of Care) Massachusetts Medicaid EHR Incentive Payment Program July.
Clinical Decision Support (CDS): Meeting the Meaningful Use Measures Massachusetts Medicaid EHR Incentive Program May 14, 2019 & May 20, 2019.
Health Information Exchange (HIE): Meeting the Measures for Stage 3 Massachusetts Medicaid EHR Incentive Program May 13, 2019 & May 21, 2019.
Presentation transcript:

Modified Stage 2 Meaningful Use: Objective #10 – Public Health Reporting Massachusetts Medicaid EHR Incentive Payment Program July 21, 2016 Today’s presenter: Al Wroblewski, PCMH CCE, Client Services Relationship Manager

Disclaimer This presentation was current at the time it was presented, published or uploaded onto the web. This presentation was prepared as a service to the public and is not intended to grant rights or impose obligations. This presentation may contain references or links to statutes, regulations, or other policy materials. The information provided is only intended to be a general summary. It is not intended to take the place of either the written law or regulations. We encourage attendees to review the specific statutes, regulations, and other interpretive materials for a full and accurate statement of their contents. Massachusetts eHealth Institute

The attestation deadline for Program Year 2015 is August 14, 2016 Reminder The attestation deadline for Program Year 2015 is August 14, 2016 Massachusetts eHealth Institute

Agenda What is Meaningful Use (MU) Objective #10 all about? Steps to meet MU Objective #10 Do the right thing: Establish “Active Engagement” with a public health agency Active Engagement Option 1 Active Engagement Option 2 Active Engagement Option 3 Generate supporting documentation Retain supporting documentation Attesting for MU Objective #10 Common Issues Questions and Answers

What is MU Objective #10 all about?

What is MU Objective #10 all about?

What is MU Objective #10 all about? Public Health Reporting Objective The Eligible Professional (EP) is in active engagement with a public health agency to submit electronic public health data from CEHRT except where prohibited and in accordance with applicable law and practice. Measure Options Measure 1 - Immunization Registry Reporting: The EP is in active engagement with a public health agency to submit immunization data. Measure 2 – Syndromic Surveillance Reporting: The EP is in active engagement with a public health agency to submit syndromic surveillance data. Measure 3 – Specialized Registry Reporting: The EP is in active engagement to submit data to a specialized registry. Alternate Exclusions EPs scheduled to be in Stage 1: Must attest to at least 1 measure from the Public Health Reporting Objective Measures 1-3. May claim an Alternate Exclusion for Measure 1, Measure 2, or Measure 3. An Alternate Exclusion may only be claimed for up to two measures, then the provider must either attest to or meet the exclusion requirements for the remaining measure described in 495.22 (e)(10)(i). EPs scheduled to be in Stage 2: Must attest to at least 2 measures from the Public Health Reporting Objective Measures 1-3. May claim an alternate exclusion for Measure 2 or Measure 3 (Syndromic Surveillance Measure or Specialized Registry Reporting Measure) or both.

What is MU Objective #10 all about? (continued) Public Health Reporting Exclusions Measure 1 Exclusions: Any EP meeting one or more of the following criteria may be excluded from the immunization registry reporting measure if the EP Does not administer any immunizations to any of the populations for which data is collected by its jurisdiction's immunization registry or immunization information system during the EHR reporting period; Operates in a jurisdiction for which no immunization registry or immunization information system is capable of accepting the specific standards required to meet the CEHRT definition at the start of the EHR reporting period; or Operates in a jurisdiction where no immunization registry or immunization information system has declared readiness to receive immunization data from the EP at the start of the EHR reporting period. Measure 2 Exclusions: Any EP meeting one or more of the following criteria may be excluded from the syndromic surveillance reporting measure if the EP Is not in a category of providers from which ambulatory syndromic surveillance data is collected by their jurisdiction's syndromic surveillance system; Operates in a jurisdiction for which no public health agency is capable of receiving electronic syndromic surveillance data from EPs in the specific standards required to meet the CEHRT definition at the start of the EHR reporting period; or Operates in a jurisdiction where no public health agency has declared readiness to receive syndromic surveillance data from EPs at the start of the EHR reporting period. Measure 3 Exclusions: Any EP meeting at least one of the following criteria may be excluded from the specialized registry reporting measure if the EP Does not diagnose or treat any disease or condition associated with, or collect relevant data that is collected by, a specialized registry in their jurisdiction during the EHR reporting period Operates in a jurisdiction for which no specialized registry is capable of accepting electronic registry transactions in the specific standards required to meet the CEHRT definition at the start of the EHR reporting period; or Operates in a jurisdiction where no specialized registry for which the EP is eligible has declared readiness to receive electronic registry transactions at the beginning of the EHR reporting period.

What is MU Objective #3 all about? Public Health Reporting - Attestation Requirements MEASURE 1: The EP must attest YES to being in active engagement with a public health agency to submit immunization data. EXCLUSIONS: EPs meeting one or more of the following criteria may be excluded: Does not administer any immunizations to any of the populations for which data is collected by its jurisdiction's immunization registry during the EHR reporting period; Operates in a jurisdiction for which no immunization registry is capable of accepting the specific standards required to meet the CEHRT definition at the start of the EHR reporting period; or Operates in a jurisdiction where no immunization registry has declared readiness to receive immunization data from the EP at the start of the EHR reporting period. What is MU Objective #3 all about?

What is MU Objective #3 all about? Public Health Reporting - Attestation Requirements MEASURE 2: The EP must attest YES to being in active engagement with a public health agency to submit syndromic surveillance data. EXCLUSIONS: EPs meeting one or more of the following criteria may be excluded: Is not in a category of providers from which ambulatory syndromic surveillance data is collected by their jurisdiction's syndromic surveillance system; Operates in a jurisdiction for which no public health agency is capable of receiving electronic syndromic surveillance data from EPs in the specific standards required to meet the CEHRT definition at the start of the EHR reporting period; or Operates in a jurisdiction where no public health agency has declared readiness to receive syndromic surveillance data from EPs at the start of the EHR reporting period. What is MU Objective #3 all about?

What is MU Objective #3 all about? Public Health Reporting - Attestation Requirements MEASURE 3: The EP must attest YES to being in active engagement to submit data to a specialized registry. EXCLUSIONS: EPs meeting one or more of the following criteria may be excluded: Does not diagnose or treat any disease or condition associated with, or collect relevant data that is collected by, a specialized registry in their jurisdiction during the EHR reporting period; Operates in a jurisdiction for which no specialized registry is capable of accepting electronic registry transactions in the specific standards required to meet the CEHRT definition at the start of the EHR reporting period; or Operates in a jurisdiction where no specialized registry for which the EP is eligible has declared readiness to receive electronic registry transactions at the beginning of the EHR reporting period. What is MU Objective #3 all about?

What is MU Objective #3 all about? Public Health Reporting - Attestation Requirements ALTERNATE EXCLUSIONS: EPs scheduled to be in Stage 1 must attest to at least 1 measure from the Public Health Reporting Objective. May claim an Alternate Exclusion for Measure 1, Measure 2, or Measure 3. An Alternate Exclusion may only be claimed for up to two measures, then the provider must either attest to or meet the standard exclusion requirements for the remaining measure described in 495.22 (e)(10)(i)(C). EPs scheduled to be in Stage 2 must attest to at least 2 measures from the Public Health Reporting Objective. May claim an Alternate Exclusion for Measure 2 or Measure 3 (Syndromic Surveillance or Specialized Registry). What is MU Objective #3 all about?

What is MU Objective #3 all about? Public Health Reporting – Additional Information Providers who engaged in activity to meet Stage 1 or Stage 2 public health reporting objectives may count those actions toward meeting the equivalent Modified Stage 2 “active engagement” option. Providers who had previously registered, tested, or begun ongoing submission of data to a registry do not need to “restart” the process. Providers scheduled to attest to Stage 1 in 2015 must report at least one measure, unless they qualify for exclusions from all 3 measures. For Stage 2 providers, simply claiming 2 exclusions is not an acceptable way to meet the objective. If the EP qualifies for 2 exclusions, the EP should meet the objective by meeting the 1 remaining measure. If the EP qualifies for 3 exclusions, the EP can meet the objective by claiming exclusions for all three measures. What is MU Objective #3 all about?

What is MU Objective #3 all about? Public Health Reporting – Additional Information If a provider is part of a group which submits data to a registry, but the provider does not contribute to that data (e.g., they do not administer immunizations), the provider should not attest to meeting the measure, but instead should claim the exclusion. A provider may report to more than one specialized registry and may count specialized registry reporting more than once to meet the objective. What is MU Objective #3 all about?

Steps to meet MU Objective #10

Meeting MU Objective #10 Do the right thing Establish “active engagement” with a public health agency to submit electronic public health data. “Active engagement” means that the provider is either: in the process of moving towards sending production data to a public health agency or clinical data registry, or sending production data to a public health agency or clinical data registry. “Production data” refers to data generated through clinical processes involving patient care (different from test data submitted for the purposes of enrolling in and testing electronic data transfers).

Meeting MU Objective #10 Active Engagement Option 1 – Completed Registration: The EP is registered to submit data with the Public Health Agency (PHA) or Clinical Data Registry (CDR); Registration was completed within 60 days after the start of the EHR reporting period; and The EP is awaiting an invitation from the PHA or CDR to begin testing and validation. This option allows providers to meet the measure when the PHA or CDR has limited resources to initiate the testing and validation process. Providers who have registered in previous years do not need to submit an additional registration to meet this requirement for each EHR reporting period.

Meeting MU Objective #10 Active Engagement Option 2 – Testing and Validation: The EP is in the process of testing and validation of the electronic submission of data. Providers must respond to requests from the PHA or CDR within 30 days; failure to respond twice within the EHR reporting period would result in failure to meet the measure.

Meeting MU Objective #10 Active Engagement Option 3 – Production: The EP has completed testing and validation of electronic submission and is actively submitting production data to the PHA or CDR.

Generate supporting documentation Meeting MU Objective #10 Generate supporting documentation Measure 1: Immunization Registry All EPs, except for those claiming an exclusion, are required to upload their Massachusetts Immunization Information System (MIIS) scorecard or Registration of Intent receipt from the Department of Public Health (DPH). Primary care physicians who claim an exclusion are required to submit a letter on letterhead, signed by the EP, attesting to accuracy of the exclusion. Measure 2: Syndromic Surveillance Massachusetts Department of Public Health (DPH) does not accept Syndromic Surveillance Data from Providers at this time. Therefore, all Massachusetts-based EPs can claim an exclusion. Measure 3: Specialized Registry Documentation from a Specialized Registry to demonstrate active engagement.

Retain supporting documentation Meeting MU Objective #10 Retain supporting documentation Attestation purposes vs. audit purposes

Attesting for MU Objective #10

Attesting for MU Objective #10 Option 1 – Immunization Registry

Attesting for MU Objective #10 Option 2 – Syndromic Surveillance

Attesting for MU Objective #10 Option 3a – Specialized Registry

Attesting for MU Objective #10 Option 3b – Specialized Registry

Common Issues

Common Issues: Objective #10

Common Issues: Objective #10 Claiming exclusions Understanding “standard” exclusions vs. Alternate Exclusions For Active Engagement Option 1 (Completed Registration), registration must be completed within the first 60 days of the EHR reporting period Specialized Registries – can be PHA or CDR

Questions Questions?

Helpful Links CMS 2015 Program Requirements page MeHI Medicaid EHR Incentive Program page MeHI 2015 Supporting Documentation Guide Massachusetts Immunization Information System (MIIS) Resource Center – Meaningful Use Massachusetts Department of Public Health (DPH) – Meaningful Use and Public Health Objectives

Contact Us Thomas Bennett Client Services Relationship Manager (508) 870-0312, ext. 403 tbennett@masstech.org Brendan Gallagher Client Services Relationship Manager (508) 870-0312, ext. 387 gallagher@masstech.org Al Wroblewski, PCMH CCE Client Services Relationship Manager (508) 870-0312, ext. 603 wroblewski@masstech.org