Moving toward inter-calibration using the Moon as a transfer

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Preliminary Study of Lunar Calibration for Geostationary Imagers Japanese Multi-functional Transport SATellite-2 (MTSAT-2) incorporates the special device.
Advertisements

Use of the Moon as a calibration reference for NPP VIIRS Frederick S. Patt, Robert E. Eplee, Robert A. Barnes, Gerhard Meister(*) and James J. Butler NASA.
2015 GSCIS annual meeting, March, 2015, New Delhi, India Application of GIRO to Himawari-8/AHI Hidehiko Murata and Masaya Takahashi Meteorological.
1GSICS Research and Data Working Groups Annual Meeting – Tsukuba, March 2016 S. Wagner, T. Hewison, B. Viticchiè Status of GIRO and GLOD policy, infrastructure.
GSICS Coordination Center Report Fangfang Yu, Fuzhong Weng, Fred Wu and George Ohring NOAA/Center for Satellite Applications and Research 8 April, 2013.
NOAA GPRC Report 2013 GSICS Annual Meeting Williamsburg, VA 03/04/ /08/2013.
Beyond the workshop: Developing inter-calibration products based on Lunar Observations Tim Hewison (EUMETSAT) [GSICS Research Working Group Chair] Special.
Beyond the workshop: Developing inter-calibration products based on Lunar Observations Tim Hewison (EUMETSAT) [GSICS Research Working Group Chair] Special.
Thomas C. Stone U.S. Geological Survey, Flagstaff, AZ USA GSICS Research Working Group Meeting EUMETSAT 24−28 March 2014 Using the Moon as a Radiometric.
A.K. Mitra, Shailesh Parihar, S.K. Peshin Ministry of Earth Sciences
PLEIADES Lunar Observations Sophie Lachérade, Bertrand Fougnie
Masaya Takahashi (JMA) and Sebastien Wagner (EUMETSAT)
Inter-calibration using DCCs and seasonality
Future eumetsat missions: MTG/FCI, MTG/UVNS and EPS-SG/METimage
Description of the giro ON THE DETAILS OF THE IMPLEMENTATION
Strategy for combining corrections for VIS/NIR+IR channels and plotting tool S. Wagner, T. Hewison (EUM) M. Takahashi (JMA)
PREPARATION OF THE GiRO executable
VIS/NIR reference instrument requirements
Tim Hewison (1) Sébastien Wagner (1), Tom Stone (2), Gary Fowler (1)
Calibrating the METEOSAT SEVIRI solar channels using lunar observations Sébastien Wagner (1) Bartolomeo Viticchie (1), Tom Stone (2), Tim Hewison(1), Gary.
EUMETSAT’s Lunar Calibration Capabilities
GRWG VIS/NIR Sub-Group Briefing Report
JMA lunar calibration report [MTSAT-2 and GMS-5]
Second Joint GSICS-IVOS Lunar Calibration Workshop
Sébastien Wagner, Tim Hewison In collaboration with D. Doelling (NASA)
Extending DCC to other bands and DCC ray-matching
Fangfang Yu and Xiangqian Wu
SEVIRI Solar Channel Calibration system
Doelling, Wagner 2015 GSICS annual meeting, New Delhi March 20, 2015
Requirements for GSICS Plotting Tool to support VIS/NIR products
GOES-16 ABI Lunar Data Preparation to GIRO
Sébastien Wagner (1) Tom Stone (2), Gary Fowler (1), Tim Hewison (1)
Lunar Calibration activities
Combining Vicarious Calibrations
Lunar INTER-CALIBRAION of AHI with MODIS
Masaya Takahashi (JMA) and Sebastien Wagner (EUMETSAT)
Tim Hewison (EUMETSAT) (GRWG Chair)
Characterizing DCC as invariant calibration target
Update on the GIRO Benchmark
Sensitivity ANALYSIS Sébastien Wagner (EUMETSAT) In collaboration with
Updating GSICS Plotting Tool to support VISNIR products
Contribution to Agenda Item 8
Himawari-8 Launch and its calibration approaches
GSICS Collaboration with SCOPE-CM IOGEO
Combination Approaches
Update on GSICS Product Development
EUMETSAT implementation of the DCC algorithm Sébastien Wagner
GIRO APPLICATION Current status and NEXT STEPS
Sensitivity ANALYSIS Sébastien Wagner (EUMETSAT) In collaboration with
Strategy for calibration references
Inter-calibration of the SEVIRI solar bands against MODIS Aqua, using Deep Convective Clouds as transfer targets Sébastien Wagner, Tim Hewison In collaboration.
Strategy for calibration references
Technical aspects of the GIRO work: inputs from GRWG
Status of the EUMETSAT GSICS DCC product
Current Status of ROLO and Future Development
Moving toward inter-calibration using the Moon as a transfer
Traceability of the GIRO to the ROLO: Definition of a benchmark
Masaya Takahashi (JMA) Dohyeong Kim (KMA)
Towards a blended GSICS VIS/NIR product
Strawman Plan for Inter-Calibration of Solar Channels
Progress toward DCC Demo product
Inter-band calibration using the Moon
goes-16/17 abi lunar calibration
S3B OLCI Lunar Observations
T. Hewison, S. Wagner, A. Burini, O. Perez Navarro, M. Burla, F
Infrared Sub-Group Report Tim Hewison
Special Issue of the IEEE TGRS on “Inter-Calibration of Satellite Instruments”: 21 May 2019 Special session on re-calibration/re-processing – Discussion.
Lunar Calibration Workshop Activities
Toward a synergy between on-orbit lunar observations
Towards a GSICS DCC product...
Presentation transcript:

Moving toward inter-calibration using the Moon as a transfer S. Wagner, B. Viticchie, T. Hewison – EUMETSAT M. Takahashi – JMA

Rational for inter-calibration using the Moon Current DCC method implemented only for VIS0.6 micron band More reflective solar bands on SEVIRI and new generation of GEO imagers Need to have more inter-calibration methods to derive robust corrections Lunar inter-calibration can be performed across the whole ROLO/GIRO spectrum Offers the possibility to cross-calibrate any combination of instruments: No need to have coinciding observation times No need to have coinciding fields of regard Possibility for instance to inter-calibrate the GEOs to a same reference (MODIS or VIIRS for instance), or to cross calibrate GEOs between each other

A possible scheme for inter-calibration -55 -55 Reference instrument = Aqua MODIS Phase angle range = [-56°,-54°] λ, ϕ = Reference wavelength, Phase ϕ = “-55” = MODIS range λ’, ϕ’ = Monitored wavelength, Phase -55 By definition: -55 Presume MODIS is the truth  we project MODIS in the irradiance space of the monitored instrument: -55 -55 -55 -55 From GLOD/NASA data, we derive the mean -55 If MODIS is perfectly calibrated and there is no phase dependence, it is assumed: -55 Consequently:

Irradiance bias for Meteosat-9 Issue with calibration as provided in the level 1.5 headers

Meteosat-9 – VIS0.6 – Preliminary results Issue with calibration as provided in the level 1.5 headers

Meteosat-9 – VIS0.8 – Preliminary results Issue with calibration as provided in the level 1.5 headers

Meteosat-9 – Preliminary results Inter-band calibration indicates a difference of ~2% between VIS0.6 and VIS0.8 Consistent result with other findings (by cloud community) Link to the results from the DCC methods still to be established SEVIRI Level 1.5 calibration coefficients either: should be fixed to initial value  irradiance bias shows instrument drift or be based on SSCC full time series and de-trended  double difference shows absolute bias + residual drift

M. Takahashi - JMA

M. Takahashi - JMA

A possible scheme for inter-calibration Issue: the phase dependence must be removed from the relative bias: 2 solutions Remove the dependence from the GIRO  Investigations in the ROLO Correct the dependence using possible information from other satellites in a similar band (central wavelength + band width)  first order approach Need to evaluate uncertainty, including SBAF and Phase-Angle-dependence This uncertainty used as weight of the lunar method in the blend with DCC, etc. This assume that all required parameters to estimate the observed irradiance are accurately calculated (i.e. the over-sampling factor). Advantage of normalising with the GIRO instead of the reference instrument irradiance = no impact of the instrument noise at low irradiance levels. Feedback and suggestions from GRWG-VIS/NIR are very welcomed 

Conclusion More work required on the current method 2016 action on EUM/CNES to compare proposed approaches Possibility to cross calibrate any combination of instrument Use of VIIRS data to inter-calibrate all bands Possibility to monitor the inter-band Should be possible to cancel-out phase dependency for instruments with similar bands Verification/validation test: inter-calibrate the MSGs