Volume 7, Issue 4, Pages (April 2005)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Original Figures for "Molecular Classification of Cancer: Class Discovery and Class Prediction by Gene Expression Monitoring"
Advertisements

Chapter 7 Essential Concepts in Molecular Pathology Companion site for Molecular Pathology Author: William B. Coleman and Gregory J. Tsongalis.
Date of download: 5/29/2016 Copyright © 2016 American Medical Association. All rights reserved. From: Gene Expression Signatures, Clinicopathological Features,
Genomic analysis: Toward a new approach in breast cancer management
Functional Genomics Analysis Reveals a MYC Signature Associated with a Poor Clinical Prognosis in Liposarcomas  Dat Tran, Kundan Verma, Kristin Ward,
Volume 129, Issue 3, Pages (September 2005)
New Views into the Prostate Cancer Genome
Genes with Bimodal Expression Are Robust Diagnostic Targets that Define Distinct Subtypes of Epithelial Ovarian Cancer with Different Overall Survival 
Volume 52, Issue 1, Pages (July 2007)
Building better therapy for children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia
High Expression of PHGDH Predicts Poor Prognosis in Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer  Jinhong Zhu, Jianqun Ma, Xudong Wang, Tianjiao Ma, Shu Zhang, Wei Wang,
Supplementary Table 1 Sequences of the primer used for q-PCR analysis
High Expression of Lymphocyte-Activation Gene 3 (LAG3) in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Cells Is Associated with Unmutated Immunoglobulin Variable Heavy.
Focus on lymphomas Cancer Cell
Three Down and One To Go: Modeling Medulloblastoma Subgroups
Design and Multiseries Validation of a Web-Based Gene Expression Assay for Predicting Breast Cancer Recurrence and Patient Survival  Ryan K. Van Laar 
DAISY: Picking Synthetic Lethals from Cancer Genomes
Figure 1 Hierarchical clustering (HCL) outcome of all tested samples with the expression profile of the case report set as unknown Hierarchical clustering.
Arjun Pennathur, MD, Liqiang Xi, MD, Virginia R. Litle, MD, William E
An Accurate, Clinically Feasible Multi-Gene Expression Assay for Predicting Metastasis in Uveal Melanoma  Michael D. Onken, Lori A. Worley, Meghan D.
Proliferating Endothelial Cells and Leukocyte Infiltration as Prognostic Markers in Colorectal Cancer  Coen I.M. Baeten, Karolien Castermans, Harry F.P.
Volume 9, Issue 4, Pages (April 2006)
Volume 148, Issue 1, Pages (January 2012)
Volume 7, Issue 4, Pages (April 2005)
Learning More from Microarrays: Insights from Modules and Networks
Volume 155, Issue 1, Pages (September 2013)
From Static to Dynamic Risk Prediction: Time Is Everything
Yuqiu Jiang, Graham Casey, Ian C
Volume 17, Issue 1, Pages (January 2010)
Molecular Subtypes of Non-muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer
Volume 29, Issue 5, Pages (May 2016)
Identification of Combinatorial Genomic Abnormalities Associated with Prostate Cancer Early Recurrence  Xiaoyu Qu, Claudio Jeldres, Lena Glaskova, Cynthia.
MicroRNA Signature Predicts Survival and Relapse in Lung Cancer
Pejman Mohammadi, Niko Beerenwinkel, Yaakov Benenson  Cell Systems 
Osteopontin-Expressing Macrophages in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Predict Survival  Yue Li, MD, Bing-sheng Sun, MD, PhD, Baoxiang Pei, MD, Chen-guang Li,
Volume 5, Issue 6, Pages e3 (December 2017)
Recurrence-Associated Long Non-coding RNA Signature for Determining the Risk of Recurrence in Patients with Colon Cancer  Meng Zhou, Long Hu, Zicheng.
Natural killer receptor ligand expression on acute myeloid leukemia impacts survival and relapse after chemotherapy by Sara Mastaglio, Eric Wong, Travis.
Volume 4, Issue 3, Pages (August 2013)
Volume 9, Issue 3, Pages (March 2006)
Patterns of Somatically Acquired Amplifications and Deletions in Apparently Normal Tissues of Ovarian Cancer Patients  Leila Aghili, Jasmine Foo, James.
Volume 7, Issue 4, Pages (April 2005)
Volume 127, Issue 2, Pages (August 2004)
Volume 7, Issue 4, Pages (April 2005)
Volume 9, Issue 3, Pages (March 2006)
Personalized Medicine: Patient-Predictive Panel Power
Volume 54, Issue 6, Pages (June 2007)
Hans Binder, Stephan Preibisch  Biophysical Journal 
Gene expression correlates of clinical prostate cancer behavior
Quantitative Imaging of Transcription in Living Drosophila Embryos Links Polymerase Activity to Patterning  Hernan G. Garcia, Mikhail Tikhonov, Albert.
Volume 140, Issue 5, Pages e2 (May 2011)
Molecular prognostication of liver cancer: End of the beginning
Mapping Cancer Origins
Volume 129, Issue 3, Pages (September 2005)
Volume 20, Issue 4, Pages (October 2011)
Volume 10, Issue 6, Pages (December 2006)
Volume 132, Issue 6, Pages (March 2008)
Katy Hanlon, Lorna W. Harries, Sian Ellard, Claudius E. Rudin 
Volume 122, Issue 6, Pages (September 2005)
Volume 1, Issue 1, Pages (July 2015)
Volume 15, Issue 12, Pages (June 2016)
Patterns of Somatically Acquired Amplifications and Deletions in Apparently Normal Tissues of Ovarian Cancer Patients  Leila Aghili, Jasmine Foo, James.
Volume 26, Issue 12, Pages e5 (March 2019)
Volume 17, Issue 3, Pages (September 2009)
Qing-Rong Chen, Gordon Vansant, Kahuku Oades, Maria Pickering, Jun S
To Infinium, and Beyond! Cancer Cell
Volume 9, Issue 5, Pages (November 2011)
External model validation of binary clinical risk prediction models in cardiovascular and thoracic surgery  Graeme L. Hickey, PhD, Eugene H. Blackstone,
Fig. 5 Proportions of EpCAM+ systemic tumor cells correlate with the clinical outcome of patients with MBC. Proportions of EpCAM+ systemic tumor cells.
Volume 12, Issue 6, Pages (December 2007)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 7, Issue 4, Pages 337-350 (April 2005) Expression profiling using a tumor-specific cDNA microarray predicts the prognosis of intermediate risk neuroblastomas  Miki Ohira, Shigeyuki Oba, Yohko Nakamura, Eriko Isogai, Setsuko Kaneko, Atsuko Nakagawa, Takahiro Hirata, Hiroyuki Kubo, Takeshi Goto, Saichi Yamada, Yasuko Yoshida, Misa Fuchioka, Shin Ishii, Akira Nakagawara  Cancer Cell  Volume 7, Issue 4, Pages 337-350 (April 2005) DOI: 10.1016/j.ccr.2005.03.019 Copyright © 2005 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Schematic diagram of this study Cancer Cell 2005 7, 337-350DOI: (10.1016/j.ccr.2005.03.019) Copyright © 2005 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Posterior probability of survival at 5 years Posterior probability of survival at 5 years for 136 training data samples, output by the leave two out (LTO) crossvalidation without any information leakage. Left panel: Neuroblastoma samples. A red or blue horizontal line denotes survival period after diagnosis for a dead or alive patient, respectively. Red and blue marks denote various clinical properties of patients; see text below the panel for detailed explanation. Background colors show groups determined by stage and MYCN amplification status: red, type III, with MYCN amplification; green, type II, with single copy of MYCN at unfavorable stage (3 or 4); and blue, type I, with single copy of MYCN and at favorable stage (1, 2, or 4s). Right upper panel: The LTO crossvalidated prediction (posterior) for each patient; a red or a blue mark denotes that the patient is dead or alive at 5 years, respectively. Right middle panel: Cumulative smooth histogram of posterior probabilities for patients of dead (red), alive (blue), and unknown (white) at 5 years after diagnosis. Right lower panel: The horizontal and vertical axes denote the posterior and the empirical probability of 5 year survival, i.e., the ratio of the smooth histogram values between dead and alive patients, shown in the middle panel, respectively. Because the border between dead and alive samples is close to the white broken line (x = y), the posterior can be regarded as a 5 year survival chance rate. Cancer Cell 2005 7, 337-350DOI: (10.1016/j.ccr.2005.03.019) Copyright © 2005 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Disease-free survival of patients who were stratified based on the gene expression patterns For each of the four figures, whole objective patients (green) are divided into favorable (blue) or unfavorable (red) based on the posterior values with threshold 0.5, which are calculated from gene expression patterns, and statistical features of their survival times are denoted by the Kaplan-Meier survival curves. The differences of the survival curves between the favorable (blue) and unfavorable (red) groups are evaluated by p values of the log rank test. A and B: Survival analysis of whole and sporadic patients, respectively, divided by the supervised classifier based on microarray data. C and D: Survival analysis of patients in the intermediate risk group with different definitions, divided by the supervised classifier. The intermediate risk group shown in (C) is defined as MYCN single and stage 3 or 4 (type II), and that in (D) is defined as MYCN single, stage 3 or 4, and older than 1 year of age. Cancer Cell 2005 7, 337-350DOI: (10.1016/j.ccr.2005.03.019) Copyright © 2005 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Posterior probability of survival at 5 years for test samples Posterior probability of survival at 5 years for 50 independent test samples measured by newly developed 200 genes chip (the mini-chip system). Left panel: Neuroblastoma samples; see also Figure 2 legend. Center panel: Prediction results when the supervised classifier constructed from 96 training samples is applied to the 50 independent samples (independent test for the classifier’s reproducibility). Right panel: LTO crossvalidation analysis using the new 50 samples (test for the procedure’s reproducibility). Both tests do not introduce any information leakage. Lower panels: Smooth histograms of posterior probabilities for dead (red) and alive (blue) patients. Cancer Cell 2005 7, 337-350DOI: (10.1016/j.ccr.2005.03.019) Copyright © 2005 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Expression profiles of 70 genes selected for predicting neuroblastoma prognosis at 2 years Note that 10 genes for predicting prognosis at 5 years are also included in the 70 genes. The left and lower trees depict hierarchical clustering of the 136 neuroblastoma samples and the 70 genes selected in the present study, respectively. In the left tree, blue, green, and red colors denote “MYCN single and stage 1, 2 or 4s tumor” (type I, favorable), “MYCN single and stage 3, 4 tumor” (type II, intermediate), and “MYCN amplified tumor” (type III, unfavorable), respectively. The blue and red colors in the expression matrix show the high and low expression, respectively. A gene showing high expression level likely for unfavorable samples belongs to the group “UF” (red subtree in the lower tree), while one showing high expression likely for favorable samples belongs to the group “F” (blue subtree in the lower tree). Cancer Cell 2005 7, 337-350DOI: (10.1016/j.ccr.2005.03.019) Copyright © 2005 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Individual survival chance analysis based on posterior probabilities LTO estimation of survival probabilities at 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, …, 5.0 years after diagnosis for 12 typical patients. Left panel: Information of patients (see caption of Figure 2). Right panel: Estimated posterior probabilities at 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, …, 5.0 years after diagnosis, which predict the time course of patient’s survival chance. A blue or a red mark denotes that the patient is alive or dead at that time after diagnosis, respectively. For example, the patient “S108,” who died at 40 months, is predicted as 100% alive at 0.5 year and 52% alive at 5 year, solely from the microarray analysis at the diagnosis Cancer Cell 2005 7, 337-350DOI: (10.1016/j.ccr.2005.03.019) Copyright © 2005 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions