Volume 53, Issue 4, Pages 767-776 (April 2008) Prognostic Significance of Gleason Score Discrepancies between Needle Biopsy and Radical Prostatectomy Michael Müntener, Jonathan I. Epstein, David J. Hernandez, Mark L. Gonzalgo, Leslie Mangold, Elizabeth Humphreys, Patrick C. Walsh, Alan W. Partin, Matthew E. Nielsen European Urology Volume 53, Issue 4, Pages 767-776 (April 2008) DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2007.11.016 Copyright © 2007 European Association of Urology Terms and Conditions
Fig. 1 Biochemical recurrence–free survival in prostatectomy Gleason score groups stratified by equal (same grade) versus lower (upgraded) needle biopsy Gleason score. European Urology 2008 53, 767-776DOI: (10.1016/j.eururo.2007.11.016) Copyright © 2007 European Association of Urology Terms and Conditions
Fig. 2 Biochemical recurrence–free survival in prostatectomy Gleason score groups stratified by equal (same grade) versus higher (downgraded) needle biopsy Gleason score. European Urology 2008 53, 767-776DOI: (10.1016/j.eururo.2007.11.016) Copyright © 2007 European Association of Urology Terms and Conditions
Fig. 3 Proportion of cases downgraded, upgraded, or equal Gleason grade from NB to RP, stratified by year of surgery (p trend < 0.001). European Urology 2008 53, 767-776DOI: (10.1016/j.eururo.2007.11.016) Copyright © 2007 European Association of Urology Terms and Conditions