Annotation of Sequence Variants in Cancer Samples

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Nine Novel Germline Gene Variants in the RET Proto-Oncogene Identified in Twelve Unrelated Cases Syed A. Ahmed, Karen Snow-Bailey, W. Edward Highsmith,
Advertisements

Design and Multiseries Validation of a Web-Based Gene Expression Assay for Predicting Breast Cancer Recurrence and Patient Survival Ryan K. Van Laar The.
A comparison of somatic mutation callers in breast cancer samples and matched blood samples THOMAS BRETONNET BIOINFORMATICS AND COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY UNIT.
Clinical Laboratory Analysis of Immunoglobulin Heavy Chain Variable Region Genes for Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Prognosis  Philippe Szankasi, David.
Thomas M. Williams  The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics 
Figure 1. Exploring and comparing context-dependent mutational profiles in various cancer types. (A) Mutational profiles of pan-cancer somatic mutations,
Assessment of HaloPlex Amplification for Sequence Capture and Massively Parallel Sequencing of Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy–Associated.
Performance Evaluation of the TheraTyper-GJB2 Assay for Detection of GJB2 Gene Mutations  Ji-Yong Chun, Soo-Kyung Shin, Kyung Tae Min, Woojae Cho, Jaeil.
Development of a Next-Generation Sequencing Method for BRCA Mutation Screening  Maurice Chan, Shen Mo Ji, Zhen Xuan Yeo, Linda Gan, Eric Yap, Yoon Sim.
A Targeted High-Throughput Next-Generation Sequencing Panel for Clinical Screening of Mutations, Gene Amplifications, and Fusions in Solid Tumors  Rajyalakshmi.
Targeted Next-Generation Sequencing for Hereditary Cancer Syndromes
In Silico Proficiency Testing for Clinical Next-Generation Sequencing
A Method to Evaluate the Quality of Clinical Gene-Panel Sequencing Data for Single- Nucleotide Variant Detection  Chung Lee, Joon S. Bae, Gyu H. Ryu, Nayoung.
Validation of a Next-Generation Sequencing Pipeline for the Molecular Diagnosis of Multiple Inherited Cancer Predisposing Syndromes  Paula Paulo, Pedro.
Assessment of HaloPlex Amplification for Sequence Capture and Massively Parallel Sequencing of Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy–Associated.
Performance of Common Analysis Methods for Detecting Low-Frequency Single Nucleotide Variants in Targeted Next-Generation Sequence Data  David H. Spencer,
Cystic Fibrosis The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics
Molecular Genetics of Pediatric Soft Tissue Tumors
Annotation of Sequence Variants in Cancer Samples
Assessment of Capture and Amplicon-Based Approaches for the Development of a Targeted Next-Generation Sequencing Pipeline to Personalize Lymphoma Management 
Utilization of Whole-Exome Next-Generation Sequencing Variant Read Frequency for Detection of Lesion-Specific, Somatic Loss of Heterozygosity in a Neurofibromatosis.
A Clinical Grade Sequencing-Based Assay for CEBPA Mutation Testing
Hou-Sung Jung, Gregory J. Tsongalis, Joel A. Lefferts 
Performance Evaluation of the TheraTyper-GJB2 Assay for Detection of GJB2 Gene Mutations  Ji-Yong Chun, Soo-Kyung Shin, Kyung Tae Min, Woojae Cho, Jaeil.
Rapid Molecular Profiling of Myeloproliferative Neoplasms Using Targeted Exon Resequencing of 86 Genes Involved in JAK-STAT Signaling and Epigenetic Regulation 
Kyong-Ah Yoon, Sohee Park, Sang Hee Lee, Jin Hee Kim, Jin Soo Lee 
Detection of Germline Mutation in Hereditary Breast and/or Ovarian Cancers by Next- Generation Sequencing on a Four-Gene Panel  Ava Kwong, Vivian Y. Shin,
Clinical Laboratory Analysis of Immunoglobulin Heavy Chain Variable Region Genes for Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Prognosis  Philippe Szankasi, David.
Markus Rechsteiner, Adriana von Teichman, Jan H
The Genetic Basis for Cancer Treatment Decisions
Comprehensive Diagnostic Testing for Stereocilin
Catherine E. Keegan, Anthony A. Killeen 
Development of a Next-Generation Sequencing Method for BRCA Mutation Screening  Maurice Chan, Shen Mo Ji, Zhen Xuan Yeo, Linda Gan, Eric Yap, Yoon Sim.
Jamal H. Carter, Samantha N. McNulty, Patrick J. Cimino, Catherine E
Marilyn M. Li, Michael Datto, Eric J
Comparison of Next-Generation Sequencing Panels and Platforms for Detection and Verification of Somatic Tumor Variants for Clinical Diagnostics  Maksym.
The c.1364C>A (p.A455E) Mutation in the CFTR Pseudogene Results in an Incorrectly Assigned Carrier Status by a Commonly Used Screening Platform  Kristin.
Utility of NIST Whole-Genome Reference Materials for the Technical Validation of a Multigene Next-Generation Sequencing Test  Bennett O.V. Shum, Ilya.
PIK3CA Hotspot Mutation Scanning by a Novel and Highly Sensitive High-Resolution Small Amplicon Melting Analysis Method  Panagiotis A. Vorkas, Nikoleta.
A Systematic Comparison of Traditional and Multigene Panel Testing for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Genes in More Than 1000 Patients  Stephen.
Comparison of KRAS Mutation Analysis and FISH for Detecting Pancreatobiliary Tract Cancer in Cytology Specimens Collected During Endoscopic Retrograde.
BRAF Mutation Testing in Solid Tumors
Iris Schrijver, Tiffanee J. Lenzi, Carol D. Jones, Marla J
Variant Association Tools for Quality Control and Analysis of Large-Scale Sequence and Genotyping Array Data  Gao T. Wang, Bo Peng, Suzanne M. Leal  The.
A Flexible Bayesian Framework for Modeling Haplotype Association with Disease, Allowing for Dominance Effects of the Underlying Causative Variants  Andrew.
Secondary Variants in Individuals Undergoing Exome Sequencing: Screening of 572 Individuals Identifies High-Penetrance Mutations in Cancer-Susceptibility.
Deamination Effects in Formalin-Fixed, Paraffin-Embedded Tissue Samples in the Era of Precision Medicine  Seokhwi Kim, Charny Park, Yongick Ji, Deok G.
Sanger Confirmation Is Required to Achieve Optimal Sensitivity and Specificity in Next- Generation Sequencing Panel Testing  Wenbo Mu, Hsiao-Mei Lu, Jefferey.
Jennifer A. Hempelmann, Sheena M. Scroggins, Colin C
Larissa V. Furtado, Helmut C. Weigelin, Kojo S. J
Ivan P. Gorlov, Olga Y. Gorlova, Shamil R. Sunyaev, Margaret R
Larissa V. Furtado, Helmut C. Weigelin, Kojo S. J
A Variant Detection Pipeline for Inherited Cardiomyopathy–Associated Genes Using Next-Generation Sequencing  Théo G.M. Oliveira, Miguel Mitne-Neto, Louise.
Evaluating the Effect of Unclassified Variants Identified in MMR Genes Using Phenotypic Features, Bioinformatics Prediction, and RNA Assays  Lucia Pérez-Cabornero,
Sarah E. Kerr, Cheryl B. Thomas, Stephen N. Thibodeau, Matthew J
A Novel Long-Range PCR Sequencing Method for Genetic Analysis of the Entire PKD1 Gene  Ying-Cai Tan, Alber Michaeel, Jon Blumenfeld, Stephanie Donahue,
Rondell P. Graham, Michelle A. Dina, Sarah C. Howe, Malinda L
Genomic Technologies and the New Era of Genomic Medicine
Standard Mutation Nomenclature in Molecular Diagnostics
Dale Muzzey, Shera Kash, Jillian I. Johnson, Laura M
Avoiding Pitfalls in Molecular Genetic Testing
Evidence for Variable Selective Pressures at MC1R
Danielle C. Smith, Alina Esterhuizen, Jacquie Greenberg 
A Platform for Rapid Detection of Multiple Oncogenic Mutations With Relevance to Targeted Therapy in Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer  Zengliu Su, Dora Dias-Santagata,
Rapid Polymerase Chain Reaction-Based Detection of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Gene Mutations in Lung Adenocarcinomas  Qiulu Pan, William Pao, Marc.
Improving the Assessment of the Outcome of Nonsynonymous SNVs with a Consensus Deleteriousness Score, Condel  Abel González-Pérez, Nuria López-Bigas 
KIT Gene Deletions at the Intron 10−Exon 11 Boundary in GI Stromal Tumors  Christopher L. Corless, Laura McGreevey, Ajia Town, Arin Schroeder, Troy Bainbridge,
Nathan D. Montgomery, Sara R. Selitsky, Nirali M. Patel, D
Development of a Novel Next-Generation Sequencing Assay for Carrier Screening in Old Order Amish and Mennonite Populations of Pennsylvania  Erin L. Crowgey,
Brian C. Verrelli, Sarah A. Tishkoff 
Presentation transcript:

Annotation of Sequence Variants in Cancer Samples Lobin A. Lee, Kevin J. Arvai, Dan Jones  The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics  Volume 17, Issue 4, Pages 339-351 (July 2015) DOI: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2015.03.003 Copyright © 2015 American Society for Investigative Pathology and the Association for Molecular Pathology Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Variant analysis pipeline comparing germline and somatic annotation. Base-calling, alignment, and variant calling (steps 1 to 3) typically use a standard toolset, such as Samtools, Genome Analysis Toolkit (https://www.broadinstitute.org/gatk), Bowtie (http://bowtie-bio.sourceforge.net), and Burrows-Wheeler Aligner (http://bio-bwa.sourceforge.net). All websites were last accessed October 2, 2014. For variant annotation (step 4), the toolset and analysis parameters are less standardized. For germline studies, the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) variant classification system provides guidance for interpretation. For somatic mutations in cancer samples, several tools are available for germline filtering if a normal and nonneoplastic reference sample is available for comparison, including MuTect (http://www.broadinstitute.org/cancer/cga/mutect), Varscan (http://varscan.sourceforge.net), and SomaticSniper.7 When no reference sequence is available, rules for trimming germline calls must be applied before the somatic calls can be annotated for significance. VUS, variant of unknown significance. The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics 2015 17, 339-351DOI: (10.1016/j.jmoldx.2015.03.003) Copyright © 2015 American Society for Investigative Pathology and the Association for Molecular Pathology Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Variant classification of the TET2 gene. A: The distribution of reported single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and somatic missense mutations in the TET2 gene. The coding region of the TET2 gene is shown with exons; amino acid number and conserved functional domain (CFD) 1 and CFD 2 are indicated. SNPs reported for the gene in the Exome Sequencing Project are graphed above the center line in bins of 19 amino acids. The height above the center line reflects the cumulative frequency of variants in that region; minor allele frequency (MAF) for the most common SNPs is colored according to the scale on the right. The bottom half depicts the distribution of missense mutations reported in COSMIC version 71 (last accessed November 4, 2014) with distance from the center line representing the total number of changes in each bin and color representing the frequency of specific mutation calls. Any mutation also present in the above SNP databases is omitted. B: Distinguishing SNPs from somatic mutations in TET2 using integrated lines of evidence. The TET2 E1010D variant is not present in SNP databases so a somatic mutation may be indicated. However, localization outside the CFDs, nonpathogenic consensus by computational tools, and no additional abnormalities in TET2 will make a SNP more likely. For the TET2 variant N1260S, presence at low frequency in SNP databases but location inside a conserved domain makes classification difficult. However, if testing identifies other TET2 mutations and/or complementing mutations in other genes, the probability of N1260S representing a somatic mutation will increase. The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics 2015 17, 339-351DOI: (10.1016/j.jmoldx.2015.03.003) Copyright © 2015 American Society for Investigative Pathology and the Association for Molecular Pathology Terms and Conditions