Managing a Statewide Network An overview of the CDOT Pavement Management Program Eric Chavez 303.398.6565 Stephen Henry303.398.6579.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Institute for Road Construction and Maintenance - Vienna University of Technology ISTU O PTIMIZED P AVEMENT D ESIGN W ITH R ESPECT TO Q UALITY AND E CONOMY.
Advertisements

A Look to the Future By: Pat Hughes, Dave Holt, and Ron Bumann.
AD/AB - LCCA 2 nd Session Wednesday, January 29th.
Executive Summary Introduction In 1988, by virtue of State Statute , the Nebraska State Legislature first assigned the Nebraska Department.
HB 1048 / SB 518 Adjustments for Local Programs May 13, 2014 Jennifer B. DeBruhl Director, Local Assistance Division.
1 Fundamentals and Application of Stress Ratio in Concrete Pavement Design Edward H. Guo Consultant April , 2012 FAA Working Group Meeting.
Deterioration of Concrete Roads
From… Maintenance Technical Advisory Guide (MTAG) Chapter 1 Introduction.
Pavement Management Engineer
Wyoming County Paved Roads Management and Monitoring Khaled Ksaibati, Ph.D., P.E. STIC June, 2014.
Selecting the Right Maintenance Treatment Sponsored by: Minnesota LTAP Center Presented by: Michael Marti, P.E. SRF Consulting Group, Inc. Dan Wegman,
Perpetual Pavements Concept and History Iowa Open House
EVOLVING DEMANDS Highway Usage Increased 29% in the 1990’s Truck Traffic Increased 40% in the 1990’s Truck Traffic Will Increase 3% per year in next 20.
Pavement Design CE 453 Lecture 28.
Pavement Management Program Overview February 10, 2015 Presented By: Christopher J. Ott, E.I.
Lecture 12 Lecture 1L PAVEMENT CONDITION INDICES.
1 PAVEMENT DATA ITEMS. 2 Climate_Shapes (4 LTPP zones) Soil_Shapes Metadata Estimates Section level data HPMS Pavement Data Summary level data.
FDOT Aviation Pavement Inspection Training Module 2 – Pavement Fundamentals – Overview Florida Department of Transportation Statewide Pavement Management.
The Dalles Pavement Preservation Program Presented by Bill Barrier Transportation Manager City of The Dalles Public Works Department.
Introduction Surface Engineering & Aggregates and Pavement Management 1.
Calibration and Application of HDM-4 for the WSDOT Highway System Jianhua Li Steve Muench Joe Mahoney Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering.
Georgia Pavement Management System Development 1997 – 1998: l A quality-based on-site pavement condition evaluation system l A KBS for diagnosing the causes.
Herriman City Engineering Department.  Herriman City has experienced tremendous growth over the last several years  Many new subdivisions and associated.
From… Maintenance Technical Advisory Guide (MTAG) Chapter 1 Introduction.
Pavement Preservation in South Carolina J. C. “Clem” Watson, P.E. Chief Engineer for Operations South Carolina Department of Transportation.
PERFORMANCE MODELS Lecture 16. Understand use of performance models Identify common modeling approaches Understand methods for evaluating reliability.
Preventive Maintenance
PAVEMENT CONDITION SURVEYS Lecture 4. Instructional Objectives n Need for condition surveys n Collection methodologies n Four basic types of condition.
PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS OVERVIEW Lecture 2. n Provide a historical perspective of the evolution of PMS over the last 20 years n Describe the basic.
PAVEMENT CONDITION INDICES. n Historic development of pavement condition indices n The basic functions of condition indices in PMS n Different types of.
PRIORITIZATION.
PAVEMENT CONDITION INDEX
Pavement Preservation Protecting the Investment and the Environment R. Gary Hicks CP2 Center, Chico, CA Prepared for CEAC 2014 Conference March 26-28,
TAM ETG Webinar #3 Network Life Cycle Analysis Part 1: Introduction and Overview Wednesday, July 8,
Street Maintenance. The Town of Bayfield maintains centerline miles of road.
Texas Maintenance Assessment Program (TxMAP). Background Developed by TxDOT’s Maintenance Division in 1999 to document the condition of the highway system.
N ORTHWEST GIS U SERS G ROUP C ONFERENCE – O CTOBER 20, 2011 Dynamic GIS-based Pavement Condition Tracking.
NETWORK LEVEL EXAMPLES OF PMS İNŞ.YÜK. MÜH. VEYSEL ARLI.
Pavement Preservation Preventive Maintenance
Influence of Pavement Condition on Project Selection
Paving for Progress Aaron D. Granquist, Project Manager, HR Green, Inc. Doug Wilson, Capital Improvement Project Manager, Cedar Rapids Handouts and presentations.
Maintenance & Rehabilitation Strategies Lecture 5.
INVENTORY AND HISTORY. Instructional Objectives n Types of inventory and historical data n Different methods of collecting inventory and historical data.
Incorporating Pavement Management into the LRTP John Kiefer, P.E. Research Engineer Center For Technology and Training Michigan’s Local Technical Assistance.
Webinar Texas Department of Transportation : Costs Associated with Conversion of Surfaced to Un-Surfaced Roads August 30, 2012.
MICHIGAN EXPERIENCE WITH WARRANTY WORK. Warranty Program History Why Warranties ? Warranty Specifications Experience & Lessons Learned.
Data Palooza Workshop May 9, 2013 Rabinder Bains, FHWA – Office of Policy and Government Affairs.
A Guidance, Parameters & Recommendations for Rubblized Pavements July 2006.
HBP Warranties – The Cost Benefit Evaluation Begins By: Jay Goldbaum, P.E. Colorado Department of Transportation Pavement Management and Design Program.
PERFORMANCE MODELS. Understand use of performance models Identify common modeling approaches Understand methods for evaluating reliability Describe requirements.
FD05 STATEWIDE RESURFACING PROGRAM OVERVIEW DIANA RADCLIFFE, TEBM, ROADWAY PRESERVATION, DIV OF MAINTENANCE.
BUSINESS SENSITIVE 1 Pavement Health Track Analysis Tool for Determining the Health of Pavement Networks Sponsored by FHWA Contractor: Battelle/ARA Team.
Gary Hicks and Rob Marsh Gary Hicks and Rob Marsh April 19, 2005 April 19, 2005 Pavement Preservation Sub-Group on Strategy Selection & Evaluation.
Effect of Load and Environmental Factors on the Performance of Airports Pavements in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia Presented by: Hazim M Abdulwahid,MSC,MBA.
Insert picture(s) here Amy Simpson, Ph.D., P.E. Gonzalo Rada, Ph.D., P.E. Beth Visintine, Ph.D. Jonathan Groeger Rutting as a Performance Indicator.
2011 S URFACE T REATMENT R EPORT FOR THE T RANSPORTATION C OMMISSION W ORKSHOP Presented by: Stephen Henry Pavement Management Program September
The Highway Fund – Planning, Measuring, and Reporting Mike Holder, PE, Chief Engineer 2015 CAPA / DOT Workshop February 24, 2015.
Design and Rehabilitation Strategies for Sustainable Concrete Pavements H. Thomas Yu Federal Highway Administration Office of Pavement Technology.
PROJECT SELECTION RIGHT TOOLS, RIGHT TIME, RIGHT PROJECT Presented by Joe Ririe, PE PAVEMENT ENGINEERING INC. September 9, 2015.
INDOT Roadway Preservation Initiative Update
Roadway Pavement Management Plan
Village of Woodridge 2011 Pavement Analysis
City of Abilene Pavement Condition Survey 2017 Results and Discussion
Multi-Year Programming and Predictive Modelling
Pavement condition index calculation
Barry Paye, PE Chief Materials & Pavement Engineer Wisconsin DOT
Pavement Design  A pavement consists of a number of layers of different materials 4 Pavement Design Methods –AASHTO Method –The Asphalt Institute Method.
Pavement Asset management section
Colorado State University
NRRA Pavement Workshop 2019
Presentation transcript:

Managing a Statewide Network An overview of the CDOT Pavement Management Program Eric Chavez Stephen Henry

Pavement Management Inputs/Processing/Outputs Pavement Management Models Regional Project Inventories DTD data (Traffic and Climate Zones) Roadway Condition Data Index Equations Remaining Service Life Roadway Images and Inventory Good/Fair/Poor Maps (Current Network Condition) Future 20-Year Network Condition Projections Project Costs and Benefits Project Recommendation Lists Resurfacing Funding Allocations Maintenance Project Info CDOT Chief Engineers Objectives (Matching Projects)

Regional Project Inventories Maintained and owned by the Regions. Maintained and owned by the Regions. Historical catalogue of all recorded projects on every highway Historical catalogue of all recorded projects on every highway –Year of construction. –Thickness of asphalt or concrete. –Maintenance history.

Division of Transportation Development (DTD) Data Traffic loading (20-year ESALs.) Traffic loading (20-year ESALs.) Climate zones. Climate zones. Highway limits. Highway limits.

Roadway Condition Data Collected annually. Collected annually. Over 11,000-miles of Colorado highways. Over 11,000-miles of Colorado highways. Digital Images of highways, shoulders, and pavement. Digital Images of highways, shoulders, and pavement. Surface distress and severity collected from the digital images in accordance with the Distress Identification Manual for the Long-Term Pavement Performance Program. Surface distress and severity collected from the digital images in accordance with the Distress Identification Manual for the Long-Term Pavement Performance Program. Data reported on 1/10-mile intervals Data reported on 1/10-mile intervals

Condition Data Distress Types: Distress Types: –Fatigue cracking –Longitudinal cracking –Transverse cracking –Corner breaks –Ride quality as IRI –Rutting Cracking Distress Severities: Cracking Distress Severities: –Low –Moderate –High Roadway Images Roadway Images Corner break Fatigue cracking

Index Equations Transforms raw distress values into a standardized scale. Transforms raw distress values into a standardized scale. Scale: 0 – 100. Scale: 0 – is a flawless pavement, no distresses. 100 is a flawless pavement, no distresses. Value of 50 is an RSL of 0. Value of 50 is an RSL of 0. One index for each distress. One index for each distress. =100- =100- (.(.(.(. Distress LOW + Distress MOD + Distress HIGH ).).).) MAX LOW MAX MOD MAX HIGH

Maintenance Work Maintenance activities are reported into the system. Maintenance activities are reported into the system. The Pavement Management Program is currently investigating more efficient ways to account for preventive maintenance efforts. The Pavement Management Program is currently investigating more efficient ways to account for preventive maintenance efforts.

Pavement Management Inputs/Processing/Outputs Pavement Management Models Regional Project Inventories DTD data (Traffic and Climate Zones) Roadway Condition Data Index Equations Remaining Service Life Roadway Images and Inventory Good/Fair/Poor Maps (Current Network Condition) Future 20-Year Network Condition Projections Project Costs and Benefits Project Recommendation Lists Resurfacing Funding Allocations Maintenance Project Info CDOT Chief Engineers Objectives (Matching Projects)

Remaining Service Life (RSL) Definition The estimated number of years, from a specified date in time, until a pavement section reaches the threshold distress index. RSL is a function of the distress level and rate of deterioration. (Pavement Management Manual) The estimated number of years, from a specified date in time, until a pavement section reaches the threshold distress index. RSL is a function of the distress level and rate of deterioration. (Pavement Management Manual) RSL = 0 : The point where a pavements condition has reached a remaining service life of zero years due to distresses and age. The Remaining Service Life pertains to the last treatment and not necessarily the entire pavement. A project level investigation of the pavement is necessary to determine the best, most cost-effective treatment. (Pavement Management Manual) RSL = 0 : The point where a pavements condition has reached a remaining service life of zero years due to distresses and age. The Remaining Service Life pertains to the last treatment and not necessarily the entire pavement. A project level investigation of the pavement is necessary to determine the best, most cost-effective treatment. (Pavement Management Manual)

RSL: Site-Specific Regression Curve RSL 17 – 8 = 9 Threshold Index = 50 (RSL = 0) Threshold Age Current Age Requirements 5 years worth of data. St Dev. <10 R 2 >= 0.5

RSL: Family Regression Curve RSL 27 – 21 = 6 Threshold Age Current Age Requirements Site 5 years worth of data. St Dev. <10 R 2 >= 0.5

RSL: Expert Opinion Curve RSL 13 – 2 = 11 Threshold Age Current Age Requirements 5 years worth of data. St Dev. <10 R2 >= 0.5 Engineering Experience

RSL: Why? RSLs are a way to take detailed data and generalize it for network level pavement management. RSLs are a way to take detailed data and generalize it for network level pavement management. RSLs quantify the life expectancy of a given project, which is valuable information that can be used for practical purposes. RSLs quantify the life expectancy of a given project, which is valuable information that can be used for practical purposes.

RSL: Scope of Calculation 11,000 miles of data collected. 11,000 miles of data collected. –Approximately 3,700 projects ( Miles in length) Each Project has five distresses. Each Project has five distresses. –Each distress on each project needs a performance curve 200 distinct pavement families 200 distinct pavement families –Each pavement family needs a regression curve for each of the five distresses

RSL & Maintenance RSL are augmented by one or two years depending upon the type and timeframe of recent maintenance activities. RSL are augmented by one or two years depending upon the type and timeframe of recent maintenance activities. The Pavement Management Program is currently investigating more efficient ways to account for preventive maintenance efforts. The Pavement Management Program is currently investigating more efficient ways to account for preventive maintenance efforts.

Pavement Management Inputs/Processing/Outputs Pavement Management Models Regional Project Inventories DTD data (Traffic and Climate Zones) Roadway Condition Data Index Equations Remaining Service Life Roadway Images and Inventory Good/Fair/Poor Maps (Current Network Condition) Future 20-Year Network Condition Projections Project Costs and Benefits Project Recommendation Lists Resurfacing Funding Allocations Maintenance Project Info CDOT Chief Engineers Objectives (Matching Projects)

Project Costs and Benefits Treatments: Preventive Maintenance Preventive Maintenance is a category of treatment that includes any thing from crack seals to chip seals to thin overlays (< 2 inches) Preventive Maintenance is a category of treatment that includes any thing from crack seals to chip seals to thin overlays (< 2 inches) Cost: $6.50/yd 2 Cost: $6.50/yd 2 Trigger: Trigger: –RSL >= 6 –AND all distress index values >= 81 Benefit: Ranges from 1 year to 5, based upon traffic Benefit: Ranges from 1 year to 5, based upon traffic

Treatments: Minor Rehabilitation Minor Rehabilitation includes most treatments that range 2 – 4 inches in depth. Minor Rehabilitation includes most treatments that range 2 – 4 inches in depth. Cost: $30.00/yd 2 Cost: $30.00/yd 2 Trigger: Trigger: –RSL –AND at least one distress index values between Benefit: Ranges from 7 year to 12, based upon traffic Benefit: Ranges from 7 year to 12, based upon traffic

Treatments: Major Rehabilitation Major Rehabilitation includes most treatments greater than 4 inches. Major Rehabilitation includes most treatments greater than 4 inches. Cost: $41.00/yd 2 Cost: $41.00/yd 2 Trigger: Trigger: –RSL <= 5 –AND at least one distress index values between Benefit: Ranges from 13 year to 20, based upon traffic Benefit: Ranges from 13 year to 20, based upon traffic

Treatments: Reconstruction Reconstruction is a treatment that replaces the entire surface and supporting structure of a highway. Reconstruction is a treatment that replaces the entire surface and supporting structure of a highway. Cost: $166.50/yd 2 Cost: $166.50/yd 2 Trigger: Trigger: –RSL = 0 –AND at least one distress index <= 50 Benefit: 25 years Benefit: 25 years

Pavement Management Inputs/Processing/Outputs Pavement Management Models Regional Project Inventories DTD data (Traffic and Climate Zones) Roadway Condition Data Index Equations Remaining Service Life Roadway Images and Inventory Good/Fair/Poor Maps (Current Network Condition) Future 20-Year Network Condition Projections Project Costs and Benefits Project Recommendation Lists Resurfacing Funding Allocations Maintenance Project Info CDOT Chief Engineers Objectives (Matching Projects)

Good/Fair/Poor Ratings Good/Fair/Poor (G/F/P) - The G/F/P designation is a categorization of a pavements RSL. A Good pavement section has an RSL greater than or equal to 11 years. A Fair pavement section has an RSL equal to 6 and less than or equal to 10 years. A Poor project has an RSL of 5 years or less. Good/Fair/Poor (G/F/P) - The G/F/P designation is a categorization of a pavements RSL. A Good pavement section has an RSL greater than or equal to 11 years. A Fair pavement section has an RSL equal to 6 and less than or equal to 10 years. A Poor project has an RSL of 5 years or less. Good: RSL >= 11Good: RSL >= 11 Fair: RSL >=6 and =6 and <=10 Poor: RSL <= 5Poor: RSL <= 5

G/F/P Map: CDOT Network

G/F/P: CDOT Network 2011 Condition Distribution 2011 Condition Distribution Good: 28% (3,067 miles)Good: 28% (3,067 miles) Fair: 20% (2,167 miles)Fair: 20% (2,167 miles) Poor: 18% (2,062 miles)Poor: 18% (2,062 miles) Poor-0: 34% (3,691 miles)Poor-0: 34% (3,691 miles)

20-Year Condition Projection

Resurfacing Funding Allocations Regional Funding Allocation Equation 5P= the sum of the previous five years of resurfacing funds for a given Region. 5P= the sum of the previous five years of resurfacing funds for a given Region. 10F = the sum of the predicted ten years of resurfacing funds for a given Region, as optimized by the Pavement Management models. 10F = the sum of the predicted ten years of resurfacing funds for a given Region, as optimized by the Pavement Management models. 2 X 5P + 10F 20

Resurfacing Funding Allocation Regional Funding Allocation - Continued 90% of Regional funding is based upon the equation. 90% of Regional funding is based upon the equation. 10% of Regional funding is allocated based upon miles of RSL=0 roads in the Region. 10% of Regional funding is allocated based upon miles of RSL=0 roads in the Region.

Project Recommendation The Pavement Management Program selects the treatment with the greatest benefit at the lowest cost. That treatment is applied at the best possible time in the life of the project. The Pavement Management Program selects the treatment with the greatest benefit at the lowest cost. That treatment is applied at the best possible time in the life of the project. Traffic is a weighted factor in the benefit that tips the cost-benefit ratio in favor of higher-traveled highways. Traffic is a weighted factor in the benefit that tips the cost-benefit ratio in favor of higher-traveled highways.

Chief Engineers Objectives Regions run their Region-Specific models and generate a list of the most cost effective projects in their Region. This list is used to create the Regions 3-year resurfacing plan. Regions run their Region-Specific models and generate a list of the most cost effective projects in their Region. This list is used to create the Regions 3-year resurfacing plan. Chief Engineer Objective: 70% of planned resurfacing projects match Pavement Management Recommendations. Chief Engineer Objective: 70% of planned resurfacing projects match Pavement Management Recommendations. –Currently achieving 76% match.

Pavement Management Inputs/Processing/Outputs Pavement Management Models Regional Project Inventories DTD data (Traffic and Climate Zones) Roadway Condition Data Index Equations Remaining Service Life Roadway Images and Inventory Good/Fair/Poor Maps (Current Network Condition) Future 20-Year Network Condition Projections Project Costs and Benefits Project Recommendation Lists Resurfacing Funding Allocations Maintenance Project Info CDOT Chief Engineers Objectives (Matching Projects)