THEOLOGY AND FALSIFICATION

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Anthony Flew and A. J. Ayer
Advertisements

The Religious Hypothesis
Religious language: Flew, Hare and Mitchell
Verificationism and religious language Michael Lacewing
LO: I will consider the falsification principle’s effect on religious language Hmk: Read Mark Vernon article on ‘The Via Negative’ before tomorrow’s lesson.
Epistemology revision Responses: add a ‘no false lemmas’ condition (J+T+B+N) Responses: replace ‘justified’ with ‘reliably formed’ (R+T+B) (reliabilism)
Rationality of Religious Belief Introduction to Philosophy Jason M. Chang.
Religious Language Speaking about God Part 1. Why Religious language? The concept of a God is: Something other Something timeless We talk of things using.
Religious Language  Language is about communication  Religious language is a means of communicating about religion  This can be within three contexts:
LO: I will know how thinkers have solved the problem of speaking meaningfully about God by making negative statements of what God is not.
Epistemology revision Concept empiricist arguments against concept innatism:  Alternative explanations (no such concept or concept re- defined as based.
Is it possible to verify statements about God? The Logical Positivists would say no – God is a metaphysical being and it is impossible to empirically verify.
John Wisdom’s Parable of the Gardener AS Philosophy God and the World – Seeing as hns adapted from richmond.
The Falsification Principle
My Philosophy teacher wants to kill me! Ellie: I think Karen is going to kill me. Rosie: She doesn’t seem that bad to me; she never acts like she hates.
Test 1.Where did the logical positivists meet? 2.Explain the meaning of cognitive and non-cognitive 4.Define an analytic statement 5.Define a synthetic.
The Cosmological Argument
What does it mean to be atheist and agnostic?
Religious language: cognitive or non-cognitive?
Extent to which Challenges to Religious Experience are Valid, including CF Davis
Religious language: the University debate
The Falsification Principle
Challenges to the falsification principle
Religious responses to the verification principle
THE VIA NEGATIVE STRENGTHS WEAKNESSES
Summarise the Verification Principle in 20 words
RM Hare - The Parable of the Paranoid Lunatic
RELIGIOUS LANGUAGE.
Reading material Articles: Tillich on symbols & Aquinas on analogy questions 1. What is art? 2. Does it open up new levels of reality for you? 3. Does.
THEOLOGY AND FALSIFICATION
THE COSMOLOGICAL ARGUMENT.
1 - FLEW AND THE PARABLE OF THE GARDENER
THEOLOGY AND FALSIFICATION
RECAP Odd one out Match them up 1. Hare 4. Hick 7. Flew 2. Swinburne
Aim: To understand the criticisms against the design argument.
The analogy of the Arrow
What do these pictures have in common?
THE ONTOLOGICAL ARGUMENT.
Is this statement meaningful?
‘Assess the credibility of the design argument for the existence of God’ (12 marks) The design argument for the existence of God is largely based upon.
4 B Criticisms of the verification and falsification principles
The Verification Principle
THE COSMOLOGICAL ARGUMENT.
What does the word ‘box’ mean?
In pairs, attempt to describe an object in the room by saying what it is not…. It is not red…..
RELIGIOUS LANGUAGE.
MITCHELL - INTRODUCTION
MITCHELL AND FLEW - OVERVIEW
How did we prove that the world was not flat?
Think, pair, share A: Explain Hick’s analogy of the celestial city B: Explain Swinburne’s analogy of the toy’s in the cupboard. A: Explain Hare’s analogy.
THEOLOGY AND FALSIFICATION
The Falsification Principle
What point is it trying to make?
What point is it trying to make?
THE DEBATE BETWEEN COPLESTON AND RUSSELL.
Critiques of Religious belief .
What point is it trying to make?
FLEW AND HARE - OVERVIEW
What point is it trying to make?
‘A triangle has three sides’
THE COSMOLOGICAL ARGUMENT.
The Teleological (Design) Argument
Is murder wrong? A: What is murder? B: What is the law on murder in the UK? A: Do you think murder is wrong? B: Do you think murder is wrong? ‘Garment.
By the end of today’s lesson you will
What has this got to do with religious language?
Argument for the existence of God
A guide for the perplexed (who think it is all meaningless)
Ethics, Philosophy and Religion
Philosopher’s Views on
Explanations for the Origins of
Presentation transcript:

THEOLOGY AND FALSIFICATION Antony Flew R.M. Hare

THEOLOGY AND FALSIFICATION ANTONY FLEW AND R.M. HARE PARAGRAPH 1 - AF Briefly summarise what Flew is saying in this paragraph. Whose parable was this originally? Who does the ‘Gardener’ represent? What do the flowers represent? What do the weeds represent? Why, at the end of the paragraph is the sceptic so frustrated with the believer? Key words or phrases to look out for so that you can identify which paragraph this is:

THEOLOGY AND FALSIFICATION ANTONY FLEW AND R.M. HARE PARAGRAPH 2 - AF Briefly summarise what Flew is saying in this paragraph. What does Flew mean by the term ’picture preference’? What are the two ways in which Flew thinks that sexual love can be understood? What does Flew say about the way in which most people actually understand the idea of spiritual love? What does it mean to ‘qualify’ an idea or statement? What does Flew mean when he says that religious beliefs suffer ‘death by a thousand qualifications’? Key words or phrases to look out for so that you can identify which paragraph this is:

THEOLOGY AND FALSIFICATION ANTONY FLEW AND R.M. HARE PARAGRAPH 3 - AF Briefly summarise what Flew is saying in this paragraph. What does it mean to view religious language in a ‘liberal’ sense? What does it mean to view religious language in a ‘traditional’ sense? What does Flew think about the liberal understanding of religious language? Which type of interpretation of religious language does Flew express that he is going to focus on? Key words or phrases to look out for so that you can identify which paragraph this is:

THEOLOGY AND FALSIFICATION ANTONY FLEW AND R.M. HARE PARAGRAPH 4 - AF Briefly summarise what Flew is saying in this paragraph. What does Flew say about statements that don’t deny anything? According to Flew, what is an ‘assertion’? Why does Flew think that religious statements cannot count as assertions? Why does Flew find the claim that the ‘Gardener’ in the parable is invisible, intangible etc meaningless? Key words or phrases to look out for so that you can identify which paragraph this is:

THEOLOGY AND FALSIFICATION ANTONY FLEW AND R.M. HARE PARAGRAPH 5 - AF Briefly summarise what Flew is saying in this paragraph. Briefly explain the analogy that Flew uses to discredit the idea that God loves us like a father. Flew anticipates two responses from theists to the reason why God allows the child to suffer, what are they? What does Flew question about the existence of God and evil simultaneously? What does Flew conclude about people who continue to believe in God despite incidences of great suffering? Key words or phrases to look out for so that you can identify which paragraph this is:

THEOLOGY AND FALSIFICATION ANTONY FLEW AND R.M. HARE PARAGRAPH 6 - RH Briefly summarise what Flew is saying in this paragraph. Why would Flew find the student’s claims meaningless? Why does Hare argue that the student’s claims are meaningful? What do Hare’s ideas suggest about how he views Flew’s work (see analysis section for paragraph 6). Key words or phrases to look out for so that you can identify which paragraph this is:

THEOLOGY AND FALSIFICATION ANTONY FLEW AND R.M. HARE PARAGRAPH S 7 AND 8 RH Briefly summarise what Flew is saying in this paragraph. What is a blik? What does Hare says that we use are bliks to do? What does it mean to ‘cherry pick’? Where else is the idea (although not the name) of bliks used? Key words or phrases to look out for so that you can identify which paragraph this is:

THEOLOGY AND FALSIFICATION ANTONY FLEW AND R.M. HARE PARAGRAPH 9 RH Briefly summarise what Flew is saying in this paragraph. What is Hume famous for What did Hume say that the fundamental flaw with inductive arguments was? Explain the blik of God ‘bearing up the pillars’ What does Hare conclude about bliks and proof? Key words or phrases to look out for so that you can identify which paragraph this is:

THEOLOGY AND FALSIFICATION ANTONY FLEW AND R.M. HARE PARAGRAPH 10 RH Briefly summarise what Flew is saying in this paragraph. How does Hare respond to Flew’s criticism that religious statements are not falsifiable? Hare acknowledges that bliks cannot be verified or falsified but still believes that they are meaningful, why? Hare’s view of bliks is an anti-realist view of language. Why is this view sometimes unpopular with theists? (see analysis notes) Why might Hare’s view that atheism is also a blik be unpopular with atheists? Key words or phrases to look out for so that you can identify which paragraph this is:

THEOLOGY AND FALSIFICATION ANTONY FLEW AND R.M. HARE PARAGRAPH 11 RH Briefly summarise what Flew is saying in this paragraph. What does Hare suggest about many scholars who consider themselves to be atheists? What similarities does Hare propose that theists and atheists share? What point is Hare trying to make about Sikhs and Muslims? Why might Hare’s ideas about the similarities between different groups be unpopular (see analysis notes) What could be considered contradictory about Hare’s ideas about shared bliks? (see analysis notes) Key words or phrases to look out for so that you can identify which paragraph this is:

THEOLOGY AND FALSIFICATION ANTONY FLEW AND R.M. HARE PARAGRAPH 12 RH Briefly summarise what Flew is saying in this paragraph. How does Hare argue that the Parable of the Gardener and that of the Paranoid student are essentially different? What is the implication about scientific questions and whether we can be detached from them? Why do some philosophers believe that Hare is wrong to make the criticism of detachment? Why do some philosophers believe that Hare is justified in claiming that you cannot be detached about God? Key words or phrases to look out for so that you can identify which paragraph this is: