Town Hall Presentation January 9-10, 2002 Curtis Powell Vice President for Human Resources The Division of Human Resources and William M. Mercer, Incorporated.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Understanding Student Learning Objectives (S.L.O.s)
Advertisements

Planning Reports and Proposals
1 (c) 2008 The McGraw Hill Companies Redesigning Teacher Salary Structures School Finance: A Policy Perspective, 4e Chapter 12.
international strategic management
[Imagine School at North Port] Oral Exit Report Quality Assurance Review Team School Accreditation.
2 Session Objectives Increase participant understanding of effective financial monitoring based upon risk assessments of sub-grantees Increase participant.
1©Jerry P. Miller Outline: How the CI function emerges in a firm Behaviors, Values, & Support Structures How to Change Corporate Cultures Where to place.
1 The Academic Profession and the Managerial University: An International Comparative Study from Japan Akira Arimoto Research Institute for Higher Education.
The Managing Authority –Keystone of the Control System
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
FACTORING ax2 + bx + c Think “unfoil” Work down, Show all steps.
1 European benchmarking with the CAF ROME 17-18th of November 2003.
Writing Negative Messages
1 Demonstration Project Pay Administration WORKSHOP FOR MANAGERS.
OH 3-1 Finding and Recruiting New Employees Human Resources Management and Supervision 3 OH 3-1.
Presenter: Beresford Riley, Government of
EMS Checklist (ISO model)
1 Dr. Ashraf El-Farghly SECC. 2 Level 3 focus on the organization - Best practices are gathered across the organization. - Processes are tailored depending.
2009 Strategic Planning playbook
NIH RESEARCH CONTRACTS
1 Market Pricing Organizations seek to offer market based pay rates in order to attract and retain competent employees There are two basic methods to recognize.
GENERAL EDUCATION ASSESSMENT Nathan Lindsay January 22-23,
VOORBLAD.
Checking & Corrective Action
What is Pay & Performance?
1 The Road to Merit Pay Merit Pay Workshop August 2013 Office of Human Resources 1.
Careers at Western 1 Careers at Western: Talent Development.
Strategic Value of the HR Function Presentation by
Chapter 5 Test Review Sections 5-1 through 5-4.
CUPA-HR Strong – together!
CUPA-HR Strong – together!
25 seconds left…...
Compensation & Classification Study Brevard Public Schools Compensation & Classification Study Brevard Public Schools July 17, 2007 Employee Orientations.
COMPENSATION AND BENEFITS STUDY March 21, CONTENTS.
Controlling as a Management Function
We will resume in: 25 Minutes.
1 Phase III: Planning Action Developing Improvement Plans.
Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Overview of the Classification and Compensation Plan Review Presented by: CBIZ Human Capital Services December 15, 2014.
The Career and Compensation Program (CCP) is a new pay and career framework designed to enhance the University's ’Canes Total Rewards package by providing.
Faculty & Staff Compensation Programs Board of Regents Meeting
Human Resources Office of 1 Classification and Compensation Redesign Job Family Studies Project Overview.
Human Resources Peer Network Fundamentals of Compensation and Utilizing the CPCA Compensation & Benefits Survey April 3, 2014 Presented by: Brenda Gilchrist,
Human Resources Office of 1 Job Classification System Redesign Information Session Health Care and Animal Care October 28, 2014.
Human Resources Office of 1 Job Classification System Redesign Information Session Student Services July 2014 Sheila Reger, HR Consulting Manager Matt.
Non-Academic Staff Compensation Structure & Administration
Career + Compensation Program?
Competitive Market Compensation Review July 2009 Project Overview.
Performance Management Open Information Session Spring 2009.
What is the Global Grading Project
21 st Century Maricopa Review of Process Human Resources Projects Steering Team Meeting May 12, 2010.
Erin Packwood 2005 Competitive Compensation Review Electric Reliability Council of Texas (ERCOT) January 17, 2006.
Staff Compensation Program – Phase 2 Internal Equity Adjustments October 2005.
Non-Academic Staff Compensation Program Employee Presentation 2013.
1 ACC FY07 Classification and Compensation Study.
Compensation Project Faculty & Staff Compensation Programs Board of Regents Finance Committee Meeting Project Overview
Butler University Compensation Study. b a c kn e x t h o m e About Fox Lawson & Associates  Bought Practice From Ernst & Young  Compensation Specialists.
Administrative Review & Restructuring. 1 The President’s Charge Review administrative organization and delivery of administrative services at all levels.
TOTAL REWARDS ANNUAL ACTION ITEM #2. 2 AGENDA  Purpose of the Presentation  Our Approach  Total Rewards Philosophy Review  Compensation- Current State/Future.
Compensation Study Preliminary Results Presented by: CBIZ Human Capital Services January 11, 2016.
Discussion on Compensation. Goal To assist in securing and retaining a staff of necessary quality to achieve the goals and objectives of the organization.
City of Galveston Classification & Compensation Study Discussion Preliminary Findings and Recommendations.
FY2017 Market Program Overview Manager Sessions. 2 Agenda Market Program Refresher FY2017 Market and New Hire Minimum Overview Key Messages and Next Steps.
Agenda • Introductions • Project Objectives • Project Steps
The University Career Architecture Project (UCAP) is designed to better define jobs, support career progression, and align compensation practices with.
Presentation transcript:

Town Hall Presentation January 9-10, 2002 Curtis Powell Vice President for Human Resources The Division of Human Resources and William M. Mercer, Incorporated

2 Todays Town Hall Objectives 1.Meet the Project Team 2.Discuss why Rensselaer launched this initiative 3.Discuss why Mercer was selected 4.Review the Project Plan 5.Show our progress to date 6.Discuss what this means to you 7.Answer questions

3 Objective #1: Meet the Project Team

4 The Project Team Curtis PowellRensselaer VP, Division of Human Resources Anne BilynskyRensselaer Manager, Compensation Kathy McNamaraRensselaer HR Specialist Kimberly KeatingMercer Senior Consultant Dr. Andrew KleinMercer Higher Education Practice Leader

5 Objective #2: Discuss why Rensselaer launched this initiative

6 Where We Want to Be Develop a total compensation system that will guide the design, implementation, and administration of your compensation program(s). It will ensure that job performance, compensation levels, and training programs are aligned with the Rensselaer Plan and your Divisions/Schools Performance Plan.

7 Developing the Total Compensation System In partnership with Mercer, Rensselaer will develop the following: Compensation Philosophy & Strategy Staff Compensation Program Faculty Compensation Program Variable Pay Program Implementation Process & Supporting Communication & Training Materials The Rensselaer Plan

8 Objective #3: Discuss why Mercer was selected

9 William M. Mercer, Incorporated Mercer consultants: Offer years of experience and have developed and implemented compensation systems in higher education. Offer years of experience and have developed and implemented compensation systems in higher education. Have access to vast data resources: Have access to vast data resources: Worlds largest human resource consulting firm, with annual revenue of approximately $2.0 billion Worlds largest human resource consulting firm, with annual revenue of approximately $2.0 billion More than 13,000 employees More than 13,000 employees 136 cities 136 cities 40 countries 40 countries Will work as a team with the Division of HR to design the best program for Rensselaer Will work as a team with the Division of HR to design the best program for Rensselaer

10 Objective #4: Review our Project Plan

11 STEP 1 - Compensation Philosophy and Strategy Development STEP 2a - Faculty and Staff Base Pay and Compensation Program Design Begin project; start to learn issues, philosophy, business and strategic plan Develop compensation philosophy and strategy and communication strategy; identify benchmark jobs Interviews leadership to understand expectations, gain perspective, ascertain desired outcomes Develop, test and finalize slotting methodology for non- benchmark staff jobs Develop base pay structure scenarios for staff jobs and competitive ranges for faculty jobs Conduct competitive market assessment of base and total cash compensation for 250 benchmark staff and faculty jobs Project Plan STEP 2b - Variable Plan Design Develop plan; design straw model; rewrite reaction models Develop variable pay program goals, culture issues, and funding limits Build plan documents for program; review costing to ensure affordability

12 STEP 3 - Program Costing Cost program alternatives, finalize approved designs Place non-benchmark faculty and staff in grades based on job evaluation and career ladder structure STEP 4 - Recommendations for Implementation Obtain Presidents approval to proceed Present recommendations to the President and Members of the Presidents Cabinet STEP 5 - Training STEP 6 - Implementation - July 2002 Develop and implement compensation policies and procedures and administrative guidelines Identify internal adjustments and finalize titling standards Begin training supervisors and informing faculty and staff of new program Begin Implementation Structure Titles Career ladders Project Plan

13 Objective #5: Show our progress to date –Research –What we learned –Status

14 Research Findings are based on information gathered through: Meetings with President Jackson, key leadership, faculty and staff Meetings with President Jackson, key leadership, faculty and staff Analysis of faculty and staff compensation data and the external marketplace Analysis of faculty and staff compensation data and the external marketplace Review of Rensselaers communications, internal published materials, and manuals Review of Rensselaers communications, internal published materials, and manuals

15 Research Review of individual performance management tools and/or job descriptions across the Institute Review of individual performance management tools and/or job descriptions across the Institute Working sessions and focus groups with staff and faculty representatives at Troy and Hartford Working sessions and focus groups with staff and faculty representatives at Troy and Hartford Division presentations Division presentations Analysis of best practices in higher education, not- for-profit, and for-profit organizations Analysis of best practices in higher education, not- for-profit, and for-profit organizations

16 What we learned... There are inconsistent messages about what is important. Study Finding # 2 Study Finding # 1 There is no Institute-wide, systematic approach for administering staff compensation. A number of systems have been developed across the campus on an ad-hoc basis.

17 What we learned... The faculty have established titles and career movement criteria that correspond to pay. A benchmarking study will assess current practices. Study Finding # 4 Study Finding # 3 Career paths are not well defined for most staff job families.

18 What we learned... The performance standards for faculty and performance management tools for staff are still being integrated into the total compensation system. Study Finding # 6 Inconsistent job titling is creating internal equity issues. Study Finding # 5

19 What we learned... There is a prevailing view that most people are underpaid. Based on a preliminary staff assessment, 80% of staff are within the competitive range of their position. Study Finding # 7 Rensselaer does not have a systematic way to attract and retain world- class faculty. Study Finding # 8

20 Status We have preliminarily defined our target markets as follows: * Geographic differentials calibrate the data for Troy and Hartford

21 Status We are in the process of finalizing the following ladders: Management Career Ladder Management Career Ladder Professional Career Ladder Professional Career Ladder Information Technology Career Ladder Information Technology Career Ladder Administrative Support Career Ladder Administrative Support Career Ladder Research/Scientific Career Ladder Research/Scientific Career Ladder

22 Status

23 Immediate Next Steps Finalize staff career ladders Finalize staff career ladders Complete the development of staff pay structures Complete the development of staff pay structures Refine staff titles Refine staff titles Continue/complete faculty external market analysis Continue/complete faculty external market analysis

24 Objective #6: Discuss what this means to you

25 The New Rensselaer Total Compensation System Salaries are going to be managed within a system. Every position will be placed in a salary grade with a defined minimum and maximum. Salaries are going to be managed within a system. Every position will be placed in a salary grade with a defined minimum and maximum. The salary system will be based on analysis of the external marketplace and an assessment of the unique value system at Rensselaer. The salary system will be based on analysis of the external marketplace and an assessment of the unique value system at Rensselaer. Defined career paths will help staff map out their career strategies. Defined career paths will help staff map out their career strategies. Fairness Competitiveness Career Opportunities

26 The New Rensselaer Total Compensation System Titles will be revised to reflect the new system and to ensure that they are consistent across the Institute. Titles will be revised to reflect the new system and to ensure that they are consistent across the Institute. Regulatory Compliance Labor regulations require that with a new/revised program of pay and rewards we conduct an audit to ensure continued compliance. Labor regulations require that with a new/revised program of pay and rewards we conduct an audit to ensure continued compliance. Title Consistency

27 Objective #7: Answer questions

28 Questions & Answers