JTLS-GO in KIDA 11. Dec. 2018.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Bulk Petroleum Executive Agent Cynthia F. Smith PETRO May 30, 2012.
Advertisements

InformationInWarfareIW-100 College of Aerospace Doctrine, Research, and Education.
What you can’t defend, doesn’t belong to you..  To ensure that Singapore enjoys peace and stability, and that Singapore’s sovereignty and territorial.
Product Support Manager Conference Incentivizing Industry Panel Vice Chair, Logistics Division National Defense Industrial Association 15 January 2015.
Applications in Acquisition Changing Defense Environment.
United States Marine Corps
Lesson 1 Dept of Defense Organization
Institutional Effectiveness Operational Update Presentation made to the Indiana State University Board of Trustees October 5, 2001.
POLICY AND PLANNING BRANCH (PPB) Proposed M&E action plan Charles Mvula IAC WAGENINGEN UR February 9 –
SEABEE COMBAT WARFARE NCF OFFICER SPECIFIC
The Department of the Navy
EDUCATION AT THE NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR DEFENSE STUDIES (NIDS) THE IMPROVEMENT OF CURRICULUM NIDS Tokyo, Japan JAPAN MINISTRY OF DEFENSE October, 2007.
Naval Organization Chapter 6 BMR
Study of Chinese Seed Project Informationization Shang Shuqi Qingdao Agricultural University Shandong,China Tel
IAUP North East Asia Conference Quality Assurance and Enhancement of Higher Education National University of Kaohsiung, Kaohsiung, Taiwan / R.O.C. October,
CTTSO Overview John Morgan, Deputy Director for Science and Technology, CTTSO September 2010.
Korea Environment Institute KEI Introduction Government-sponsored research institute, under the Prime Minster’s office involved in policy development.
United States Armed Forces
DASD (Plans) Directorate for Interagency Planning and Assessments UNCLASSIFIED.
INTOSAI Public Debt Working Group Updating of the Strategic Plan Richard Domingue Office of the Auditor General of Canada June 14, 2010.
REPUBLIC of MOLDOVA The MILITARY REFORM. The necessity of military reform is determined by: imperfection of presentimperfection of present state security.
Nursing Home Incident Command System
Cultural Resource Management in the Department of Defense September 29, 2005 Maureen Sullivan Federal Preservation Officer.
Air Force Doctrine Document 2-1: Air Warfare
1 A CASE STUDY: Organization and Workforce for Operations at Maryland State Highway Administration Glenn McLaughlin, Deputy Director Office of CHART and.
1 Institutional Adaptation Panel Association of the United States Army Mr. Dean G. Popps Acting Assistant Secretary of the Army (Acquisition, Logistics.
BPK Strategic Planning: Briefing for Denpasar Regional Office Leadership Team Craig Anderson Ahmed Fajarprana August 11-12, 2005.
POLISH CAPABILITY DEVELOPMENT FOR ARMOURED AND MECHANISED FORCES
Transparency in Armaments / Military confidence-building measures 28 February, 2013.
Developing Proposals for a System of Indicators on the Nation’s Environment (the SINE) H. Theodore Heintz, Jr. Indicator Coordinator White House Council.
EU military crisis management capabilities
Agenda Command Structure Mission Operating Environment Conclusion.
Can North Korea Build More Nuclear Weapons?. A North Korean People’s Army naval unit tests a new type of anti-ship cruise missile in this undated photo.
Building a Culture of Research Ethics in the Ontario Colleges OTTE ROSENKRANTZ PHD.
Health Management Dr. Sireen Alkhaldi, DrPH Community Medicine Faculty of Medicine, The University of Jordan First Semester 2015 / 2016.
United Nations Economic Commission for Europe Statistical Division WHAT MAKES AN EFFECTIVE AND EFFICIENT STATISTICAL SYSTEM Lidia Bratanova, Statistical.
Strategic and Business Planning for Ensuring of Cooperatives Sustainability Dr. Hakkı Çetin TARIS Union of Olive and Olive Oil Agricultural Sale Cooperatives.
HLC Criterion Five Primer Thursday, Nov. 5, :40 – 11:40 a.m. Event Center.
Leadership Guide for Strategic Information Management Leadership Guide for Strategic Information Management for State DOTs NCHRP Project Information.
RCUK International Funding Name Job title Research Councils UK.
Imagine, Create, and Secure a Stronger Peace… National Defense University Col Kris Bauman, USAF, PhD Senior Military Fellow, Institute for National Strategic.
U.S. in WWII: Pacific Theater
January 23,  Balance state’s higher education long range plan and agency operations in the required strategic plan;  Involve agency staff in.
RESEARCH CENTER FOR ENERGY STRATEGIES AND POLICIES OF TURKEY
Asia’s Transformation:
HSTS114 Official, Social & Economic Statistics
What is the main difference between the Truman Doctrine and the Marshall Plan? Bell Ringer.
Department of Health Philippines Short Briefing.
“Existing world order is being redefined.” Henry Kissinger Jan 2015
Parts Management Plan Builder 26 July 07
Project Cycle Management
Independent Budget Analysis: Tools and Techniques
Simulation architecture for ROK-US Combined exercises
Should the United States have gone to war with Korea?
Architecture Tool Vendor’s Day
US Marine Corps
GCC and Military Power Mohammed Hassan Ali Alshidi.
Commercial Item Group Overview.
What is the main difference between the Truman Doctrine and the Marshall Plan? Bell Ringer.
Find a seat and get your binder Bellringer
The Kirtland National Security Complex
Public Policy Foreign and Domestic.
Human resource and Work flow of the Research Office, RUPP
DIAGNOSTIC FRAMEWORK: National Accounts and Supporting Statistics
Research Issues & Projects Sadiq M. Sait
Review of the Incident Command System
Country Experiences in Mitigation Assessment : Republic of Korea
Ðì SA Effective Monitoring and Evaluation of Progress on the SDGs Monitoring SDGs : the perspective of Armstat Learning Conference: Implementing.
Implementing the 2030 Agenda in the Asia- Pacific region, January 2019, Shanghai Institutional arrangements to facilitate coherence in sustainable.
DIAGNOSTIC FRAMEWORK: National Accounts and Supporting Statistics
Presentation transcript:

JTLS-GO in KIDA 11. Dec. 2018

Agenda Korea Theater KIDA Force Requirements Analysis & Evaluation Group JTLS-GO in Korea

Agenda Korea Theater KIDA Force Requirements Analysis & Evaluation Group JTLS-GO in Korea

Korea Theater (1/4) Geopolitical position Military Peninsula in Northeast Asia Surrounded by 4 great power countries : USA, Japan, China, Russia Military Predominantly land theater Air support can be decisive Naval operations exert heavy influences Amphibious turning movements Russia North Korea South Korea China Japan USA Taiwan Pacific Ocean picture source: Google Map

Korea Theater (2/4) North Korea Garrison country On service: 1,280,000 soldiers Reserve force: 7,500,000 soldiers One of the worlds poorest nation The electronic situation is poor Don’t enough food, so many children suffer from malnutrition One of few dictatorship country in the world All people have dictators picture at home, and bow every morning picture source: www.naver.com

Korea Theater (3/4) North Korea(cont.) In spite of their economic condition, they have threatening military power Conventional weapons Troops /Service Period Tanks Armored Vehicles Field Artillery Aircrafts Combatants Vessels North KOR 1,280,000/12 years 4,300 2,500 14,000 819 430 South KOR 600,000/2 years 2,400 2,700 5,900 410 110 source: 2016 Defense White Paper, ROK ※ However, almost North Korean conventional weapons are old and out of date.

Korea Theater (4/4) North Korea(cont.) So, trying to get asymmetric force Nuclear and Ballistic Missile SCUD-C SCUD-ER Nodong Musudan Daepodong Russia Alaska China Washington Japan Pacific Ocean Guam Australia over over picture source: www.naver.com source: 2016 Defense White Paper, ROK

Agenda Korea Theater KIDA Force Requirements Analysis & Evaluation Group JTLS-GO in Korea

KIDA (1/2) Who is KIDA? Established in 1979 Purpose Government-funded national research institute Purpose Improving security and defense policy-making by providing academic and analytical research on overall security and defense policies Korea Institute for Defense Analyses www.kida.re.kr

KIDA (2/2) Organization chart President Vice President Center for Security & Strategy Military Analysis & Planning Defense Human Resource Management Defense Resource Management Defense Acquisition & Requirements Analysis Defense Information System Management Group Force Requirements Analysis & Evaluation Group Acquisition Assessment Group Cost Analysis Division Div. Administrative Support Div. Planning & Coordination President Vice President KIDA consists of the Board of Trustees, Office of the President and its supporting departments and offices, and 4 research centers, namely, the Center for Security and Strategy, the Center for Military Planning, the Center for Defense Acquisition, and the Center for Resource & Manpower Management, as well as the Defense Information System Management Group. KIDA performs the following tasks in five core research areas: Conducts research and develops alternatives on the security environment and basic defense policies Engages in research on military strategy and military force construction Carries out research for the selection and acquisition of weapons systems Undertakes research on defense resource and manpower management policies Provides support for defense informatization policies and projects ※ Current Workforce 544 including 398 researchers in KIDA

Agenda Korea Theater KIDA Force Requirements Analysis & Evaluation Group JTLS-GO in Korea

Force Requirements Analysis & Evaluation Group (1/2) Position Agency of ROK MND Research Areas Main Analysis & evaluation for force requirements of ROK ARMY to verify the appropriateness, necessity and priority of the force requirements Adjust priority between force requirements Supporting main area Studying methodologies to analyze and evaluate military forces Data management for our research Ministry of National Defense The ROK armed forces have been requiring new capabilities to fight due to changes in security environment and obsolescence of conventional weapon systems. With constraints of the defense budget and a new form of warfare issues to consider, Force Requirements Analysis and Evaluation Group(FRAEG) conducts a study on overall perspective of the requirements. For this purpose, the tools and methodology of decision-making and DM&S are used to analyze and evaluate operational necessity, capabilities, quantities, and priority of required forces. We also offers rational alternatives to military decision-makers under a comprehensive point of view such as enhancement of the forces and the efficiency of defense budget management. ※ Current Workforce: 30 researchers

Force Requirements Analysis & Evaluation Group (2/2) What to do? Scope Contents Analysis & Evaluation of issues (1) Necessity (2) ROC (Required Operational Capability) (3) Required Quantity (4) Timing of Force Integration Identify and analyze issues for the target force requirement Necessity: Assess whether the requirement has the ability to supplement deficiencies ROC: Evaluate the over-capacity and lack of performance of weapon systems Required Quantity: Assess the quantity required for mission Timing of Force Integration: Evaluate the lack of capacity by time Analysis & Evaluation of alternatives Alternative establishment Alternative assessment (2-1) Operational effect assessment (2-2) Total Life Cycle cost (2-3) Risk and technical factors (2-4) Policy factors, etc. Establish competitive alternatives centering on identified issues Compare each alternative: Basic plan and comparative alternative – considering operational and non-operational effects. Expert panel evaluation Deriving results through professional panel evaluations

Agenda Korea Theater KIDA? Force Requirements Analysis & Evaluation Group JTLS-GO in Korea

History of JTLS in Korea Main User/Purpose How get KIDA’s Role Combined Forces Command Getting JTLS ver. 1.65 from CFC in 1991 Getting JTLS ver. 1.8 from CFC in 1996 ROK JCS/Command and staffs Ex. Using JTLS during 1996 ~ 2003 Current, using self-developed model Technical support Buying JTLS ver. 2.4 from ROLANDS during 2002~2010 Maintain contraction with ROLANDS Latest getting: ver. 3.3 in 2010 Air Univ./To give an experience for joint warfare for the student Using JTLS during 2002 ~ 2010 Current, using self-developed model Support for Theater Data

Current Simulation Tools What we have to support Force Requirements Analysis & Evaluation Resolution Ground Air Naval STORM NORAM AWAM Self-developing in KIDA Army Weapon effectiveness analysis model A-9(US) developing Synthetic Theater Operations Research Model ROK ARMY developing Naval Operations Research & Analysis Model RAND(US) developing Joint Integrated Contingency Model EADSIM TB(US) developing Extended Air Defense Simulation JICM Vision 21 ROK ARMY developing ※ Insufficient Area: Simulation for joint operations

Why we need JTLS-GO To supplement our insufficient field Analysis for joint operations & operation level battle field Resolution Ground Air Naval STORM NORAM AWAM Self-developing in KIDA Army Weapon effectiveness analysis model A-9(US) developing Synthetic Theater Operations Research Model RAND(US) developing Joint Integrated Contingency Model EADSIM TB(US) developing Extended Air Defense Simulation JICM JTLS-GO Vision 21 Naval Operations Research & Analysis Model ROK ARMY developing

Why we need JTLS-GO KIDA joins JTLS-GO Users group this year We will use it in the analysis & evaluation of force requirements Resolution Ground Air Naval STORM NORAM AWAM Self-developing Army Weapon effectiveness analysis model A-9(US) developing Synthetic Theater Operations Research Model RAND(US) developing Joint Integrated Contingency Model EADSIM TB(US) developing Extended Air Defense Simulation JICM JTLS-GO Vision 21 Naval Operations Research & Analysis Model ROK ARMY developing Please, give me Congratulations !!!

Thank You! Sang-yun Jeong Ph.D. e-mail: syjung@kida.re.kr, mathjung@naver.com Chief of Force Requirements Analysis & Evaluation Group Korea Institute for Defense Analyses