Dynamic criteria Biorid

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 KOREA GTR No.7 2 nd Phase Research Results Dec. 8, 2009 Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs, Korea Automobile Testing and Research Institute.
Advertisements

51 st GRSP Session Draft new Regulation on child restraint systems Pierre CASTAING Informal document GRSP (51 st GRSP, May 2012, agenda item.
Actual needed height of head restraints Follow up of discussions during IWG on gtr No.7 in London, March 2012 Hans Ammerlaan - Netherlands Update GRSP.
Pedestrian Safety GTR Leg Impact Testing 42 nd Session of GRSP December 2007 Transmitted by the expert from USA Informal Document No. GRSP (42 nd.
GTR Head restraints ES Page 1 HR-7-8 GTR Head restraints Dynamic test procedure Trigger-point in dynamic test procedure.
47th GRSP Session Status report of Informal Group on CRS Pierre CASTAING Chairman Informal Document No. GRSP (47th session, May 2010, agenda.
GTR-7 IWG Meeting 3 – Summary of Decisions and Actions Page  1  Harmonised drawings -Most drawings and tolerance agreed. Completion expected June  Upright.
Impact-Shield Type CRS in JNCAP National Agency for Automotive Safety and Victims ’ Aid Informal document No. GRSP Rev.1 (43rd GRSP, May 2008.
2014 KNCAP Updated Status Korea Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport Submitted by the expert from Republic of Korea Informal document GRSP
Head Restraint GTR Status to AC th Session of WP.29 March 2007 Informal document No. WP , March 2007, agenda item II
Status report GRSP IWG ECRS 53rd GRSP Geneva May 2013 Informal document GRSP (53 nd GRSP, May 2013, agenda item 19)
CLEPA analysis Future i-Size approval possibilities FOR GRSP CONSIDERATION 15 May CLEPA logo Informal document GRSP (53 nd GRSP, May.
Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport Clarification of Relaxation Area(s) for Flexible lower legform to bumper test Submitted by the expert from.
STATUS OF CRS IN BUSES AND COACHES 44TH GRSP (9-12 DECEMBER) Informal document No. GRSP (44th GRSP, December 2008, agenda item 19(b))
Fourth progress report of the informal group on Phase 2 of gtr No. 9 (IG GTR9 - PH2) Transmitted by the experts of Japan and Germany Informal document.
ISOFIX FRENCH PROPOSAL (DOCUMENTS TRANS/WP29/GRSP/2001/14Rev1; 2001/15Rev1 and 2001/16Rev1) GRSP 13-17/05/2002.
44th GRSP Session Status report of Informal Group on CRS Pierre CASTAING Chairman Informal Document No. GRSP (44th session, December 2008,
Headform tests Data INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION OF MOTOR VEHICLE MANUFACTURERS January 06 Pedestrian Safety GRSP Informal Group January 06.
EEVC WG20 European Enhanced Vehicle-safety Committee 12 th December, 2006 Slide 1 EEVC WG20 and WG12 Rear Impact Test Procedure Development Programme Presented.
46th GRSP Session Status report of Informal Group on CRS Pierre CASTAING Chairman Informal Document No. GRSP (46th session, December 2009,
44th GRSP Session Status report of Informal Group on FI Pierre CASTAING Chairman Informal Document No. GRSP (44th session, December 2008, agenda.
Traffic Accidents caused by Lane Departure in Japan  Data of Traffic Accidents around Japan Transmitted by the expert from Japan Informal document GRRF
Global Harmonisation OICA Priorities UN/ECE/WP.29/AC3 13 November Informal document No. WP th WP.29, November 2008, agenda item.
1 Research on Chest Injury Criteria JASIC 54 th GRSP December, 2013 Submitted by the expert from Japan Informal document GRSP (54 th GRSP,
1 Atsuhiro Konosu Chairperson of Flex-TEG, Japan Status Report on Flexible Pedestrian Legform Impactor Technical Evaluation Group (Flex-TEG) Activities.
1 Status Report on Flexible Pedestrian Legform Impactor Technical Evaluation Group (Flex-TEG) Activities Status Report on Flexible Pedestrian Legform Impactor.
Introduction to Revision of GTR 7
1 GRPE Informal Working Group on Heavy Duty Hybrids UNITED NATIONS Report to GRPE 65 Geneva, 17 January 2013 Informal document No. GRPE (65th GRPE,
December 2015 Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism Transmitted by the expert from JapanGRSP Rev.1 (58th GRSP, 8-11 December 2015,
Short Report Status of GTR No. 7/BioRID TEG
Head Restraints Working Group Meeting Paris, France February 1-2, 2005 U.S. FMVSS No. 202 Final Rule Head Restraint IWG Document:HR-1-8.
3 rd Meeting of the IWG GTR No. 7 Draft Status Report of the BioRID TEG Bernd Lorenz (BASt) Chairman Geneva,17 th May 2010 GTR
Draft Status Report of the BioRID TEG Bernd Lorenz (BASt) Chairman 51 st GRSP Geneva, 21 st May 2012 Informal document GRSP (51st GRSP, 21–25 May.
WorldSID Update Edmund Hautmann BMW Group On behalf of the WorldSID Task Group 34 th GRSP Session Geneva, December 8-12, 2003 Edmund Hautmann BMW Group.
Japanese Proposal for the New Regulation JASIC / Japan GRSP Inf. Group on Child Restraint Systems CRS April 11th, 2012 Informal document GRSP
Regulations of Crash Safety about HEV and EV MLIT, Japan December 2006 Informal Document No. GRSP th GRSP 12th- 15th December 2006 Agenda Item.
Proposal of the Informal Working Group on Head Restraints GTR Phase 2 JAPAN Informal document No. GRSP (43rd GRSP, May 2008, agenda item.
1 Status Report on Flexible Pedestrian Legform Impactor Technical Evaluation Group (Flex-TEG) Activities Status Report on Flexible Pedestrian Legform Impactor.
Starting note on gearshift issues
Meeting Review – GTR #7 Phase II 44 th Session of GRSP December 2008 Informal Document No. GRSP (44th session, December 2008, agenda.
WorldSID Update Edmund Hautmann BMW Group On behalf of the WorldSID Task Group 37 th GRSP Session Geneva, May 23 rd -27 th, 2005 Edmund Hautmann BMW Group.
Japan’s Proposal and Clarification 57th GRSP Informal Group on Child Restraint System 23rd March 2016 JASIC.
Chalmers University of Technology Suggestions for new BioRID certification procedures By Johan Davidsson, Chalmers University of Technology GTR
GRSP Ad hoc Group on R44 COP
Japan’s Stance for the R129 Phase 2
Transmitted by the expert from CLEPA Informal document GRSP-57-25
Regulation 129 CLEPA response to
Submitted by expert from France
Gtr7 measuring method for effective head restraint height
CHILD OCCUPANT SAFETY WORKING GROUP 18 Jean-Yves LE COZ Chairman
Bundesanstalt für Straßenwesen
Response to ANEC proposal for Booster phase out in R44
GRSP May 2016 ECE R129 Amendments N°1 & 2
JASIC Japan ______ 61st GRSP Session May 2017
UN-Regulation No. 80 Additional Information to GRSP-62-35
Status report GRSP IWG FI
BioRIDII Repeatability on Production Seat
CLEPA analysis of belt contact width measurement (ref. GRSP/2018/6)
Submitted by the expert from Republic of Korea
BioRID vs. HIII Develop new “side-by-side” buck
Harmonization of Crash Regulations in Korea
Introduction to Revision of GTR 7
Informal document GRSP Add.1
GRSP December 2016 ECE R129 Amendments N°1 & 2
GRSP December 2016 ECE R129 Amendments N°1 & 2
Summary of Proposed Amendment to gtr 9
Submitted by the expert
Introduction to Revision of GTR 7
52nd GRSP Session Status report of Informal Group on FI
GRSP Inf. Group on Child Restraint Systems CRS-31-08
Presentation transcript:

Dynamic criteria Biorid Transmitted by the expert from CLEPA Informal document GRSP-64-44 (64th GRSP 11-14 December 2018, agenda item 2) Dynamic criteria Biorid Clepa has investigated the industrial feasability of proposed GTR 7 Phase 2 dynamic proposed criteria. Proposed criteria and limits are :    

Dynamic criteria Biorid Transmitted by the expert from CLEPA Informal document GRSP-64-xx (64th GRSP 11-14 December 2018, agenda item xx) Dynamic criteria Biorid 1st investigation : data from JNCAP 2010/12 results at 17.6 km/h. Clepa has analyzed : If seats exceeded the Japanese Biomechanic proposed limits If seats exceeded the German Biomechanic proposed limits If seats can go into a serial production -> proposed limits – 20 % 41 data sets were checked for 40 vehicles, 1 vehicle has had 2 seat variants    

Dynamic criteria Biorid Transmitted by the expert from CLEPA Informal document GRSP-64-xx (64th GRSP 11-14 December 2018, agenda item xx) Dynamic criteria Biorid 1st investigation : data from JNCAP 2010/12 results at 17.6 km/h. Results: Several vehicles do not meet GTR7 dynamic criteria or would be too borderline to allow an industrialization of such seats. Do not meet criteria proposed by Japan : 2 out of 40 cars Too borderline to be allowed in serial production for a regulatory use when Japan criteria are used in regulations : 7 out of 40 cars Do not meet criteria proposed by Germany : 8 out of 40 cars Too borderline to be allowed in serial production for a regulatory use when German criteria are used in regulations : 18 out of 40 cars We were not able to determine if such 18 cars fulfilled the backset requirement of GTR7.    

Dynamic criteria Biorid Transmitted by the expert from CLEPA Informal document GRSP-64-xx (64th GRSP 11-14 December 2018, agenda item xx) Dynamic criteria Biorid Conclusion from data from JNCAP 2010/12 results at 17.6 km/h : Almost half of the vehicle seats will be eliminated from the market with the german proposal versus 2010/12 vehicles tested by JNCAP No injury curves are available on Fx- upper and Fx – lower and therefore those criteria shall not be included. The number of injury criteria can be reduced    

Dynamic criteria Biorid Transmitted by the expert from CLEPA Informal document GRSP-64-xx (64th GRSP 11-14 December 2018, agenda item xx) Dynamic criteria Biorid 2. Dynamic GTR7 phase 2 tests of GOOD EuroNcap seats by Clepa : Seats A, B, C, D and F have GOOD EuroNcap results, Seat E (1.46 out of 2 points) is near Good EuroNcap limit 3 seats were tested by changing pulse to GTR7 pulse, but maintaining Biorid setup of EuroNcap protocol with HRMD.(marked HRMD) 5 seats were tested by applying GTR7 pulse and GTR7 proposed Biorid set up (marked GTR7) Torso angle of 25° Orange : value exceed german proposal Yellow : value near to regulatory limit (within 20% band)    

Dynamic criteria Biorid Transmitted by the expert from CLEPA Informal document GRSP-64-xx (64th GRSP 11-14 December 2018, agenda item xx) Dynamic criteria Biorid 2. Dynamic GTR7 phase 2 tests of GOOD EuroNcap seats by Clepa : Results : 1 of 6 seats did not fulfill German proposal the seat not fulfilling german proposal was limit for GOOD EuroNcap rating 5 of the 6 seats would be too borderline to allow serial production in respect to german proposal 80 % of tested GOOD EuroNcap seats will not fulfill the requirements for industrial production and GTR7 phase 2 german proposed injury limits.    

Dynamic criteria Biorid Transmitted by the expert from CLEPA Informal document GRSP-64-xx (64th GRSP 11-14 December 2018, agenda item xx) Dynamic criteria Biorid 3. Results of more than 200 tests from seats released in serial production. Fx+ lower. A considerable amount of actual seats will not fulfill GTR7 dynamic proposed values of Germany. Clepa does not understand the statement from Germany that 95% of actual EuroNcap tested head restraints fulfill the values.    

Dynamic criteria Biorid Transmitted by the expert from CLEPA Informal document GRSP-64-xx (64th GRSP 11-14 December 2018, agenda item xx) Dynamic criteria Biorid 2. Dynamic GTR7 phase 2 tests of GOOD EuroNcap seats by Clepa : Results : 1 of 6 seats did not fulfill German proposal the seat not fulfilling german proposal was limit for GOOD EuroNcap rating 5 of the 6 seats would be too borderline to allow serial production in respect to german proposal 80 % of tested GOOD EuroNcap seats will not fulfill the requirements for industrial production and GTR7 phase 2 german proposed injury limits.    

Repeatability and reproducibility of Biorid Transmitted by the expert from CLEPA Informal document GRSP-64-xx (64th GRSP 11-14 December 2018, agenda item xx) Repeatability and reproducibility of Biorid 3. Clepa has done 6 repeatability tests of Biorid dummy in 2016 - 2018 Before and after calibration of Biorid dummy according to latest calibration recommandations from Humanetics, 3 times before and 3 times after calibration. The 3 sets of data for 3 calibrations were realized on 6 seats with Good EuroNcap results produced the same day to minimize seat variations with 16 km/h IIWPG pulse. Results for cv values of the 6 tests and variation of results expressed in +/- 2 sigma :    

Repeatability and reproducibility of Biorid Transmitted by the expert from CLEPA Informal document GRSP-64-xx (64th GRSP 11-14 December 2018, agenda item xx) Repeatability and reproducibility of Biorid Summary of repeatability and reproducibility studies of Humanetics : This data was already presented in the GTR7 group under GTR7- 16-02-HIS.    

Repeatability and reproducibility of Biorid Transmitted by the expert from CLEPA Informal document GRSP-64-xx (64th GRSP 11-14 December 2018, agenda item xx) Transmitted by the expert from CLEPA Informal document GRSP-64-xx (64th GRSP 11-14 December 2018, agenda item xx) Repeatability and reproducibility of Biorid Summary R&R for NIC and calibration corridor : Humanetics : Repeatability : cv = 9.9% and +/- 2 sigma = +/- 7 m²/s² Reproducibility : cv = 10.7% and +/- 2 sigma = +/- 7.5 m²/s² Clepa : Repeatability : : cv = 13.6% and +/- 2 sigma = +/- 3.8 m²/s² Calibration corridor : none for NIC, but influence by T1 acceleration corridor:    

Repeatability and reproducibility of Biorid Transmitted by the expert from CLEPA Informal document GRSP-64-xx (64th GRSP 11-14 December 2018, agenda item xx) Repeatability and reproducibility of Biorid Summary R&R for My+ upper and calibration corridor : Humanetics : Repeatability : cv = 1,7% and +/- 2 sigma = +/- 0.6 Nm Reproducibility : cv = 5,3% and +/- 2 sigma = +/- 1.6 Nm Clepa : Repeatability : cv = 15,3% and +/- 2 sigma = +/- 3.8 Nm Calibration corridor : here or here ?    

Repeatability and reproducibility of Biorid Transmitted by the expert from CLEPA Informal document GRSP-64-xx (64th GRSP 11-14 December 2018, agenda item xx) Repeatability and reproducibility of Biorid Summary R&R for Fx+ lower and calibration corridor : Humanetics : Repeatability : cv = 3,4% and +/- 2 sigma = +/- 15 N Reproducibility : cv = 10.5% and +/- 2 sigma = +/- 47 N Clepa : Repeatability : : cv = 10.7% and +/- 2 sigma = +/- 47 N Calibration corridor : +/- 150N    

Dynamic criteria Biorid Transmitted by the expert from CLEPA Informal document GRSP-64-xx (64th GRSP 11-14 December 2018, agenda item xx) Dynamic criteria Biorid Conclusion Repeatability and Reproducibility Clepa is concerned by R&R issues and calibration corridors of Biorid in addition to needed margin for serial production of seats. Those variations must be taken into account for the allowed regulatory values. Allowed variations of the dummy must be added to the injury criteria. NIC : 2 sigma of reproducibility of Biorid to be added. My+ upper : it is not clear if the right area has been studied for R&R, therefore Clepa proposes to add repeatability values obtained by Clepa. Fx+ lower : the corridor of GEN-X test is about +/- 150N and needs to be added.    

Dynamic criteria Biorid Transmitted by the expert from CLEPA Informal document GRSP-64-xx (64th GRSP 11-14 December 2018, agenda item xx) Dynamic criteria Biorid Conclusion Repeatability and Reproducibility Results : Clepa is concerned by R&R issues and calibration corridors of Biorid in addition to needed margin for serial production of seats. Those variations must be taken into account for the allowed regulatory values. Allowed variations of the dummy must be added to the injury criteria. NIC : 2 sigma of reproducibility of Biorid to be added. 2 sigma = 2 x cv (10.7%) x 23 = 5m²/s² My+ upper : it is not clear if the right area has been studied for R&R, therefore proposal to add repeatability values obtained by Clepa = 3.8 Nm Fx+ lower : the corridor of GEN-X test is about +/- 150N and needs to be added.    

Dynamic criteria Biorid Transmitted by the expert from CLEPA Informal document GRSP-64-xx (64th GRSP 11-14 December 2018, agenda item xx) Dynamic criteria Biorid Conclusion : Clepa does not support the german proposal on injury criteria as not justified by injury risk curves. Clepa supports the japanese proposal on injury criteria and values, with following changes : Supression of Fx- upper and Fx- lower as no injury curves have been shown There is a need for a review of all data for establishement of appropriate injury limits As example, Clepa believes following limits appropriate : NIC : 23 m²/s² + 5m²/s² = 28 m²/s² My+ upper : 34 Nm + 3.8 Nm = 37.8 Nm Fx+ lower : 640 N + 150N = 790 N