Volume 13, Issue 1, Pages (January 2013)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 4, Issue 2, Pages (August 2008)
Advertisements

Cotranscriptional Recruitment of the mRNA Export Factor Yra1 by Direct Interaction with the 3′ End Processing Factor Pcf11  Sara Ann Johnson, Gabrielle.
Anura Rambukkana, James L Salzer, Peter D Yurchenco, Elaine I Tuomanen 
A Novel Cofactor for p300 that Regulates the p53 Response
Volume 36, Issue 5, Pages (December 2009)
Phosphorylation of the WASP-VCA Domain Increases Its Affinity for the Arp2/3 Complex and Enhances Actin Polymerization by WASP  Giles O.C. Cory, Rainer.
Volume 22, Issue 3, Pages (May 2006)
Carlos Rio, Heather I Rieff, Peimin Qi, Gabriel Corfas  Neuron 
Structural and Functional Characterization of Factor H Mutations Associated with Atypical Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome  Pilar Sánchez-Corral, David Pérez-Caballero,
Volume 11, Issue 6, Pages (June 2012)
Volume 2, Issue 6, Pages (December 2007)
The UPEC Pore-Forming Toxin α-Hemolysin Triggers Proteolysis of Host Proteins to Disrupt Cell Adhesion, Inflammatory, and Survival Pathways  Bijaya K.
Volume 42, Issue 3, Pages (March 2015)
ASK1 Is Essential for JNK/SAPK Activation by TRAF2
Elias T. Spiliotis, Manuel Osorio, Martha C. Zúñiga, Michael Edidin 
Volume 45, Issue 5, Pages (March 2012)
Volume 15, Issue 6, Pages (December 2001)
Stuart W. Hicks, Guillaume Charron, Howard C. Hang, Jorge E. Galán 
Volume 24, Issue 5, Pages (May 2006)
Volume 48, Issue 2, Pages (October 2005)
Volume 22, Issue 6, Pages e4 (December 2017)
MyD88: An Adapter That Recruits IRAK to the IL-1 Receptor Complex
Volume 50, Issue 2, Pages (April 2006)
The Cytoplasmic Tail of the Mouse Brown Locus Product Determines Intracellular Stability and Export from the Endoplasmic Reticulum  Yiqing Xu, Setaluri.
Aldolase Is Essential for Energy Production and Bridging Adhesin-Actin Cytoskeletal Interactions during Parasite Invasion of Host Cells  G. Lucas Starnes,
Phospholipid Scramblase 1 Mediates Type I Interferon-Induced Protection against Staphylococcal α-Toxin  Miroslaw Lizak, Timur O. Yarovinsky  Cell Host.
Jungmook Lyu, Vicky Yamamoto, Wange Lu  Developmental Cell 
Volume 22, Issue 4, Pages (April 2005)
Volume 9, Issue 6, Pages (June 2011)
Volume 6, Issue 6, Pages (December 2000)
Volume 134, Issue 5, Pages (September 2008)
Monica Kong-Beltran, Jennifer Stamos, Dineli Wickramasinghe 
The Timing of Midzone Stabilization during Cytokinesis Depends on Myosin II Activity and an Interaction between INCENP and Actin  Jennifer Landino, Ryoma.
Yutian Peng, Lois S. Weisman  Developmental Cell 
WNK1 Phosphorylates Synaptotagmin 2 and Modulates Its Membrane Binding
Volume 50, Issue 2, Pages (April 2006)
C-Jun Downregulation by HDAC3-Dependent Transcriptional Repression Promotes Osmotic Stress-Induced Cell Apoptosis  Yan Xia, Ji Wang, Ta-Jen Liu, W.K.
Volume 25, Issue 5, Pages (November 2006)
DNA binding of activator protein-1 is increased in human mesangial cells cultured in high glucose concentrations  William A. Wilmer, Fernando G. Cosio 
Volume 5, Issue 3, Pages (March 2009)
c-Src Activates Endonuclease-Mediated mRNA Decay
Kentaro Abe, Masatoshi Takeichi  Neuron 
Volume 9, Issue 5, Pages (May 2011)
Volume 22, Issue 5, Pages e5 (November 2017)
Volume 12, Issue 6, Pages (December 2012)
Volume 103, Issue 6, Pages (December 2000)
Cotranscriptional Recruitment of the mRNA Export Factor Yra1 by Direct Interaction with the 3′ End Processing Factor Pcf11  Sara Ann Johnson, Gabrielle.
May K. Wang, Sun-Young Lim, Soo Mi Lee, James M. Cunningham 
Volume 8, Issue 4, Pages (October 2010)
Volume 22, Issue 5, Pages e5 (November 2017)
Ruth Halaban, Elaine Cheng  Journal of Investigative Dermatology 
Cellular 5′-3′ mRNA Exonuclease Xrn1 Controls Double-Stranded RNA Accumulation and Anti-Viral Responses  Hannah M. Burgess, Ian Mohr  Cell Host & Microbe 
Richard W. Deibler, Marc W. Kirschner  Molecular Cell 
Volume 90, Issue 2, Pages (July 1997)
A Stable Prefusion Intermediate of the Alphavirus Fusion Protein Reveals Critical Features of Class II Membrane Fusion  Claudia Sánchez-San Martín, Hernando.
Coxsackievirus Entry across Epithelial Tight Junctions Requires Occludin and the Small GTPases Rab34 and Rab5  Carolyn B. Coyne, Le Shen, Jerrold R. Turner,
Takashi Hayashi, Gavin Rumbaugh, Richard L. Huganir  Neuron 
Volume 2, Issue 6, Pages (December 2007)
Plexin-Neuropilin-1 Complexes Form Functional Semaphorin-3A Receptors
Regulation of Yeast mRNA 3′ End Processing by Phosphorylation
Growth Factor-Dependent Trafficking of Cerebellar NMDA Receptors via Protein Kinase B/Akt Phosphorylation of NR2C  Bo-Shiun Chen, Katherine W. Roche 
Changes in integrin expression during adipocyte differentiation
An Inhibitory Activity in Human Cells Restricts the Function of an Avian-like Influenza Virus Polymerase  Andrew Mehle, Jennifer A. Doudna  Cell Host.
Yuki Okuda-Shimizu, Linda M. Hendershot  Molecular Cell 
Michael U. Shiloh, Paolo Manzanillo, Jeffery S. Cox 
Elias T. Spiliotis, Manuel Osorio, Martha C. Zúñiga, Michael Edidin 
A Smad Transcriptional Corepressor
Volume 36, Issue 4, Pages (November 2009)
Volume 65, Issue 5, Pages e4 (March 2017)
Volume 91, Issue 4, Pages (November 1997)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 13, Issue 1, Pages 29-41 (January 2013) Malaria Parasites Co-opt Human Factor H to Prevent Complement-Mediated Lysis in the Mosquito Midgut  Nina Simon, Edwin Lasonder, Matthias Scheuermayer, Andrea Kuehn, Sabrina Tews, Rainer Fischer, Peter F. Zipfel, Christine Skerka, Gabriele Pradel  Cell Host & Microbe  Volume 13, Issue 1, Pages 29-41 (January 2013) DOI: 10.1016/j.chom.2012.11.013 Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Cell Host & Microbe 2013 13, 29-41DOI: (10.1016/j.chom.2012.11.013) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Activity of Human Complement in the Mosquito Blood Meal and Binding of FH to Activated GCs (A) C3a concentration in the blood meal of An. stephensi with or without prior treatment of mosquitoes with gentamicin, as measured by ELISA. The optical density (450 nm) of the PBS control was set to 1 (represented as mean ± SD). ∗/∗∗/∗∗∗, significant increase in C3a (∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗p < 0.001; Student’s t test). (B) Numbers of exflagellation centers at 15 min p.a., macrogametes at 20 min p.a., and zygotes at 20 hr p.a. after GC activation with NHS or HIS in the absence or presence of anti-FH mAb 131X. The number of NHS-activated cells was set to 100% (represented as mean ± SD). Significant differences in parasite numbers are indicated (∗p < 0.05; Student’s t test). (C) Binding of FH to sexual-stage parasites after GC activation with NHS, HIS, or SAX in the absence or presence of FH, as shown by immunoblotting with polyclonal anti-CCP1–CCP20 antiserum to visualize bound FH (155 kDa). Noninfected erythrocytes (EC) were used for negative control. (D) Binding of FH family proteins to sexual-stage parasites after GC activation with NHS, as shown by immunoblotting with polyclonal anti-CCP1–CCP20 antiserum to visualize FH (155 kDa), FHL-1 (37 kDa), and CFHR-1α (34 kDa) and CFHR-1β (36 kDa). NHS and S. aureus strain Newman served as a positive control. (E) Schematic depicting the CCP domains of FH, FHL-1, and CFHR-1. The binding sites for C3b and heparin (Hep) are indicated. (F) Binding of FH deletion mutants to sexual-stage parasites after GC activation with SAX supplemented with recombinant FH deletion mutants or CFHR-1 (negative control). Immunoblotting with polyclonal anti-CCP1–CCP20 antiserum detected binding of peptide CCP1–CCP7 (equal to FHL-1; ∼40 kDa). See also Figure S1. Cell Host & Microbe 2013 13, 29-41DOI: (10.1016/j.chom.2012.11.013) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Binding of FH and C3b to Sexual-Stage Parasites (A) Binding of FH to sexual-stage parasites after GC activation with NHS, as shown by IFA, using polyclonal anti-CCP1–CCP20 antiserum to detect FH (green). The sexual stages were labeled with antibodies against the respective marker proteins (PfCCp4, GCs; Pfs230, macrogametes [MaGs]; Pfs25, young zygotes; Pfs28, old zygotes; red), noninfected red blood cells (RBCs) were labeled with Evans Blue (EB, red). Bar, 5 μm. (B) For negative control, Kluyveromyces lactis was incubated with 500 μg/ml of FH for 1 hr. No FH binding (green) was detected via IFA using anti-CCP1–CCP20 antiserum. The yeast were counterstained with Evans Blue (red). Bar, 5 μm. (C) Binding of C3b to sexual-stage parasites after GC activation with NHS. The IFA was pursued as described in (A). C3b was detected using a polyclonal anti-C3 antibody (green). Bar, 5 μm. See also Figure S2. Cell Host & Microbe 2013 13, 29-41DOI: (10.1016/j.chom.2012.11.013) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 C3b Inactivation by FH Bound to the Sexual-Stage Surface (A) Schematic depicting the composition of C3b. The cleavage sites are indicated. (B) FH-mediated processing of C3b by factor I on the sexual-stage surface after GC activation with SAX in the presence or absence of FH, as shown by immunoblotting with anti-C3 antibodies to visualize bound C3b products α′ (101 kDa) and β (75 kDa) and the processing products α′1 (67 kDa) and α′2 (40 kDa). (C) C3b processing over time on the sexual-stage surface after GC activation with NHS, as shown by immunoblotting with anti-C3 antibodies to visualize the C3b processing products. The α chain signal originated from nonhydrolysed C3. For negative control, GCs were kept in NHS at 37°C; for positive control, S. aureus strain Newman was kept in NHS at 37°C. Immunoblotting of purified C3b highlighted the unprocessed α′ chain and the β chain. (D) C3b inactivation on the sexual-stage surface after GC activation with NHS in the presence or absence of heparin, as shown by immunoblotting with anti-C3 antibodies to visualize the C3b processing products. GCs activated in SAX were used for negative control. (E) FH binding to the sexual-stage surface after GC activation with NHS in the presence or absence of heparin, as shown by immunoblotting with anti-CCP1–CCP20 antiserum (top). The signal strength for the FH bands (arrow) was measured using the ImageJ program (bottom). The results of three independent experiments were combined, and the FH signal in GCs at 15 min p.a. was set to 100% (represented as mean ± SD). (F) For loading control, GCs were processed as described in (E) and immunoblotted with anti-PfCCp2 antiserum to detect PfCCp2 (185 kDa; top, arrow). The signal strength was measured as described in (E) (bottom). Cell Host & Microbe 2013 13, 29-41DOI: (10.1016/j.chom.2012.11.013) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Identification of PfGAP50 as FH Receptor (A) Mass spectrometric identification of PfGAP50 as FH receptor in GCs at 30 min p.a. with NHS, following coimmunoprecipitation with anti-FH mAb 131X and silver staining of SDS-PAGE (left, arrow). NHS-incubated mixed asexual cultures were used for negative control. Immunoblotting with mouse polyclonal anti-PfGAP50 antiserum confirmed PfGAP50 in the immunoprecipitated activated GC sample (right, arrow). (B) Schematic depicting PfGAP50. SP, signal peptide; TM, transmembrane domain. (C) PfGAP50 expression in synchronized blood-stage schizonts, mature GCs, and GCs at 1 hr p.a. as shown by immunoblotting with anti-PfGAP50 antiserum. PfGAP50 was running at a molecular weight of 45 kDa in the schizonts lysate, and as a 45/42 kDa doublet in the GC lysates. See also Figure S3. Cell Host & Microbe 2013 13, 29-41DOI: (10.1016/j.chom.2012.11.013) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Localization of PfGAP50 in the Blood- and Sexual-Stage Parasites (A) PfGAP50 expression in blood-stage parasites as shown by IFA following MeOH fixation and saponin permeabilization. PfGAP50 was labeled with polyclonal anti-PfGAP50 antiserum (green), asexual blood-stage parasites were highlighted with anti-MSP1 antibodies, and GCs were highlighted with anti-Pfs25 antibodies (red). Nuclei were highlighted with Hoechst nuclear stain (blue). DIC, differential interference contrast. Bar, 5 μm. (B) Surface-associated expression of PfGAP50 in emerged macrogametes, following PFA fixation at 30 min p.a. without further saponin permeabilization. The IFA was pursued as described in (A). Arrowhead indicates nonactivated GC. Bar, 5 μm. (C) Subcellular localization of PfGAP50 in nonactivated GCs, following stripping by saponin treatment to remove the enveloping membranes and after PFA fixation without further saponin permeabilization. Untreated GCs were fixed with MeOH and saponin permeabilized. GCs were labeled with anti-PfGAP50, anti-human myosin 1C, or anti-Pfs230 antisera (green) and counterstained with Evans Blue (red). Bar, 2 μm. (D) Expression of PfGAP50 in sexual-stage parasites. The parasites were fixed with MeOH, saponin permeabilized, and labeled with antisera against Pfs230 (red) and PfGAP50 (green). MaG, macrogamete. Bar, 5 μm. See also Figure S4. Cell Host & Microbe 2013 13, 29-41DOI: (10.1016/j.chom.2012.11.013) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Binding of FH by PfGAP50 (A) Concentration-dependent binding of recombinant CCP1–CCP20 (equal to FH), CCP1–CCP7 (equal to FHL-1), and CCP1–CCP4 to recombinant immobilized PfGAP50. FH peptide binding was measured colorimetrically at an optical density of 450 nm (represented as mean ± SD). Immobilized gelatine and PBS alone were used for negative controls. Significant differences in protein binding are indicated (∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗p < 0.001; Student’s t test). ns, not significant. (B) FH binding to sexual-stage parasites, following GC activation with XA in the presence of 10% (v/v) rabbit anti-PfGAP50 or anti-plasmepsin II antibody, as shown by immunoblotting with anti-CCP1–CCP20 antiserum (top). The signal strength for the FH protein bands (arrow) was measured using the ImageJ program (bottom). The results of two independent experiments were combined, and the FH signal in GC samples treated with anti-plasmepsin II antibody was set to 100% (represented as mean ± SD). (C) Lysis of stripped nonactivated GCs by complement during incubation with NHS, as shown by immunoblotting with antiserum against Pf39 (arrow) to demonstrate cell integrity. Nonstripped GCs were used for control. (D) Numbers of zygotes at 16 hr p.a. after GC activation with XA in the presence of 20% (v/v) rabbit anti-PfGAP50 or anti-plasmepsin II antibody. The mean number of zygotes in the samples treated with anti-plasmepsin II antibody was set to 100% (represented as mean ± SD). Significant differences in zygote numbers are indicated (∗∗p < 0.01; Student’s t test). See Also Figure S5. Cell Host & Microbe 2013 13, 29-41DOI: (10.1016/j.chom.2012.11.013) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions