An Overview of the Current OCD Underground Injection Control (UIC) Program Heather Riley, Director New Mexico Oil Conservation Division.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Railroad Commission of Texas Victor G. Carrillo - Chairman Elizabeth A. Jones – Commissioner Michael L. Williams – Commissioner.
Advertisements

 What does this statement mean?  Who are we?.  NARO was founded in 1980 Due to Windfall Profits Tax  We have grown into an educational/advocacy organization.
RULES DONE RIGHT HOW ARKANSAS BROUGHT ITS OIL AND GAS LAW INTO A HORIZONTAL WORLD.
Hydraulic Fracturing under Senate Bill 4. Senate Bill 4 - Approved September 20, Requires a permit to conduct a well stimulation treatment, such.
Environmental Regulation and Hydraulic Fracturing in California
CWAG 2010 WATER LAW CONFERENCE The Broadmoor Colorado Springs, Colorado April 29 – 30, 2010.
Michele Robertson, PG Is Deep Injection a Disposal Option in Arizona? GATEKEEPER REGULATORY ROUNDUP 2011 February 16, 2011.
Induced Seismicity Houston Bar Association Environmental Law Section Houston, Texas January 21, 2015 Mark K. Boling Executive Vice President and President,
Keith Turner Watkins & Eager. The Issues Water usage Fracking fluid disclosure Infrastructure – lack of Transportation – direct Support – indirect Fracking.
The Underground Injection Control (UIC) Program Presentation for the Radionuclide Webcast August 4, pm.
1 Hydraulic Fracturing Regulatory Processes in Louisiana James H. Welsh Commissioner of Conservation.
It’s not my Fracking Problem! Regulations, Liability, and the Process of Hydraulic Fracturing Katie Heath November 30, 2010.
Legal and Institutional Issues Affecting Aquifer Storage Recovery in Texas Edmond R. McCarthy, Jr. Jackson, Sjoberg, McCarthy & Wilson LLP
August 14, 2001AOGCC / Jt. Committee on Natural Gas Pipelines 1 Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission (AOGCC) Presentation August 14, 2001 to Joint.
EPAs Proposed Ground Water Protection Standards 40 CFR 192 an Industry Perspective Peter Luthiger Mesteña Uranium LLC.
COLORADO OIL AND GAS CONSERVATION COMMISSION CLASS II UNDERGROUND INJECTION CONTROL RULES AND REGULATIONS Garfield County Energy Advisory Board Thursday,
New Mexico Oil & Gas Production
Michael A. Skiffington Program Support Manager Virginia Department of Mines, Minerals and Energy W&M ELPR Spring Symposium Williamsburg, VA – March 28,
SCOPING MEETING FOR ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT REQUIRED BY PUBLIC RESOURCES CODE SECTION 3161 (b)(3) AND (4) (SENATE BILL 4) (PAVLEY) C ALIFORNIA D EPARTMENT.
RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS Horizontal Drilling Permit Applications Lorenzo Garza.
UTAH GEOTHERMAL Dr. R. Gordon Bloomquist, Ph.D Washington State University Energy Program Salt Lake City, Utah 20 January 2004.
The Underground Injection Control (UIC) Program
Developing Green Stormwater Design Solutions For UIC Compliance Presented by: Adam Zucker PE, CWRE 819 SE Morrison Street ● Suite 310 ● Portland, Oregon.
Proposed Amendments to Chapter 32, Article V, Solid Waste Management, and to Chapter 38, Zoning Orange County Code Presented by the Orange County Environmental.
Proposed Amendments to Chapter 32, Article V, Solid Waste Management, and to Chapter 38, Zoning Orange County Code Presented by the Orange County Environmental.
HYDRAULIC FRACTURING (FRACKING) AND OFFSHORE DRILLING IN FLAGLER COUNTY CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP JUNE 9, 2015.
Manitoba Oil Activity Review Bismarck, ND May 22, th Williston Basin Petroleum Conference.
DOE Program for Studying the Use of Salt Caverns for Oil Field Waste Disposal John Ford National Petroleum Technology Office.
EPA's Regulatory Approach : Climate Mitigation via Sequestration of CO2: by Rob Ferri (EPA - Underground Injection Control) This presentation has not been.
Idaho Oil and Gas 101 Bobby Johnson, P.G. Oil and Gas Program Manager Idaho Department of Lands.
California Integrated Waste Management Board November 10, 2008 Item #2 Discussion And Request For Direction Regarding The Board's Fulfillment Of The Requirements.
Ch WAC Geologic Sequestration of Carbon dioxide John Stormon Hydrogeologist Washington Department of Ecology Seattle, WA October.
Revisions to Primacy State Underground Injection Control Programs Primacy State Implementation of the New Class V Rule.
Hydraulic Fracturing in the Ohio River Basin. –Conventional vs. nonconventional (continuous) Overview of Hydraulic Fracturing.
SPACING Vertical Horizontal Eric R. King Week Three September 8, 2011.
Understanding the SWD Market in the Bakken Shale Play, North Dakota Authors: J. Daniel Arthur, P.E., SPEC; Bobbi Lorengo, EIT; Alex Zyskin.
Water Quality Rulemaking in Response to S.L
Developing U.S. Shale Gas and Oil Resources: Problems and Prospects for the Next Decade Peter D. Blair, Executive Director NRC Division on Engineering.
Hydraulic Fracturing (Fracking)
W HEN F RACKING I SN ' T C ALLED F RACKING : Flawed Well Stimulation Definition in Proposed State Oil Legislation (HB 191/SB 318) Excludes Most Common.
1 Salt Water Disposal Pilot Project October 14, 2008.
Global Warming – The Broad Legal Reach of Initiatives to Reduce Carbon Emissions Worldwide Legal Issues Associated with Carbon Capture and Geologic Storage.
RICK COOPER DIRECTOR OF THE DIVISION OF GAS AND OIL VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF MINES, MINERALS AND ENERGY Gas and Oil Well Drilling Requirements for the Tidewater.
John James Tintera, PG #325 Texas Alliance of Energy Producers Injection Well Regulatory Update April, 2016.
Water Quality/Stormwater Seminar September House Bill 2031 Requires TCEQ to adopt an expedited permitting process for discharge permits for treated.
Political Backdrop As non-geologists and seeming without Professional Geology consultation individuals make the following types of comments: "We have a.
Oil in Paradise and Florida’s Debate on Formation Stimulation: the Professional Geology Perspective By: Thomas A. Herbert, Ph.D, P.G. Lampl Herbert Consultants.
Oil and Gas Production 1 PRO 250 PowerPoint presentation created by Dr. Shauna Kocman used in CMC PRO250 with her permission under Creative Commons License.
Oil & Gas Waste Stream Management and Permitting Options
Chairman Christi Craddick
Department of Environmental Quality
by John Mitchell, Director Division of Environment
Proposed Revisions to 10 CFR Part 61
Prioritizing Fossil Fuel Production over Drinking Water
NRC’s LLW Regulatory Program: Update of Emerging Issues
Class I Injection Well Application Issues
Regulating Injection and Fracking In Oil & Gas Operations
Solid Waste Handling Standards
AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF PETROLEUM LANDMEN
Water Quality Rulemaking in Response to S.L
Groundwater and Waste Management Committee November 9, 2016
Julie Woosley, Division of Waste Management
Butte County Board of Supervisors April 21, 2015
Julie Woosley, Division of Waste Management
Dr. Jim Thomas Desert Research Institute
Julie Woosley, Division of Waste Management
Breaking the Gridlock with Smart Regulations
Texas Disposal Well Rules And Seismicity Leslie Savage, P.G.
How Well is Your Well? UIC Class I Well Construction Standards
Texas Disposal Wells And Seismicity Paul Dubois, P.E. May 2019.
Presentation transcript:

An Overview of the Current OCD Underground Injection Control (UIC) Program Heather Riley, Director New Mexico Oil Conservation Division

NMOCD Statutory and Regulatory Responsibilities Prevent waste Protect correlative rights Protect public health, fresh water and the environment Encourage reuse and recycling of produced water

State Primacy Under the Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) In 1981, the Oil Conservation Division provided the USEPA with a Program Demonstration, called the New Mexico State Demonstration for Class II Wells, as required under Part C, Section 1425 of the SDWA (Public Law 93-523 as amended). Following the review by USEPA, the Program Demonstration was accepted and the state was approved for primacy effective March 7, 1982. This primacy allowed the Division to issue permits, referred to as “orders”, and regulate operations for Underground Injection Control (UIC) Class II wells. This primacy agreement resulted in rulemaking which is found in the New Mexico Administrative Code (NMAC) under Title 19, Chapter 15, Part 26 Injection.

State Primacy Under the Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) The current method of application for an order approving injection begins with the submission of Form C-108 that contains the following information: identification of the proposed injection interval and the underground sources of drinking water (USDWs) in the area; a suitable drilling, casing, and cementing program that protect USDWs; a review of penetrating wells within one-half mile; notification of affected parties within one-half mile; operation plan along with a description of the sources of fluids to be disposed in the well. The applicant must be an operator in the state of New Mexico and must be in compliance with Division rules on financial assurance and inactive wells. If the application is protested, then the application cannot be considered for administrative approval and must be considered in a hearing before an examiner or the Oil Conservation Commission.

State Primacy Under the Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) Three groups of injection activities are approved under 19.15.26 NMAC: Enhanced recovery: primarily waterfloods, water alternating gas (WAG) flooding operations, and pressure maintenance projects Hydrocarbon storage: injection wells for the underground storage of liquified hydrocarbons Disposal Wells: produced water disposal wells and acid-gas injection wells. Disposal wells for produced water are referred to as both UIC Class II wells or salt water disposal (SWD) wells Exempted E&P Waste UIC Class II or SWD wells are permitted to accept waste resulting from oil and gas exploration and production (E&P). These wastes commonly include produced water associated with production from a well, well completion and stimulation operations (including flowback), drilling fluids, workover wastes

Additional Requirements for Review of Injection Applications Along with authority granted to the state under the SDWA, the New Mexico Oil and Gas Act of 1978 (NMSA) delegated additional responsibilities when considering an application the Division is authorized to make rules, regulations and orders: 70-2-12. Enumeration of powers.   B. (4)   to prevent the drowning by water of any stratum or part thereof capable of producing oil or gas or both oil and gas in paying quantities and to prevent the premature and irregular encroachment of water or any other kind of water encroachment that reduces or tends to reduce the total ultimate recovery of crude petroleum oil or gas or both oil and gas from any pool; This portion of the Oil and Gas Act provides for the protection of the hydrocarbon potential for an interval proposed for injection as well as the protection of correlative rights. The Bureau of Land Management also participates in the Division’s UIC Program through the assessment of applications in the Secretary’s potash area, the assessment of impacts to hydrocarbon potential in proposed disposal intervals that include federal mineral estate, and with approvals of Applications for Permits to Drill on federal lands.

Summary of Current Disposal Activities in New Mexico There are currently 832 active salt water disposal (SWD) wells and 96 active approved orders that the well is yet to be spud For this total of 928 SWD wells, 826 wells or 89 percent operate in the New Mexico portion of the Permian Basin The demand for proper disposal has grown with the expansion of horizonal drilling and completions in the Permian Basin

Recent Developments in Disposal Activities in Southeast New Mexico Expansion in Exploration and Development of Permian Targets During the last two years, there has been a significant increase in the drilling activity for the Wolfcamp Formation. This interval is directly below the Bone Spring Formation, with its multiple zones for horizontal development, and has been the dominate target of the last decade. Other targets that have been developed by horizontal well drilling during the last decade include the Avalon Shale which occurs at the top of the Bone Spring Formation and the lower Brushy Canyon Formation at the base of the Delaware Mountain Group.

Recent Developments in Disposal Activities in Southeast New Mexico Expansion in Exploration and Development of Permian Targets Recently, the Purple Sage (Wolfcamp) pool has significantly increased the drilling activity in the basin especially in the area south of Loving extending to the New Mexico – Texas state line. Other Wolfcamp plays are being identified to the east of this pool and are being consolidated for drilling programs.

Recent Developments in Disposal Activities in Southeast New Mexico Delaware Mountain Group Prior to the increase in horizontal drilling, the Delaware Mountain Group, consisting of the Bell Canyon, Cherry Canyon and Brushy Canyon Formations, was a favored interval for disposal. As the transition from vertical drilling to horizontal drilling occurred through the early 2000s, the Delaware continued to be the optimal solution for the disposal of produced water. By the time the Division adopted its “Horizontal Rule” in 2010, nearly all wells were being drilled and completed as horizontal wells. With this change in production came an increase necessity for disposal of E&P wastes.

Recent Developments in Disposal Activities in Southeast New Mexico Delaware Mountain Group With the expanded use of the Delaware Mountain Group for disposal by operators, there was an increase in reports of “waterflows” and abnormally high reservoir pressures observed in these formations in the vicinity of injection operations. Most notable of these events resulted in a Division case where an adjacent operator identified producing horizontal wells in the lower Brushy Canyon Formation that were impacted by injection in the upper formations of the Delaware Mountain Group. This interference of production was attributed not to a single well, but to the concentration of several disposal wells with injection intervals within the Delaware.

Recent Developments in Disposal Activities in Southeast New Mexico Delaware Mountain Group Other events that indicated an increase in reservoir pressure included several Delaware disposal wells in close proximity that required approval of pressure increases for continued disposal operation and a new Delaware SWD well that was plugged and abandoned within two years of commencing injection.

Recent Developments in Disposal Activities in Southeast New Mexico Devonian and Silurian Interval To address the growing demand for additional disposal capacity, the Division reviewed several intervals approved for current SWD wells. Following this review, the Division identified the Devonian and Silurian formations as a recommended alternative to large volume disposal in shallower zones. Additionally, the potential for use of the Devonian strata was also noted in the New Mexico State Demonstration for Class II Wells. These formations are also known as the Thirtyone Formation, the Wristen Group, the Fasken Formation, and Fusselman Formation as well as the Siluro-Devonian depending on location. These units are found in significant thickness and permeability in the areas with the expanded Permian development.

Recent Developments in Disposal Activities in Southeast New Mexico Devonian and Silurian Disposal Wells The effort to utilize deeper Devonian SWD wells have resulted in concentration of applications and approved orders for injection in the vicinity of the Purple Sage pool especially between Loving and Malaga. The Division is approving orders with the intent to spread out disposal wells as to limit impacts to the disposal interval and extend the operational life of these wells

Recent Developments in Disposal Activities in Southeast New Mexico Devonian and Silurian Interval In 2015, the USEPA issued it findings of the UIC Technical Workgroup on minimizing the potential impacts of injection-induced seismicity. The Division considered these findings and noted the growth Devonian SWD wells increased a potential for effects of pressure activating pre-existing stresses in the Pre-Cambrian or “basement” rocks. As a result, the Division enacted a moratorium on any new injection below the top of the Ordovician System. This is an effort to isolate injection from the Devonian SWD wells from deeper migration by using the Ordovician formations as a lower confining zone or “buffer”.

Recent Developments in Disposal Activities in Southeast New Mexico Devonian and Silurian Interval and Induced Seismicity The Division also required supplemental information to be added to an application for a deep Devonian SWD well that would consider the overall seismic potential for the life of the disposal well. This assessment was to be based on current models offered by academic or governmental agencies using both publicly-available data or proprietary data such as deep 3-D seismic.

Recent Developments in Disposal Activities in Southeast New Mexico Efforts to Address to Disposal in the Southeast The Division is cooperating with NMOGA and other stakeholders in an effort to study and to produce a plan for further disposal in the Delaware Mountain Group including limitations on location, on disposal pressures, and on type of disposal operation. The Division is also reviewing the application process for “large-capacity”, deep Devonian SWD wells in an effort to maximize these type of wells with reduced potential for future issues such as induced seismicity or significant reservoir pressure increases. Efforts to Increase Alternatives to Disposal Recycling Treatment

Recent Developments in Disposal Activities in Southeast New Mexico Comments or Questions