Frank Zimmermann Mike’s 14:00 meeting,

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

FCC-pp - Collider First Look at the Arc Lattice R. Alemany & B. Holzer.

Advertisements

“AC” Dispersion Measurement David Rubin Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-Based Sciences and Education.

Beam Based Survey and Alignment of Ring Magnets David Rubin Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-Based Sciences and Education.

Highlights of the ATS MD part I (injection and ramp) … An 8h video game party carefully organized by Jorg et al. 1S. Fartoukh, LSWG 24/05/2011.

Analysis of ATF EXT/FF Orbit Jitter and extrapolation to IP (Data of ) ATF2 Project Meeting K. Kubo.

Searching for Quantum LOVE at the Australian Synchrotron Light Source Eugene Tan On behalf of Rohan Dowd 120/10/2010Eugene Tan – IWLC 2010, Genega ASLS.

Where did all the protons go? Mike Lamont LBOC 20 th January 2015.

A Sampling Distribution

Diffuse Intergalactic Light in Intermediate Redshift Cluster: RX J I. Toledo (PUC) J. Melnick (ESO) E. Giraud (LPTA) F. Selman (ESO) H. Quintana.

J. Pfingstner Jitter studies February 12, 2014 Optics corrections in the ATF damping ring Jürgen Pfingstner, Yves Renier.

The HiLumi LHC Design Study is included in the High Luminosity LHC project and is partly funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme.

J. Pfingstner, LCWS13 Jitter and ground motion studies November 13, 2013 Beam jitter at ATF2: A. Source localisation and B. Ground motion correlation Jürgen.

LHC orbit system, performance and stability LHC Beam commissioning workshop, Evian, 19./20. Jan 2010 Kajetan Fuchsberger Thanks for Help and discussion:

Design options for emittance measurement systems for the CLIC RTML R Apsimon.

J. Pfingstner Imperfections tolerances for on-line DFS Improved imperfection tolerances for an on-line dispersion free steering algorithm Jürgen Pfingstner.

DMS steering with BPM scale error - Trial of a New Optics - Kiyoshi Kubo

Advanced Optics Control, CERN, Masamitsu Aiba, PSI Recent optics measurements at SLS M. Aiba, M. Böge, Á. Saá Hernández, D. Mayilyan and.

Orbit related issues of the spin tune control at RHIC V.Ptitsyn, M.Bai, W.MacKay, T.Roser.

Beam Based Optics Measurements CTF3 Collaboration meeting CERN Yu-Chiu Chao, TJNAF.

Progress with Beam Report to LMC, Machine Coordination W10: Mike Lamont – Ralph Assmann Thanks to other machine coordinators, EIC’s, operators,

FJPPL-FKPPL ATF2 Workshop Jitter studies March 18, 2014 Beam jitter localization and identification at ATF2 Marcin Patecki Jürgen Pfingstner 18 th of March.

Tune: Decay at Injection and Snapback Michaela Schaumann In cooperation with: Mariusz Juchno, Matteo Solfaroli Camillocci, Jorg Wennigner.

STABILITY STUDIES OF THE PSB-TO-PS TRANSFER W. Bartmann, J. Abelleira With many inputs from: O. Berrig, J. Borburgh, S. Gilardoni, GP di Giovanni, B. Goddard,

LHC Commissioning Status Gianluigi Arduini CERN – AB Department For… 23/10/20081LHC Commissioning Status - G. Arduini.

High Luminosity LHC Robustness & tolerances Catia Milardi HL LHC Task 2.2, September 19 th 2012.

Expected field quality in LHC magnets E. Todesco AT-MAS With contributions of S. Fartoukh, M. Giovannozzi, A. Lombardi, F. Schmidt (beam dynamics) N. Catalan-Lasheras,

Slide 1 Overview Introduction Stochastic Cooling History of the Antiproton machines at CERN The AD and ELENA Conclusion.

Investigation of Injection Schemes for SLS 2.0

TPE Contributions to Proton EM Properties in TL Region Dian-Yong Chen Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing

The HiLumi LHC Design Study is included in the High Luminosity LHC project and is partly funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme.

How low can we go? Getting below β*=3.5m R. Bruce, R.W. Assmann Acknowledgment: T. Baer, W. Bartmann, C. Bracco, S. Fartoukh, M. Giovannozzi, B. Goddard,W.

Issues related to crossing angles Frank Zimmermann.

Threading / LTC/ JW1 How difficult is threading at the LHC ? When MADX meets the control system … J. Wenninger AB-OP &

ILC DR Lower Horizontal Emittance, preliminary study

Alignment and beam-based correction

Floating MD week 28 summary

Ralph Assmann, Giulia Papotti, Frank Zimmermann 25 August 2011

Sextupole calibrations via measurements of off-energy orbit response matrix and high order dispersion Nicola Carmignani.

Vertical emittance measurement and modeling Correction methods

Beam-beam effect with an external noise in LHC

Field quality update and recent tracking results

The LHC - Status Is COLD Is almost fully commissioned

ILC DR Lower Horizontal Emittance? -2

Emittance growth AT PS injection

Optimization of Triplet Field Quality in Collision

Impact of remanent fields on SPS chromaticity

Probing Quark – Gluon correlations in the neutron Precision measurements of d2n and g2n Brad Sawatzky for the E Collaboration.

CHEN, Fusan KANG, Wen November 5, 2017

Monday h00: Ramp 10 A/s (chromaticity, crossing angle non-closure, beta-beating): At 7m and 3.5m, put in one by one crossing angles, calculated.

Pulse Shape Fitting Beam Test September, October CERN

Field quality to achieve the required lifetime goals (single beam)

Optics Development for HE-LHC

LHC Emittance Measurements and Preservation

آشنايی با اصول و پايه های يک آزمايش

Tuesday 23/11/10 8:00 Physics fill #1511 dumped

Nonlinear Field Quality Checks

MD#2 News & Plan Tue – Wed (19. – 20.6.)

Progress of SPPC lattice design

ILC Baseline Design: Physics with Polarized Positrons

450 GeV Preliminary Commissioning: Measurement Programme

Orbit response measurements and analysis

Thursday 04/11 - Morning Access until ~13:00 Pre-cycle Proton checks:

Optics Measurements in the PSB

TI8 analysis / J. Wenninger

Yuri Nosochkov Yunhai Cai, Fanglei Lin, Vasiliy Morozov

Thursday 2.12 Cryo recovery…. Access… RF cavity check (noise) Cav4B1.

Follow-up on tilt of triplet magnets

DYNAMIC APERTURE OF JLEIC ELECTRON COLLIDER

Emittance Studies at Extraction of the PS Booster: Emittance Calculation S. Albright, F. Antoniou, F. Asvesta, H. Bartosik, G.P. Di Giovanni, M. Fraser,

Borislav Nedelchev et al. 2019

Presentation transcript:

1st-turn dispersion of beam 2 data taken by Jörg et al on 10 September ~16:30 Frank Zimmermann Mike’s 14:00 meeting, 16.09.2008 Thanks to Masamitsu Aiba, Kajetan Fuchsberger, Massimo Giovannozzi, Mike Lamont, Rogelio Tomas

equal to zero within the noise of this measurement

large incoming dispersion oscillation with 1-2 m amplitude

overall dispersion looks pretty good; rather beautiful in all LSS’s except LSS2 IR3 IR6 small problem?! larger problem?! “ring dispersion” after taking out incoming oscillation by fitting over first 10 km

zoomed view of dispersion around IR6, taking out the dispersion mismatch observed in preceding arc

some deviation already seen before the IR center?! further zoom of dispersion around IR6, taking out the dispersion mismatch observed in preceding arc

zoomed view of dispersion around IR3, taking out the dispersion mismatch observed in preceding arc

some deviation already seen before the IR center?! further zoom of dispersion around IR3, taking out the dispersion mismatch observed in preceding arc

trial and error studies effect of a wrong polarity for various quadrupoles & quadrupole combinations in IR3 and IR6: QTL11LR3, QTL11R3, odd QTLs (7,9,11) LR3, odd QTLs L3, odd QTLs L3+QT13, QTL11R3+QT9L3, QTL11R3+QT13R3, QTL11LR6, Q6LR3, Q6L3, QT5LR3, QT5R3, QT5L3, QT4LR3, QT4LR3+QTL11L3, QT4LR3+QTL9L3 QT4R3, QTL5L3, QTL5R3, QTL5LR3,…

dispersion around IR3, with QTL4 LR3 inverted, after taking out dispersion mismatch of preceding arc

closer view of IR3 dispersion, with QTL4 LR3 inverted, after taking out dispersion mismatch of preceding arc

nominal model model w QT4 LR3 inverted

discussion over the weekend Massimo+Mike: QT4 was checked and double checked, even with Hall probes; must be OK Rogelio+Kajetan+Masamitsu: not clear back to the drawing board try quadrupoles with similar effect as QT4

dispersion around IR3, with QTL8 LR3 inverted, after taking out dispersion mismatch of preceding arc

dispersion around IR3, with QTL10 LR3 inverted, after taking out dispersion mismatch of preceding arc

bingo! dispersion around IR3, with QTL8+10 LR3 inverted, after taking out dispersion mismatch of preceding arc

nominal model model w QT8+10 LR3 inv.

dispersion around IR3, with QTL8+10 L3 inverted, QTL8+10 R3 are very weak and their polarity hardly affects the result dispersion around IR3, with QTL8+10 L3 inverted, after taking out dispersion mismatch of preceding arc

nominal model model w QT8+10 L3 inv.

model w QT8+10 LR3 inv.. model w QT8+10 L3 inv.

conclusions attempt to extract “ring dispersion” by taking out incoming oscillation; this type of “measured” ring dispersion changes with underlying model measurement with circulating model should be better dispersion shows only two regions where errors may be present: IR3 and perhaps IR6 dispersion is very sensitive to polarity errors in the IR3 region QTL8+QTL10 L3 (+R3) may have wrong polarity BPM data and optics are remarkably precise