Mammalian Sweet Taste Receptors

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 20, Issue 12, Pages (June 2010)
Advertisements

Interacting Roles of Attention and Visual Salience in V4
A Human Extrastriate Area Functionally Homologous to Macaque V4
Dual Modes of Cdc42 Recycling Fine-Tune Polarized Morphogenesis
Martin D Bootman, Michael J Berridge  Current Biology 
Representation of Natural Stimuli in the Rodent Main Olfactory Bulb
Jurian Schuijers, Laurens G. van der Flier, Johan van Es, Hans Clevers 
Jianbin Wang, H. Christina Fan, Barry Behr, Stephen R. Quake  Cell 
Indrajeet Singh, Efrosyni Themistou, Lionel Porcar, Sriram Neelamegham 
Volume 22, Issue 2, Pages (February 1999)
T2Rs Function as Bitter Taste Receptors
Responses to Spatial Contrast in the Mouse Suprachiasmatic Nuclei
RNAi Related Mechanisms Affect Both Transcriptional and Posttranscriptional Transgene Silencing in Drosophila  Manika Pal-Bhadra, Utpal Bhadra, James.
Common Sense about Taste: From Mammals to Insects
Volume 131, Issue 5, Pages (November 2007)
Volume 102, Issue 10, Pages (May 2012)
Volume 8, Issue 5, Pages (September 2014)
Volume 19, Issue 4, Pages (October 1997)
Two-Dimensional Substructure of MT Receptive Fields
Volume 79, Issue 4, Pages (August 2013)
Volume 21, Issue 12, Pages (December 2017)
Volume 15, Issue 4, Pages (February 2005)
Volume 17, Issue 12, Pages (December 2016)
Adult Mouse Liver Contains Two Distinct Populations of Cholangiocytes
Volume 81, Issue 4, Pages (February 2014)
Representations of Taste Modality in the Drosophila Brain
Volume 49, Issue 2, Pages (January 2006)
Volume 112, Issue 2, Pages (January 2003)
Encoding of Conditioned Taste Aversion in Cortico-Amygdala Circuits
A Novel Family of Candidate Pheromone Receptors in Mammals
Matthew P. Pando, David Morse, Nicolas Cermakian, Paolo Sassone-Corsi 
Volume 24, Issue 17, Pages (September 2014)
Coding of Sweet, Bitter, and Umami Tastes
Beena Krishnan, Lila M. Gierasch  Chemistry & Biology 
Conditional Gene Expression in the Epidermis of Transgenic Mice Using the Tetracycline-Regulated Transactivators tTA and rTA Linked to the Keratin 5 Promoter 
Circadian Clock Neurons in the Silkmoth Antheraea pernyi: Novel Mechanisms of Period Protein Regulation  Ivo Sauman, Steven M Reppert  Neuron  Volume.
Hiroaki Matsunami, Linda B Buck  Cell 
Molecular Analysis of Mammalian Timeless
The Receptors for Mammalian Sweet and Umami Taste
A New Multigene Family of Putative Pheromone Receptors
Taste Representations in the Drosophila Brain
A Taste Receptor Required for the Caffeine Response In Vivo
Functional Differentiation of Multiple Climbing Fiber Inputs during Synapse Elimination in the Developing Cerebellum  Kouichi Hashimoto, Masanobu Kano 
Figure 1. Expression of olfactory receptors in circumvallate taste papillae of mOR-M71-GFP (top row) and mOR-EG-GFP ... Figure 1. Expression of olfactory.
Volume 16, Issue 3, Pages (March 1996)
Volume 17, Issue 12, Pages (December 2016)
Blends of Non-caloric Sweeteners Saccharin and Cyclamate Show Reduced Off-Taste due to TAS2R Bitter Receptor Inhibition  Maik Behrens, Kristina Blank,
Drosophila Clock Can Generate Ectopic Circadian Clocks
The Shaping of the T Cell Repertoire
Volume 32, Issue 3, Pages (November 2001)
A Novel Family of Mammalian Taste Receptors
Volume 119, Issue 5, Pages (November 2004)
Bonnie Chu, Vincent Chui, Kevin Mann, Michael D. Gordon 
Target-Specific Glycinergic Transmission from VGluT3-Expressing Amacrine Cells Shapes Suppressive Contrast Responses in the Retina  Nai-Wen Tien, Tahnbee.
Haploinsufficiency at the Nkx3.1 locus
Volume 7, Issue 2, Pages (August 2016)
Jing Zhang, Zhe Fang, Corinne Jud, Mariska J
Volume 24, Issue 10, Pages (September 2018)
Cosuppression of Nonhomologous Transgenes in Drosophila Involves Mutually Related Endogenous Sequences  Manika Pal-Bhadra, Utpal Bhadra, James A. Birchler 
John B Reppas, W.Martin Usrey, R.Clay Reid  Neuron 
Inscuteable and Staufen Mediate Asymmetric Localization and Segregation of prosperoRNA during Drosophila Neuroblast Cell Divisions  Peng Li, Xiaohang.
Volume 112, Issue 6, Pages (March 2003)
Three period Homologs in Mammals: Differential Light Responses in the Suprachiasmatic Circadian Clock and Oscillating Transcripts Outside of Brain  Mark.
Vision and Cortical Map Development
Volume 28, Issue 6, Pages e3 (March 2018)
A Novel Family of Putative Pheromone Receptors in Mammals with a Topographically Organized and Sexually Dimorphic Distribution  Gilles Herrada, Catherine.
Putative Mammalian Taste Receptors
Volume 14, Issue 15, Pages (August 2004)
Volume 25, Issue 6, Pages (June 2017)
Volume 103, Issue 5, Pages (November 2000)
Presentation transcript:

Mammalian Sweet Taste Receptors Greg Nelson, Mark A. Hoon, Jayaram Chandrashekar, Yifeng Zhang, Nicholas J.P. Ryba, Charles S. Zuker  Cell  Volume 106, Issue 3, Pages 381-390 (August 2001) DOI: 10.1016/S0092-8674(01)00451-2

Figure 1 The T1R Family (a) Radiation hybrid and STS mapping localized all three T1R genes to the distal end of chromosome 4. The T1R3 gene is closely linked to D18346, an STS marker within the Sac genetic interval (Kitagawa et al., 2001; Li et al., 2001; Max et al., 2001; Montmayeur et al., 2001; Sainz et al., 2001; see Experimental Procedures for details on our cloning, mapping, and characterization of T1R3). (b) Cladogram showing sequence similarity between human (h) and mouse (m) T1Rs and related receptors (Nakanishi, 1992; Brown et al., 1993; Herrada and Dulac, 1997; Matsunami and Buck, 1997; Ryba and Tirindelli, 1997; Kaupmann et al., 1997; Hoon et al., 1999); mouse V2Rs do not have human counterparts Cell 2001 106, 381-390DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(01)00451-2)

Figure 2 T1R3 Encodes Sac (a) Schematic diagram indicating structure of the T1R3 gene and transgenic construct. The alternate 3′-UTRs used for genotyping and in situ hybridization are highlighted in green and red. (b) In situ hybridization demonstrated perfect concordance in the expression pattern of the T1R3 transgene (red) and the endogenous gene (green). The dotted lines illustrate the outline of selected taste buds; sections were cut perpendicular to the planes shown in Figure 3. (c–h) Taste preferences of control and transgenic animals (solid red circles) were measured using standard two-bottle preference tests. The behavioral responses of mice expressing the T1R3 transgene to saccharin and sucrose (c and d) were indistinguishable from those of the control taster mice (C57BL/6; open red circles). Siblings without the transgene (solid black circles) behaved like 129/Sv non-taster control mice (open black circles). Responses to bitter, salty, sour, and umami stimuli (e–h) were not affected by presence of the transgene Cell 2001 106, 381-390DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(01)00451-2)

Figure 3 Expression of T1Rs in Subsets of Taste Receptor Cells In situ hybridizations with digoxigenin-labeled antisense RNA probes demonstrated that T1R3 is expressed in subsets of mouse taste receptor cells (upper panels). Approx. 30% of cells in fungiform, circumvallate, foliate, and palate taste buds express T1R3. Shown for comparison are similar, but not serial, sections labeled with T1R1 and T1R2 (middle and lower panels; see also Hoon et al., 1999 and Figure 4). The dotted lines illustrate the outline of a sample taste bud. Note that the selectivity of T1R3 expression closely resembles that of T1R1 plus T1R2 Cell 2001 106, 381-390DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(01)00451-2)

Figure 4 T1R Expression Patterns Define Three Cell Types Double-label fluorescent in situ hybridization was used to directly examine the overlap in cellular expression of T1Rs. Two-channel fluorescent images (1–2 μm optical sections) are overlaid on difference interference contrast images. (a) Fungiform papillae illustrating coexpression of T1R1 (red) and T1R3 (green). At least 90% of the cells expressing T1R1 also express T1R3; similar results were observed in the palate. Note the presence of some T1R3-positive but T1R1-negative cells. (b) Circumvallate papillae illustrating coexpression of T1R2 (green) and T1R3 (red). Every T1R2 positive cell expresses T1R3 Cell 2001 106, 381-390DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(01)00451-2)

Figure 5 T1R2+3 Responds to Sweet Tastants HEK-293 cells coexpressing promiscuous G proteins and rat T1R2 and T1R3 were stimulated with various sweet compounds. Robust increases in [Ca2+]i were observed upon addition of 250 mM sucrose (d and g), 180 μM GA-2 (e and h) and 10 mM acesulfame-K (f and i). (a)–(c) show cells prior to stimulation. No responses were detected without receptors (panel j) or promiscuous G proteins (panel k). Glucose and several other sweet tastants (see figure 6) did not activate this receptor combination (l); scales indicate [Ca2+]i (nM) determined from FURA-2 F340/F380 ratios. Line traces (g–i) show the kinetics of the [Ca2+]i changes for representative cells from panels (d)–(f). The bar indicates the time and duration of the stimulus Cell 2001 106, 381-390DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(01)00451-2)

Figure 6 T1R2+3 Selectively Responds to a Broad Range of Sweet Compounds (a) The responses of the T1R2+3 receptor combination were specific to sucrose, fructose, and five artificial sweeteners. Concentrations used are: GA-1 (500 μM); GA-2 (500 μM); sucrose (250 mM); fructose (250 mM); acesulfame-K (10 mM); dulcin (2 mM); sodium saccharin (5 mM); N-methyl saccharin (5 mM); glucose (250 mM); maltose (250 mM); lactose (250 mM); galactose (250 mM); palatinose (250 mM); thaumatin (0.1%); sodium cyclamate (15 mM); aspartame (2 mM). Columns represent the mean ± SEM of a minimum of 16 independent determinations. (b) Dose response of T1R2+3 to sucrose, saccharin, acesulfame-K and GA-2. The relative changes in [Ca2+]i are shown as FURA-2 (F340/F380) ratios normalized to the responses obtained for the highest concentration of each compound. Each point represents the mean ± SEM of a minimum of 20 assays. (c) Kinetics and desensitization of T1R2+3 sweet responses. Cells expressing T1R2+3 were stimulated with multiple pulses of sweet tastants: GA-2 (360 μM), sucrose, (suc: 250 mM), acesulfame-K (aceK: 10 mM), cyclamate (cyc: 15 mM), glucose (glu: 250 mM), and aspartame (asp: 2 mM). Dots and horizontal bars indicate the time and duration of the stimulus. Sucrose, GA-2, and acesulfame-K elicit robust responses; repeated or prolonged stimulation with any one of these tastants (e.g., GA-2) results in a decreased response indicative of desensitization. Stimulation with sucrose or acesulfame-K immediately after GA-2 results in an attenuated response, suggesting cross-desensitization. The trace was derived from 80 responding cells in the field of view. See text for additional details Cell 2001 106, 381-390DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(01)00451-2)

Figure 7 T1Rs and T2Rs Are Segregated in Distinct Populations of Taste Receptor Cells Double-label fluorescent in situ hybridization was used to examine the degree of overlap between the T1R and T2R families of sweet and bitter taste receptors. (a) T1R3 (green) and T2Rs (a mixture of 20 receptors, red) are never coexpressed. A section through a circumvallate papilla is shown (b) like panel (a), but with a mixture of all three T1Rs (green) versus 20 T2Rs in a foliate papilla Cell 2001 106, 381-390DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(01)00451-2)