Chief Minister’s School Reforms Roadmap

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Present Status of Software for Site Specific Fertilizer Recommendations and Future Outlook for improving its Scope and Precision.
Advertisements

Investing in Energy Today, Our key to a brighter tomorrow! 01 August 2013.
ANNUAL STATUS OF EDUCATION REPORT (ASER) ASER PAKISTAN  Citizen led large scale national household survey (3-16).  Measure quality of.
CLIMATE CHANGE ADAPTATIONS AND AGRI-EXTENSION PUNJAB DR MUHAMMAD ANJUM ALI DIRECTOR GENERAL AGRICULTURE (EXTENSION AND ADAPTIVE RESEARCH) PUNJAB.
PRESENTED TO: Mam. Ammara Ikram Presented By: Muhammad Ajmal (BIT-07-12) Shahbaz Hussain (BIT-07-26) Sultan Salahuddin (BIT-07-46) Muhammad Faisal (BIT-07-49)
Paint Your Districts Prepared by: Information Management Unit FAO, Pakistan Contact for more information: 1.To edit the districts with.
Out of School Children in Punjab Looking at Access & Equity “Every child enrolls in school Every child is retained in school Every child learns and makes.
PUNJAB Launch – 07 Feb ASER PAKISTAN ASER - The Annual Status of Education Report (ASER) is a citizen led large scale national household.
ANNUAL STATUS OF EDUCATION REPORT (ASER) ASER PAKISTAN  Citizen led large scale national household survey (3-16).  Measure quality of.
Does the labour market structure explain differences in poverty in Rural Punjab Rashid Amjad G.M. Arif.
Should Pakistan leapfrog the developed world in broadband? Rizwan Tiwana Chief Technical Officer Wateen Telecom International Networking and Communications.
ANNUAL STATUS OF EDUCATION REPORT (ASER) ASER PAKISTAN  Citizen led large scale national household survey (3-16).  Measure quality of.
SANITATION STRATEGY PUNJAB SEQUENCE VISION NATIONAL SANITATION POLICY SANITATION STRATEGY – PUNJAB SANITATION RELATED DATA SELECTION CRITERIA.
The Geography and Lives of the Poor: Evidence from Punjab Ali Cheema Lyyla Khalid Manasa Patnam Lahore University of Management Sciences 2008.
ASER PAKISTAN Punjab Launch February10, 2014 Lahore A Citizen Led Initiative.
ANNUAL STATUS OF EDUCATION REPORT (ASER) ASER PAKISTAN  Citizen led large scale national household survey (3-16).  Measure quality of.
Dist Chiniot Launch – 11 Feb ASER PAKISTAN 2011  ASER- Annual Status of Education report is a survey of the quality of education.  ASER seeks.
Reforms in School Education, Punjab
ANNUAL STATUS OF EDUCATION REPORT (ASER) ASER PAKISTAN  Citizen led large scale national household survey (3-16).  Measure quality of.
 schools in Punjab  1006 non-functional schools  Non-Functional Schools Reasoning: › No Teachers › No Students › No Building  PEF to take.
ACTIVITIES & FUNCTIONS OF BUREAU OF STATISTICS, PUNJAB BOS Punjab1 By: Shamim Rafique Director Generall, Bureau of Statistics.
ANNUAL STATUS OF EDUCATION REPORT (ASER) ASER PAKISTAN  Citizen led large scale national household survey (3-16).  Measure quality of.
IndicatorTarget Teacher Presence 90% for all districts every month Student Attendance Districts are divided into category A, B & C, based on past performance.
ANNUAL STATUS OF EDUCATION REPORT (ASER) ASER PAKISTAN  Citizen led large scale national household survey (3-16).  Measure quality of.
ANNUAL STATUS OF EDUCATION REPORT (ASER) ASER PAKISTAN  Citizen led large scale national household survey (3-16).  Measure quality of.
ASER Pakistan A citizen led initiative Punjab Launch.
URBAN POLICY AND GOVERANCE AND INTITUITIONS Parvez Latif Qureshi 1.
KPK LAUNCH 31 st January % Male and 42% female.
ANNUAL STATUS OF EDUCATION REPORT (ASER)
ANNUAL STATUS OF EDUCATION REPORT (ASER)
Strictly Private & Confidential
Chief Minister’s School Reforms Roadmap
Role of Diaspora in Economic Corridors Development (ECD) in Pakistan
ANNUAL STATUS OF EDUCATION REPORT (ASER)
ANNUAL STATUS OF EDUCATION REPORT (ASER)
ANNUAL STATUS OF EDUCATION REPORT (ASER)
Chief Minister’s School Reforms Roadmap
31st January 2011 KPK LAUNCH.
ANNUAL STATUS OF EDUCATION REPORT ANNUAL STATUS OF EDUCATION REPORT
ANNUAL STATUS OF EDUCATION REPORT (ASER)
Chief Minister’s School Reforms Roadmap
Chief Minister’s School Reforms Roadmap
ANNUAL STATUS OF EDUCATION REPORT ANNUAL STATUS OF EDUCATION REPORT
ANNUAL STATUS OF EDUCATION REPORT ANNUAL STATUS OF EDUCATION REPORT
Chief Minister’s School Reforms Roadmap
Chief Minister’s School Reforms Roadmap
Chief Minister’s School Reforms Roadmap
ANNUAL STATUS OF EDUCATION REPORT (ASER)
Chief Minister’s School Reforms Roadmap
ANNUAL STATUS OF EDUCATION REPORT (ASER)
20th January 2010 PUNJAB LAUNCH.
ANNUAL STATUS OF EDUCATION REPORT ANNUAL STATUS OF EDUCATION REPORT
Chief Minister’s School Reforms Roadmap
Chief Minister’s School Reforms Roadmap
ANNUAL STATUS OF EDUCATION REPORT ANNUAL STATUS OF EDUCATION REPORT
Chief Minister’s School Reforms Roadmap
Parho Punjab, Barho Punjab School Education Reforms Roadmap
ANNUAL STATUS OF EDUCATION REPORT (ASER)
ANNUAL STATUS OF EDUCATION REPORT (ASER)
ANNUAL STATUS OF EDUCATION REPORT (ASER)
Chief Minister’s School Reforms Roadmap
Chief Minister’s School Reforms Roadmap
ANNUAL STATUS OF EDUCATION REPORT (ASER)
Chief Minister’s School Reforms Roadmap
ANNUAL STATUS OF EDUCATION REPORT (ASER)
Chief Minister’s School Reforms Roadmap
Chief Minister’s School Reforms Roadmap
ANNUAL STATUS OF EDUCATION REPORT (ASER)
Chief Minister’s School Reforms Roadmap
20th January 2010 PUNJAB LAUNCH.
Presentation transcript:

Chief Minister’s School Reforms Roadmap Ranking of the Districts & Divisions 1st Quarter 2018-19 (September 2018)

Monitoring Indicators (1/4) Definition Target A. Core Student Attendance (1-12) Student PRESENT as % of total students ENROLLED District Specific A1 Teacher Presence Teachers PRESENT as a % of TOTAL teachers A2 90% AEO Visits % of only primary schools visited by concerned AEO twice in the month A3 90% 25 December 2018 Programme Monitoring & Implementation Unit

Monitoring Indicators (2/4) Definition Target B. Retention Student Attendance (Kachi) Student PRESENT as % of total students ENROLLED B1 District Specific Retention (Kachi) CURRENT enrolment as % of BASELINE enrolment District Specific B2 Student Attendance (1-5) Student PRESENT as % of total students ENROLLED B3 District Specific Retention (1-5) CURRENT enrolment as % of BASELINE enrolment District Specific B4 25 December 2018 Programme Monitoring & Implementation Unit

Monitoring Indicators (3/4) Definition Target C. Facilities Functioning Facilities FUNCTIONING & available facilities as a % of total REQUIRED facilities (Electricity, BW, Toilets and DW) C1 95% Sufficiency of Toilets Schools having number of toilets in accordance with the given criteria District Specific C2 School Hygiene Average score of cleanliness (Building, Classrooms, Toilets, Play ground) of the schools at dist level C3 80% 25 December 2018 Programme Monitoring & Implementation Unit

Monitoring Indicators (4/4) Definition Target D. Literacy and Numeracy English Questions answered correctly 𝐓𝐨𝐭𝐚𝐥 𝐐𝐮𝐞𝐬𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐬 % D1 80% Urdu Questions answered correctly 𝐓𝐨𝐭𝐚𝐥 𝐐𝐮𝐞𝐬𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐬 % D2 80% Mathematics Questions answered correctly 𝐓𝐨𝐭𝐚𝐥 𝐐𝐮𝐞𝐬𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐬 % D3 80% LitNum materials % of schools where LitNum material is present and being used D4 80% 25 December 2018 Programme Monitoring & Implementation Unit

1-Student Attendance (1-12) Target : District Specific Rank District Sep'18 Target Score Avg. Perf. against target Final Score 1 BHAKKAR 91.09 85 6.1 2 HAFIZABAD 96.02 90 6.0 3 RAHIMYAR KHAN 90.76 5.8 4 GUJRANWALA 93.60 88 5.6 5 PAKPATTAN 92.88 4.9 6 OKARA 94.78 4.8 7 MIANWALI 92.74 4.7 8 NANKANA SAHIB 92.69 9 RAJANPUR 89.53 4.5 10 D.G. KHAN 89.50 11 JHELUM 94.25 4.2 12 KHANEWAL 94.09 4.1 13 RAWALPINDI 91.73 3.7 14 GUJRAT 93.72 15 M.B.DIN 93.61 3.6 16 FAISALABAD 93.53 3.5 17 KASUR 93.49 18 NAROWAL 91.48 19 CHAKWAL 93.21 3.2 20 CHINIOT 93.14 3.1 21 KHUSHAB 93.09 22 JHANG 92.94 2.9 23 T.T.SINGH 92.90 24 SIALKOT 92.84 2.8 25 BAHAWALNAGAR 26 SAHIWAL 92.71 2.7 27 SHEIKHUPURA 92.70 28 LAYYAH 90.61 2.6 29 SARGODHA 92.58 30 MUZAFFARGARH 90.49 2.5 31 ATTOCK 92.39 2.4 32 MULTAN 91.95 2.0 33 VEHARI 91.70 1.7 34 LAHORE 90.97 1.0 35 LODHRAN 90.78 0.8 36 BAHAWALPUR 89.98 (0.0) Target achieved Target not achieved Sahiwal Khanewal D.G . Khan Multan Muzaffargarh Lodhran Vehari Bahawalpur Rahimyar Rajanpur Layyah T.T . Singh Rawalpindi Gujrat Jhelum M.B . Din Sialkot Narowal Gujranwala Hafizabad Lahore Faisalabad Bahawalnagar Pakpattan Okara Jhang Sargodha Khushab Bhakkar Mianwali Chakwal Attock Shekhupura Nankana Sahib Chiniot Kasur Khan PMIU-PESRP

2-Teacher Presence Target : 90% PMIU-PESRP OKARA 96.4 6.4 CHINIOT 96.2 Rank District Sep'18 Score Avg. Perf. against target Final Score 1 OKARA 96.4 6.4 2 CHINIOT 96.2 6.2 3 BHAKKAR 4 FAISALABAD 5 MUZAFFARGARH 96.1 6.1 6 T.T.SINGH 96.0 6.0 7 KHUSHAB 8 HAFIZABAD 9 RAJANPUR 95.9 5.9 10 JHELUM 11 SIALKOT 95.8 5.8 12 NANKANA SAHIB 95.7 5.7 13 M.B.DIN 95.6 5.6 14 GUJRAT 95.5 5.5 15 KHANEWAL 95.4 5.4 16 D.G. KHAN 17 LAYYAH 18 SHEIKHUPURA 95.3 5.3 19 SARGODHA 20 BAHAWALPUR 95.2 5.2 21 KASUR 22 JHANG 23 LODHRAN 24 SAHIWAL 25 PAKPATTAN 95.1 5.1 26 MULTAN 27 GUJRANWALA 95.0 5.0 28 CHAKWAL 29 MIANWALI 94.8 4.8 30 VEHARI 31 BAHAWALNAGAR 94.6 4.6 32 RAHIMYAR KHAN 33 NAROWAL 34 ATTOCK 94.5 4.5 35 RAWALPINDI 94.0 4.0 36 LAHORE 93.6 3.7 Target achieved Target not achieved Sahiwal Khanewal D.G . Khan Multan Muzaffargarh Lodhran Vehari Bahawalpur Rahimyar Rajanpur Layyah T.T . Singh Rawalpindi Gujrat Jhelum M.B . Din Sialkot Narowal Gujranwala Hafizabad Lahore Faisalabad Bahawalnagar Pakpattan Okara Jhang Sargodha Khushab Bhakkar Mianwali Chakwal Attock Shekhupura Nankana Sahib Chiniot Kasur Khan PMIU-PESRP

3-AEO Visits Target : 90% Rank District Sep'18 Score Avg. Perf. against target Final Score 1 OKARA 99.9 9.9 2 GUJRAT 3 NANKANA SAHIB 99.8 9.8 4 HAFIZABAD 5 M.B.DIN 6 ATTOCK 7 BHAKKAR 8 JHANG 9 SAHIWAL 99.7 9.7 10 CHINIOT 11 KHANEWAL 12 RAHIMYAR KHAN 99.6 9.6 13 MULTAN 99.5 9.5 14 RAJANPUR 15 CHAKWAL 16 LAYYAH 17 FAISALABAD 18 SARGODHA 19 PAKPATTAN 20 KHUSHAB 99.4 9.4 21 JHELUM 22 KASUR 99.3 9.3 23 BAHAWALPUR 24 MUZAFFARGARH 99.2 9.2 25 VEHARI 26 T.T.SINGH 99.0 9.0 27 LODHRAN 98.9 8.9 28 D.G. KHAN 98.8 8.8 29 MIANWALI 30 RAWALPINDI 98.7 8.7 31 GUJRANWALA 98.5 8.5 32 LAHORE 98.4 8.4 33 NAROWAL 97.9 7.9 34 BAHAWALNAGAR 97.6 7.6 35 SIALKOT 97.5 7.5 36 SHEIKHUPURA Target achieved Target not achieved Sahiwal Khanewal D.G . Khan Multan Muzaffargarh Lodhran Vehari Bahawalpur Rahimyar Rajanpur Layyah T.T . Singh Rawalpindi Gujrat Jhelum M.B . Din Sialkot Narowal Gujranwala Hafizabad Lahore Faisalabad Bahawalnagar Pakpattan Okara Jhang Sargodha Khushab Bhakkar Mianwali Chakwal Attock Shekhupura Nankana Sahib Chiniot Kasur Khan * % of Primary & Middle Schools visited by concerned AEO twice in a month PMIU-PESRP

4-Student Attendance (Kachi) Target : District Specific Rank District Sep'18 Target Score Avg. Perf. against target Final Score 1 BHAKKAR 92.6 85 7.6 2 GUJRANWALA 95.1 88 7.1 3 PAKPATTAN 95.0 7.0 4 HAFIZABAD 96.8 90 6.8 5 OKARA 96.6 6.6 6 CHAKWAL 96.4 6.4 7 RAHIMYAR KHAN 91.2 6.2 8 KASUR 96.0 6.0 9 MIANWALI 93.7 5.7 10 KHUSHAB 95.6 5.6 11 JHELUM 95.5 5.5 12 RAWALPINDI 93.3 5.3 13 M.B.DIN 95.3 14 LAYYAH 93.2 5.2 15 SHEIKHUPURA 95.2 16 JHANG 17 GUJRAT 5.1 18 RAJANPUR 90.0 5.0 19 SIALKOT 20 KHANEWAL 94.9 4.9 21 FAISALABAD 94.8 4.8 22 T.T.SINGH 23 NANKANA SAHIB 92.7 4.7 24 MUZAFFARGARH 4.6 25 ATTOCK 94.6 26 SARGODHA 94.5 4.5 27 D.G. KHAN 89.4 4.4 28 NAROWAL 91.4 3.4 29 MULTAN 93.0 3.0 30 BAHAWALNAGAR 92.8 2.8 31 SAHIWAL 2.6 32 VEHARI 92.3 2.3 33 BAHAWALPUR 92.1 2.1 34 CHINIOT 91.7 1.7 35 LAHORE 91.6 1.6 36 LODHRAN 1.4 Target achieved Target not achieved Sahiwal Khanewal D.G . Khan Multan Muzaffargarh Lodhran Vehari Bahawalpur Rahimyar Rajanpur Layyah T.T . Singh Rawalpindi Gujrat Jhelum M.B . Din Sialkot Narowal Gujranwala Hafizabad Lahore Faisalabad Bahawalnagar Pakpattan Okara Jhang Sargodha Khushab Bhakkar Mianwali Chakwal Attock Shekhupura Nankana Sahib Chiniot Kasur Khan PMIU-PESRP

5-Retention (Kachi) Target : District Specific PMIU-PESRP LAHORE 98.66 Rank District Sep'18 Target Score Avg. Perf. against target Final Score 1 LAHORE 98.66 92.00 6.7 2 KHANEWAL 99.60 93.43 6.2 3 PAKPATTAN 98.78 93.00 5.8 4 BAHAWALNAGAR 98.59 93.59 5.0 5 RAJANPUR 98.90 94.12 4.8 6 NANKANA SAHIB 99.14 94.44 4.7 7 RAWALPINDI 98.68 94.26 4.4 8 ATTOCK 99.13 95.39 3.7 9 CHINIOT 99.51 95.84 10 HAFIZABAD 99.18 95.74 3.4 11 SARGODHA 99.39 96.15 3.2 12 M.B.DIN 99.67 96.44 13 SAHIWAL 99.46 96.33 3.1 14 VEHARI 99.59 96.70 2.9 15 MUZAFFARGARH 98.87 96.07 2.8 16 JHELUM 98.89 96.34 2.6 17 JHANG 99.58 97.06 2.5 18 GUJRANWALA 98.14 95.64 19 T.T.SINGH 99.69 97.23 20 SIALKOT 98.81 96.40 2.4 21 BHAKKAR 97.28 2.3 22 KHUSHAB 98.99 96.95 2.0 23 SHEIKHUPURA 99.38 97.38 24 BAHAWALPUR 98.88 96.94 1.9 25 LODHRAN 99.56 97.74 1.8 26 MULTAN 98.75 97.04 1.7 27 OKARA 99.86 98.29 1.6 28 FAISALABAD 98.16 1.5 29 NAROWAL 97.56 1.4 30 D.G. KHAN 98.13 96.74 31 RAHIMYAR KHAN 98.98 97.70 1.3 32 LAYYAH 99.50 98.25 1.2 33 KASUR 98.69 0.9 34 GUJRAT 98.67 0.8 35 MIANWALI 99.45 98.71 0.7 36 CHAKWAL 99.48 0.6 Target achieved Target not achieved Sahiwal Khanewal D.G . Khan Multan Muzaffargarh Lodhran Vehari Bahawalpur Rahimyar Rajanpur Layyah T.T . Singh Rawalpindi Gujrat Jhelum M.B . Din Sialkot Narowal Gujranwala Hafizabad Lahore Faisalabad Bahawalnagar Pakpattan Okara Jhang Sargodha Khushab Bhakkar Mianwali Chakwal Attock Shekhupura Nankana Sahib Chiniot Kasur Khan PMIU-PESRP

6-Student Attendance (1-5) Target : District Specific Rank District Sep'18 Target Score Avg. Perf. against target Final Score 1 BHAKKAR 91.36 85 6.4 2 HAFIZABAD 96.34 90 6.3 3 GUJRANWALA 93.73 88 5.7 4 RAHIMYAR KHAN 90.54 5.5 5 PAKPATTAN 93.12 5.1 6 OKARA 94.72 4.7 7 NANKANA SAHIB 92.57 4.6 8 MIANWALI 92.42 4.4 9 RAJANPUR 89.20 4.2 10 KHANEWAL 93.89 3.9 11 RAWALPINDI 91.83 3.8 12 D.G. KHAN 88.80 13 GUJRAT 93.80 14 KASUR 93.79 15 JHELUM 93.76 16 NAROWAL 91.76 17 M.B.DIN 93.57 3.6 18 CHAKWAL 93.33 3.3 19 FAISALABAD 20 KHUSHAB 93.26 21 SHEIKHUPURA 93.19 3.2 22 JHANG 93.08 3.1 23 ATTOCK 93.02 3.0 24 T.T.SINGH 92.89 2.9 25 MUZAFFARGARH 90.88 26 SIALKOT 92.82 2.8 27 CHINIOT 92.81 28 LAYYAH 2.5 29 SARGODHA 92.52 30 SAHIWAL 92.48 31 BAHAWALNAGAR 92.40 2.4 32 MULTAN 91.72 1.7 33 VEHARI 91.24 1.2 34 LODHRAN 91.16 35 LAHORE 91.15 36 BAHAWALPUR 90.13 0.1 Target achieved Target not achieved Sahiwal Khanewal D.G . Khan Multan Muzaffargarh Lodhran Vehari Bahawalpur Rahimyar Rajanpur Layyah T.T . Singh Rawalpindi Gujrat Jhelum M.B . Din Sialkot Narowal Gujranwala Hafizabad Lahore Faisalabad Bahawalnagar Pakpattan Okara Jhang Sargodha Khushab Bhakkar Mianwali Chakwal Attock Shekhupura Nankana Sahib Chiniot Kasur Khan PMIU-PESRP

7-Retention (1-5) Target : District Specific PMIU-PESRP PAKPATTAN Rank District Sep'18 Target Score Avg. Perf. against target Final Score 1 PAKPATTAN 97.05 77.20 19.9 2 LAHORE 98.40 86.72 11.7 3 ATTOCK 98.50 87.89 10.6 4 JHELUM 98.69 88.16 10.5 5 RAJANPUR 98.37 88.74 9.6 6 BAHAWALNAGAR 98.02 88.98 9.0 7 KHUSHAB 98.76 90.65 8.1 8 GUJRANWALA 98.32 90.58 7.7 9 NANKANA SAHIB 98.75 91.07 10 LODHRAN 99.00 91.31 11 BAHAWALPUR 98.45 91.38 7.1 12 SAHIWAL 98.24 91.30 6.9 13 JHANG 99.28 92.64 6.6 14 BHAKKAR 99.13 93.04 6.1 15 MUZAFFARGARH 98.72 92.93 5.8 16 MULTAN 93.74 5.0 17 HAFIZABAD 99.04 94.20 4.8 18 RAHIMYAR KHAN 98.23 93.63 4.6 19 D.G. KHAN 97.66 93.29 4.4 20 KHANEWAL 98.66 94.43 4.2 21 RAWALPINDI 98.52 94.31 22 CHINIOT 98.64 95.00 3.6 23 LAYYAH 99.14 95.62 3.5 24 SIALKOT 98.93 95.42 25 SARGODHA 99.07 95.93 3.1 26 OKARA 99.78 96.89 2.9 27 VEHARI 95.48 2.8 28 T.T.SINGH 99.70 97.01 2.7 29 M.B.DIN 99.18 96.49 30 SHEIKHUPURA 99.29 96.63 31 FAISALABAD 99.53 96.95 2.6 32 MIANWALI 99.38 96.96 2.4 33 CHAKWAL 99.45 97.34 2.1 34 KASUR 99.50 97.67 1.8 35 NAROWAL 98.98 97.76 1.2 36 GUJRAT 99.62 99.06 0.6 Target achieved Target not achieved Sahiwal Khanewal D.G . Khan Multan Muzaffargarh Lodhran Vehari Bahawalpur Rahimyar Rajanpur Layyah T.T . Singh Rawalpindi Gujrat Jhelum M.B . Din Sialkot Narowal Gujranwala Hafizabad Lahore Faisalabad Bahawalnagar Pakpattan Okara Jhang Sargodha Khushab Bhakkar Mianwali Chakwal Attock Shekhupura Nankana Sahib Chiniot Kasur Khan PMIU-PESRP

8-Functioning of Facilities Target : 95% Rank District Sep'18 Score Avg. Perf. against target Final Score 1 JHELUM 100.0 5.0 2 KHANEWAL 99.9 4.9 3 BHAKKAR 4 LAHORE 5 KASUR 6 VEHARI 7 SARGODHA 99.8 4.8 8 LODHRAN 9 GUJRAT 99.7 4.7 10 CHINIOT 11 MULTAN 99.6 4.6 12 GUJRANWALA 13 ATTOCK 14 MIANWALI 15 SIALKOT 16 M.B.DIN 99.5 4.5 17 CHAKWAL 18 KHUSHAB 99.4 4.4 19 NANKANA SAHIB 99.3 4.3 20 LAYYAH 99.2 4.2 21 FAISALABAD 22 SHEIKHUPURA 99.1 4.1 23 HAFIZABAD 99.0 4.0 24 NAROWAL 98.8 3.8 25 MUZAFFARGARH 98.7 3.7 26 PAKPATTAN 98.6 3.6 27 OKARA 28 D.G. KHAN 98.5 3.5 29 RAJANPUR 30 RAHIMYAR KHAN 31 SAHIWAL 97.9 2.9 32 BAHAWALPUR 33 JHANG 97.8 2.8 34 RAWALPINDI 97.7 2.7 35 BAHAWALNAGAR 97.5 2.5 36 T.T.SINGH 96.5 1.5 Target achieved Target not achieved Sahiwal Khanewal D.G . Khan Multan Muzaffargarh Lodhran Vehari Bahawalpur Rahimyar Rajanpur Layyah T.T . Singh Rawalpindi Gujrat Jhelum M.B . Din Sialkot Narowal Gujranwala Hafizabad Lahore Faisalabad Bahawalnagar Pakpattan Okara Jhang Sargodha Khushab Bhakkar Mianwali Chakwal Attock Shekhupura Nankana Sahib Chiniot Kasur Khan Facilities: 1-Electricity 2-Drinking Water 3-Toilets 4-Boundary Wall PMIU-PESRP

9-Sufficiency of Toilets Target : District Specific Rank District Sep'18 Target Score Avg. Perf. against target Final Score 1 OKARA 96.00 65.1 30.9 2 PAKPATTAN 92.07 66.5 25.5 3 BHAKKAR 93.54 68.2 25.4 4 CHINIOT 81.35 58.8 22.6 5 KASUR 76.47 54.0 22.5 6 NAROWAL 85.75 64.9 20.8 7 SARGODHA 85.85 67.5 18.4 8 JHANG 75.15 57.4 17.7 9 T.T.SINGH 76.97 63.9 13.0 10 ATTOCK 93.86 83.9 9.9 11 SAHIWAL 73.39 64.0 9.4 12 SIALKOT 79.80 72.1 7.7 13 FAISALABAD 56.89 50.2 6.7 14 M.B.DIN 73.65 67.2 6.5 15 KHUSHAB 82.74 77.7 5.0 16 RAHIMYAR KHAN 74.10 69.3 4.8 17 MIANWALI 87.98 84.8 3.1 18 VEHARI 70.29 68.5 1.8 19 LAHORE 67.35 65.5 20 LODHRAN 81.03 79.3 1.7 21 LAYYAH 81.01 79.8 1.2 22 CHAKWAL 91.80 90.9 0.9 23 MUZAFFARGARH 67.23 0.7 24 KHANEWAL 69.52 69.0 0.5 25 BAHAWALNAGAR 66.21 65.8 0.4 26 MULTAN 52.48 54.1 (1.6) 27 NANKANA SAHIB 57.64 61.2 (3.6) 28 HAFIZABAD 67.92 71.6 (3.7) 29 GUJRANWALA 71.44 75.2 30 JHELUM 82.55 86.8 (4.3) 31 D.G. KHAN 45.47 51.7 (6.2) 32 SHEIKHUPURA 54.57 (6.6) 33 GUJRAT 74.44 81.9 (7.5) 34 BAHAWALPUR 69.51 77.6 (8.1) 35 RAWALPINDI 66.67 77.9 (11.2) 36 RAJANPUR 65.86 78.8 (13.0) Target achieved Target not achieved Sahiwal Khanewal D.G . Khan Multan Muzaffargarh Lodhran Vehari Bahawalpur Rahimyar Rajanpur Layyah T.T . Singh Rawalpindi Gujrat Jhelum M.B . Din Sialkot Narowal Gujranwala Hafizabad Lahore Faisalabad Bahawalnagar Pakpattan Okara Jhang Sargodha Khushab Bhakkar Mianwali Chakwal Attock Shekhupura Nankana Sahib Chiniot Kasur Khan PMIU-PESRP

10-School Hygiene Target : 80% Rank District Sep'18 Score Avg. Perf. against target Final Score 1 HAFIZABAD 92.3 12.3 2 SARGODHA 91.7 11.7 3 OKARA 90.2 10.2 4 BHAKKAR 89.7 9.7 5 KHANEWAL 89.3 9.3 6 ATTOCK 88.7 8.7 7 M.B.DIN 87.3 7.3 8 JHELUM 86.6 6.6 9 MULTAN 86.3 6.3 10 FAISALABAD 85.8 5.8 11 MUZAFFARGARH 85.4 5.4 12 NAROWAL 85.1 5.1 13 KHUSHAB 84.9 4.9 14 KASUR 84.7 4.7 15 JHANG 16 MIANWALI 83.8 3.8 17 LAHORE 83.2 3.2 18 CHINIOT 83.1 3.1 19 GUJRANWALA 82.5 2.5 20 LAYYAH 82.0 2.0 21 PAKPATTAN 81.6 1.6 22 T.T.SINGH 81.5 1.5 23 SIALKOT 81.4 1.4 24 RAJANPUR 81.3 1.3 25 SHEIKHUPURA 81.2 1.2 26 CHAKWAL 80.7 0.7 27 RAHIMYAR KHAN 80.4 0.4 28 SAHIWAL 80.3 0.3 29 RAWALPINDI 79.4 (0.6) 30 GUJRAT 79.3 (0.7) 31 D.G. KHAN 79.1 (0.9) 32 LODHRAN 76.5 (3.5) 33 BAHAWALPUR 76.2 (3.8) 34 VEHARI 75.4 (4.6) 35 BAHAWALNAGAR 36 NANKANA SAHIB 68.5 (11.5) Target achieved Target not achieved Sahiwal Khanewal D.G . Khan Multan Muzaffargarh Lodhran Vehari Bahawalpur Rahimyar Rajanpur Layyah T.T . Singh Rawalpindi Gujrat Jhelum M.B . Din Sialkot Narowal Gujranwala Hafizabad Lahore Faisalabad Bahawalnagar Pakpattan Okara Jhang Sargodha Khushab Bhakkar Mianwali Chakwal Attock Shekhupura Nankana Sahib Chiniot Kasur Khan * Building, Classrooms, Toilets & Play ground PMIU-PESRP

11-LND-English Target : 80% PMIU-PESRP OKARA 85.40 5.4 M.B.DIN 84.30 Rank District Sep'18 Score Avg. Perf. against target Final Score 1 OKARA 85.40 5.4 2 M.B.DIN 84.30 4.3 3 HAFIZABAD 83.70 3.7 4 NANKANA SAHIB 83.30 3.3 5 KHANEWAL 83.20 3.2 6 CHAKWAL 82.50 2.5 7 BAHAWALPUR 8 SARGODHA 82.40 2.4 9 GUJRAT 10 LAYYAH 82.20 2.2 11 FAISALABAD 82.00 2.0 12 MUZAFFARGARH 81.40 1.4 13 RAWALPINDI 81.30 1.3 14 RAHIMYAR KHAN 81.20 1.2 15 JHANG 80.90 0.9 16 BHAKKAR 80.80 0.8 17 PAKPATTAN 18 LODHRAN 19 SAHIWAL 80.60 0.6 20 JHELUM 80.40 0.4 21 KHUSHAB 22 MIANWALI 23 ATTOCK 80.30 0.3 24 MULTAN 25 BAHAWALNAGAR 80.20 0.2 26 NAROWAL 80.10 0.1 27 RAJANPUR 80.00 - 28 SHEIKHUPURA 79.70 (0.3) 29 T.T.SINGH 79.40 (0.6) 30 LAHORE 79.30 (0.7) 31 SIALKOT 79.00 (1.0) 32 D.G. KHAN 78.90 (1.1) 33 CHINIOT 77.70 (2.3) 34 GUJRANWALA 35 KASUR 77.50 (2.5) 36 VEHARI 77.00 (3.0) Target achieved Target not achieved Sahiwal Khanewal D.G . Khan Multan Muzaffargarh Lodhran Vehari Bahawalpur Rahimyar Rajanpur Layyah T.T . Singh Rawalpindi Gujrat Jhelum M.B . Din Sialkot Narowal Gujranwala Hafizabad Lahore Faisalabad Bahawalnagar Pakpattan Okara Jhang Sargodha Khushab Bhakkar Mianwali Chakwal Attock Shekhupura Nankana Sahib Chiniot Kasur Khan PMIU-PESRP

12-LND-Urdu Target : 80% PMIU-PESRP OKARA 90.90 10.9 HAFIZABAD 90.10 Rank District Sep'18 Score Avg. Perf. against target Final Score 1 OKARA 90.90 10.9 2 HAFIZABAD 90.10 10.1 3 NANKANA SAHIB 89.10 9.1 4 M.B.DIN 88.80 8.8 5 PAKPATTAN 88.70 8.7 6 KHANEWAL 88.50 8.5 7 BHAKKAR 8 GUJRAT 88.10 8.1 9 BAHAWALPUR 10 SARGODHA 88.00 8.0 11 LAYYAH 87.80 7.8 12 RAHIMYAR KHAN 87.70 7.7 13 JHANG 87.30 7.3 14 FAISALABAD 87.20 7.2 15 MUZAFFARGARH 87.00 7.0 16 LODHRAN 86.90 6.9 17 MIANWALI 86.80 6.8 18 SHEIKHUPURA 86.70 6.7 19 KASUR 20 BAHAWALNAGAR 86.60 6.6 21 RAJANPUR 22 RAWALPINDI 86.20 6.2 23 T.T.SINGH 85.90 5.9 24 D.G. KHAN 85.80 5.8 25 CHAKWAL 85.60 5.6 26 CHINIOT 85.50 5.5 27 ATTOCK 85.40 5.4 28 MULTAN 29 SIALKOT 85.30 5.3 30 NAROWAL 85.20 5.2 31 LAHORE 85.10 5.1 32 SAHIWAL 85.00 5.0 33 KHUSHAB 34 JHELUM 84.90 4.9 35 VEHARI 84.80 4.8 36 GUJRANWALA 84.70 4.7 Target achieved Target not achieved Sahiwal Khanewal D.G . Khan Multan Muzaffargarh Lodhran Vehari Bahawalpur Rahimyar Rajanpur Layyah T.T . Singh Rawalpindi Gujrat Jhelum M.B . Din Sialkot Narowal Gujranwala Hafizabad Lahore Faisalabad Bahawalnagar Pakpattan Okara Jhang Sargodha Khushab Bhakkar Mianwali Chakwal Attock Shekhupura Nankana Sahib Chiniot Kasur Khan PMIU-PESRP

13-LND-Math Target : 80% PMIU-PESRP OKARA 91.60 11.6 HAFIZABAD 90.00 Rank District Sep'18 Score Avg. Perf. against target Final Score 1 OKARA 91.60 11.6 2 HAFIZABAD 90.00 10.0 3 GUJRAT 89.40 9.4 4 M.B.DIN 89.30 9.3 5 BAHAWALPUR 6 KHANEWAL 89.20 9.2 7 NANKANA SAHIB 89.00 9.0 8 MIANWALI 88.80 8.8 9 LAYYAH 88.60 8.6 10 SARGODHA 88.50 8.5 11 JHANG 88.30 8.3 12 PAKPATTAN 88.20 8.2 13 CHAKWAL 87.80 7.8 14 RAHIMYAR KHAN 87.70 7.7 15 BHAKKAR 87.60 7.6 16 LODHRAN 17 BAHAWALNAGAR 87.50 7.5 18 T.T.SINGH 19 ATTOCK 20 FAISALABAD 87.20 7.2 21 RAWALPINDI 86.90 6.9 22 NAROWAL 23 SIALKOT 86.80 6.8 24 RAJANPUR 86.70 6.7 25 SHEIKHUPURA 86.60 6.6 26 SAHIWAL 86.50 6.5 27 KHUSHAB 86.20 6.2 28 JHELUM 86.00 6.0 29 MUZAFFARGARH 85.80 5.8 30 KASUR 85.50 5.5 31 GUJRANWALA 85.40 5.4 32 LAHORE 85.00 5.0 33 CHINIOT 84.50 4.5 34 MULTAN 84.30 4.3 35 VEHARI 84.20 4.2 36 D.G. KHAN 83.70 3.7 Target achieved Target not achieved Sahiwal Khanewal D.G . Khan Multan Muzaffargarh Lodhran Vehari Bahawalpur Rahimyar Rajanpur Layyah T.T . Singh Rawalpindi Gujrat Jhelum M.B . Din Sialkot Narowal Gujranwala Hafizabad Lahore Faisalabad Bahawalnagar Pakpattan Okara Jhang Sargodha Khushab Bhakkar Mianwali Chakwal Attock Shekhupura Nankana Sahib Chiniot Kasur Khan PMIU-PESRP

14-Litnum Material Target : 80% PMIU-PESRP * LND Kitaabcha V3 Rank District Sep'18 Score Avg. Perf. against target Final Score 1 OKARA 98.18 18.2 2 KHANEWAL 96.81 16.8 3 BHAKKAR 96.71 16.7 4 PAKPATTAN 96.30 16.3 5 RAJANPUR 96.14 16.1 6 HAFIZABAD 95.35 15.3 7 FAISALABAD 94.81 14.8 8 CHINIOT 94.51 14.5 9 JHANG 94.43 14.4 10 T.T.SINGH 94.01 14.0 11 RAHIMYAR KHAN 93.31 13.3 12 LAYYAH 13 SAHIWAL 92.92 12.9 14 JHELUM 92.79 12.8 15 VEHARI 92.63 12.6 16 LODHRAN 92.47 12.5 17 NANKANA SAHIB 92.46 18 BAHAWALPUR 92.20 12.2 19 KHUSHAB 92.13 12.1 20 MULTAN 92.07 21 BAHAWALNAGAR 91.51 11.5 22 SARGODHA 91.44 11.4 23 SHEIKHUPURA 90.61 10.6 24 M.B.DIN 90.14 10.1 25 CHAKWAL 89.84 9.8 26 ATTOCK 27 MIANWALI 89.78 28 RAWALPINDI 89.41 9.4 29 MUZAFFARGARH 88.89 8.9 30 GUJRAT 88.50 8.5 31 KASUR 88.08 8.1 32 SIALKOT 88.04 8.0 33 D.G. KHAN 87.12 7.1 34 GUJRANWALA 86.73 6.7 35 LAHORE 85.44 5.4 36 NAROWAL 79.27 (0.7) Target achieved Target not achieved Sahiwal Khanewal D.G . Khan Multan Muzaffargarh Lodhran Vehari Bahawalpur Rahimyar Rajanpur Layyah T.T . Singh Rawalpindi Gujrat Jhelum M.B . Din Sialkot Narowal Gujranwala Hafizabad Lahore Faisalabad Bahawalnagar Pakpattan Okara Jhang Sargodha Khushab Bhakkar Mianwali Chakwal Attock Shekhupura Nankana Sahib Chiniot Kasur Khan * LND Kitaabcha V3 LND public app Monthly test presence Monthly test usage PMIU-PESRP

CONSOLIDATED – 1ST Quarter 2018-19 Equal to or greater than 13 Greater than or equal to 11 but less than 13 Rank District Sep'18 *Performance 1 OKARA 14 9.12 2 PAKPATTAN 8.71 3 BHAKKAR 8.42 4 SARGODHA 6.85 5 JHANG 6.54 6 KHANEWAL 6.48 7 ATTOCK 6.06 8 M.B.DIN 6.04 9 FAISALABAD 5.66 10 RAHIMYAR KHAN 5.44 11 KHUSHAB 5.40 12 SAHIWAL 5.03 13 LAYYAH 4.96 MIANWALI 4.91 15 MUZAFFARGARH 4.77 16 CHAKWAL 4.44 17 HAFIZABAD 6.79 18 CHINIOT 5.96 19 KASUR 5.74 20 T.T.SINGH 5.26 21 JHELUM 5.24 22 NAROWAL 4.79 23 RAJANPUR 4.63 24 SIALKOT 4.47 25 MULTAN 4.25 26 LAHORE 4.20 27 BAHAWALNAGAR 4.17 28 LODHRAN 4.12 29 NANKANA SAHIB 4.64 30 GUJRANWALA 4.30 31 GUJRAT 3.88 32 SHEIKHUPURA 3.63 33 RAWALPINDI 3.50 34 VEHARI 3.25 35 BAHAWALPUR 3.48 36 D.G. KHAN 3.18 Greater than and equal to 9 but less than 11 Less than 9 Sahiwal Khanewal D.G . Khan Multan Muzaffargarh Lodhran Vehari Bahawalpur Rahimyar Rajanpur Layyah T.T . Singh Rawalpindi Gujrat Jhelum M.B . Din Sialkot Narowal Gujranwala Hafizabad Lahore Faisalabad Bahawalnagar Pakpattan Okara Jhang Sargodha Khushab Bhakkar Mianwali Chakwal Attock Shekhupura Nankana Sahib Chiniot Kasur Khan *Performance = Average performance of all indicators against target PMIU-PESRP

Top & Bottom 5 Districts – 1st Quarter 2018-19 Sahiwal Khanewal D.G . Khan Multan Muzaffargarh Lodhran Vehari Bahawalpur Rahimyar Rajanpur Layyah T.T . Singh Rawalpindi Gujrat Jhelum M.B . Din Sialkot Narowal Gujranwala Hafizabad Lahore Faisalabad Bahawalnagar Pakpattan Okara Jhang Sargodha Khushab Bhakkar Mianwali Chakwal Attock Shekhupura Nankana Sahib Chiniot Kasur Khan Top 5 Districts Okara Pakpattan Bhakkar Sargodha Jhang Sahiwal Bottom 5 Districts 36. D.G.Khan 35. Bahawalpur 34. Vehari Rawalpindi 32. Sheikhupura PMIU-PESRP

District & Quarter wise Ranking Positions – Last 5 Quarters 2018-19 4th Quarter 2017-18 3rd Quarter 2nd Quarter OKARA 1 18 PAKPATTAN 2 3 6 16 BHAKKAR SARGODHA 4 7 19 23 JHANG 5 25 15 13 KHANEWAL 8 14 11 ATTOCK 17 M.B.DIN FAISALABAD 9 22 28 RAHIMYAR KHAN 10 29 33 20 KHUSHAB 26 31 SAHIWAL 12 LAYYAH 21 MIANWALI 35 MUZAFFARGARH CHAKWAL HAFIZABAD 24 CHINIOT KASUR 32 34 T.T.SINGH JHELUM 27 NAROWAL RAJANPUR SIALKOT MULTAN LAHORE 30 BAHAWALNAGAR LODHRAN NANKANA SAHIB GUJRANWALA GUJRAT SHEIKHUPURA 36 RAWALPINDI VEHARI BAHAWALPUR D.G. KHAN

CONSOLIDATED – 1st Quarter 2018-19 Equal to or greater than 13 Greater than or equal to 11 but less than 13 Greater than and equal to 9 but less than 11 Less than 9 Khanewal D.G . Khan Multan Vehari . Rawalpindi Jhelum M.B . Din Narowal Okara Chakwal Kasur Division Score SAHIWAL 14.00 SARGODHA FAISALABAD 13.50 RAWALPINDI 13.25 MULTAN 13.00 D.G. KHAN GUJRANWALA 12.83 BAHAWALPUR 12.67 LAHORE 12.50 Rawalpindi Gujranwala Sargodha Lahore Faisalabad Sahiwal D.G.Khan Multan Bahawalpur PMIU-PESRP

Thanks