Adding Value to the Urban Audit

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SOER 2010: structure and approach. Structure of SOER 2010 A Exploratory assessment Global drivers Megatrends Uncertainties Long-term policy implications.
Advertisements

URBACT II Building Healthy Communities 1 st Steering Group Meeting Brussels, 9-10 June 2008 An overview.
ESPON UK Network Workshop - ESPON and INTERREG IN THE UK Building spatial knowledge An ESPON Perspective Cliff Hague and Jenny Crawford.
8-9 October 2009 The ESPON 2013 Programme: Prospects and Achievements Regional and Urban Statistics Working Group meeting.
Improving the added value of EU Cohesion policy Professor John Bachtler European Policies Research Centre University of Strathclyde, Glasgow
1 Professionalising Programme & Project Management Developing programme & project management capacities for UNDP and national counterparts External Briefing.
EUROPEAN REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT FUND INTERREG EUROPE 2014 – 2020 Perspectives & possibilities Petra POLASKOVA Joint Technical Secretariat INTERACT on article.
The European Platform on Sustainable Urban Mobility Plans 25 th September 2014 Casablanca, Morocco Christof Marx Executive Agency for Small and Medium-sized.
Community of Practice on partnership in the ESF 8 October 2007 Open Days Benedict Wauters Deputy Director Flemish ESF Agency COP partnership coordinator.
URBACT II Thematic Network with Fast Track Label HerO – Her itage as O pportunity HerO – Her itage as O pportunity Thematic Network with Fast Track Label.
ESPON Seminar 15 November 2006 in Espoo, Finland Review of the ESPON 2006 and lessons learned for the ESPON 2013 Programme Thiemo W. Eser, ESPON Managing.
Regional Policy EUROPEAN COMMISSION 1 Interregional Cooperation and the Lisbon and Gothenburg Agendas “GROW” Brussels, 18 October 2007 Territorial Co-operation.
EUROPEAN REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT FUND RECOMMEND Final Event, 11 September 2014, Varna EU Interregional Cooperation State of play and perspectives Jason Martinez.
EUROPEAN REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT FUND Event – date, place About INTERREG EUROPE INTERREG EUROPE INTERREG IVC Joint Technical Secretariat.
HiLumi LHC is co-funded by the EU FP7 Capacities Programme, Grant Agreement Svet Stavrev (EU Projects Office, CERN) Administrative Manager 17.
20 May 2009 Indicators for long-term developments Unit D5 - Key Indicators for European policies Ottawa, May, 2009 Pieter Everaers, Eurostat.
REGIONAL POLICY EUROPEAN COMMISSION LSE/CASE Weak Market Cities Programme LSE/CASE Weak Market Cities Programme Why do declining cities matter to the EU.
ESPON / Social Preparatory Study on Social Aspects of EU Territorial Development Status: Interim Report Erich Dallhammer (ÖIR)
Summary of Local Seminars & Focus Groups 20/06/ Athens WP8 – TESTING II coordinated by IFI.
FP7-Infra : Design studies for European Research Infrastrutures 1st October 2011 – 31st December 2014 Duration 39 months – Periods : 2 (month.
Early School Leaving: A pathway for change Petra Goran DG Education and Culture.
ESPON 2013 Programme Info Day on Calls and Partner Café Call for Proposals on Targeted Analysis A Decade of Territorial Evidence.
EUROPEAN REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT FUND Stakeholder Workshop Brussels – 5 February 2014 INTERREG EUROPE Nicolas Singer | Senior Project Officer INTERREG IVC.
HORIZON 2020 W ORK PROGRAMME DG Research and Innovation.
ESPON Workshop at the Open Days 2012 “Creating Results informed by Territorial Evidence” Brussels, 10 October 2012 Introduction to ESPON Piera Petruzzi,
Action 12:Internal Monitoring BMW Regional Assembly.
The FDES revision process: progress so far, state of the art, the way forward United Nations Statistics Division.
Future outlook and next steps for ESPON The ESPON 2013 Programme OPEN DAYS Bruxelles, 10 October 2007.
Dissemination of SBS data and technical visits to MSs item 10 of the agenda Structural Business Statistics Working Group 14 April 2015, Luxembourg.
Mathias DEPRETZ – EuroVO-DCA Project Manager Work Package 1 – Management First Board Meeting – 2&3 october 2006 WP1 Management EuroVO-DCA Project FIRST.
Transnational Working & Reporting Procedures. LP Seminar January 2013 Transnational Cooperation & Reporting Procedures I) Transnational cooperation: Definition.
ESPON 2013 Programme Info Day on Calls and Partner Café Call for Proposals on ESPON Scientific Platform and Tools A Decade of Territorial Evidence.
Eastern European Partner countries
PLANNED ACTIONS – UPCOMING DUTIES
BenchCan Core Group Meeting
Open information day, DG Information Society
PROMOTION OF BEST PRACTICES FOR NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION
First Partners’ Meeting
Third Climate-ADAPT Webinar
MAES Working Group Meeting Brussels
Introduction to the Broader Impacts Resource Center
Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD)
Developing energy consumption data to meet users needs
Introduction to the Broader Impacts Resource Center
Website Monitoring – what are our users looking at?
Financing Natura 2000 GUIDANCE HANDBOOK
Alban MARCHÉ Director of Economics Policies Région Centre-Val de Loire
The ESPON 2013 Programme: Regional and Urban Statistics
Eurostat Flagship publication on cities
Country Update The Netherlands
Digital Innovation Hubs – An overview Parallel session in Agri-Food Working Committee Bilbao, 28 November 2018 Annita Kalpaka, Policy Analyst JRC Unit.
Adding Value to the Urban Audit
CEF e-Invoicing Readiness Checker
Overview of SDG indicators - latest developments
STATE OF AFFAIRS IN THE MISSOC PROJECT
”From Policy to Practice”
Developing a common understanding of Articles 8, 9 & 10 MSFD
Evolution of Urban Audit
Urban Statistics – Methodological work
The ‘State of European Cities Report’
Data Dissemination at the EU level
Structural Funds: Investing in Roma
Description of the REALISE project
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
EU Water Framework Directive
The approved ESPON 2013 Programme
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
… Two-step approach Conceptual Framework Annex I Annex II Annex III
Eurostat Flagship publication on cities
UN-GGIM: Europe – Work Plan
Presentation transcript:

Adding Value to the Urban Audit Update 10th October 2006

Contents Introduction, aims, process Overview of main deliverables 3. State of European Cities Report: Some Highlights

1. Introduction and aims

Introduction of the team ECOTEC Research & Consulting – Lead partner NordRegio – data perspective and Strength/weaknesses of Urban Audit Eurofutures – Social cohesion IDEA Consult – Case studies ECORYS Netherlands – User survey

External Experts Interim results reviewed in External Expert Meetings (April and September) Prof. M. Parkinson Prof. J. Lambooy Prof. G. Gorzelak M. Pezzini (OECD) -> Additional input (User perspective): Greg Clark (Cities and Regions)

Aims of the project Describe the current state of European cities and the changes over time; including the position of cities within their countries through country chapters To create a clear set of city typologies – helping to organise the cities in different groups facilitating the exchange of experience To demonstrate the use of the urban audit – helping to provide a guide to urban policy based on the relative positioning of a city Assess the strengths and weaknesses of the Urban Audit

2. Process and progress

State of European Cities Report Aim: Main deliverable that will set the bar for the future Balanced trend report with proper attention to different thematic categories Easy-to-understand and appealing classifications/ typologies Methodology should not distract from focusing on the information

State of European Cities Report: A. Typology & Trends Deliverables: Main State of Cities Report (approx. 150 pages) Сhapter 2: Growth and Stagnation of cities Chapter 3: Competitiveness of cities Chapter 4: Social Cohesion Chapter 5: Power of Cities Deadline Next version 2nd half October, final version 2nd half November

State of European Cities Report: B. Country Chapters Aim: Description of the national urban hierarchy, trends Overview of main themes, including competitiveness, social cohesion and power of cities

State of European Cities Report: B. Country Chapters Deliverables: 5 pages per country (presented in Annex to report) Deadlines:

Case Studies Aim: Comparing cities as a value added Collaboration with city authorities Useful example/template: what can you do with the Urban Audit? Short and concise deliverables (including some process aspects) Focus on transferable key issues only (especially within the typology - no need to be comprehensive) 4-6 accessible case studies (balanced package in terms of size, typology and geographic position within EU) Linking with Regional Programming/Structural Funds would be especially interesting

Case Studies Deliverables: Deadlines: (end October/mid-November) 4 to 5 5-page case studies Deadlines: (end October/mid-November) Amiens (Fr) Oviedo (Sp.) Darmstadt (D) Poznan (P) Glasgow (UK)

Strengths/weakness analysis of the UA Aim: Write down experiences with the usage (including a judgment about LUZ) Comment on the new list of variables (for 2009) – e.g. strange outlyers Deliverables: Note on Strengths/Weaknesses Approach Take note of comments throughout the project

Contents

3. State of the European Cities Report: Some Highlights

Growth and stagnation of cities

Urban size and contribution to economic growth

Competitiveness and typologies (1)

Competitiveness and typologies (2)

Dynamics of typologies

Power of Cities

Thank you for the attention! Feedback requests: Country profiles: 20/10 – 20/11 Typologies: 20/10 – 20/11 Thank you for the attention!