Project Manager: Brietta Perez

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SP 225 Lecture 11 Introduction to Hypothesis Testing.
Advertisements

Hypothesis Testing with z Tests Chapter 7. The z Table >Benefits of standardization: allowing fair comparisons >z table: provides percentage of scores.
TOPOLOGIES FOR POWER EFFICIENT WIRELESS SENSOR NETWORKS ---KRISHNA JETTI.
Forest Project Protocol v3.1 Use of FIA Data John Nickerson FIA Conference February 2010.
Post fieldwork analysis – archaeology Module: 10004/SU10 Archaeological reports Dr James Morris Museum of London
Topics: Regression Simple Linear Regression: one dependent variable and one independent variable Multiple Regression: one dependent variable and two or.
Basic Hydraulics Irrigation.
United Nations Statistics Division Backcasting. Overview  Any change in classifications creates a break in time series, since they are suddenly based.
The Consortium of Opportunities for Learners Second Year Mentor Project Department of Education Transition to Teaching Grant, 2004.
Chapter 14 in 1e Ch. 12 in 2/3 Can. Ed. Association Between Variables Measured at the Ordinal Level Using the Statistic Gamma and Conducting a Z-test for.
The BIM Project Execution Planning Procedure
Collecting Tree Survey Data Each group is assigned a series of randomly generated points along a transect line passing through a stand of trees. 1.At.
Copyright © 2005 Advantica Inc. (USA Only) and Advantica Ltd. (Outside USA). All rights reserved by the respective owner. Own Use Gas Review of 2000 Model.
Statistical Techniques I EXST7005 Review. Objectives n Develop an understanding and appreciation of Statistical Inference - particularly Hypothesis testing.
Proposal for Geodatabase on 5 Mile Dam Soccer Complex Daniel Cohen – Project Manager Samuel Boesch – Assistant Manager Mathew Riggan – GIS Consultant.
TEC 4607 Wind and Hydro Power Technologies Fall 2011.
Aims/Objectives Investigate the proposal for a new system.
1 Air Quality Bureau Kaizen Event Report Out By: Modeling Meddlers October 6, 2006.
Section Copyright © 2014, 2012, 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Lecture Slides Elementary Statistics Twelfth Edition and the Triola Statistics Series.
How much wood is in that tree? How much is that tree worth?
Ahmad Al-Ghoul. Learning Objectives Explain what a project is,, list various attributes of projects. Describe project management, discuss Who uses Project.
Lecture 16 Section 8.1 Objectives: Testing Statistical Hypotheses − Stating hypotheses statements − Type I and II errors − Conducting a hypothesis test.
Mitigation of the Urban Heat Island Effect via NeighborWoods Tree Program Project Manager-Clancy Taylor GIS Analyst/Web Designer-Will Johnston GIS/Remote.
Objectives Introduction Introduction Study Area Methodology Results & Recommendations.
Doing Science: Texting and Gender Experiment. Group Roles for Conducting Experiment (In some groups, individuals may perform more than one role) Recorders.
M ATH For Environmental Science. Dimensional Analysis Dimensional Analysis (Factor-Label) It is critical for success on the exam that you have a thorough.
10/31/2012 PROGRESS REPORT Prepared for the Texas Department of Transportation.
Assessment of Hill Country Land Use: Records at the County Level Loma Environmental Strategies.
Impacts of Environmental Regulations in the ERCOT Region Dana Lazarus Planning Analyst, ERCOT January 26, 2016.
Internal assessment, Results, Discussion, and Format By Mr Daniel Hansson.
Overview of the Final Report and Findings from the Review of Sampling Methods in Extrapolated New Base-Year Generation Studies May 11-12, 2004.
Info-Tech Research Group1 Manage IT Budgets & Cost World Class Operations - Impact Workshop.
Hypothesis Testing with z Tests Chapter 7. A quick review This section should be a review because we did a lot of these examples in class for chapter.
Prepared By: Maxine Cunningham John Schmidt Jonathan Braams 4/4/2009 Production Facility Optimization.
Project Management PTM721S
9.3 Hypothesis Tests for Population Proportions
PRESENTATION OF FINDINGS GRANTEES NEED ASSESSMENT
Chapter 7 Hypothesis Testing with One Sample.
Austin Tree Planting Prioritization
The revised Periodic Reporting Questionnaires: general features Alessandra Borchi Policy and Statutory Meetings Section UNESCO World Heritage Centre.
Lab Roles and Lab Report
Progress Report Project Manager-Clancy Taylor
System Design and Modeling
PCB 3043L - General Ecology Data Analysis.
Introduction to Geospatial Technologies in Ag
Chapter 7 Hypothesis Testing with One Sample.
Lecture 02 The Basics pf Creating a GIS Map
Devising a Marketing Plan
Statistics Mr. zboril | Milford PEP
Chapter 14 in 1e Ch. 12 in 2/3 Can. Ed.
CIS 498 Innovative Education-- snaptutorial.com
Theory, Tools, and Obstacles
Inferential Statistics
Inferential Statistics
In this tutorial you will:
Client Name Energy & Water Assessment August 27, 2014
STEM Fair Graphs & Statistical Analysis
Exploring Unsupervised Classification and Interactive Supervised Classification in Order to Characterize Impervious Cover Walker Wieland GEOG 342.
Using a Digital Terrain Model to Analyze a Watershed in Order to Match Inlets with their Respective Outfalls Aspen Navarro, Project Manager, GIS Analyst.
Neighborhood Planning Area
Urban Ecology Studio: 125th Street Smart Street Proposals
Project Management Process Groups
Introduction San Marcos Cemetery is a 45-acre plot located along Ranch Road 12, just West of the intersection of 12 and W Holland St. Some burials data.
PMI-SVC Scheduling Forum
Tools for Implementation
Tools for Implementation
Skills 5. Skills 5 Standard deviation What is it used for? This statistical test is used for measuring the degree of dispersion. It is another way.
COMPARING VARIABLES OF ORDINAL OR DICHOTOMOUS SCALES: SPEARMAN RANK- ORDER, POINT-BISERIAL, AND BISERIAL CORRELATIONS.
Chaug‐Ing Hsu & Yuh‐Horng Wen (1998)
Improving estimates of confidence intervals around smoking quit rates
Presentation transcript:

Project Manager: Brietta Perez Assistant Project Manager: Mujahid Hussein GIS Analysts: Jeffrey Cuevas and Nick Waters

Tree Planting in Austin, Texas An Analysis of the Austin Community Tree Program

Outline Introduction Task 1: Canopy growth and significance testing Task 2: CO2 and energy benefit totals Task 3: Extrapolation Conclusion

Task 1: Canopy Growth Work Completed Found the total canopy growth and reduction in the neighborhood planning areas as a whole Reduction subtracted from growth to account for canopy that disappeared between 2006 and 2010 Percentage of 16.5% overall tree canopy growth from 2006 to 2010 Sample map of Old West Austin neighborhood

Task 1: Canopy Growth Current and Future Work Current: plan visual representation, including data display and aesthetics Future: finalize and implement consistent layout for each neighborhood in the map book, to include: Map page for each neighborhood Locator map Neighbor labels

Task 1: Significance Testing Find out statistically weather there is a significant increase in canopy growth Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test Paired sampling Data not normally distributed Two sample sets: areas of canopy extent in each neighborhood in 2006 and 2010 Critical value of 0.05 Final decision to be presented in the final deliverables

Task 2: CO2 and Energy Benefit Totals Work Completed Total CO2 sequestered and energy conserved/delivery address/year: Assumed 1 in. tree trunk diameter (National Tree Benefit Calculator) CO2 or kWh * tree type (e.g. large broadleaf deciduous) = Total CO2 or kWh/address/year (e.g., Total Large Broadleaf Deciduous CO2 lbs. sequestered in one year at one address) Total CO2 sequestered and energy conserved/delivery 2006-2015: Initial data updated to 2014; added one year to total years in ground (Years in Ground + 1) * Total CO2 or kW h/address/year = Total CO2 or kW h/address/2006-2015 No longer conducting significance testing: necessary data unavailable

Task 2: CO2 and Energy Benefit Totals Planning Area Total CO2 in Pounds Total Energy in kWh’s Coronado Hills 8,696 3,532 Crestview* 27,540 10,800 East Cesar Chavez 7,580 3,400 East Congress 14,130 5,306 Franklin Park 10,890 4,524 McKinney 5,034 2,079 Montopolis* 25,152 10,590 N. Austin Civic Assn. 10,620 4,244 Old West Austin 10,152 4,293 Rosewood 14,448 5,008 St. John 2,016 880 Sweetbriar 9,982 3,724 West Congress 16,842 6,650 Wooten 9,020 3,270 Totals 173,034 68,657

Task 2: CO2 and Energy Benefit Totals Current and Future Work Currently assessing best possible method for visually displaying benefit totals Point symbols, graduated color 2 series of maps: delivery locations showing CO2 and kWh totals (natural breaks) Finalize consistent layout for the CO2 and energy benefits sections of the map book, to include: Number of ACT trees delivered within each planning area Overall total lbs. and kWh’s as of 2015 Locator map Neighbor labels

Task 3: Extrapolation Performed extrapolation to find canopy growth representative of 2015 and 2025 Assumed a tree canopy growth of one square foot per year Tree delivery data representative of 2014 Total amount of trees in a neighborhood multiplied by the field “years in ground” in order to assign a starting canopy extent value in square feet Total canopy extent provided by ACT trees in 2014 was 20,405 ft2

Task 3: Extrapolation One year = one square foot of canopy growth; can simply extrapolate by multiplying the number of years we want to predict 1 year was added to the “years in ground” field to represent 2015 Canopy extent in 2015 = 24,908 ft2 11 years were added to the “years in ground” field to represent 2025 Canopy extent in 2025 = 69,938 ft2

Extrapolation Results Planning Area Total Trees Years in Ground (2014) Years in Ground (2015) Years in Ground (2025) Canopy Extent (2014) Canopy Extent (2015) Canopy Extent (2025) N. Austin Civic Association 749 1 2 12 749 ft2 1,498 ft2 8,988 ft2 Wooten 134 9 10 20 1,206 1,340 2,680 Crestview 408 3,672 4,080 8,160 St. John 68 3 4 14 204 272 952 Coronado Hills 307 921 1,228 4,298 Old West Austin 175 8 19 1,400 1,575 3,325 Rosewood 253 7 18 1,771 2,024 4,554 E. Cesar Chavez 231 5 15 924 1,155 3,465 Montopolis 598 6 16 2,990 3,588 9,568 McKinney 13 462 693 3,003 Franklin Park 497 994 1,491 6,461 East Congress 295 17 1,770 2,065 5,015 West Congress 347 2,082 2,429 5,899 Sweetbriar 210 1,260 1,470 3,570 Totals 4503 20,405 ft2 24,908 ft2 69,938 ft2 Future work will consist of adding extrapolation results per neighborhood planning area to the map book.

Time Table Data processing actually completed very shortly after proposal presentation Data analysis took four weeks rather than three because of the need to revise methodology and recalculate In all, left with one week than initially planned for interpretation and production of deliverables Week 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Starting Date 8/ 24 31 9/ 21 28 10/ 19 26 11/ 16 11/ 23 Data Collection Data Preprocessing Data Analysis Interpretation and Deliverables

Conclusion On track to submit all deliverables by November 30, 2015 Question over which methodology to use for canopy growth extrapolation to balance accuracy and efficiency (time constraints) Base on NTBC leaf surface area (LSA) calculation? Base on assumption of 1 foot growth per year? Decided to base on assumption of 1 ft. growth per year No longer conducting significance testing for Task 2 Transitioning from data analysis to planning and implementing visual display Map book in three parts: series of map pages featuring canopy growth, CO2 sequestration, and energy conservation

Questions?