Experiences of designing WFD-monitoring networks in the Netherlands

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Role of monitoring programmes developed under the Water Framework Directive for future data flow Tim Lack.
Advertisements

Convention of the Protection and Use of Transboundary Watercourses and International Lakes Setting the scene for Session 1 National information systems.
Monitoring network development for the WFD in The Netherlands: State of affairs Jos Timmerman RIZA.
UNW-DPC International Workshop Institutional Capacity Development in Transboundary Basins Lessons learned from practical experiences 10 – 12 November 2008.
How close are we in the Water Framework Directive’s Implementation ? Paul C.M. Frintrop Institute for Inland Water Management and Waste-Water Treatment.
GIS development. Danube Commission+ISRBC meeting Sava GIS Sava GIS establishment –Performed in accordance with the Sava GIS Strategy EU WFD INSPIRE Directive.
The implementation of the EC Water Framework Directive in Norway Eva Skarbøvik and Stig A. Borgvang Norwegian Institute for Water Research (NIVA) with.
TMAP – WFD Workshop Reference Values Hamburg 29 – 30 November 2004 Overview WFD Implementation Harald Marencic Common Wadden Sea Secretariat.
Characterization Report Module 2: Water Budget, Pressures and Impacts, Significant Water Management Issues, Monitoring, Characterization Report Characterization.
Final Conference June Maastricht, The Netherlands 1 Case Study: Kłodnica catchment, (Odra river basin) Poland Janusz Krupanek Institut for Ecology.
National Environmental Research Institute Department of Freshwater Ecology WFD-Monitoring in Denmark NOVANA Brian Kronvang NERI.
IPPC Discharges Monitoring Workshop Water Framework Directive Overview (and its implications for Industry) Peter Webster Regional Chemist (EPA Cork)
MODULE 1 Water Framework Directive, Relation of WFD with Daughter Directives, River Basin Management Planning, Water Bodies, Typology, Classification River.
THE MANAGEMENT PLAN IN PRACTICE Case study. RBMP Detailed publication process in the directive...  art. 13: general rules  annex VII: detailed contents.
Water.europa.eu Water Framework Directive - a framework for Community action in the field of water policy Marieke van Nood WFD Team, DG ENV.D.2, European.
BUG SURVEYS : An Initiation of Transboundary Co- operation Małgorzata Landsberg-Uczciwek Voivodeship Inspectorate of Environmental Protection in Szczecin.
Europe-wide monitoring obligations under the EU Water Framework Directive Jos G. Timmerman Institute for Inland Water Management and Waste Water Treatment.
11 juni 2007 Ecological classification in the Netherlands1 Diederik van der Molen Ministry of Transport, Public Works and Water Management CIS workshop.
1 European Topic Centre on Water Workshop on: Identification of surface water bodies under the Pilot River Basin Initiative Monitoring Water Bodies Steve.
River Basin Management Plan Steps, Status and Objectives.
TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE FOR THE CONVERSION OF RBPAPs INTO RBMPs MONITORING INCEPTION WORKSHOP ISTAMBUL February Alfredo CORROCHANO CODORNÍU Carmen.
CIS Working Group 2A ECOSTAT Overall Approach to the Ecological Classification 01 July 2003 D/UK WGL CIS 2A.
TRANSBOUNDARY WATERCOURSES IN THE UNECE REGION Guidelines to complete the information data sheet for transboundary rivers Finnish Environment Institute.
Building WFD into impact assessment Richard Sharp Geomorphology IEMA webinar Thursday 31 March 2016.
Thematic assessments based on results from RBMPs Coastal and transitional ecological status & related presures Inland surface waters Hydromorphological.
Identification on Significant Pressures - Surface Water Bodies
Types of information and data required
Environmental policies in Europe
WFD and Inland Navigation
State of Implementation of CEA in Germany
Type of presentation/visualisation
The design of the monitoring network for lakes and rivers in Finland
Purpose Independent piece of legislation, closely integrated in a larger regulatory framework (complement to WFD): prevent deterioration protect, enhance.
One-out-all-out and other indicators
GEP vs. GES.
EU Water Framework Directive
One-out-all-out and other indicators
1. Implementation of the Water Framework Directive: notifications & infringements, RBMP assessments for the agricultural sector Expert Group on WFD & agriculture.
River Kokemäenjoki – Flood risk management & WFD
River Kokemäenjoki – Flood risk management & WFD
Philippe QUEVAUVILLER
Design of monitoring networks for rivers in Austria
One-out-all-out and other indicators
Preliminary feedback on analysis of Article V reports
Change and adapt the Eionet water data flow to meet WFD requirements
REFCOND Workshop Uppsala, May 2001
CIS-Workshop on River Basin Management Plans 8 and 9 May 2006 Bonn
Monitoring programs in Sweden
WGC-2 DG Meeting Towards a Guidance on Groundwater Chemical Status and Threshold Values 14:00 – 16:00 21 April 2008 Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Commission report on Art. 8 WFD Monitoring programmes
Scaldit: Scaldis Integrated Testing
Project 2.7 Guidance on Monitoring
Mandate of the EEA To provide the Community and Member States with:
Which is the real scope of the Guidance ?
CIS Working Group 2A ECOSTAT SCG Meeting in Brussels
Comparison of methodologies for defining Good Ecological Potential
Alternative Methodology for Defining Good Ecological Potential (GEP)
Scheldt Pilot River Basin
EP Pilot project Comparative study of pressures and measures
Water Framework Directive, Habitats Directive and Inland Waterway Transport Marieke van Nood WFD Team, DG ENV.D.2, European Commission.
Preparation of the second RBMP in Romania
Legal issues and compliance checking in WFD implementation SCG meeting 5-6 November 2008 Jorge Rodríguez Romero, Unit D.2, DG Environment, European.
CIS WG D meeting 7 April 2011 DG ENV, Brussels
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
Concept paper on the assessment of WFD River Basin Management Plans
Frequently asked questions Part II: Coordination of monitoring under WFD and BHD Workshop: Biodiversity and Water - Links between EU nature and water.
WG A ECOSTAT Draft Mandate
UK experience of Programmes of Measures
A general introduction
Assessment of Member States‘ 2nd River Basin Management Plans
Presentation transcript:

Experiences of designing WFD-monitoring networks in the Netherlands CIS workshop on Surface Waters Monitoring Networks Experiences of designing WFD-monitoring networks in the Netherlands Wim van Leussen Ministry of Transport, Public Works and Water Management, NL Brussels - 27-28 April 2006

Implementation WFD in the Netherlands Living in a delta (more than 50% lower than sea level) Rhine Meuse Scheldt Ems

Rhine Meuse Distribution of the water of the rivers & in Ems Rhine Scheldt Distribution of the water of the rivers Rhine & Meuse in the Netherlands

Implementation WFD in the Netherlands seven (sub)catchments Eems Schelde Maas

Working Programme Design WFD-monitoring network 2005 2006 NL-guidelines regional design compliance checking improvements of the network uploading data to WFD-portal regional decision-making national decision-making final monitoring nertwork

Surveillance monitoring Objectives: Assessment of long term changes in natural conditions and effects of anthropogenic activities Supplementing “risk analysis” Efficient and effective design of future monitoring programmes  How to obtain a representative overview?

First approach for the surveillance network: mainly in the major rivers (

First approach for the surveillance network: mainly in the major rivers ( Representative overview of the status of the major rivers and the regional subcatchments Final approach:

Selection of measuring locations representative cluster of water bodies the same type and status (biology and hydromorphology) measuring location - chemistry: 1 measuring point - biology and hydromorphology: generally more measuring points or the whole area

Selection of measuring locations BIOLOGY major questions: water body with a significant size and functions in the catchment? border crossing water body of significant size? belongs to one of the dominant or important types of water bodies in the catchment?

Selection of measuring locations CHEMICAL SUBSTANCES in the major rivers and at the downstream end of relevant subcatchments at relevant border crossing waters all WFD priority substances other chemical substances, giving essential pressure to the catchment physico-chemical parameters, supporting the biological quality elements at the biological monitoring locations

Selection of measuring locations HYDROMORPHOLOGY hydromorphological quality elements, supporting the biological quality elements at the biological monitoring locations over the whole area of the water body

surveillance monitoring network for the River Meuse chemistry

surveillance monitoring network chemistry Rhine-Centre surveillance monitoring network

surveillance monitoring network Scheldt surveillance monitoring network

Quality elements and measuring frequencies frequencies in accordance with WFD, sometimes higher due to requirements of the status classification

optimization surveillance monitoring network reference measurements Rhine-Centre < FHI standard < detection limit > FHI standard 1 year measurements optimization surveillance monitoring network

Hydromorphological quality elements RIVERS Course of the river (sinuosity, etc.) Cross section and natural condition Occurrences of artificial bottom areas Percentage of natural substrate Erosion / sedimentation patterns Occurrences of bank protection structures Land use in the riparian zones Land use in the flood plains Possibilities for natural inundation Possibilities for natural meandering Continuity in the river (inventary of obstacles) (biota and sediment) Obstacles for fish migration? Water levels Discharge, flow velocity Any effects on free (natural) discharge? Natural dynamics of the flow? Any effects? Tidal charateristics, incl. tidal range Groundwater levels in surrounding area

Meuse river basin district Hydromorphological quality elements Meuse river basin district Overall description of the hydromorphological status Deutsche Strukturgütekartierung For the whole Meuse river basin district

Meuse river basin district with 7 subcatchments Geul

Hydromorphological status (Gewässerstrukturgütekarte) Catchment of the Geul Hydromorphological status (Gewässerstrukturgütekarte) River Meuse GEUL Eyserbeek Selzerbeek Gulp Geul

Operational monitoring Objectives: Establish the status of the “at risk” water bodies (failing to meet the environmental objectives) Assess any changes in this status as a result of the implementation of programmes of measures determination in 6 steps “at risk” assessment of 2004 How to obtain a representative overview?

Surface waters “at risk”, possibly failing to reach the good status in 2015

All water bodies, which are “at risk” and the HMWBs Where to measure? All water bodies, which are “at risk” and the HMWBs All water bodies, where priority substances are discharged  water bodies can be clustered, but measuring points should be representative

6 steps step 1: operational monitoring needed? (water bodies “at risk”, and/or HMWBs) step 2: clustering of water bodies (same type, status, comparable pressures, belonging to the same (sub)catchment) step 3: what must be monitored? - selection of dominant pressures; - selection representative (most sensitive) biological quality element; - selection significant supporting abiotic quality elements step 4: where to monitor? - selection of representative measuring points step 5: frequencies of monotoring measurements step 6: monitoring methods (determination of the parameters)

tributary of the river Meuse Geleenbeek tributary of the river Meuse Some typical characteristics: area with previous mining industry densely populated area in Eastern part 3 sewage treatment plants important functions: agriculture and nature high potentials for ecological zone along the river

tributary of the river Meuse Geleenbeek tributary of the river Meuse Pressures: chemical: sulphate and heavy metals from previous mining area heavy metals and pesticides from agriculture inputs from sewage treatment plants (point sources) and agriculture (diffuse sources) hydromorphological: normalisation, obstacles for continuity

tributary of the river Meuse 3 clusters of water bodies Geleenbeek tributary of the river Meuse Three operational monitoring locations: - heavy metals - pesticides| - priority substances (1. = surveillance MP) - sulphate - heavy metals 2. & 3. - benthic diatoms - macrofauna 1 2 3

Operational monitoring locations in the Meuse river basin district