Commission of the UE Genedec project (FP )

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SCIENCE,SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURE AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT IN THE E.U.
Advertisements

Rural Development Policy
The political framework
Smart Growth for Europes Cities and Regions: Insights from Economic Geography for An Integrated Approach Philip McCann University of Groningen Special.
1. 2 Why are Result & Impact Indicators Needed? To better understand the positive/negative results of EC aid. The main questions are: 1.What change is.
Community Strategic Guidelines DG AGRI, July 2005 Rural Development.
BVLE Rural Development in Flanders – Prof. G. Van Huylenbroeck - 30/11/2005 Faculty of Bioscience Engineering – Department of Agricultural Economics Guido.
SOCIAL POLIS Vienna Conference Vienna, May 11-12, 2009 Working Group Session “Urban labour markets and economic development” Building a “Social Polis”
Zuzana Sarvasova National Forest Centre Zvolen
New opportunities for regional development through cross-border cooperation Ministry of Environmental Protection and Regional Development November 16,
RURAL DEVELOPMENT POLICIES IN BULGARIA Nedka Ivanova UNWE, Sofia, Bulgaria.
Community Strategic Guidelines DG AGRI, November 2005 Rural Development.
Presentation of the workshop results to the plenary session A) Strengthening rural entrepreneurship by connecting the local production with other economic.
Rural Development Programme 2014 – 2020 Local Government Practioners Workshop 12 th February Lorraine Lynas RDP Managing Authority.
The EU rural development plan and the international context Sabine LARUELLE Ministre des Classes Moyennes et de l’Agriculture FSAGx – November.
EU Rural Development Policy and Tourism Jean-Michel Courades DG Agriculture and Rural Development European Commission.
Axis 3: Diversification of the rural economy and Quality of Life in rural areas Axis 4: The Leader approach DG AGRI, October 2005 Rural Development
Nic Lampkin Institute of Rural Sciences
The implementation of the rural development policy and its impacts on innovation and modernisation of rural economy Christian Vincentini, European Commission.
Pathways out of poverty in the new agriculture John Staatz & Niama Nango Dembélé Michigan State University Cornell International Workshops on Agricultural.
1 European Union Regional Policy – Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion Commission proposals for Cohesion Policy Addressing challenges of.
© Economics Department, King’s School, Chester Enlargement of the EU: investigating the issues.
Ⓒ Olof S. Future directions of EU agricultural policies The CAP towards 2020 Tassos Haniotis, Director Economic Analysis, Perspectives and Evaluations.
Antonis Constantinou Director, Rural Development Programmes II DG Agriculture and Rural Development, European Commission DEVELOPING A VISION ON THE FUTURE.
Common policy, common budget? Péter Halmai Professor of Economics Szent Isván University Budapest, The future of the EU budget.
European Commission Introduction to the Community Programme for Employment and Social Solidarity PROGRESS
RURAL REGENERATION RURAL REGENERATION according to Andrea Fugaro Responsible for Development Policies.
Strategic Priorities of the NWE INTERREG IVB Programme Harry Knottley, UK representative in the International Working Party Lille, 5th March 2007.
│ 1│ 1 What are we talking about?… Culture: Visual Arts, Performing Arts, Heritage Literature Cultural Industries: Film and Video, Television and radio,
EU regionalism Practice, Implementation, Tools and Development Possibilities of EU Regional Policy Anita Pelle University of Szeged Faculty of Economics.
Wageningen International Introduction agri environment measures Pleven Agri environment in the Netherlands Background Natura 2000 and agricultere Common.
Creation of the basic conditions which will allow rural inhabitance to solve their problems of sustainable development in their communities rural development.
March 2007, Smolyan Angelos SANOPOULOS, Euroconsultants SA CROSS BORDER COOPERATION Bulgaria-Greece Experiences, Framework and New Operational.
The Common Agricultural Policy - the UK View Claire Wilding British Embassy Paris.
EIN Working Group 2, Seminar: Sustainable Farming and Food Safety Brussels 19 th June 2003 Sustainable use of land resources – policies and economics Allan.
Ⓒ Olof S. Communication on the future of the CAP “The CAP towards 2020: meeting the food, natural resources and territorial challenges of the future” DG.
Loretta Dormal Marino Deputy Director General DG for Agriculture and Rural Development, European Commission IFAJ Congress 2010 – Brussels, 22 April 2010.
Andrea Valigurova Radoslava Mitkova Monika Bialkowska.
07/02/2011Rural Development in the CAP post RURAL DEVELOPMENT IN THE CAP POST 2013 Attila JAMBOR Assistant Professor Corvinus University of Budapest.
EU RURAL DEVELOPMENT POLICY Half of the population of the 25 EU member states live in rural areas Therefore rural development is a very important policy.
Domestic support and international agricultural markets
A snapshot of the main challenges and opportunities of rural areas
Commission of the UE Genedec project (FP )
Food and Nutrition Security and Agriculture
Climate Change Elements of the SADC Regional Agricultural Policy (RAP)
Social economy as an opportunity to deal with local problems
What does the Community want?
Competitiveness in low income and low growth regions
THE MACRO-MICRO APPROACH FOR THE EVALUATION OF PUBLIC POLICIES
Sustainable rural development through organic production encouragement in state and local strategies in Bulgaria Organic production creates strong connections.
University of agribusiness and rural development
1University of Pavia, Dipartimento di Ricerche Aziendali, Pavia, Italy
Commission of the UE Genedec project (FP )
Regional Profile Tuscany residents: 3.7 million
Directore General for Agriculture and Rural Development
A "greener" CAP an ever greater need for agri-environmental indicators Working Group "Agriculture and Environment" of the Standing Committee for Agricultural.
Francesco PECCI University of Verona Maria SASSI University of Pavia
European Commission - Directorate General for Agriculture - A2
Sergiu Didicescu, Unit H1 DG Agriculture and Rural Development
1 – To update figures on economic and social disparities;
THE MACRO-MICRO APPROACH FOR THE EVALUATION OF PUBLIC POLICIES
Cohesion Policy, using geospatial information and statistics
REGIONAL COMPETITIVENESS: COMPARATIVE ADVANTAGES AND UNUSED RESOURCES by Vincenzo Spiezia OECD – Territorial Statistics and Indicators Regional and Urban.
Chapter 10: Location effects, economic geography and regional policy
The EU-added value of the CAP
Climate Change Elements of the SADC Regional Agricultural Policy (RAP)
Strategic Policies for a More Competitive Agriculture Sector
Commission of the UE Genedec project (FP )
The CAP post-2013: statistical needs in the field of rural development
Regional Co-operation Factsheet 2016
Presentation transcript:

Commission of the UE Genedec project (FP6-502184) Rural Development Policy: Possible Impact on Agricultural Productivity in Old and New Member States Commission of the UE Genedec project (FP6-502184) Elisa Montresor Univeristy of Verona – Italy Francesco Pecci University of Verona - Italy Maria Sassi University of Pavia - Italy

Importance of the analysis Fostering and enabling policy and institutional environment Encouraging agricultural productivity and competitiveness Rural Development Policy (2007-13) Strategic priorities Encouraging non-farm growth activity Improving social well-being, gender equity, managing risk, reducing vulnerability The rural development policy for the programming period 2007-2013 has stated five strategic priorities: Encouraging sustainable management of natural resources

Importance of the analysis Relationship between local agricultural systems and local socio-economic systems The analysis of the territorial systems Impact of decoupling on agriculture considering the interactions between agricultural and socio-economic variables The Rural Development Policy, Modulation and Cross-compliance Impact of decoupling and policy sensitive socio-economic variables on agriculture productivity From the agricultural point of view this rises at least two isuues Importance for the EU-15 and New Member Stats

socio-economic variables on agriculture productivity Impact of decoupling and policy sensitive socio-economic variables on agriculture productivity Intensity of the impact 1. Importance of the analysis Decoupling affects agricultural and socio-economic systems only in relatively restricted areas The analysis of the territorial systems

socio-economic variables on agriculture productivity Impact of decoupling and policy sensitive socio-economic variables on agriculture productivity Intensity of the impact 1. Importance of the analysis Territorial interventions to promote local factors for agricultural development The analysis of the territorial systems Stationary and non-stationary parameters

socio-economic variables on agriculture productivity Impact of decoupling and policy sensitive socio-economic variables on agriculture productivity Intensity of the impact 1. Importance of the analysis Non-stationary parameters Insights for territorial and decentralised intervention policymaking Stationary and non-stationary parameters Groups of homogeneous regions

The CAP regionalization? Impact of decoupling and policy sensitive socio-economic variables on agriculture productivity Intensity of the impact 1. Importance of the analysis 2. Object of the analysis The CAP regionalization? Object of the analysis Stationary and non-stationary parameters Groups of homogeneous regions

Data processing chain Initial data set AIC minimization Indicators 1. Importance of the analysis Initial data set 2. Object of the analysis 3. Data processing chain AIC minimization Indicators for GWRs Stationary parameters Non-stationary parameters Kohonen SOM classification Regionalization results

Indicators: analytical framework 1. Importance of the analysis Common 2. Object of the analysis Environmental, food safety and animal welfare standards Cross-compliance and good practices 3. Data processing chain - Competitiveness - Environment and Country side - Quality of life and Diversification of Rural areas 4. Indicators: analytical framework - Competitiveness - Multifunctionality - Sustainability Farmers: free to produce what the market needs Rural development Consumers Taxpayers Decoupling Single farm payments Modulation Agricultural Policy Subsidies

Agricultural productivity Indicators 1. Importance of the analysis 164 regions EU-15 205 regions EU-25 2. Object of the analysis Demographic features EU-15 Subsidies Innovation and diversification 3. Data processing chain 4. Indicators Agricultural productivity Socio-economic context Efficiency and competitiveness Environmental sustainability

Results: Non-stationary parameters 1. Importance of the analysis The variables affecting only locally the agricultural productivity are not only subsidies but also agricultural and socio-economic variables 2. Object of the analysis 3. Data processing chain 4. Indicators Farms and farmers structure; Agricultural innovation Employment and Human capital quality in rural areas 5. Results: Non-stationary parameters Overall Economic development, Innovation, Labour market Demographic features + Agricultural diversification Local attraction capacity

Results: Cluster analysis EU-15 Cluster 1 (48) – Total subsidies and the socio-economic context 1. Importance of the analysis Cluster 2 (38) – Total subsidies and the rural context 2. Object of the analysis 3. Data processing chain Cluster 4 (17) – Agricultural context and labour market Cluster 3 (17) – Innovation, human capital and regional welfare 4. Indicators 5. Results: Non-stationary parameters Cluster 6 (17) – Total subsidies, livestock intensity and socio-economic welfare 5.1. Results: Cluster analysis EU-15 Cluster 5 (24) – Agricultural and rural features

Results: Cluster analysis EU-25 1. Importance of the analysis Cluster 5 (31) – Agricultural structure, rural features and territorial attraction capacity Cluster 1 (42) – Farmers age structure, quality of human capital in rural areas and economic context 2. Object of the analysis 3. Data processing chain Cluster 4 (17) – Territorial attraction capacity and human capital 4. Indicators 5. Results: Non-stationary parameters Cluster 3 (42) – Agricultural diversification and socio-economic context 5.1. Results: Cluster analysis EU-15 Cluster 6 (36) – Agricultural vitality and sustainability and socio-economic context 5.2. Results: Cluster analysis EU-25 Cluster 2 (37) – Agricultural diversification and human capital

Results: maps comparison 1. Importance of the analysis EU-15 EU-25 2. Object of the analysis 3. Data processing chain 4. Indicators 5. Results: Non-stationary parameters 5.1. Results: Cluster analysis EU-15 5.2. Results: Cluster analysis EU-25 5.3. Results: maps comparison

Conclusions 1. The variables affecting only locally the agricultural EU-15 EU-25 1. Importance of the analysis 1. The variables affecting only locally the agricultural productivity are not only subsidies but also agricultural and socio-economic variables 2. Object of the analysis 3. Data processing chain 4. indicators 2. Spatial coherence among groups of regions sharing geographic borders and sometime coincident with the reference State borders 5. Results: Non-stationary parameters 5.1. Results: Cluster analysis EU-15 3. A great diversity exists between clusters in terms of profile 5.2. Results: Cluster analysis EU-25 5.3. Results: maps comparison 4. Regionalization: Integrated and multi-sector policy for agricultural development at the Regional and State level. 6. Conclusions

Results: Non-stationary parameters EU-15 EU-25 1. Importance of the analysis Total subsidies Farmers age structure <35/>55 Farm size structure <50UAA/>5UAA Cow+beef/UAA IPC agric./IPC total Employment in rural areas Life-long learning in rural areas GDP PPS per capita Employment rate High and medium high tec. manuf. (% employment) Population density Ageing Farmers age structure <35/>55 Farmers with other gainful activities Life-long learning in rural areas Tourism infrastructures in rural areas Employment in public sector/total employment Net migration rate GDP PPS per capita Unemployment rate Students ISCED levels 5 and 6 on total students High and medium high tec. manuf. (% employment) 2. Object of the analysis 3. Data processing chain 4. Data set 5. Results: Non-stationary parameters