Jérémy Lebreton EXOZODI Kick-off Meeting 10-02-2011.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
You have been given a mission and a code. Use the code to complete the mission and you will save the world from obliteration…
Advertisements

1 Copyright © 2010, Elsevier Inc. All rights Reserved Fig 2.1 Chapter 2.
STATISTICS Univariate Distributions
By D. Fisher Geometric Transformations. Reflection, Rotation, or Translation 1.
MIT 2.71/2.710 Optics 10/25/04 wk8-a-1 The spatial frequency domain.
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
0 - 0.
DIVIDING INTEGERS 1. IF THE SIGNS ARE THE SAME THE ANSWER IS POSITIVE 2. IF THE SIGNS ARE DIFFERENT THE ANSWER IS NEGATIVE.
MULTIPLYING MONOMIALS TIMES POLYNOMIALS (DISTRIBUTIVE PROPERTY)
Addition Facts
Robin Hogan, Chris Westbrook University of Reading Lin Tian NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Phil Brown Met Office Why it is important that ice particles.
Proposed new uses for the Ceilometer Network
ZMQS ZMQS
Chapter 7 Sampling and Sampling Distributions
Probing the Conditions for Planet Formation in Inner Protoplanetary Disks James Muzerolle.
Spitzer IRS Spectroscopy of IRAS-Discovered Debris Disks Christine H. Chen (NOAO) IRS Disks Team astro-ph/
Disk Structure and Evolution (the so-called model of disk viscosity) Ge/Ay 133.
Proto-Planetary Disk and Planetary Formation
Dust emission from Haebes: Disks and Envelopes A. Miroshnichenko (Pulkovo/Toledo) Z. Ivezic (Princeton) D. Vinkovic (UK) M. Elitzur (UK) ApJ 475, L41 (1997;
Resonant Structures due to Planets Mark Wyatt UK Astronomy Technology Centre Royal Observatory Edinburgh.
Protoplanetary Disks: The Initial Conditions of Planet Formation Eric Mamajek University of Rochester, Dept. of Physics & Astronomy Astrobio 2010 – Santiago.
ExoZodical Emission and ExoPlanets: Ground-based Challenges C. Beichman (NASA Exoplanet Science Institute) With lots of help from A. Tanner (Georgia State),
Ralf Siebenmorgen Köln 2012 ISM dust model Monte Carlo dust radiative transfer Proto-planetary disks: ring-like structures PAH destruction in proto-planetary.
Dust Growth in Transitional Disks Paola Pinilla PhD student Heidelberg University ZAH/ITA 1st ITA-MPIA/Heidelberg-IPAG Colloquium "Signs of planetary formation.
Disks around young Brown Dwarfs as critical testbeds for models of dust evolution: an investigation with ALMA Luca Ricci (CARMA Fellow, Caltech) Testi.
D EBRIS DISKS WITH H ERSCHEL : AN OVERVIEW OF THE DUNES MODELING ACTIVITIES Jean-Charles Augereau, Steve Ertel, Alexander Krivov, Jérémy Lebreton, Torsten.
Circumstellar disks: what can we learn from ALMA? March ARC meeting, CSL.
Francesco Trotta YERAC, Manchester Using mm observations to constrain variations of dust properties in circumstellar disks Advised by: Leonardo.
ABC Technology Project
Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved.
Oil & Gas Final Sample Analysis April 27, Background Information TXU ED provided a list of ESI IDs with SIC codes indicating Oil & Gas (8,583)
Mark Hervig, CAWSES Ice Layer Workshop, Kuehlungsborn, May 15, 2006 PMC Particle Size from 14 Years of HALOE Observations Mark Hervig GATS Inc.
Effects on UK of Eustatic sea Level rise GIS is used to evaluate flood risk. Insurance companies use GIS models to assess likely impact and consequently.
FU Ori and Outburst Mechanisms Zhaohuan Zhu Hubble Fellow, Princeton University Collaborators: Lee Hartmann (Umich), Charles Gammie (UIUC), Nuria Calvet.
Squares and Square Root WALK. Solve each problem REVIEW:
Lets play bingo!!. Calculate: MEAN Calculate: MEDIAN
Chapter 5 Test Review Sections 5-1 through 5-4.
Benjamin Banneker Charter Academy of Technology Making AYP Benjamin Banneker Charter Academy of Technology Making AYP.
1 Anisotropic characteristics of wood dynamic viscoelastic properties Jianxiong Lu, Fucheng Bao and Jiali Jiang Key Laboratory of Wood Science and Technology.
Addition 1’s to 20.
25 seconds left…...
Week 1.
Number bonds to 10,
We will resume in: 25 Minutes.
Origin and evolution of dust in galaxies Can we account for the dust in galaxies by stellar sources? Mikako Matsuura Origin’s fellow, Institute of Origins,
1 Unit 1 Kinematics Chapter 1 Day
IP, IST, José Bioucas, Probability The mathematical language to quantify uncertainty  Observation mechanism:  Priors:  Parameters Role in inverse.
9. Two Functions of Two Random Variables
Signatures of Planets in Debris Disks A. Moro-Martin 1,2,3, S. Wolf 2, R. Malhotra 4 & G. Rieke 1 1. Steward Observatory (University of Arizona); 2. MPIA.
Dust Dynamics in Debris Gaseous Disks Taku Takeuchi (Kobe Univ., Japan) 1.Dynamics of Dust - gas drag - radiation 2. Estimate of Gas Mass 3. Dust Disk.
Efficient Monte Carlo continuum radiative transfer with SKIRT Maarten Baes 2 nd East-Asia Numerical Astrophysics Meeting, Daejeon, Korea 3 November 2006.
+ Current efforts for modeling exozodiacal disks Jean-Charles Augereau & Olivier Absil LAOG, Grenoble, France & U. Liège, Belgium Barcelona, September.
« Debris » discs A crash course in numerical methods Philippe Thébault Paris Observatory/Stockholm Observatory.
Dust Envelopes around Oxygen-rich AGB stars Kyung-Won Suh Dept. of Astronomy & Space Science Chungbuk National University, Korea
Modeling Planetary Systems Around Sun-like Stars Paper: Formation and Evolution of Planetary Systems: Cold Outer Disks Associated with Sun-like Stars,
The AU Mic Debris Ring Density profiles & Dust Dynamics J.-C. Augereau & H. Beust Grenoble Observatory (LAOG)
Astronomy 405 Solar System and ISM Lecture 14 Comets February 15, 2013.
Visual & near infrared ( ApJ, 523, L151 (1999) ): large, optically thin, circularly symmetric envelope (or a large disk with inclination < 45 O ) Millimeter.
Herschel images of Fomalhaut An extrasolar Kuiper belt at the height of its dynamical activity B. Acke, M. Min, C. Dominik, B. Vandenbussche, B. Sibthorpe,
Kate Su, George Rieke, Karl Misselt, John Stansberry, Amaya Moro-Martin, David Trilling… etc. (U. of A) Karl Stapelfeldt, Michael Werner (NASA JPL) Mark.
Astromineralogy of Protoplanetary Disks (and other astrophysical objects) Steve Desch Melissa Morris Arizona State University.
OSIRIS Full Team Meeting -
Extended debris discs around nearby, Sun-like stars as a probe of disc-planet interactions Astronomical Society of Australia ASM 5th July 2016 Dr. Jonty.
Young planetary systems
Gas! Very few debris disks have detected gas, and it is generally only found around the youngest systems. So why should we consider gas here?
Debris Discs in Binaries
Dynamical trapping (pile-up) of grains near the sublimation radius
Debris disks Basic properties Observational methods & constraints
Plasma Poynting-Roberson Effect on Fluffy Dust Aggregate
Presentation transcript:

Jérémy Lebreton EXOZODI Kick-off Meeting

Different and complementary approaches to model debris disks Collisional Dynamical Radiative transfer GRaTeR: Originally designed to model cold dust disks around Kuiper-Belt analogues like HR4796A (Augereau et al. 1999) Efficient radiative transfer modeling of optically thin disks Fitting SEDs, resolved images and interferometric observations Allows statistical analysis on a large parameter space. Modeling debris disks with GRaTeR J. Lebreton 2

Star properties Spectral type, magnitude, distance Geometrical properties Surface density profile Inclination Dust grains properties Size distribution Composition Modeling debris disks with GRaTeR J. Lebreton 3

NextGen synthetic stellar spectrum (log g, T eff ) Scaled to V magnitude or Spitzer IRS spectrum NextGen stellar Spectrum Excess emission Modeling debris disks with GRaTeR J. Lebreton 4

Parametrical profiles 1-power law (r 0, α out ) 2-power law (r 0, α in, α out ): Ring-like disks Anything you want Profiles derived from inversion of resolved images Profiles derived from dynamical models Modeling debris disks with GRaTeR J. Lebreton 5

Optical indexes available for various materials Amorphous silicates, olivine,... Carbon, organic refractories,... Amorphous, crystalline ices,... Multi-component grains Use of an effective medium theory (Maxwell-Garnett / Bruggeman EMT) Porous aggregates The spheres are partly filled with vacuum Modeling debris disks with GRaTeR J. Lebreton 6

Classical power-law dn/da a -κ, from a min to a max idealized collisional equilibrium: κ = -3.5 Independent of the distance from the star « Wavy » size distribution (Thébault & Augereau 2007) Possibly a distance- dependent distribution... Modeling debris disks with GRaTeR J. Lebreton 7

Mie theory - Valid for hard, spherical grains Absorption efficiency : Q abs (a, λ, composition) Scattering efficiency : Q sca (a, λ, composition) Radiation pressure efficiency Q RP (a, λ, composition) Possibly anisotropic scattering : g HG ( Q PR = Q abs + (1-g HG )Q sca ) Modeling debris disks with GRaTeR J. Lebreton 8

Central stars gravity Drag forces Radiation pressure β PR = |F RP / F G | Blowout size : a blow = a(β PR =0.5) Eccentricity: e(β PR ) = β PR /(1-β PR ) Poynting-Robertson drag Beta ratios (F8 star) Krivov et al Modeling debris disks with GRaTeR J. Lebreton 9

Sublimation Each material sublimation temperature Each grain equilibrium temperature vs. distance sublimation distance D sub When D < D sub : material is removed A more sophisticated treatment of the grain sublimation physics (cf. next previous talk) Modeling debris disks with GRaTeR J. Lebreton 10 - Solid line : 50% silicates + 50% carbons - Dashed line: 100% carbons

Collisions Collision time scale To date: ~ t orb /8Σ 0 (r) (Backman & Paresce 93) Π : mean scattering cross section Σ 0 (r): Midplane surface density Independent of the grain size Valid for circular orbits Modeling debris disks with GRaTeR J. Lebreton 11

Need for a more sophisticated calculation of the collisional lifetime Method from Hahn et al Considers all possible orbits and grain sizes Calculate collision probability densities between streamlines Tc(s i ) α T0 Modeling debris disks with GRaTeR J. Lebreton 12

Fitting strategy: Chi-square minimization Bayesian analysis Independent assessment of each parameter + uncertainties Provides the best parameters: Disk mass Grain properties (size distribution, composition) Dust location And additional ouput: Blowout size Optical depths Time scales Modeling debris disks with GRaTeR J. Lebreton 13

Interferometric observations : Need to take the transfer function into account (spatial filtering) Sublimation process are very important Transient events, … Other specificities ? Blue: near-IR CHARA Red : mid-IR MMT nulling Modeling debris disks with GRaTeR J. Lebreton 14

Examples of GRaTeR achievements Modeling debris disks with GRaTeR J. Lebreton 15

Absil et al Submicronic grains (a min 0.3 μm) Highly refractive: graphite/ amorphous carbon + Olivine (~50-50) Concentrated close to the star: r0 = 0.17–0.30 AU r0 < r sub ~0.6AU) M disk = 8x10 -8 M Earth Submicronic grains (a min 0.3 μm) Highly refractive: graphite/ amorphous carbon + Olivine (~50-50) Concentrated close to the star: r0 = 0.17–0.30 AU r0 < r sub ~0.6AU) M disk = 8x10 -8 M Earth Modeling debris disks with GRaTeR J. Lebreton 16

Sublimation temperatures were re-evaluated: T sub (astrosi) = 1200 K T sub (Acar) = 2000 K Spatial distribution could be less steep (r -3.0) Modeling debris disks with GRaTeR J. Lebreton 17

Augereau et al (in prep.) Modeling debris disks with GRaTeR J. Lebreton 18

Modeling debris disks with GRaTeR J. Lebreton 19

D UST R ING : Mass : 0.04 M Earth Mass : 0.04 M Earth Surface density: r -2 Surface density: r -2 Belt peak position: 75-80AU Belt peak position: 75-80AU Fit to the SED Fit to the PACS Radial Profiles G RAIN PROPERTIES : Minimum grain size ~ 1.5 m Size distribution: power law index Close to silicate-ice mixture Modeling debris disks with GRaTeR J. Lebreton 20

Lebreton et al (in prep.) Modeling debris disks with GRaTeR J. Lebreton 21

Composition Astrosilicates: 20% Organic refractory: 10% Amorphous ice: 70% Vacuum: porosity = 65% Size distribution dn a -κ.da κ = a min =0.70 μm < a blowout =5.46 μm Mass = 0.05 M Earth (up to 1mm) Temperature : K Composition Astrosilicates: 20% Organic refractory: 10% Amorphous ice: 70% Vacuum: porosity = 65% Size distribution dn a -κ.da κ = a min =0.70 μm < a blowout =5.46 μm Mass = 0.05 M Earth (up to 1mm) Temperature : K Best model Up to 8 mm here! Modeling debris disks with GRaTeR J. Lebreton 22

GRaTeR is a flexible toolbox to model dusty disks Will be used to model systematically the SED of the near-IR excess detected through interferometry Will be coupled to the dynamical codes to derive synthetic observations Future improvements Better description for the dust sublimation Better estimates of the time scales Modeling debris disks with GRaTeR J. Lebreton 23