Variable Costing and Segment Reporting: Tools for Management

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
© The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2002 McGraw-Hill/Irwin Responsibility Accounting and Transfer Pricing Chapter 21.
Advertisements

Segment Reporting, Decentralization, and the Balanced Scorecard
Financial and Managerial Accounting Wild, Shaw, and Chiappetta Fourth Edition Wild, Shaw, and Chiappetta Fourth Edition McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2011.
Financial and Managerial Accounting John J. Wild Third Edition John J. Wild Third Edition McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies,
Variable Costing and Segment Reporting: Tools for Management
Variable Costing: A Tool for Management Chapter 7.
Copyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin Absorption and Variable Costing Chapter 8.
Performance Measurement in Decentralized Organizations
Variable Costing: A Tool for Management Chapter 7.
Copyright © 2012 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited 8-1 PowerPoint Author: Robert G. Ducharme, MAcc, CA University of Waterloo, School of Accounting and Finance.
Variable Costing: A Tool for Management 3/17/04
20 Variable Costing for Management Analysis
7-1 Explain how variable costing differs from absorption costing and compute unit product costs under each method. Learning objective number 1 is to explain.
Chapter six Variable Costing: A Tool for Management.
Variable Costing: A Tool for Management Chapter 7.
Inventory Costing and Capacity Analysis Lecture 22 1 Readings Chapter 09,Cost Accounting, Managerial Emphasis, 14 th edition by Horengren Chapter 07, Managerial.
Copyright © 2006, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin Chapters Three & Seven Overhead Allocation. Absorption costing vs Variable Costing.
Chapter 21 Variable Costing
Chapter 10 Cost Analysis for Management Decision Making.
© 2010 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Variable Costing: A Tool for Management Chapter 7.
© 2010 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Variable Costing: A Tool for Management Chapter 7.
PowerPoint Authors: Susan Coomer Galbreath, Ph.D., CPA Charles W. Caldwell, D.B.A., CMA Jon A. Booker, Ph.D., CPA, CIA Cynthia J. Rooney, Ph.D., CPA McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
PPT 10-1 ADVANCED MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTING. PPT 10-2 Decentralization and Transfer Pricing.
Variable Costing and Segment Reporting: Tools for Management
Profit Reporting for Management Analysis Chapter M 4.
Copyright © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc 2011 VARIABLE COSTING: A TOOL FOR MANAGEMENT Chapter 6.
Absorption and Variable Costing Chapter 8 Copyright © 2011 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
Copyright © 2006, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin Variable Costing: A Tool for Management Chapter Seven.
PowerPoint Authors: Susan Coomer Galbreath, Ph.D., CPA Charles W. Caldwell, D.B.A., CMA Jon A. Booker, Ph.D., CPA, CIA Cynthia J. Rooney, Ph.D., CPA Copyright.
Shahadat Hosan Faculty ( Part-time), MBA Program Stamford University Bangladesh Variable Costing: A Tool for Managemet.
© The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2008 McGraw-Hill/Irwin Financial & Managerial Accounting The Basis for Business Decisions FOURTEENTH EDITION Williams.
© The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2005 McGraw-Hill/Irwin 22-1 RESPONSIBILITY ACCOUNTING AND TRANSFER PRICING Chapter 22.
Learning Objective 1 Identify the major differences and similarities between financial and managerial accounting.
VARIABLE COSTING: A TOOL FOR MANAGEMENT Chapter 6 PowerPoint Authors: Susan Coomer Galbreath, Ph.D., CPA Charles W. Caldwell, D.B.A., CMA Jon A. Booker,
Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin Chapter 7 Variable Costing: A Tool for Management.
Variable Costing: A Tool for Management
PowerPoint Authors: Susan Coomer Galbreath, Ph.D., CPA Charles W. Caldwell, D.B.A., CMA Jon A. Booker, Ph.D., CPA, CIA Cynthia J. Rooney, Ph.D., CPA Copyright.
1 Variable Costing for Management Analysis Describe and illustrate income reporting under variable costing and absorption costing. Objective
Variable Costing: A Tool for Management
PowerPoint Authors: Susan Coomer Galbreath, Ph.D., CPA Charles W. Caldwell, D.B.A., CMA Jon A. Booker, Ph.D., CPA, CIA Cynthia J. Rooney, Ph.D., CPA Copyright.
Introduction to Managerial Accounting, Brewer, Garrison,Noreen
11th Edition Chapter 7.
Variable Costing and Segment Reporting: Tools for Management
Prepared by Debby Bloom-Hill CMA, CFM
Variable Costing: A Tool for Management
Cost Analysis for Management Decision Making
Cost Analysis for Management Decision Making
Segment Reporting, and Decentralization
Segment Reporting and Decentralization
Criticisms of Absorption Cost Systems: Incentive to Over-produce
Chapter 5 Variable Costing for Management Analysis Student Version
Variable Costing: A Tool for Management
Super-Variable Costing
Variable Costing: A Tool for Management
Variable Costing: A Tool for Management
Absorption Costing and Variable Costing
Variable Costing: A Tool for Management
Variable Costing and Segment Reporting: Tools for Management
Variable Costing and Segment Reporting: Tools for Management
MANAGERIAL ACCOUNTING Eighth Canadian Edition GARRISON, CHESLEY, CARROLL, WEBB Prepared by: Robert G. Ducharme, MAcc, CA University of Waterloo, School.
CHAPTER 9 INVENTORY COSTING.
Variable Costing: A Tool for Management
Variable Costing & Segmented Reporting
Introduction to Managerial Accounting, Brewer, Garrison,Noreen
Responsibility Accounting
Introduction to Managerial Accounting, Brewer, Garrison,Noreen
Introduction to Managerial Accounting, Brewer, Garrison,Noreen
Introduction to Managerial Accounting, Brewer, Garrison,Noreen
Variable Costing: A Tool for Management
Presentation transcript:

Variable Costing and Segment Reporting: Tools for Management Chapter 06 Chapter 6: Variable Costing and Segment Reporting: Tools for Management Two general approaches are used for valuing inventories and cost of goods sold. One approach, called absorption costing, is generally used for external reporting purposes. The other approach, called variable costing, is preferred by some managers for internal decision making and must be used when an income statement is prepared in the contribution format. This chapter shows how these two methods differ from each other. It also explains how to create segmented contribution format income statements. McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2012 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

Overview of Variable and Absorption Costing Variable Costing Absorption Costing Product Costs Period Costs Direct Materials Direct Labor Variable Manufacturing Overhead Fixed Manufacturing Overhead Variable Selling and Administrative Expenses Fixed Selling and Administrative Expenses Product Costs Period Costs Variable costing (also called direct costing or marginal costing) treats only those costs of production that vary with output as product costs. This approach dovetails with the contribution approach income statement and supports CVP analysis because of its emphasis on separating variable and fixed costs. The cost of a unit of product consists of direct materials, direct labor, and variable overhead. Fixed manufacturing overhead, and both variable and fixed selling and administrative expenses are treated as period costs and deducted from revenue as incurred. Absorption costing (also called the full cost method) treats all costs of production as product costs, regardless of whether they are variable or fixed. Since no distinction is made between variable and fixed costs, absorption costing is not well suited for CVP computations. Under absorption costing, the cost of a unit of product consists of direct materials, direct labor, and both variable and fixed overhead. Variable and fixed selling and administrative expenses are treated as period costs and are deducted from revenue as incurred.

Unit Cost Computations Harvey Company produces a single product with the following information available: Harvey Company produces 25,000 units of a single product. Variable manufacturing costs total $10 per unit. Variable selling and administrative expenses are $3 per unit. Fixed manufacturing overhead for the year is $150,000 and fixed selling and administrative expenses for the year are $100,000.

Unit Cost Computations Unit product cost is determined as follows: The unit product costs under absorption and variable costing would be $16 and $10, respectively. Under absorption costing, all production costs, variable and fixed, are included when determining unit product cost. Under variable costing, only the variable production costs are included in product costs. Under absorption costing, all production costs, variable and fixed, are included when determining unit product cost. Under variable costing, only the variable production costs are included in product costs.

Variable and Absorption Costing Income Statements Let’s assume the following additional information for Harvey Company. 20,000 units were sold during the year at a price of $30 each. There is no beginning inventory. Now, let’s compute net operating income using both absorption and variable costing. We need some additional information to allow us to prepare income statements for Harvey Company: 20,000 units were sold during the year. The selling price per unit is $30. There is no beginning inventory. Now let’s prepare income statements for Harvey Company. We will start with an absorption income statement.

Variable Costing Contribution Format Income Statement All fixed manufacturing overhead is expensed. Variable manufacturing costs only. Let’s examine a variable costing contribution format income statement. First, we subtract all variable expenses from sales to get contribution margin. At a product cost of $10 per unit, the variable cost of goods sold for 20,000 units is $200,000. The next variable expense is the variable selling and administrative expense. After computing contribution margin, we subtract fixed expenses to get the $90,000 net operating income. Note that all $150,000 of fixed manufacturing overhead is expensed in the current period.

Absorption Costing Income Statement Unit product cost. Now, let’s examine an absorption costing income statement. Harvey sold only 20,000 of the 25,000 units produced, leaving 5,000 units in ending inventory. At a sales price of $30 per unit, sales revenue for the 20,000 units sold is $600,000. At a unit product cost of $16, cost of goods sold for the 20,000 units sold is $320,000. Subtracting cost of goods sold from sales, we find the gross margin of $280,000. After subtracting selling and administrative expenses from the gross margin, we see that net operating income is $120,000. Fixed manufacturing overhead deferred in inventory, as a result of the 5,000 unsold units at $6 of fixed overhead per unit, is $30,000. Fixed manufacturing overhead deferred in inventory is 5,000 units × $6 = $30,000.

Extended Comparisons of Income Data Harvey Company – Year Two In the second year, Harvey Company sells 30,000 units. The selling price per unit, variable costs per unit, total fixed costs, and number of units produced remain unchanged. Five thousand units are in beginning inventory, left from last year.

Variable Costing Contribution Format Income Statement All fixed manufacturing overhead is expensed. Variable manufacturing costs only. First, let’s examine a variable costing contribution format income statement for the second year. At a product cost of $10 per unit, the variable cost of goods sold for 30,000 units is $300,000. After computing contribution margin, we subtract fixed expenses to get the $260,000 net operating income. Note that all $150,000 of fixed manufacturing overhead is expensed in the current period.

Absorption Costing Income Statement Unit product cost. Of the 30,000 units sold in the second year, 25,000 units were produced in the second year and 5,000 units came from beginning inventory. The $30,000 of fixed manufacturing overhead deferred into inventory in the first year is released from inventory this year as part of the $16 unit product cost. Selling and administrative expenses are deducted from gross margin to obtain the net operating income of $230,000. Fixed manufacturing overhead is released from inventory as a result of the 5,000 units sold in the second year that were produced in the first year. The amount released is $30,000 (5,000 units at $6 of fixed overhead per unit). Fixed manufacturing overhead released from inventory is 5,000 units × $6 = $30,000.

Summary of Key Insights On your screen is a summary of what we have observed from the Harvey Company’s two years: When units produced equal units sold, the two methods report the same net operating income. When units produced are greater units sold, as in year 1 for Harvey, absorption income is greater than variable costing income.  When units produced are less than units sold, as in year 2 for Harvey, absorption costing income is less than variable costing income. 

Explaining Changes in Net Operating Income Variable costing income is only affected by changes in unit sales. It is not affected by the number of units produced. As a general rule, when sales go up, net operating income goes up, and vice versa. Variable costing income is only affected by changes in unit sales. It is not affected by the number of units produced. As a general rule, when sales go up, net operating income goes up, and vice versa.   Absorption costing income is influenced by changes in unit sales and units of production. Net operating income can be increased simply by producing more units even if those units are not sold. Absorption costing income is influenced by changes in unit sales and units of production. Net operating income can be increased simply by producing more units even if those units are not sold.

Keys to Segmented Income Statements There are two keys to building segmented income statements: A contribution format should be used because it separates fixed from variable costs and it enables the calculation of a contribution margin. There are two keys to building segmented income statements.   First, a contribution format should be used because it separates fixed from variable costs and it enables the calculation of a contribution margin. The contribution margin is especially useful in decisions involving temporary uses of capacity, such as special orders. Second, traceable fixed costs should be separated from common fixed costs to enable the calculation of a segment margin. Traceable fixed costs should be separated from common fixed costs to enable the calculation of a segment margin.

Identifying Traceable Fixed Costs Traceable fixed costs arise because of the existence of a particular segment and would disappear over time if the segment itself disappeared. No computer division means . . . No computer division manager. A traceable fixed cost of a segment is a fixed cost that is incurred because of the existence of the segment. If the segment were eliminated, the fixed cost would disappear. Examples of traceable fixed costs include the following: The salary of the Fritos product manager at PepsiCo is a traceable fixed cost of the Fritos business segment of PepsiCo. The maintenance cost for the building in which Boeing 747s are assembled is a traceable fixed cost of the 747 business segment of Boeing.

Identifying Common Fixed Costs Common fixed costs arise because of the overall operation of the company and would not disappear if any particular segment were eliminated. No computer division but . . . We still have a company president. A common fixed cost is a fixed cost that supports the operations of more than one segment, but is not traceable in whole or in part to any one segment. Examples of common fixed costs include the following: The salary of the CEO of General Motors is a common fixed cost of the various divisions of General Motors. The cost of heating a Safeway or Kroger grocery store is a common fixed cost of the various departments – groceries, produce, and bakery.

Traceable Costs Can Become Common Costs It is important to realize that the traceable fixed costs of one segment may be a common fixed cost of another segment. For example, the landing fee paid to land an airplane at an airport is traceable to the particular flight, but it is not traceable to first-class, business-class, and economy-class passengers. It is important to realize that the traceable fixed costs of one segment may be a common fixed cost of another segment. For example, the landing fee paid to land an airplane at an airport is traceable to a particular flight, but it is not traceable to first-class, business-class, and economy-class passengers.

Segment Margin The segment margin, which is computed by subtracting the traceable fixed costs of a segment from its contribution margin, is the best gauge of the long-run profitability of a segment. A segment margin is computed by subtracting the traceable fixed costs of a segment from its contribution margin. The segment margin is a valuable tool for assessing the long-run profitability of a segment. Profits Time

Inappropriate Methods of Allocating Costs Among Segments Failure to trace costs directly Inappropriate allocation base Costs that can be traced directly to specific segments of a company should not be allocated to other segments. Rather, such costs should be charged directly to the responsible segment. For example, the rent for a branch office of an insurance company should be charged directly against the branch office rather than included in a companywide overhead pool and then spread throughout the company. Some companies allocate costs to segments using arbitrary bases. Costs should be allocated to segments for internal decision making purposes only when the allocation base actually drives the cost being allocated. For example, sales is frequently used to allocate selling and administrative expenses to segments. This should only be done if sales drive these expenses. Segment 1 Segment 2 Segment 3 Segment 4

Common Costs and Segments Common costs should not be arbitrarily allocated to segments based on the rationale that “someone has to cover the common costs” for two reasons: This practice may make a profitable business segment appear to be unprofitable. Allocating common fixed costs forces managers to be held accountable for costs they cannot control. Common costs should not be arbitrarily allocated to segments based on the rationale that “someone has to cover the common costs” for two reasons:   First, this practice may make a profitable business segment appear to be unprofitable. If the segment is eliminated the revenue lost may exceed the traceable costs that are avoided. Second, allocating common fixed costs forces managers to be held accountable for costs that they cannot control. Segment 1 Segment 2 Segment 3 Segment 4

End of Chapter 06 End of Chapter 6.