BLHC Funds Flow Plan Steering Committee

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Allan Yu Feb 23, 2011 IFRS Financial Statements Presentation.
Advertisements

Driving change in information risk within the financial services industry Subtitle Date.
Views on TRAC and the UWE workload model 12 th December 2013.
College Efficiency Maximising Income John Bolt. © 2011 KPMG LLP, a UK limited Liability Partnership, is a subsidiary of KPMG Europe LLP and a member firm.
Trending Topics in Contract Auditing Presenters: Allen Devine, Senior Manager Dan Smith, Manager Government Contracts.
0 © 2009 KPMG LLP, a UK limited liability partnership, is a subsidiary of KPMG Europe LLP and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms.
© 2013 Grant Thornton UK LLP | Certification work report for North Hertfordshire District Council | December 2013 Certification report 2012/13 for North.
Public Private Partnerships: What’s in it for my Government? 14 July 2011 Malcolm Butterfield.
Start-ups & big business Competition or competitive advantage? Imperial Business Insights Lecture 13 February 2014.
Institute of Operational Risk Breakout Session - Operational Risk Nirvana KPMG Giles Triffitt Peter Watson Peter Docherty 1 November 2013.
RIBA / UK TI Conference ‘Working Internationally’ Getting Paid Martin Kelly, KPMG LLP Ruth Adams, KPMG LLP 23rd March 2012.
KPMG’s Abilities in Motion Network USBLN Annual Conference October 2012 kpmg.com.
© [year] [legal member firm name], a [jurisdiction] [legal structure] and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with.
Reporting Package Update Chapter 9 Presented by Lily Wang CSU, Chancellor’s Office KPMG LLP.
Faculty Release Time and Energy Rebates Presented by Sherry Pickering AUDIT.
Reporting Requirements Chapter 12 Presented by Kathy V. Lai, Manager KPMG LLP KPMG LLP.
The Business Impact of Transparency Requirements Martin Nielsen, Tax Partner KPMG Acor Tax 12. December 2014.
© 2008 KPMG LLP, the U.S. member firm of KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved. KPMG and the KPMG logo are registered trademarks.
Chad V. Seely Assistant General Counsel Tab 6.2: User Fee – Digital Certificate Fee Finance & Audit Committee Meeting ERCOT Public November 12, 2012.
Audit Sampling: A Basic Understanding AGA-Baltimore Johnny Ramsey, Senior Manager KPMG Government Industry Sector September 20, 2012.
Florin Banateanu October 2011 EU funds for private sector in Romania – opportunities and practical features.
Risk Management Reconstructed Implementing fraud risk intelligence practices July 2011 KPMG FORENSIC SM.
0 © 2013 KPMG, an Australian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative.
Michael H. Plowgian August 9, 2014 FATCA, Extraterritoriality, and the Path to the OECD- Standard on Automatic Exchange of Information (“AEOI”)
CIPFA North West – Audit & Governance Group Autumn Seminar Regeneration Schemes 11 October 2013 Neil Bellamy, Director.
KPMG-Refugee Council Partnership Deb Conner and Nicole Masri 4 December 09.
AUDIT FEI Career Management Group Qualifications for a Successful CFO/Controller in Today's Market December 3, 2009.
Natives of Kodiak, Inc. September 20,2014 Beth Stuart kpmg.com.
Protecting Corporate Assets and the Brand in a Digitized, Global Environment July 29, 2013 Stacy-Ann Golding.
North American Accounting Society Developing the Auditor of the Future.
FY 2005 Indigent Care Trust Fund Disproportionate Share Hospital Program Presented to House Appropriations Health Subcommittee June 23, 2005.
Financial Outlook for U.S. Not-for-Profit Healthcare Sector Drew Corrigan May 5, 2011.
Accounting for Income Taxes Introduction to Accounting for Taxes
KPMG’s 2012 National Faculty Symposium Building Partnerships with Academia June 26–27, 2012 | New York, NY.
Review of the Transparent Approach to Costing A report by KPMG for HEFCE.
Presented by: Timothy A. A. Stiles, KPMG LLP ’s Global Grants Program Hanoi, Vietnam 06 February 2007 Presented by: Timothy A. A. Stiles, KPMG LLP ’s Global.
Factors Associated with IT Audits by the Internal Audit Function Discussant Comments October 2, 2009 INFORMATION RISK MANAGEMENT ADVISORY.
Session III: Current Uses of XBRL Tagged Data April 26, th KU International Conference on XBRL Transparency, Assurance and Analysis kpmg.com.
DIR Board Meeting | July 17, 2012 Cost-Recovery Fees and Fee Setting Methodology Nick Villalpando Chief Financial Officer.
© [year] [legal member firm name], a [jurisdiction] [legal structure] and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with.
Amendments to the Work Permit Rules: Problematic Issues Alex Nisengolts 28 April 2011.
Yachting in Malta: A Fiscal Perspective Pierre Portelli 11 June 2015.
FFT Business Meeting 2014 March Contact: Kevin Bromley Colin Campbell
1 Eurostat’s grant policy for 2010 Luxembourg, 23/03/2010 Unit A4 – Financial Management Section 3 – Grant procedures and agreements.
Annette Rosta Associate Director Recruiting Diversity & Compliance KPMG Career Center Navigating Career Web Sites February 2012 Annette Rosta Associate.
New Revenue Recognition Standard – Overview
© 2012 KPMG LLP, a U.S. limited liability partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International,
Who is the typical fraudster? Michael Peer Partner 16 June 2011.
DSRIP Application 101. DSRIP Application Overview NY DSRIP Application – requires average score of 60% or higher Organizational Application 30% weight.
©2009 Cooley Godward Kronish LLP. All rights reserved. STARTUP 2009 LEGAL SERIES Topic #2 Forming an Entity.
DSRIP OVERVIEW. What is DSRIP? 2  DSRIP = Delivery System Reform Incentive Payment  An effort between the New York State Department of Health (NYSDOH)
ERM and Information Risks July 2013 Advisory. 1 © KPMG, a partnership established under Ghanaian law and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent.
Tax Litigation in Russia – Current Court Practice LITIGATION SERVICES 10 March 2011.
2011 KPMG / AAA IFRS In The Accounting Curriculum Survey October, 2011 AAA Education Committee and KPMG LLP.
Workshop 4: Developing a one page business case
Jeff Markert, KPMG LLP June 11, 2014
By Lillian Irene Stormo, HiB
KPMG university mentoring program
Proposed Medicaid Hospital Outpatient Prospective Payment System
Sick Leave Overview March 27, 2003
AMCH PPS PAC Executive Committee Meeting July 23, 2015
Workstream 5: Governance Financial overview for Year 5
Views on TRAC and the UWE workload model
Medicaid Transformation Funding Overview
GLOBAL GRANTS John Dewitt Dist 7670 Districts Grants Chair.
Rethinking classroom design
Welcome and Introductions
Finance Committee Board Meeting February 12, 2018.
Finance Committee March 2, 2018.
Pension Regulations Presented by David Maccoux, CPA, Shareholder
Presentation transcript:

BLHC Funds Flow Plan Steering Committee December 15, 2015

Contents Developing The Plan – Input From The PPS BLHC DSRIP Award Overview of the Distribution Process BLHC Funds Flow Process Payment Received Contribution Percent Distribution Factor Performance Adjustment Graphic Example – Project 3.f.i Questions and Discussion

Developing The Plan – Input From The PPS BLHC’s approach to developing the funds flow methodology included oversight and input from the Executive Team and the Finance Committee

Developing The Plan – Input From The PPS Project Leads and Team members provided input regarding funds flow priorities. Board members provided input on the methodology, priorities and objectives. The recommended methodology reflects the involvement of the broad provider network in the funds flow plan process

BLHC Award And Funds Flow Overview

Overview of the Distribution Process The funds flow distribution process begins with the receipt of an actual DSRIP payment from DOH. Receipt of payment by BLHC initiates the planning and distribution process. The actual distribution of payments requires specific steps related to the distribution of funds for PPS level costs and contingency reserves

Overview of the Distribution Process The funds flow process includes consideration of PPS level costs and reserves that are needed for the administration of the PPS and implementation of DSRIP projects: The actual payment received – including recoups or reductions applied by DOH – impacts the amount available for costs and distribution to providers. Distribution to the PPS Lead for administrative and implementation costs Reserve or contingency payments as defined or approved by the PPS Other PPS level payments including financial sustainability The amount remaining after PPS level costs and reserves are deducted is eligible to be distributed to the provider partners.

Overview of the Distribution Process After determining the amount available to be distributed to the provider partners – the actual payment to the provider is calculated: The amount available to each provider type is calculated first based upon their project participation and an established “contribution percentage”. Each of the provider type “pools” is then distributed to the individual provider or contracting entity based upon a distribution variable or factor that is defined for each type (i.e. attribution, visits, discharges) The provider’s performance against specific requirements defined in their contract will then be applied as a final “performance factor” adjustment to determine their eligible payment Each contracting entity with providers participating in a project will receive a minimum payment amount to acknowledge their participation in the PPS and the related work effort.

BLHC Funds Flow Process

BLHC Funds Flow – Payment Received BLHC PPS receives DSRIP payments based on its achievement of DSRIP project goals BLHC expects to receive its DSRIP payments twice per year – January and July Payments would be distributed to providers within 60 days

BLHC Funds Flow – Contribution Percent The remaining payment is allocated to each DSRIP Provider Type based upon a Contribution Percent assigned to each Provider Type by Project. Project Leads and Co-Leads will receive an allocation for their contribution.

BLHC Funds Flow – Determine Provider Level Amount Payments will be distributed to the BLHC PPS Contracted Entities. Eligible payment is based upon a Distribution Factor for each Provider Type The plan is flexible in that the factors can be revised if needed in future periods. A minimum payment per Contracted Entity will be paid as part of Project 2.a.i

BLHC Funds Flow – Performance Adjusted Provider eligible payments will be adjusted based upon their performance in meeting achievement values for each project Distribution would be made within 60 days of BLHC receiving payment from DOH. Amounts not paid due to non-performance will be held to allow provider opportunity for review. They will be included in future distributions by the PPS if not disputed.

Graphic Example – Project 3.f.i The Distribution Factor may vary by Project and can be changed by BLHC in future periods. Distribution to Providers would be made within 60 days of BLHC receiving payment from DOH.

QUESTIONS And DISCUSSION BLHC Funds Flow QUESTIONS And DISCUSSION

© 2015 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U. S © 2015 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. NDPPS 308607 The KPMG name, logo and “cutting through complexity” are registered trademarks or trademarks of KPMG International. Add appendix page