‘Top Ten’ Things Auditors Should Know About 9104/1

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Company Confidential Registration Management Committee (RMC) Mike Roberts Boeing OP Assessor Workshop Other Party (OP) Assessor Workshop San Diego,
Advertisements

Company Confidential Registration Management Committee (RMC) :2009 Revision Workshop Tony Marino The Boeing Company Other Party (OP) Assessor Workshop.
Module 13 Oversight Assessment of Auditor Authentication Bodies
Company Confidential Registration Management Committee (RMC) Other Party (OP) Assessor Workshop San Diego, CA January 20, AS9104/2 Oversight Process.
Company Confidential Registration Management Committee AS9104/1 Impacts to CB’s & Organizations Bob Cruse, ANAB Vince May, ANAB Tim Lee, The Boeing Company.
Company Confidential Registration Management Committee (RMC) 1 Other Party Management Team (OPMT) Resolutions Stanley Faust Spirit AeroSystems Other Party.
IAQG OPMT OP Assessor Training Oversight Assessment of Training Provider Approval Bodies February 2015 Module 14.
Prepared by: Tim Lee – Chair IAQG OPMT The Boeing Company October 10, 2013 International Aerospace Quality Group (IAQG) Other Party Management Team (OPMT)
Company Confidential Registration Management Committee (RMC) OP Assessors Need to Know 1 Other Party (OP) Assessor Workshop Palm Beach Gardens, Florida.
Registration Management Committee Body of Knowledge (BoK) for Other Party (OP) Assessors David Day GE Aviation.
Company Confidential Registration Management Committee (RMC) The OP Assessor Process San Diego, CA January 19, 2012 Melvin L. Jeppson ATK Propulsion Systems.
Company Confidential Registration Management Committee (RMC) OP Assessor Process: Office and Witness Oversight San Diego, CA January 17, 2013 Melvin L.
Company Confidential Registration Management Committee (RMC) 1 CB and Auditor Performance Expectations Boston, MA July 22, 2011 R. Darrell Taylor Raytheon.
Company Confidential Registration Management Committee (RMC) Summer Meeting Preparing for the Second Ballot Atlanta, GA July 20, 2010 Michael.
Company Confidential Registration Management Committee (RMC) & Auditor Workshop /1 “Completing the Trilogy” Atlanta, GA July 23, 2010 Michael C.
1111 AS9104/1 and Potential Impacts to Your AS Registration November 16, 2012 Presented by Pete Kucan Director of PRI Registrar Operations.
The OP Assessor Process
Michelle Barton – Lead Technical Reviewer/Auditor UL DQS Inc.
Company Confidential Registration Management Committee 1 AS9104/1 Certification Structures - Client and CB Agreement July 17, 2014 Tim Lee Chair - IAQG.
IAQG OPMT OP Assessor Training SMS, CBMC and OASIS Oversight Assessment February 2015 Module 16.
Company Confidential 1 AS9104/1: The Main Changes Tim Lee 12 March 2012.
Company Confidential Registration Management Committee (RMC) & Auditor Workshop 11 ‘Top Ten’ Things Auditors Should Know About 9104/1 Boston, MA July 22,
Other Party Management Team (OPMT) Status Briefing Americas Aerospace Quality Group (AAQG) Registration Management Committee (RMC) Tim Lee – Chair The.
Company Confidential 1 Other Party Management (OPMT) Team AAQG RMC Report Tim Lee, The Boeing Company OPMT Chair 14 March 2012.
Company Confidential Registration Management Committee (RMC) What’s Next for Oversight? 1 Other Party (OP) Assessor Workshop Palm Beach Gardens, Florida.
Company Confidential Registration Management Committee (RMC) & Auditor Workshop 11 ‘Top Ten’ Things Auditors Should Know About 9104/1 OP Assessor Workshop.
Company Confidential Registration Management Committee 1 Industry Controlled Other Party (ICOP) Oversight Market Surveillance AS9104/2A Supplemental Oversight.
Company Confidential Registration Management Committee (RMC) Audit Calc Program Palm Beach, Florida January 16, 2014 Tim Lee The Boeing Company.
9104/1 Rewrite Team Report / Review to the AAQG-RMC 11 March 2009 Michael C Roberts Boeing, Technical Fellow.
Company Confidential Registration Management Committee (RMC) :2009 Revision Workshop Tony Marino The Boeing Company Other Party (OP) Assessor Workshop.
Company Confidential Registration Management Committee (RMC) Other Party Management Team (OPMT) Resolutions San Diego, CA January 19, 2012 Stanley Faust.
Company Confidential Registration Management Committee (RMC) AS9104/2A Presentation San Diego, CA January 17, 2013 Tim Lee The Boeing Company 1 Other Party.
Other Party Management Team (OPMT) Status Briefing Americas Aerospace Quality Group (AAQG) Registration Management Committee (RMC) Tim Lee – Chair The.
Company Confidential Registration Management Committee RMC Auditor Workshop Charleston, SC July Supplemental Oversight AS9104/2A & Special.
Company Confidential Registration Management Committee (RMC) & Auditor Workshop /1 Boston, MA July 20, 2011 Michael Roberts Boeing RMC Meeting Boston,
Company Confidential Registration Management Committee RMC Auditor Workshop Charleston, SC July 2015 The OASIS Feedback Process Empowering Communication.
Hosted by AAQG RMC Certification Structures Impacts to Auditors Impacts to Stakeholders Transition.
CSOC – Certification Structure Oversight Committee Application Guidance October 2015.
Company Confidential 1 Other Party Management (OPMT) 9104/1 Special Sub Team Recommendation Summary Tim Lee & Ian Folland June 23, 2010.
Company Confidential 1 AAQG RMC 9101:2009 Revision Workshop Prepared by IAQG 9101 Team 19 July, 2010 Atlanta Ga. “It’s All About Performing” Quality Management.
Company Confidential Registration Management Committee 1 AS9104/1 Certification Structures July 22, 2015 Tim Lee Chair - IAQG OPMT The Boeing Company RMC.
Company Confidential Registration Management Committee (RMC) Audit Calc Program San Diego, CA January 17, 2013 Tim Lee The Boeing Company Bill.
Registration Management Committee (RMC) Other Party Assessor Workshop January 16, 2009 – Orlando, Florida AS/EN/SJAC Oversight Process Tim Lee The.
Company Confidential 1 Other Party Management (OPMT) 9104/1 Special Sub Team Recommendation Summary Tim Lee September 14, 2010.
Company Confidential Registration Management Committee 1 July 17, 2014 Bryan Blunt IAQG OASIS Administrator OASIS Tools for Continuous Improvement / Next-Gen.
Company Confidential Registration Management Committee (RMC) Independent Oversight Assessments 1 Other Party (OP) Assessor Workshop Palm Beach Gardens,
Company Confidential IAQG Workshop October 21, IAQG Workshop 9100 Certification Scheme Certification status – Changes implemented Tim Lee The Boeing.
Registration Management Committee (RMC) Auditor Training and Workshop Minneapolis, MN July 30-31, 2009 Americas Aerospace Quality Group AAQG Registration.
ANAB AQMS Accreditation Programs Overall AQMS Accreditations  37 AS9100  6 AS9110  23 AS9120 AQMS Applicants  2 AS9100  8 AS9110  1 AS9120.
Company Confidential Registration Management Committee RMC Auditor Workshop Charleston, SC July Ballot: What is it all about? Information.
July 21, 2016 Susie Neal Director QMS Compliance UTC
9101 Forms July 20-21, Revision Team Paul Dionne
Rich DeMary / Tammy Patton
AAQG Member AS/JISQ Supplemental Oversight
IAQG Other Party Management Team (OPMT) AAQG RMC Report
July 21, 2016 Susie Neal Director QMS Compliance UTC
Tim Lee The Boeing Company
Highlights of SR003 Rules for AS 9100, 9120 and 9110 Transition
Witness Assessment AS9104/2A
Vince May Atlanta, Georgia July , 2010
Americas Aerospace Quality Group
ICOP – Industry Controlled Other Party
AS Risk Mitigation Plan
AS Risk Mitigation Plan
Tim Lee – Chair The Boeing Company July 13, 2012
‘Top Ten’ Things Auditors Should Know About 9104/1
Vince May Atlanta, Georgia July , 2010
Tim Lee The Boeing Company Chair IAQG OPMT October 22, 2010
Tim Lee – Chair The Boeing Company May 21, 2013
AS9104/1: The Main Changes Tim Lee 12 March 2012.
Presentation transcript:

‘Top Ten’ Things Auditors Should Know About 9104/1 Boston, MA July 22, 2011 Michael Roberts & Tim Lee Boeing Auditor Workshop Boston, MA July 21-22, 2011 1

Agenda / Contents What Is The Current Status Of 9104/1? ‘Top Ten’ Things Auditors Should Know about 9104/1 Latest Schedule Q & A

Current Status of 9104/1 As of Friday, 15 July 2011: Ballot PASSED in the Americas in May 2011 In Ballot in Asia – due 31 July 2011 In Ballot in Europe – due 21 August 2011

9104/1 ‘Top Ten’ ‘Top Ten’ Things Auditors Should Know about 9104/1 The auditor must educate themselves on certification structures and audit duration requirements, as defined in Appendix B and Table 2 The CB shall initiate the client certification suspension process, when an organization fails to demonstrate that conformance to the applicable standard has been re- established within 60 days from the issuance of a Nonconformity Report (NCR) (8.4.d) OASIS Feedback Loop - CB auditors are expected to address this feedback during their management review activity, as well as investigations of product, process, and system issues (14.2)

9104/1 ‘Top Ten’ ‘Top Ten’ Things Auditors Should Know about 9104/1 The auditor must educate themselves on certification structures and audit duration requirements, as defined in Appendix B and Table 2 The CB shall initiate the client certification suspension process, when an organization fails to demonstrate that conformance to the applicable standard has been re- established within 60 days from the issuance of a Nonconformity Report (NCR) (8.4.d) OASIS Feedback Loop - CB auditors are expected to address this feedback during their management review activity, as well as investigations of product, process, and system issues (14.2)

Appendix B, Page 1

Appendix B, Page 2

Appendix B, Page 3

Chapter 8, Table 2

Chapter 8, Table 2 No reductions in frequency or audit duration allowed, unless specifically defined in the 9104/1 standard.

9104/1 ‘Top Ten’ ‘Top Ten’ Things Auditors Should Know about 9104/1 The auditor must educate themselves on certification structures and audit duration requirements, as defined in Appendix B and Table 2 The CB shall initiate the client certification suspension process, when an organization fails to demonstrate that conformance to the applicable standard has been re- established within 60 days from the issuance of a Nonconformity Report (NCR) (8.4.d) OASIS Feedback Loop - CB auditors are expected to address this feedback during their management review activity, as well as investigations of product, process, and system issues (14.2)

9104/1 ‘Top Ten’ ‘Top Ten’ Things Auditors Should Know about 9104/1 The auditor must educate themselves on certification structures and audit duration requirements, as defined in Appendix B and Table 2 The CB shall initiate the client certification suspension process, when an organization fails to demonstrate that conformance to the applicable standard has been re- established within 60 days from the issuance of a Nonconformity Report (NCR) (8.4.d) OASIS Feedback Loop - CB auditors are expected to address this feedback during their management review activity, as well as investigations of product, process, and system issues (14.2)

OASIS Feedback Process (Chapter 14, Figure 1)

9104/1 ‘Top Ten’ ‘Top Ten’ Things Auditors Should Know about 9104/1 The same audit team leader shall be limited to a maximum of two consecutive certification cycles at the client (organization). Rotation of supporting AEAs and auditors after each certification cycle is recommended. (8.3.8) The CB and audit team leader shall ensure that an AEA is on-site and actively involved at each site during the entire audit. In addition, the audit team leader shall be on-site at one or more sites during all audit activity (8.3.3) SMS has the right to withdraw or suspend authentication based on, but not limited to poor performance, non- conformity to requirements, or falsification of data. (4.13)

9104/1 ‘Top Ten’ ‘Top Ten’ Things Auditors Should Know about 9104/1 The same audit team leader shall be limited to a maximum of two consecutive certification cycles at the client (organization). Rotation of supporting AEAs and auditors after each certification cycle is recommended. (8.3.8) The CB and audit team leader shall ensure that an AEA is on-site and actively involved at each site during the entire audit. In addition, the audit team leader shall be on-site at one or more sites during all audit activity (8.3.3) SMS has the right to withdraw or suspend authentication based on, but not limited to poor performance, non- conformity to requirements, or falsification of data. (4.13)

9104/1 ‘Top Ten’ ‘Top Ten’ Things Auditors Should Know about 9104/1 The same audit team leader shall be limited to a maximum of two consecutive certification cycles at the client (organization). Rotation of supporting AEAs and auditors after each certification cycle is recommended. (8.3.8) The CB and audit team leader shall ensure that an AEA is on-site and actively involved at each site during the entire audit. In addition, the audit team leader shall be on-site at one or more sites during all audit activity (8.3.3) SMS has the right to withdraw or suspend authentication based on, but not limited to poor performance, non- conformity to requirements, or falsification of data. (4.13)

9104/1 ‘Top Ten’ ‘Top Ten’ Things Auditors Should Know about 9104/1 Auditors who are withdrawn for cause by an AAB shall not reapply for authentication for 12 months in any sector of the ICOP scheme (7.4) The CB’s audit program shall ensure that a certified organization’s ‘Control of Purchasing’ process is audited at least annually. (8.2.2.n) CBs shall not allow requests by clients for auditor changes/substitutions without substantiated evidence of improper activity or contract violations. (6.12)

9104/1 ‘Top Ten’ ‘Top Ten’ Things Auditors Should Know about 9104/1 Auditors who are withdrawn for cause by an AAB shall not reapply for authentication for 12 months in any sector of the ICOP scheme (7.4) The CB’s audit program shall ensure that a certified organization’s ‘Control of Purchasing’ process is audited at least annually. (8.2.2.n) CBs shall not allow requests by clients for auditor changes/substitutions without substantiated evidence of improper activity or contract violations. (6.12)

9104/1 ‘Top Ten’ ‘Top Ten’ Things Auditors Should Know about 9104/1 Auditors who are withdrawn for cause by an AAB shall not reapply for authentication for 12 months in any sector of the ICOP scheme (7.4) The CB’s audit program shall ensure that a certified organization’s ‘Control of Purchasing’ process is audited at least annually. (8.2.2.n) CBs shall not allow requests by clients for auditor changes/substitutions without substantiated evidence of improper activity or contract violations. (6.12)

9104/1 ‘Top Ten’ ‘Top Ten’ (or Eleven or Twelve) Things Auditors Should Know about 9104/1 Classified material or export control requirements, related to CB auditor access must be determined prior to audit activity (6.11) The audit team leader shall present the complete audit report to the organization within two weeks of the closing meeting using the audit report and associated forms defined in the 9101 standard. (8.5.a) The new 9104/1 standard is firmly based upon the new ISO 17xxx –series standards and the IAF Mandatory Documents [MD-series] (2.0)

9104/1 ‘Top Ten’ ‘Top Ten’ (or Eleven or Twelve) Things Auditors Should Know about 9104/1 Classified material or export control requirements, related to CB auditor access must be determined prior to audit activity (6.11) The audit team leader shall present the complete audit report to the organization within two weeks of the closing meeting using the audit report and associated forms defined in the 9101 standard. (8.5.a) The new 9104/1 standard is firmly based upon the new ISO 17xxx –series standards and the IAF Mandatory Documents [MD-series] (2.0)

9104/1 ‘Top Ten’ ‘Top Ten’ (or Eleven or Twelve) Things Auditors Should Know about 9104/1 Classified material or export control requirements, related to CB auditor access must be determined prior to audit activity (6.11) The audit team leader shall present the complete audit report to the organization within two weeks of the closing meeting using the audit report and associated forms defined in the 9101 standard. (8.5.a) The new 9104/1 standard is firmly based upon the new ISO 17xxx –series standards and the IAF Mandatory Documents [MD-series] (2.0)

9104/1 ‘Top Ten’ ‘Top Ten’ (or Eleven or Twelve) Things Auditors Should Know about 9104/1 Classified material or export control requirements, related to CB auditor access must be determined prior to audit activity (6.11) The audit team leader shall present the complete audit report to the organization within two weeks of the closing meeting using the audit report and associated forms defined in the 9101 standard. (8.5.a) The new 9104/1 standard is firmly based upon the new ISO 17xxx –series standards and the IAF Mandatory Documents [MD-series] (2.0)

Latest Schedule We had published an updated 9104/1 Schedule for every IAQG, AAQG, AAQSC, OPMT, and RMC meeting, OP-Assessor Workshop, and Auditor Workshop for the past 4+ years. For whatever reasons, those schedules were never achieved. So, no more detailed schedules. Crystal Ball: If Europe and Asia pass their current 9104/1 ballots in their sectors with no significant or technical changes, the 9104/1 published version will be available by mid November 2011. The 9104/1 Transition Team (Susie Neal – Chairperson) has developed a phase-in plan, and are awaiting ballot results for go-ahead.

Questions ?

Back-Up Slides

Sites – New Organizational Structures Single Site Multiple Site Campus Several Sites Complex Sites The above takes into consideration the unique organizational structures that exist in the Aviation, Space, and Defense industry today.

Single Site Structure A1.1 Example of a Single Site Organization The organization has one location. It could be organised under one large building or several buildings in one location. In either case the organisation is located on one site. The organisation has multiple products or product families flowing through multiple processes.

Multiple Site Structure A1.2 Example of a Multiple Site Organization The organization has two sites, A and B. They make two product families X and Y. Product family X is made the same way using the same processes on both sites A and B. Product family Y is only made on site A. This organization makes to customer specification. The central function is located on site A. Explanation: Site B conducts the same but fewer processes than site A making the same product X. In this way the organization is eligible for a multiple site approach.

Campus Structure A1.3 Example of a Campus Organization The organisation has four sites with four buildings on site A, four buildings on site B and one building on each site C and D. The organisation has multiple products and product families that all flow through substantially similar processes i.e. one value stream.

Several Site Structure A1.4 Example of a Several Site Organization The organization has three sites A, B and C that make different product families by mainly dissimilar processes although some of processes such as purchasing are the same. Site C makes to customer specification. Sites A and B design and manufacture their products. Some of the customers for products from each site are the same, others are not.

Complex Organization Structure A1.5 Example of a Complex Organization This organization has 6 sites. It has two different product families. One family is made through product stream 1, the other through product stream 2. The processes carried out within sites C and D are identical realizing the same product through the same processes. The same is true for sites E and F however the processes in E and F are dissimilar from those used in C and D. Sites A and B support both product streams. Sites and A and B use the same facilities for all products even through the types of products manufactured are different and utilize different technologies in their production. Where during the realization processes in sites A and B products in value stream 1 and in value stream 2 use the same processes.