Cui Xiaohao, Bian Tianjian, Zhang Chuang 2017/11/07

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
USR-WS (Beijing) Oct. 30 – Nov. 1, 2012 K. Soutome (JASRI / SPring-8) on behalf of SPring-8 Upgrade Working Group Injection Scheme for the SPring-8 Upgrade.
Advertisements

CEPC BoosterDesign CEPC Booster Design FCC Week 2015, March, 2015 Marriot Georgetown Hotel Huiping Geng Presented for Chuang Zhang.
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES NSLS-II ASAC-2007, April. 23, 2007 Injection System with a Booster in Separate Tunnel T. Shaftan for the NSLS-II team.
Damping ring K. Ohmi LC Layout Single tunnel Circumference 6.7 km Energy 5 GeV 2 km 35 km.
SuperB and the ILC Damping Rings Andy Wolski University of Liverpool/Cockcroft Institute 27 April, 2006.
April 6th 2009Olympus Meeting at DESY, F.Brinker1 Vacuum system Available beam scraper Beam dimensions, Target cell Machine Studies on February 7 th 2009.
ALPHA Storage Ring Indiana University Xiaoying Pang.
Sergey Antipov, University of Chicago Fermilab Mentor: Sergei Nagaitsev Injection to IOTA ring.
MEIC Electron Cooling Simulation He Zhang 03/18/2014, EIC 14 Newport News, VA.
3 GeV,1.2 MW, Booster for Proton Driver G H Rees, RAL.
1 Flux concentrator for SuperKEKB Kamitani Takuya IWLC October.20.
Simulation and Experimental Results of SSRF Top-up Operation Haohu Li, Manzhou Zhang SSRF Top-up Workshop, Melbourne
November 14, 2004First ILC Workshop1 CESR-c Wiggler Dynamics D.Rubin -Objectives -Specifications -Modeling and simulation -Machine measurements/ analysis.
Overview of Booster PIP II upgrades and plans C.Y. Tan for Proton Source group PIP II Collaboration Meeting 03 June 2014.
28-May-2008Non-linear Beam Dynamics WS1 On Injection Beam Loss at the SPring-8 Storage Ring Masaru TAKAO & J. Schimizu, K. Soutome, and H. Tanaka JASRI.
Damping Ring Parameters and Interface to Sources S. Guiducci BTR, LNF 7 July 2011.
P I T Z Photo Injector Test Facility Zeuthen Design consideration of the RF deflector to optimize the photo injector at PITZ S.Korepanov.
The Introduction to CSNS Accelerators Oct. 5, 2010 Sheng Wang AP group, Accelerator Centre,IHEP, CAS.
Principals of fast injection and extraction R. Apsimon.
PSB H- injection concept J.Borburgh, C.Bracco, C.Carli, B.Goddard, M.Hourican, B.Mikulec, W.Weterings,
CEPC Booster Zhang Chuang, Cui Xiaohao September 11,2015.
FCC-ee injector complex including Booster Yannis Papaphilippou, CERN Thanks to: M.Aiba (PSI), Ö.Etisken (Ankara Un.), K.Oide (KEK), L.Rinolfi (ESI-JUAS),
Baseline Injection/Extraction Configuration Aimin Xiao and Louis Emery, September 12th 2006.
BEAM TRANSFER CHANNELS, INJECTION AND EXTRACTION SYSTEMS
CEPC parameter choice and partial double ring design
Design study of CEPC Alternating Magnetic Field Booster
Cui Xiaohao, Zhang Chuang,Bian Tianjian January 12,2016
Large Booster and Collider Ring
Discussion on Emittance Evolution through FCC-e+e-
Luminosity Optimization for FCC-ee: recent results
CEPC accelerator physics
Top-Up Injection for PEP-II and Applications to a Higgs Factory
CEPC accelerator physics
Beam Injection and Extraction Scheme
Status of CEPC lattice design
CEPC Booster Design Dou Wang, Chenghui Yu, Tianjian Bian, Xiaohao Cui, Chuang Zhang, Yudong Liu, Na Wang, Daheng Ji, Jiyuan Zhai, Wen Kang, Cai Meng, Jie.
CASA Collider Design Review Retreat Other Electron-Ion Colliders: eRHIC, ENC & LHeC Yuhong Zhang February 24, 2010.
CEPC Booster Design Progress (Low field)
The new 7BA design of BAPS
The design of interaction region
Capture and Transmission of polarized positrons from a Compton Scheme
CEPC Injector Damping Ring
CEPC partial double ring scheme and crab-waist parameters
Design Study of the CEPC Booster
LHC (SSC) Byung Yunn CASA.
CEPC Injector positron source
Lattice design for the CEPC collider ring
ILC 3.2 km DR design based on FODO lattice (DMC3)
Collider Ring Optics & Related Issues
ILC 3.2 km DR design based on FODO lattice (DMC3)
Lattice design for the CEPC collider ring
Design study of CEPC Alternating Magnetic Field Booster
Design study of CEPC Alternating Magnetic Field Booster
Design study of CEPC Alternating Magnetic Field Booster
Pulsed Sextupole Injection for Beijing Advanced Photon Source
Design study of CEPC Alternating Magnetic Field Booster
PEPX-type BAPS Lattice Design and Beam Dynamics Optimization
CEPC optics and booster optics
J. Seeman Perugia Super-B Meeting June 2009
Kicker and RF systems for Damping Rings
Kicker specifications for Damping Rings
Injection design of CEPC
CEPC SRF Parameters (100 km Main Ring)
JLEIC Reaching 140 GeV CM Energy: Concept and Luminosity Estimate
MEIC New Baseline: Part 10
MEIC New Baseline: Part 7
MEIC New Baseline: Performance and Accelerator R&D
Fanglei Lin JLEIC R&D Meeting, August 4, 2016
Optimization of JLEIC Integrated Luminosity Without On-Energy Cooling*
JLEIC Ion Beam Formation options for 200 GeV
Presentation transcript:

Cui Xiaohao, Bian Tianjian, Zhang Chuang 2017/11/07 CEPC Injection Cui Xiaohao, Bian Tianjian, Zhang Chuang 2017/11/07

Contents 1. Injection Systems 2. requirement 3. Injection Process 4. Summary

1. Injection Systems 10 GeV Linac Transport line From Linac To booster 100 km booster 10 GeV -> 120 GeV Transport line From booster To collider Booster Dipole field at low energy is only 30 Gauss, Low field Magnet R&D is needed

Geometrical Arrangement Linac on the ground level Booster and collider in the same tunnel about 100 m deep Booster is 1.5 m above the collider Booster Collider 1.5 m

Transport lines: Linac to booster Guiding the beam from Linac to the booster Beam Energy: 10 GeV Beam emittance: 300 nm.rad horizontal bending section and one vertical bending section Vertical bending section matches the 100m height Efficiency: > 99% Linac Separation Vertical slope Horizontal bending Geometry of the Transport line

Transport lines: booster to collider Guiding the beam from the booster to collider ring Beam Energy: 120/80/45 GeV Beam emittance: 3.1/1.56/0.51 nm.rad horizontal bending section and one vertical bending section Vertical bending section matches the 1.5 m height Efficiency: > 99% Horizontal Extraction Vertical Slope Horizontal Injection Geometry of the Transport line

Machine Functions of Two Transport lines

2. requirement Some parameters of the Collider ring Higgs W Z Energy 120 80 45.5 Bunch number 286 5220 10900 Beam current (mA) 17.7 90.3 83.8 Collider Lifetime 20 min 3.5 Hr 7.4 Hr 3% decay time (sec) 37 383 811 3% current (mA) 0.531 2.709 2.514 Due to the short lifetime, a Top-up injection is needed and the injection time must be less than that listed above.

Booster current The current in the booster is limited by the instabilities. For aluminium vacuum chamber, the TMCI current threshold is 0.803 mA. In W, and Z mode, It takes the booster 5 cycles to fill all bunches.

Acceptance For booster injection: the beam emittance from linac is 300 nm.rad in both x, and y direction. The booster physical aperture is 3 sigma + 5mm. For collider injection: the beam emittance from booster is 3.1 nm.rad in x, and 1% coupling. The collider dynamic aperture is more than 16 sigma in x, and 6 sigma in y for higgs injection.

Beam parameters from Linac Value Unit Beam Energy 10 GeV Repetition rate 100 Hz Bunch Charge >1 nC Energy Spread <2E-3 Emittance < 0.3 mm.rad Emittance is required by the vacuum chamber in the booster. Bunch charge is required by the injection current in Higgs mode.

Beam parameters from booster H W Z Unit Bunch Charge 0.62 0.18 0.077 nC Ramping Cycle 10 6 2 s Beam Current 0.532 0.542 0.504 mA Emittance x 3.1 1.56 0.51 nm.rad Energy Spread 0.0966 0.064 0.037 % Efficiency 92 %

3. Injection process Injection from Linac to booster Booster ramping to High Energy Inject from booster to collider Booster ramping to Low Energy repeat

Injection Time Structure: In W, and Z mode, It takes the booster 5 cycles to fill all bunches For Z injection, the booster needs 8s at the high energy for beam damping.

Booster injection and Extraction: Injected beam Septum Injecting beam On axis injection One septum and one kicker is needed Extraction is just the oppsite

Kickers and Septums: Booster Injection Booster Extraction Component Length (m) Waveform Deflection angle (mrad) Field (T) Beam-Stay-clear H(mm) V(mm) Septum 2 DC 9.1 0.152 63 Kicker 0.5 Half_sin 0.034 Booster Extraction Component Length (m) Waveform Deflection angle (mrad) Field (T) Beam-Stay-clear H(mm) V(mm) Septum 10 DC 10.4 0.41 20 Kicker 2 Half_sin 0.2 0.04

Collider Injection: Bump Height Acceptance >4sxc + 8sxi + S Bumped Stored beam Septum 2mm Injected beam For Higgs: e_x = 1.21 nm.rad; e_inject = 3.1 nm.rad sx = 0.47 mm, s_inject = 0.45 mm Septum = 2 mm Acceptance > 16 s For Z: e_x = 0.17 nm.rad; e_inject = 0.51 nm.rad sx = 0.18 mm, s_inject = 0.16 mm Septum = 2 mm Acceptance > 23 s Bump Height Acceptance >4sxc + 8sxi + S

Injection Simulation: Performed simulations of the injected beam dynamics Beam distribution in X-X’ phase- space is tracked after injection Blue distribution: Beam before injection Green distribution: Beam of the first 10 turns after injection Dotted line is the acceptance

Kickers and Septums: Kicker strength Bump height 20mm,kicker length 2m,then the strength of the kickers are about 200 Gauss Septum strength If the Septum is 35m, the strength needed is much higher. As a result, we tried to use 4 separate septum instead of a single one. Their magnet strength are: 0.64T, 0.32T, 0.16T, 0.08T and their thickness are 16mm,8mm,4mm,2mm separately.

Booster parameters and filling time Mode Higgs W Z Injection Energy (GeV) 120 80 45.5 Bunch number 286 1044 2180 Bunch Charge (nC) 0.62 0.173 0.077 Beam Current (mA) 0.532 0.542 0.504 Current threshold due to TMCI 0.803 Number of Cycles 1 5 Current decay 3% Ramping Cycle (sec) 10 6 2 Filling time (sec) 28 185 318 Injection frequency (sec) 37 383 811

4. Summary A baseline design of the injection systems of CEPC is presented in this talk The total transmission efficiency of the system is larger than 90% (99%*92%*99%) It satisfies the Top-Up injection requirements for both Higgs, W, and Z mode. It also has the ability to fill the collider from empty in a reasonable time.

Thank you!