Benefits and Barriers: ICTs in M&E

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Session 9b: Next steps on financial management harmonization and alignment.
Advertisements

Project leaders will keep track of team progress using an A3 Report.
Page 0 Agency Approaches to Managing for Development Results Why Results? What Results? Key Challenges, lessons learnt Core principles and draft action.
BUILDING A COMMUNITY OF PRACTICE. Question 1: What is the mission of our network? To share knowledge and experiences. To extract lessons to improve dialogue.
1 Experiences of Using Performance Information in Budget Process 27 th Annual Meeting of Senior Budget Officials Sydney, June 5 th 2006 Teresa Curristine.
Including School Stakeholders. There are many individuals and groups associated with schools and many of these people are likely to have valuable ideas.
Monitoring & Evaluation Capacity Strengthening Workshop WORKSHOP INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW.
Introduction in to Social Accounting & Audit Building Confident Communities, in Partnership Louise Robson Customer Focus Service Manager 1.
How can information systems help us?
Leading By Convening: A Blueprint for Authentic Engagement September 13, 2014.
1 Chapter 9 Implementing Six Sigma. Top 8 Reasons for Six Sigma Project Failure 8. The training was not practical. 7. The project was too small for DMAIC.
Logic Models How to Integrate Data Collection into your Everyday Work.
School Building Leader and School District Leader exam
The Moment to Explore Strategic Partnerships: Adapting to Change
Global Refugee Youth Consultations
Build an Enterprise IT Security Training Program
MODULE 15 – ORGANISATIONAL COMMUNICATION
How to show your social value – reporting outcomes & impact
Country Level Programs
Equality and Human Rights Exchange Network
Bath Consultancy Group Alexander Ballard
Project Management BBA & MBA
Virtual Office APHSA ISM Conference August 26, 2008 Presented by
Capacity Development 4.0 Andrea Pellandra
INTER-AMERICAN DEVELOPMENT BANK CAPACITY BUILDING AND TRAINING.
I love portfolio! Nelly Zafeiriadou MA, EdD ELT School Advisor
Learning Partner Presentation
Why we need an honest assessment culture and how to create one.
Open All Areas Difficulties met in the process
Descriptive Analysis of Performance-Based Financing Education Project in Burundi Victoria Ryan World Bank Group May 16, 2017.
Monitoring and Evaluation Systems for NARS Organisations in Papua New Guinea Day 3. Session 7. Managers’ and stakeholders’ information needs.
Public support to PGS development
IT Project and Portfolio Management at WVU
COME TOGETHER to Effect Positive Program Change presented by Fred V
Business Environment Dr. Aravind Banakar –
Business Environment Dr. Aravind Banakar –
Business Environment
Business Environment
Business Environment
Business Environment
Implementing Change Presented by Courtney Moon
Grievance, Discipline & Dismissal
Perspective Interview: Sofia Perez
Module 5 SDG follow-up and review mechanisms
Professional Services at FAS June 9, 2014
Building Successful and Engaging Boards The “Effectiveness Spectrum”
Overview of the GMUS-2 work plan UN FAO, Rome, Italy February 21-23, 2012 Daniel Kunkel.
EDU827 : EDUCATIONAL LEADERSHIP
GNC Global Partners Meeting Washington 30/03/16
Results of the Organizational Performance
Engaging Institutional Leadership
school self-evaluation and improvement toolkit
Public engagement strategy
A Funders Perspective Maria Uhle Co-Chair, Belmont Forum Directorates for Geosciences, US National Science Foundation.
Introduction to the PRISM Framework
Community Integration and Development USP Conference May 2013
Taking care of our people Being good neighbours
Address the human side of change The ability to engage employees in change is rapidly becoming a key determinant of business success. Your leaders.
Clear Language and Organizational Change
Obtaining and Using Feedback from Participants
UNDMTP Presentation, Session V: Early Warning Symposium 24 May 2006
‘ Children as Agents of Social Change  Opening Seminar
ReDSS is supporting the JSC, EIDACS and SDSC consortia to…
SUSTAINABLE MICRO-FINANCE for WOMEN’S EMPOWERMENT
Fahrig, R. SI Reorg Presentation: DCSI
Environment and Development Policy Section
Common reasons for partial use of DTM data
Professor Jacqueline Stevenson, Sheffield Hallam University
Monitoring and Evaluation in Communication Management
DATA FOR NOW STAKEHOLDERS MEETING July 2019 #DATA4NOW
Presentation transcript:

Benefits and Barriers: ICTs in M&E We held a few Technology Salons to bring people together to find out more about what different organizations were doing in this space We talked about what some of the possibilities and challenges were in a few key areas: How can ICTs bring in more voices and support planning of and feedback on development programs? How can we help strengthen local capacity around ICTs and M&E? How can we use ICTs for qualitative M&E? What is happening with ICT and M&E in S Asia, what are the common challenges? What studies or evidence is there on ICTs and M&E What is happening in E Africa? Benefits and Barriers: ICTs in M&E Linda Raftree July 9, 2013

Benefits Collect better, more rigorous data Combine information sources, types Broaden participation, “downward” accountability Save time and money Improve decision-making Coordinate and cooperate Collect better data More rigorous More complete Combine information sources and types: M&E is not only about formal data collection and indicators anymore. Can be free form, contain sentiment (U-Report SMS) Expand participation, increase downward accountability: SMS and other social monitoring can supplement formal information sources Combinations of official data sets and SMS data -> new ways of looking at cross-sections of information Overcome geographical barriers, capture the pulse of the population. Participant feedback, dialogue and engagement, bottom up policies and programs “eliminate the middle man Save time and money on collecting, aggregating and analyzing data: Timeliness, veracity, validation, quicker reactions to information Can reduce cost once established Improve decision making: New or additional information for planning and decision-making – community, organizational, government, donor levels Visualizations and trend spotting/trend analysis can support decision making Real-time feedback Coordinate and cooperate more: Better cooperation (if data is open, shared standards Greater transparency: Easier data auditing

Barriers Organizational challenges Community level barriers Donor level issues Organizational level challenges: When to use ICTs in M&E, for what and why? Starting with the tech not the goals and not thinking through who the M&E is for Difficulties deciding on the right ICT for the situation (if any) – no tools offer all we need Possibly too much focus on ICT for quantitative data collection – less exploration of other tools? Qualitative? Combinations of new/old tools? Need to get beyond ‘we can collect data!’ to better data analysis and use Tendency to offload excessive data collection to frontline staff – is it all useful? Staff capacity, low uptake, resistance to change - Technology capacity =/ M&E capacity and vice versa; need to work together Tacking ICT and M&E on at the end rather than building both in from the start Extractive data collection – not sharing back with communities Lack of data interoperability across organizations/governments – can’t see whole picture, duplication of efforts Not enough attention to security and privacy; lack of awareness of ethical standards w new ICT tools Community level barriers Motivation / incentives to participate or give information. Where does my information go? Will I see the results? Cost, access, capacity, language, literacy, cultural barriers Privacy and protection – are we putting people at risk with new tools/ICTs in M&E? Inclusion -> often need other kinds of tools/combinations of tools to avoid exclusion Donor level issues Pushing or dictating use of ICT w/o regard for whether it’s useful M&E for whom? For what? Donors or implementers? both? Current obsession with maps “We want something that’s never been done, but we want evidence it will work and for you to be an expert at it” Often focus on top-down, externally created ‘solutions’ rather than building on bottom up or local systems and processes, or working with local partners Results-based, data-based focus can bias towards the “countable” and leave out complexity & qualitative information

Lessons Start with the M&E goal, not the tech Collect the right amount of data Think about technology + people + processes Ensure inclusion Strengthen existing systems Share “up” and “down” and “across” Consider who you are threatening Ensure data -> action, response Start with your goal, not the tech Start with a good M&E plan, then see if it can be supported w ICTs Collect the right amount of data Pick a feasible and limited number of quality indicators Think through how you’ll motivate staff to collect them Make sure you’re not collecting excessive data that you will not be able to analyze/use Technology, but also people and processes Change management process, needs clarity of purpose Remember that ICT may not be the best solution Get influential people on your side, champions Provide incentives for staff Get the first effort right and then share Remember training, ongoing technical support Inclusion / bypassing key players Who is left out when you use ICTs for M&E Who are you ‘going around’ that you need to engage (government? Leaders?) Are you undermining existing political channels by enabling direct feedback – is that OK? Strengthen existing systems Are you creating duplicate systems, parallel systems or fragmenting government systems? If there is no system, are you working with different stakeholders to build one? Share up, down and across Don’t just feed info up the chain Share with communities, with partners, with the home office, etc. These levels all have different information and communication needs/styles Who are you threatening? More open information can be threatening – do a power analysis and understand this Look at the unintended consequences of this data collection Make sure the data collected leads to action Is the data actionable? Accurate? Does it lead to decisions? To some kind of reaction or response?

Resources