Challenges in Finding and Connecting New Water Sources J. Tupling, P.Eng. June 22, 2009.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
TRP Chapter Chapter 6.8 Site selection for hazardous waste treatment facilities.
Advertisements

Princeton Wastewater Servicing Study
Meadowbank Gold Project Cumberland Resources Ltd. Nunavut Impact Review Board Public Hearing Chesterfield Inlet, Nunavut March 30, 2006.
Identify Problems, Planning Objectives and Constraints.
TN Regional Water-Supply Planning Technical Working Group Tennessee Regional Water-Supply Planning: General Observations and Conclusions TACIR February.
Landfill Legislation Richard Campbell. INTRODUCTION  Prior to the mid-1980's, waste disposal sites were: sites that no one wanted, ie they were holes.
THE EXPANDING ROLE of RECYCLED WATER The Need, Benefits and Cost Effectiveness Make Recycled Water an Increasingly Valued Resource Harry Ehrlich, SDA Principal.
Growth Management & Draft Land Budget June 24 th, 2013 Planning Services Department.
Prepared by: Earth Data N.E., Inc. August 19, 2008.
Geology Matters 2013 Presenter: Robert Federico, Principal November 14, 2013 Donkin Coal Mine Environmental Assessment Case Study.
Sacramento Local Agency Formation Commission Peter Brundage, Executive Officer; Donald J. Lockhart, Assistant Executive Officer; Diane Thorpe, Commission.
Identify Problems, Planning Objectives and Constraints
Lecture(3) Instructor : Dr. Abed Al-Majed Nassar
Connecticut Department of Energy and Environmental Protection.
Environmental Impact Assessment Review Process for Oil and Gas Projects In Saskatchewan Larry Lechner, P. Eng. Director Environmental Assessment Branch.
Metropolitan Council Master Water Supply Plan March 11, 2009 Christopher Elvrum Manager, Water Supply Planning Keith Buttleman Assistant General Manager,
MEA Class EA Requirements to support a new Sewage Treatment Facility May, 2013.
1 Brace Centre for Water Resources Management McGill University, Sept. 25 François Boulanger, Regional Director The New Canadian Environmental Assessment.
What If I Must Go Beyond a Preliminary Assessment? (the example of a USAID EA under Reg. 216) [DATE][SPEAKERS NAMES]
Canada vs. USA Environmental Regulation (Why Canadians are better known for hockey) Georgia Basin-Puget Sound International Airshed Strategy Meeting September.
Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA): Overview
BioCarbon Fund Projects and World Bank Safeguard Policies Jean-Roger Mercier September 12, 2005.
Regional Water Supply Planning. Background  Legislative history  Benefits of regional planning  Regulatory requirements  Existing water source information.
The Importance of Baseline Data More Than Just Counting Things Presentation to Geology Matters November 14, 2013.
North Eastham Wind Feasibility Study Results Brian Eastman Eastham Energy Committee Kristen Burke Massachusetts Technology Collaborative Ric O’Connell.
What does an Environmental Professional Do?
Water Supply Planning Initiative State Water Commission November 22, 2004.
Georgia’s Water Plan June 17, /09/08 Page 2 Agenda Plan Development Plan Overview.
What is Necessary to Ensure Natural Justice in EIA Decision-making? Angus Morrison-Saunders Senior Lecturer in Environmental Assessment School of Environmental.
Review of the Nipissar Lake Replenishment Project, Rankin Inlet, Nunavut September 25, 2014 NWB Hearing Presentation Type A Water License Amendment Application.
BASICS IN IRRIGATION ENGINEERING 2.1. Planning Irrigation systems 2.2. soil-plant-water relation – over view 2.3. Crop water requirement 2.4. Base, delta.
BioCarbon Fund Projects and World Bank Safeguards Jean-Roger Mercier July 11, 2005.
The SSMP Process 1. The Servicing and Settlement Master Plan A plan to encompass the community’s visions and ideas, while approaching planning and servicing.
PPSD in specific sectors in Bulgaria - Regional Plans for Development National Programme for Ports Development (2006 – 2015) Vania Grigorova, Jacquelina.
Jefferson County Agricultural Preservation and Land Use Plan Jefferson County’s Comprehensive Plan: Process and Strategies Presented to: Dane County Officials.
New activities Tour de Table – Lithuania Kestutis Kadunas, Geological Survey of Lithuania.
SEA in the Czech Republic Prague, 24 September 2008.
Environmental Assessment in British Columbia Forum of Federations Conference September 14, 2009.
Millbrook Dam Environmental Assessment Study Dan Marinigh CAO/Secretary-Treasurer Otonabee Region Conservation Authority October 20, 2015 Otonabee Conservation.
Metropolitan Council Environment Committee Master Water Supply Plan February 10, 2009 Christopher Elvrum Manager, Water Supply Planning Keith Buttleman.
CHAPTER 4 ALTERNATIVES. --- “The driving impetus for conducting environmental impact studies is to comparatively present the effects of proposed alternatives.
Drinking Water Source Protection Ministry of the Environment Source Protection Programs Branch March 2010.
NRC Environmental Reviews for Uranium Recovery Applicants and Licensees James Park (301)
Sonoma Valley Groundwater Management Planning. 2 Presentation Overview SCWA/USGS Groundwater Study Stakeholder Assessment Groundwater Management Work.
San Diego Regional Comprehensive Plan Presentation to Senate Transportation and Housing Committee February 8, 2005.
California Water Plan Update Advisory Committee Meeting January 20, 2005.
1 Water Quality Antidegradation: Guidance to Implement Tier II Summary of Discussion: Review the Tier II Rule requirements. Clarify what feedback we are.
Sustainability Principles for Land Use and Mobility Approved by City Council – January 2007.
CEAA 2012 EA PROCESS OPTIONS OCTOBER 15, 2012
An Overview of Coastal Management Issues Overview and Scrutiny Co-ordinating and Call-in Committee, 10 March Andrew Wainwright, Environmental Health.
Waterdown Road Corridor Class Environmental Assessment (Phase 3 & 4) Community Services Committee May 9, 2012.
Mandeni Municipality Multi Year Housing Plan To house every resident of Mandeni in a sustainable and affordable way, with the necessary services, in progressive.
1 1 The Project Description: Framing the CEQA Analysis Terry Rivasplata.
ISO Session 3 Environmental Management and Ethics in Management.
EIAScreening6(Gajaseni, 2007)1 II. Scoping. EIAScreening6(Gajaseni, 2007)2 Scoping Definition: is a process of interaction between the interested public,
Proven Management – Proven Gold Districts – Safe Jurisdictions Symbol:PG Exchange:TSX Hardrock Project Environmental.
County Road 19(Manning Road) & County Road 22 Improvements Environmental Study/ Preliminary Design Report November 2008.
STOCKTON DELTA WATER SUPPLY PROJECT (DWSP) Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR) Certification Hearing November 8, 2005 Mark J. Madison, Director Municipal.
Municipal Class Environmental Assessment
James Palmer, HBRC The Future of Our Water; Community Symposium
EIA approval process, Management plan and Monitoring
Affordable Energy Production from Renewable Fuel
The Prepared Process: The Next Generation
Florida and Reclaimed Water
What is Necessary to Ensure Natural Justice in EIA Decision-making?
National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
1 Stadium Company Network. The Stadium Company Project Is a sports facility management company that manages a stadium. Stadium Company needs to upgrade.
Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA)
Strategic Appropriate Assessment of Spatial Plans
Agricultural Land & Avian Foraging Habitat Mitigation Fee
Presentation transcript:

Challenges in Finding and Connecting New Water Sources J. Tupling, P.Eng. June 22, 2009

The Process Process to find and connect a new water source is a good news / bad news story. Good news is there is a process that is available. Bad news is there will be challenges that have the potential to make the process lengthy, litigious, and/or acrimonious. But in the end a decision will be made.

The Planning Process for a New Water Source Required to follow the Municipal Class Environmental (EA) process under Environmental Assessment Act. Connecting a new water source is a Schedule C project under the Class EA process. Schedule A projects are pre-approved. Schedule B projects are subject to public consultation and screening. Schedule C projects involve a 5 phase planning and implementation process that includes significant public consultation.

The Steps in the Process Formulate the problem statement. Determine how much water is needed. Identify the options. Set out the steps in the process. Assess the challenges.

Formulate Problem Statement The problem statement is preferably concise and to the point. Two examples: To identify additional supply capacity to service lands designated for development in the Towns Official Plan; or To identify additional supply capacity to provide a sustainable supply for the existing community. The Tier 3 Groundwater Quantity Risk Assessment work can be used as a basis for the problem statement.

Determine How Much Water is Needed? Determine how much water will be needed to meet the future demand based on the municipalitys Official Plan or to ensure a sustainable supply for existing community. For Orangeville, the current supply capacity is approximately 16,000 m 3 /day. 5 year average max day demand is approximately 13,000 m 3 /day. At build out, Orangeville will need an additional 4,000 m 3 /day +/- to service the planned growth, and assuming no loss in supply capacity.

Determine How Much Water is Needed - Other Considerations What population is the municipality going to be servicing? Does that future population meet the Places to Grow targets? Is it practical to try to obtain enough water to meet those targets? If a new water source can be found and connected, will there be adequate sewage treatment capacity for the growth the additional water supply capacity will support?

What are the Options? Class EA process requires proponent to consider the Do Nothing option. Generally, not practical as it means lands designated for development could not be serviced or the additional water is needed to make up lost supply cannot be found. Increase the available supply by optimizing the use of existing supply and facilities. Introduce or expand conservation opportunities. But in the end, new sources will likely need to be found, and for Orangeville those new sources will be outside its municipal boundaries.

Set Out the Steps in the Process Assess the environment and identify alternative solutions; ie, different well locations. Consult the Public on the problem statement and the alternative solutions. Public includes all parties who may be affected by the undertaking; the public at large, other municipalities, regulatory agencies, special interest groups, etc. At the first mandatory consultation, the problem statement is identified and options that will be considered are identified.

Set Out the Steps in the Process (Contd) Evaluate the alternative solutions and determine which one will be recommended. Consult the Public and present the recommended alternative. Finalize the preferred design and prepare the Environmental Study Report which documents the planning process and the preferred design. Issue the notice of completion. Public has 30 days to request the Minister of the Environment for a Part II order; effectively the appeal process. The Part II order can be denied, referred to mediation, or granted in which case an individual EA is required.

The Challenges Evaluation of the alternatives requires consideration of three environments: Natural; Social; and Economic As it would relate to Orangeville, the following discussion relates to finding and connecting a new well.

Natural Environment Will there be any effect on the natural environment; streams and fish habitats, wet lands, wood lots, etc? What is the geological and hydrogeological setting; is the well site secure from contamination?

Summary and Conclusions There is a process that a municipality can use to deal with the challenges in finding and connecting new water sources. There will be a greater number of issues when the new water source is outside a municipalitys boundary. As an observation, the formidable task I see the Source Protection Committee having is to develop policies that will be as fair and equitable as they can be for everyone involved.