How to communicate about a Bilan Carbone® assessment

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Prompts Consider the following questions as you build this slide:
Advertisements

1 Introduction to System Engineering G. Nacouzi ME 155B.
1 Regulatory Impact Assessment: Methodology and Best Practices David Shortall INMETRO International Workshop on Conformity Assessment Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
1 Introduction, reporting requirements, workshop objectives Workshop on greenhouse gas and ammonia emission inventories and projections from agriculture.
EU Environmental approximation in the WB and Turkey- ETNAR Conference Climate, transport and energy policy analysis in Montenegro Jelena Marojevic-Galic.
1 CARBON AND ENVIRONMENTAL FOOTPRINTING 11. CORPORATE AND PRODUCT EMISSIONS Two viewpoints – Corporate: considers activities that create or release emissions.
1 Hsin Chu, August 2012 Regulatory Impact Assessment Charles-Henri Montin, Senior Regulatory Expert, Ministry of economy and finance, Paris
CP methodology adapted to UNFCCC Swedish International Development Agency S ESSION 9.A United Nations Environment Program Division of Technology Industry.
EU Climate Action EU – Central Asia Working Group on
Leonardo da Vinci Partnerships: an opportunity to work together Italian National Agency for LLP - Leonardo da Vinci Sectoral Programme.
EU Funding opportunities : Rights, Equality and Citizenship Programme Justice Programme Jose Ortega European Commission DG Justice.
UNDP Handbook for conducting technology needs assessments and Preliminary analysis of countries’ TNAs UNFCCC Seminar on the development and transfer on.
Evaluation Proposal Defense Observations and Suggestions Yibeltal Kiflie August 2009.
1 Strategy for the sustainable competitiveness of the construction sector Communication COM (2012) 433 final Vicente Leoz Argüelles UNIEP POLICY DAY 12th.
Business case Name: Date: Author: Version:. business case The summary should provide the reader with a clear understanding of the reasons for the initiative.
General remarks Goal of the presentation Illustration of the business in a concise way Visual support for your pitch The prompts and tips should be addressed.
Action towards Resource-efficient and Low Carbon Cities in Asia
The Implementation of BPR Pertemuan 9 Matakuliah: M0734-Business Process Reenginering Tahun: 2010.
Social value reporting: An integrated approach John Maddocks – CIPFA
Sustainability Reporting in Norway An Assessment of Non- Financial Disclosures by the 100 Largest Firms Irja Vormedal and Audun Ruud.
 Alan Barnard [Company Name] [Submission Title] LAA ENVIRO AWARDS 2010.
Improving performance, reducing risk Dr Apostolos Noulis, Lead Assessor, Business Development Mgr Thessaloniki, 02 June 2014 ISO Energy Management.
C.H. Montin, Tbilisi 11 Tbilisi, 12 November 2014 Developing Regulatory Impact Assessment In Georgia Overview of the RIA process & methodology Charles-Henri.
GENERAL REMARKS Guidelines and suggestions for GSVC pitch decks Goal of the Presentation Illustration of the business in a concise way Visual support for.
Energetická náročnost budov
Business Management March 2, 2017, Marketing.
Social return on investments (SROI)
Name: Date: Author: Version:
Manager Training Deck: Equip Managers to Conduct Effective Pay Conversations Customization Notes: Please note this deck is intended for you to customize.
Supervision of Insurance Market Conduct in Canada
Session 3 General RIA Training 6–8 July 2009 EuropeAid/125317/D/SER/TR
European Topic Centre on Sustainable Consumption and Production (ETC/SCP) Lars Fogh Mortensen, Head of Group Sustainable Consumption and Production.
Strategic Information Initiatives
Evaluation of Priority Gender Equality
EUROPE 2020 Seven Flagships
EWG Study Tour, Galway, 18/09/2006
LO1 - Analyse the impact and influence which the macro environment has on an organization and its business strategies 1. P1 Applying appropriate frameworks,
An Introduction to the Scottish Carbon Metric
Monitoring and Evaluation Systems for NARS Organisations in Papua New Guinea Day 2. Session 6. Developing indicators.
SoilCare introduction
GROUP 2 - STRATEGY GOAL/IMPACT AND OUTCOME; OUTPUT OBJECTIVE 4
Sustainable EU Research Infrastructures
IENG 451 / 452 Voice of the Customer: Analysis (KANO, CTQ)
Developments in the Community transport policy and their statistical implications The White Paper 2011 sets the Commission strategy on transport for the.
Building Efficiency Accelerator
Making Sustainability Tangible by denkstatt group
Copyright © Texas Education Agency, All rights reserved
Global Social Venture Competition Pitch Deck
Climfoot training session
Presentation Module 3c Cost-Benefit-Analysis (CBA)
April 2011.
Using the EFQM Excellence Model to support the role of a trustee
How to communicate about a Bilan Carbone® assessment
New Zealand Aluminium Smelters Ltd Climate Change Approach
The Balanced Scorecard
Work Programme 2012 COOPERATION Theme 6 Environment (including climate change) Challenge 6.1 Coping with climate change European Commission Research.
Climfoot training session
Climfoot training session
Good Practices on Disaster Prevention in Europe
Business Retention and Expansion
Draft Methodology for impact analysis of ESS.VIP Projects
Building The Single Market for Green Products
Template and Process for Expression of Interest by Countries
Energy Management Systems Business Case for EnMS
ESF monitoring and evaluation in Draft guidance
Main recommendations & conclusions (1)
QMS, ISO and Six Sigma It’s all related…..
EM&V Planning and EM&V Issues
Environment in Cohesion Policy framework for
Driving Successful Projects
Presentation transcript:

How to communicate about a Bilan Carbone® assessment Clim’Foot Project How to communicate about a Bilan Carbone® assessment

How to communicate the Clim’ Foot BC approach ? The main objective is to ensure that people have a clear understanding of what can and can’t be expected from a Bilan Carbone®. Among main points : A Bilan Carbone® assessment has 2 main goals : quantifying the GHG emissions of one organisation over (usually) one year, define and implement short, medium and long term actions to reduce these emissions. But it can also provide quantitative results for reporting purposes. Before starting the assessment, make sure the final objective(s) is well defined. A Bilan Carbone® assessment, completely and properly made, provides an uncommon view on the organisation’s flows : energy, logistics, products/services, people. It helps identifying risks and opportunities for the organisation, primarily related to energy and climate change challenges. It also provides quantitative results in line with ISO and GHG-Protocol standards. A GHG assessment strategy with the Bilan Carbone® method and tools is a medium term approach. Therefore, the first one will not be exhaustive, neither very detailed or precise. The first one is a relatively blurred picture. The following annual updates will improve the focus. The perimeter of the assessment generates lots of discussions and misunderstanding generally related to the fact that people want to assess what they consider being “responsible for” i.e. most of the “Direct” emissions. Make sure to clarify this question at the very beginning of the assessment. It also important to remind that a Clim’ Foot BC assessment is a mono criteria analysis focusing on carbon emissions only. It will not address other environmental or societal impacts.

How/What should you communicate after the assessment ? Before any communication action, make sure that the « Why » communicating on the Clim’ Foot BC assessment is clear, and anticipate potential positive/negative consequences, as communication about GHG emissions is a complex subject with a lot of misunderstandings. Communication content should cover the following topics : Use data that can be understood : primarily focus on main activity data (with ratios) and mention related CO2e results as a consequence. Keep in mind that nobody knows what a ton of CO2e represents. Avoid precise data : CO2e results must always be rounded, because of the uncertainty which will be between 15 and 30%. Responsibility : No one within the organisation is officially « responsible » for the emissions. Emissions are the « normal » consequences of what is the core activity of the organisation, and the way it is organised. The main goals is to identify who best positioned to implement emission reduction actions, and the energy and climate challenges will be integrated in the organisation’s strategy. Don’t try to compare with others : Comparison of results with one or more « similar » external organisations is very very risky. There is no guarantee that the other assessment is done the same way, with the same assumptions, and the same methodological choices. No good results : There is no « good » Bilan Carbone® at least in EU countries, since all emissions have to be divided by 3 to 5 within the next 40 years. Reminder : EU countries committed to the 2030 target of reducing GHG emissions by 40% by 2030, and to divide them by 4 by 2050. No partial communication : Don’t communicate only on one part of the activity (usually the less emissive one), since sooner or later one of your stakeholder will be back to you highlighting the fact you did not communicate on the most important parts. It’s better no communicating at all, than on one part of the activity only. Focus on the various dimensions : A Bilan Carbone® highlights potential risks and opportunities for the organisation, related to energy and climate challenges. It’s both an « accounting » type of assessment and a strategic approach. Focus on actions and progress plan : Actions identified quantified to be implemented in the short and medium term (see next slide).

How to present our action plan ? Group actions into main categories : « quick wins », preferred, strategic. People will better understand what your organisation is planning to implement. Keep very precise actions only : no generic sentences such as « improve energy efficiency of buildings » or « replace cars by low carbon vehicles ». Action “catalog” might be interesting as a support to identify actions, however each organisation is specific, and only specifically defined actions will generate the best reductions. Quantify your actions both from a CO2e standpoint and from a financial one as much as possible (exclusively for internal communication). Quantification can be made using the ADEME methodology to ensure an extensive and well structured calculation. Avoid action plans having only « small actions », and no action on the core activity. Reminder : Clim’ Foot BC assessment is mono criteria. Be careful about communicating only on carbon benefit of actions, as some of them might have other environmental or societal impacts that could be considered as more important. Reminder : carbon offset investments should not be part of your Bilan Carbone® action plan, and they will not reduce your emissions.

How to communicate after the assessment ? Respect of the logos in the “Bilan Carbone® Clim’Foot” tools Mention of the ABC and the methodology “Bilan Carbone® Clim’Foot” when the results of the assessment are communicated Sending a summary report to ABC upon completion of the assessment (cf. Contractual Licensing Agreement, 2.2). The ABC can help to communicate properly about the assessment once the ABC knows about it. If questions about the ABC : French non- profit organization mobilizing stakeholders in the field of GHG emission reduction Elaboration and promotion of cutting-edge and pragmatic methodological solutions to reduce GHG emissions, in order to support transition towards a low-carbon society Development and promotion of the GHG emissions diagnostic system called ”Bilan Carbone®” The tools must not be given without the consent of the ABC (and the proper training). The training materials must not be given without the consent of the ABC. If communication of the “Bilan Carbone ClimFoot Method” to third persons out of the Clim’Foot project (conferences, meetings, training sessions), the ABC should be informed. NOUVEAU LOGO « BC ClimFoot » ? LOGO pour les formés de ClimFoot ?

How to present Bilan Carbone® ? BC is a leading edge methodology + calculations tools support organisation implementing a GHG accounting and management strategy. Developed in France in 2002-2003, the BC can be used almost as such anywhere in European countries, and in any other country if proper emission factors are added. BC is fully compatible with all leading market standards for GHG emissions reporting such as GHG Protocol, ISO 14064/69, and soon with CDP. BC calculators are fully open and transparent. No “black box” calculation. Calculations are fully traceable. BC is constantly evolving with new emission factors, new functionalities and new tools. Starting in 2002 with version 1, BC is now with V7.6 and V8 is expected by the end of 2017. The mains steps of a BC project are : defining the perimeter of the study, collect and process activity data, calculate GHG emissions and analyse results, identify actions to reduce emission in the short, medium and long term. NOUVEAU LOGO « BC ClimFoot » ? LOGO pour les formés de ClimFoot ?