docMD: (DOCument Mediated Delivery)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Management Information Systems 2007 Understanding a Systems Approach to Sound Fiscal Management.
Advertisements

Using the Web for Fast, Convenient Electronic Document Delivery Eric H. Schnell Associate Professor Head, Information Technology Prior.
EFTS: It’s All That and a Bag of Chips! References: Lewis, Jacqueline. The DOCLINE Electronic Funds.
DOCLINE Medical Library Association May 2004 Maria Elizabeth Collins National Library of Medicine National Institutes of Health Department of Health &
Information Technology for Physicians’ Medical Practices Renee’ Ross Hung N. Winn.
Jason Moran Help Desk Coordinator. Who are we supporting? 800 Traditional Undergraduate Students 1100 Non-Traditional Students 300 Graduate Students 400.
Digitization Projects: Internal Development vs. Outsourcing Production or D.I.Y. vs. The Pros.
1 Public Outreach October 2008 By Adelina Murtezaj – Public Relation Officer For Inaugural Partnership Activity between ICC and ERO.
E.F.T.S. Electronic Fund Transfer System Informational Session CHLA Annual Meeting Halifax, Nova Scotia May 29, 2008.
E Copyright © 2004, Oracle. All rights reserved. Next Steps Continuing your education.
Evaluating and Addressing the Information Needs of an Urban Public Health Department Through an Academic Health Sciences Library Health Department Partnership.
Old.libqual.org What will ARL do for you? What will you do? January 2005 Shrivenham, UK.
From Health Professionals to Health Consumers: New Opportunities for the Medical Library Network Becky J. Lyon CRICS V April 27, 2001.
U.S. General Services Administration Public Buildings Service Reimbursable Services Division Office of Facilities Management & Services Programs General.
EFTS UPDATE 2007 NAHSL Annual Meeting Woodstock, VT.
DocMD: Eric H. Schnell Associate Professor Head, Information Technology Prior Health Sciences Library The Ohio State University (DOCument.
The (Almost) Free ILL System for Medical Information DOCLINE: Northwest Interlibrary Loan and Resource Sharing Conference September 11, 2003.
2nd Annual NAUUG Meeting SUNYConnect Implementation Planning for a Consortium.
What Does Electronic ILL Mean to You? Cherié L. Weible Acting Head of Central Access Services Associate Professor of Library Administration.
NLM Sunrise Seminar DOCLINE Update Medical Library Association 2006 Phoenix, Arizona Maria Elizabeth Collins National Library of Medicine, NIH/HHS.
Project web site: old.libqual.org LibQUAL+™ Process Management: Using the Web as a Management Tool ALA Midwinter Conference San Diego, California January.
DocMD: Eric H. Schnell Associate Professor Prior Health Sciences Library The Ohio State University Bringing Electronic Document Delivery.
Resource Sharing Survey 2013 Maria Elizabeth Collins Public Services Division National Library of Medicine National Institutes of Health U.S. Department.
DocMD: Eric H. Schnell Associate Professor Head, Information Technology Prior Health Sciences Library The Ohio State University (DOCument.
DocMD: Eric H. Schnell Associate Professor Head, Information Technology Prior Health Sciences Library The Ohio State University (DOCument.
A worldwide library cooperative OCLC Online Computer Library Center QuestionPoint and 24/7 Reference Update Vivien Cook Regional Account Manager OCLC PICA.
Partnering for Success: ILL & IT Lara Bushallow (Head, Systems Group) Jessica Bowdoin (Head, ILL) 16 July 2010 VIVA ILL Forum.
NN/LM MCR Past and Future ▪NN/LM bingo card in hand? ▪5 in a row - diagonal, horizontal, vertical ▪Write your name in the chat box ▪Eligible for 1 of 8.
2017 Nursing Informatics Workforce Survey
International Resource Sharing Where are we today?
LibQUAL+® Survey Administration American Library Association
Digital Library Development in Australia
NYSICA 2016Membership survey
Creating Workflow Efficiencies in the E-book Ecosystem
Merging Departments, Service Desks and Staff: Managing Change While Improving Customer Service and Staff Morale Mary Ann Venner, Head of Access Services.
Missouri Behavioral Health Independent Practice Association (IPA)
THE FARMERS MARKET SNAP SUPPORT PROJECT
So Much to Do and So Little Help: Migrating a Small Consortium
Pre-Close Rules of Engagement
Getting Ready for the Next Recession
ATIA Webinar: IMPLEMENTING SONOCENT AudionotakeR
The Federal Reserve In Action
Chapter Awards and Compliance Matrix
HIPAA PRIVACY RULE IMPLEMENTATION – WHAT’S UP AFTER 4/14/03?
Annual Title I Meeting and Benefits of Parental Involvement
Best Practice Strategies for Maximizing Clinic Efficiency: Part 1
11/29/2018 MOWR and GMC A Year in Review Jody Yearwood Vice President of Information Technology and Executive Director Online Campus.
Iowa Extension Council Association Iowa 4-H Youth Development
Annual Title I Meeting and Benefits of Parental Involvement
Achieving Success Through Project Management Excellence
2018 Digital Survey: Feedback & Analysis
Health and Human Services Information for Rural America
Getting Kids Connected with
Electronic Services from a School's Perspective PESC Annual Conference on Standards in Higher Education Judith Nemerovski Flink Director of Student Financial.
Proposal Processing Wake Forest University Health Sciences
NIGP 2014 Public Procurement Benchmark Survey
Annual Title I Meeting and Benefits of Parent and Family Engagement
Annual Title I Meeting and Benefits of Parent and Family Engagement
Strategies for Private Provider Participation in Registries
Annual Title I Meeting and Benefits of Parent and Family Engagement
BCS Template Presentation February 22, 2018
Topic Leader Training 2012.
PRESENTATION OF EXISTING EVALUATION
Labour Market Information (LMI) What does it tell us?
FISCAL PLANNING " BUDGETS "
Downtime Preparation Panel Discussion
Chapter 7 Marketing Channels for Services
Role of Evaluation coordination group and Capacity Building Projects in Lithuania Vilija Šemetienė Head of Economic Analysis and Evaluation Division.
Chapter Two.
Advisory Committees for Educator Preparation Programs
Presentation transcript:

docMD: (DOCument Mediated Delivery) Eric H. Schnell (schnell.9@osu.edu) Associate Professor Head, Information Technology Prior Health Sciences Library The Ohio State University docMD is funded through support by the National Network of Libraries of Medicine, Greater Midwest Region. Ohio State University project number 743202

docMD Goal “ To establish an electronic document delivery service for hospital libraries that are unable to support such a service themselves due to limited human, financial, or technical resources “

docMD Objectives Establish a mediated direct-to-customer document delivery service for hospital libraries Identify the costs involved in providing such a service Develop a model for use by other resource libraries in other regions of the country

Why docMD? IDD Reduces telecom costs IDD Reduces turnaround time (Landes ’97) IDD Reduces turnaround time 1986: 13.76 days (Budd) 1999: reduced to 2.52 (Sellen) Web delivery reduces supply costs (Weible ’02)

Barriers to Hospital Library IDD Implementation Firewalls (McKnight 2001) communication ports network authority Workflow / staffing (Jackson 1993) Access to technical staff Fiscal resources

How docMD Jumps these Barriers Firewalls a common communication port is used (80) Workflow / staffing DOCLINE processing remains the same Less physical processing of documents Access to technical staff Essential technical staff at mediation center Little technical site support needed Fiscal resources GMR supported

Scans/Sends though IDD Scans/Sends though IDD docMD Delivery Model Customer Email with docID# Email Alert Local Library DOCLINE Lending “A” Lending “B” Scans/Sends though IDD Scans/Sends though IDD docMD Web Server

Survey Tools Project Librarian Survey Technical Survey (Lib / Cust) Attitudes Survey (Cust) Turnaround Time Study

docMD Statistics (as of Sept 2, ‘04) 406 registered customers 3111 documents processed ~15% have gone unviewed >40% sent to the librarian <1% required reposting <1% alternative distribution <1% posting failures

docMD Statistics Average document processing time: 1 minute Average number of documents requiring follow up: 1 per week Percentage of documents arriving upside down: 20% -> 1% Number of customers contacting docMD central regarding difficulty in downloading a document: 1

Turnaround Time Pre – docMD: 6.53 days (max 19 days) Post – docMD: 3.11 days (max 9)

Feedback “Our docs are always so delighted when personalized mail arrives for them.” one has a “raft of administrators tooling past his office wanting to know how his articles were retrieved electronically. They believe that he magically pulled them up all by himself. “ “another test subject… has been running around Nursing telling people…”

Issues: Geography: Project leaders / librarian face-to-face contact difficult Geography II: Difficult if not impossible to organize group training Geography III: Email helps. Phone is more effective but more time consuming

Issues: How docMD is implemented at a site is dependent on the hospital librarian Level of participation is dependent on the marketing performed by the hospital librarians Too much hand-holding or separation anxiety?

Issues: Funding Pay-to-Play (1) Pay-to-Play (2) Subsidized (1) Each hospital pays a fee based on scale determined by the number of documents they normally process through DOCLINE in relation to other participants in a tiered fee schedule. Pay-to-Play (2) Each hospital pays a per-document fee based on the actual number of documents they process using docMD and is billed on a quarterly or annual or per-document basis. Subsidized (1) Each NNLM region establishes funding opportunities for resource libraries to support a docMD service for their resource area. Resource libraries apply for the available awards. Subsidized (2) Each NNLM region provides a funded mandate to each resource library to establish a docMD service in their area. Benevolent Any library can provide the service but supports it using their individual operating funds and can pursue reimbursement from the participants.

Expanding the Concept: OhioDOC Establish a direct-to-customer electronic document delivery service for all OhioLINK libraries. Establish a system for centralized electronic document delivery distribution Establish electronic document delivery services in libraries without them Create workflow efficiencies

Current Direct to Customer Processing Model EDD Local Library OCLC / DOCLINE Ohio Lending “A” Ohio Lending “B” Scans/Sends though IDD Scans/Sends though IDD Web Server

Scans/Sends though EDD Scans/Sends though EDD OhioDOC Model Customer Local Library OCLC / Docline Ohio Lending “A” Ohio Lending “B” Scans/Sends though EDD Scans/Sends though EDD OhioDOC

OhioDoc Model Expanded Customer Local Library EDD OCLC / Docline Ohio Lending “A” Ohio Lending “B” Ohio Lending “C” Ohio Lending “D” Ohio Lending “E” Web Server

Current Direct to Customer Processing Model Ohio “A” Ohio “B” Ohio “C” Process Web

OhioDOC Processing Model Ohio “A” Ohio “B” Ohio “C” Process Web Web

OhioDOC Expectations Lending libraries still scan and process documents intended for OhioLINK libraries Borrowing libraries would no longer receive and process documents coming from OhioLINK lending libraries

Thanks! E-mail: schnell.9@osu.edu Project: docmd.med.ohio-state.edu