Watershed-Based Planning A Blueprint for Action!.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Water Pollution. Definitions Impaired Waters Section 303(d) of the Clean Water Act requires states to develop lists of impaired waters, those that do.
Advertisements

LOCAL IPP REGULATIONS SEWER USE ORDINANCES Sandra Diorka Director of Public Services Delhi Charter Township.
SW101 Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems (MS4s)
What are TMDLs? and What Might They Mean to MS4 Permittees?
When It Rains, It Drains An Overview of Our Community’s New Storm Water Management Program.
Clean Water Act SAFE 210. History/Amendments Recent major amendments were enacted in 1972, 1977, and – Established the National Pollutant Discharge.
Introduction to Environmental Engineering Code No. (PE389) Lec. 6.
Bureau of Water Overview Wastewater issues Drinking water issues Wrap up topics.
What is NPDES? “National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System”
Legislative Changes Affecting Water Quality at a Local Level October 2011 Robert Kollinger, P.E. Water Resources Manager Polk County Parks and Natural.
RIPDES Storm Water Program: Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems (MS4s)
Upper Providence Township Stormwater Management MS4 Program.
Environmental Harm Urban stormwater frequently contains litter, oil, chemicals, toxic metals, bacteria, and excess nutrients, like nitrogen and phosphorous.
Austin Peay State University Stormwater Program Kristen Spicer, Ph.D.
When It Rains, It Drains An Overview: The Lower Providence Township Storm Water Management Program.
Bureau of Water Program Overview Local Government Interest.
Water Treatment Plant General Discharge Permit
EPA Region 6 Dallas, Texas EPA Region 6 Dallas, Texas.
April 22, 2005Chester Creek Watershed TMDL Total Maximum Daily Load Chester Creek University Lake & Westchester Lagoon Alaska Department of Environmental.
Watershed-Based Planning A Framework for Action!.
Lecture ERS 482/682 (Fall 2002) TMDL Assessment ERS 482/682 Small Watershed Hydrology.
Water Quality Monitoring The Role of the Clean Water Act.
Implementation of Antidegradation Policies for Indiana Waters.
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System(NPDES) Permit.
Impaired and TMDL Waterbody Listings Impacts on DoD Facilities Bill Melville, Regional TMDL Coordinator
Department of the Environment Overview of Water Quality Data Used by MDE and Water Quality Parameters Timothy Fox MDE, Science Service Administration Wednesday.
Lake Erie HABs Workshop Bill Fischbein Supervising Attorney Water Programs March 16, 2012 – Toledo March 30, Columbus.
 Why are we here?  Without regulations, rivers used to catch fire. Rules and Regulation.
Overview of WQ Standards Rule & WQ Assessment 303(d) LIst 1 Susan Braley Water Quality Program
Regulations that Protect Clean Water Jocelyn Mullen, P.E. PART 2 OF PRESENTATION Presented at The Water Course January 27, 2010 Mesa County Water Association.
1 ATTAINS: A Gateway to State-Reported Water Quality Information Webcast Sponsored by EPA’s Watershed Academy June 18, 2008, 11:30am-1:30pm EST Shera Bender,
Module 1: Stormwater Permit Program Robert Pitt Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering University of Alabama Tuscaloosa, AL.
VIRGINIA’S TMDL PROCESS.
1 Sandra Spence EPA Region 8 TMDL Program EPA Region 8 TMDL Program Integrating Watershed Plans and TMDLs to Help Answer Watershed Planning Questions November.
Regulations that Protect Clean Water Jocelyn Mullen, P.E. Presented at The Water Course January 27, 2010 Mesa County Water Association.
Teresa Marks Director 1. o The Clean Water Act of 1972 requires states to establish water quality standards (WQS) for all waterbodies within the state.
Workshop on the draft General Permit for Discharges of Storm Water from Small MS4s Fresno August 6, 2002 Redding August 8, 2002 San Luis Obispo August.
Eric Agnew Environmental Regulations February 15, 2006.
Water Quality ENVE 649 Water Quality n Hazardous waste winds up in water n If it can be legally discharged to water it may not be hazardous.
MWCOG Water Resource Workshop “Preparing for Regulatory Change” February 20, 2004 Track 2: Panel #4 - Storm Water MS4 Regulation Paula Estornell, USEPA,
Rapid Bioassessment Protocols for low gradient streams) for species richness, composition and pollution tolerance, as well as a composite benthic macroinvertebrate.
Arkansas Water Quality Standards Ryan Benefield Deputy Director.
Clean Water Act Mrs. Perryman Mrs. Trimble. Clean Water Act “Restore and maintain the chemical, physical and biological integrity of the Nation’s waters”
An Overview of our Community’s Stormwater Management Program
Kentucky Growth Readiness for Water Quality Does your water quality matter?
West Metro Water Alliance A Path to Clean Water – Understanding TMDLs and Watershed Planning September 21, 2011 Diane Spector Wenck Associates, Inc.
ANTIDEGRADATION and THE BENEFITS OF PUMP LOGS FOR BATCH DISCHARGES Given by: Dan Murray, Terrell Hendren and Josh Frazier.
Water Sources & Pollutants FS Unit 5 FCS-FS-5: Students will discuss why water and pH are important factors in food preparation and preservation. C. List.
76. The central U.S. law regulating water quality is the Clean Water Act (CWA), adopted in The Act initially focused on point sources, which it.
Water Quality Investigations How Does Land-Use Impact Water Quality? Mitigating Water Quality – Current Issues July 9, 2015 Jim Kipp, Associate Director.
Urban Runoff Greg Gearheart Christine Sotelo Eric Berntsen State Water Resources Control Board.
REVISIONS TO THE FEDERAL WATER QUALITY STANDARDS RULE JILL CSEKITZ, TECHNICAL SPECIALIST TEXAS COMMISSION ON ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY.
ARE 309Ted Feitshans016-1 Unit 17 Point Source Control Federal Water Pollution Control Act (Clean Water Act of 1972)
The Clean Water Act (1977, 1981, 1987) By: Jonas Szajowitz.
1975 EPA Study  Extensive construction in 1950s -1970s  Poor canal flushing results in “stagnation, putrification, and excessive nutrient enrichment.
Slide 1 California Implementation Water Board Policies.
Fred Noble, P.E. State NPDES Administrator Florida Department of Transportation NPDES MS4 Permit Overview 2016 Maintenance Conference.
The Iowa Water Quality Standards: an overview Nutrient Science Committee June 13, 2007 John Olson Watershed Monitoring & Assessment Section Iowa DNR.
Stormwater Management and MS4 Compliance
GREAT BAY and NEW HAMPSHIRE WATER QUALITY STANDARDS
Use Attainability Analyses & Criteria Development
Use Attainability Analyses & Criteria Development
Water Pollution.
Water Pollution.
Great Salt Lake Water Quality Strategy Update
Water Quality ENVE 649.
Lake Erie HABs Workshop
John Tinger U.S. EPA Region IX
Clean Water Act (CWA) Purpose
Water Pollution.
Presentation transcript:

Watershed-Based Planning A Blueprint for Action!

Statutory and regulatory context Clean Water Act –Water quality standards –KPDES discharge permits –Stream & wetland filling Safe Drinking Water Act –Source water protection Public health codes –Residential wastewater Local Codes –Planning/zoning, subdivision, etc.

Source Water Protection Map for Slate Creek (Montgomery County)

Clean Water Act

Clean Water Act Part I: Technology Based Focus on point source (PS) discharges to surface waters, through NPDES permitting Limits apply regardless of condition of receiving water, or relative contribution from the source Pollutant levels in discharges determined by technical/economic feasibility Same limits placed on all PS within each industrial grouping (50 categories/plus subcategories) –Generally, municipal sewage plants must achieve discharge equal tosecondary treatment

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis COST ($) POLLUTANT REMOVAL (%) Technology-Based Treatment Level 100%

KPDES Permitting under Sec. 402 Illegal for point source (pipe, ditch, channel, tunnel, vessel, rolling stock, or other manmade conveyance) to discharge pollutants to surface waters without a permit Permit is a license granting permission to discharge –Not a right: permit is revocable for cause (eg, non-compliance ) –No guarantee against more stringent future requirements

Covers WWTPs and other point sources

KPDES Program: Coverage Industrial and municipal wastewater Industrial, urban, and construction-related storm water runoff Concentrated animal feeding operations (CAFOs) Active, inactive, and some abandoned mines Discharges from RCRA remedial action activity meeting point source definition

KPDES stormwater covers: Construction sites with a disturbed area of one acre or more –General permit, BMP plan, inspections required Some cities with municipally-owned separate storm sewer systems –10,000 population or more –Must develop program with public education & involvement, construction site controls, post- construction stormwater management, pollution prevention, illicit discharge detection and elimination.

Direct Indirect POTW Industry Direct and Indirect Discharges

KPDES Permits Individual permits –All point sources not covered by general permits must obtain (no de minimis exemption) –Required to submit detailed permit application form, including data on actual/expected levels of pollutants in discharge General permits (many sources) –Usually similar sources –Usually same requirements for all –Minimal reporting –Notice of intent vs. passive coverage

KPDES Permits: Elements Effluent limits –Limits must ensure meeting WQS –Maximum daily and monthly average limits required for most –POTWs have weekly average instead of daily maximum –Expressed as mass–directly/indirectly Best management practices –Production process modifications –Operational changes –Materials substitution –Materials and/or water conservation Compliance schedule (shouldnt extend beyond 5- year permit term

KPDES Permits: Elements (cont.) Monitoring requirements –Self-monitoring by permittee –Traditionally effluents only, increasingly ambient, too –Specifies parameters and tests –Specifies frequency Reporting requirements –Discharge Monitoring Reports (DMRs) sent to the permitting agency Often monthly but sometimes less frequently Reopener provisions For POTWs only: Pretreatment program and sludge management requirements

Technology-Based Requirements for Municipal Discharges: Secondary Treatment

Clean Water Act Part II: Water Quality Standards What are you using it for? What criteria support that use? How will you keep it from degrading?

Water Quality Standards States yardstick to measure health of waters Three key elements of WQSs: –Designated uses –Water quality criteria –Antidegradation provisions

Kentucky Use Designations Aquatic life support – warmwater & coldwater aquatic habitat Primary contact recreation – swimming Secondary contact recreation – boating and fishing Fish consumption – eating fish Drinking water – domestic water supply

WQS: Water Quality Criteria (WQC) Consistent scientifically with protecting all designated uses (DUs) Basic types of criteria –Narrative/numeric –Water column/sediment/ fish tissue Categories of criteria –Aquatic life Pollutant-specific/aquatic community indices –Human health (drinking/fish consumption) –Wildlife (semiaquatic/food chain effects)

WQS: Narrative Criteria Waters must be "free from" –Putrescent or otherwise objectionable bottom deposits –Oil, scum, and floating debris in amounts that are unsightly –Nuisance levels of odor, color, or other conditions –Undesirable or nuisance aquatic life –Substances in amounts toxic to humans or aquatic life Usually apply to all waters, regardless of use designation

WQS: Numeric Criteria Parameter-specific: DO, temp., turbidity, N, P, Cu, dioxin, etc. –Level/concentration: 1 mg/L, 5 mg/kg –Duration: Acute: instantaneous, 1-hour, 1-day Chronic: 4-day, 7-day, 30-day –Recurrence interval: 1 year, 3 years

Kentucky warmwater aquatic habitat numeric criteria

MINIMUM DATASET FOR FRESHWATER WATER QUALITY CRITERIA DERIVATION SALMONID SECOND FISH FAMILY CHORDATA PLANKTONIC CRUSTACEAN BENTHIC CRUSTACEAN INSECT ROTIFERA, ANNELIDA, MOLLUSCA OTHER INSECT OR MOLLUSCA

DATA FROM THE MOST SENSITIVE LIFE STAGES SHOULD BE USED Most Sensitive Egg Larva Adult

Acute Toxicity Data 96-hour LC50 Concentration: 0.0 μg/L 25 μg/L 50 μg/L 100 μg/L 200 μg/L 500 μg/L 96-hr LC50 = 100 μg/L Control

Biological criteria Good Mid-Range Poor

WQS: Biological Criteria Applicable to aquatic life, not human health Require field sampling and studies Fish, macroinvertebrates, plants, etc. –Number of individuals, species, categories –Mass of species, feeding guilds, trophic levels –Specialists verses generalists –Tolerant verses intolerant Compare conditions at study site with relatively unimpacted reference site

WQS: antidegradation provisions Purpose: Prevent deterioration of existing levels of good water quality Generally applies parameter-by-parameter, not waterbody-by-waterbody Three tiers of protection –Tiers 1 and 2 apply to all waters with some features at or better than WQS –Tier 3 applies only to specially classified waters

Tier 1: the absolute floor Cannot allow loss of any existing use Cannot allow water quality to drop below levels needed to maintain existing use Applies to all waters, regardless of use designation

Tier 2: use of available assimilative capacity not a right Brakes slide from really good WQ to barely at WQS by saying cant degrade WQ unless: –Allowing lower WQ is necessary to accommodate important economic or social development –Point sources are meeting relevant technology- based limits –Have achieved all cost-effective and reasonable best management practices for nonpoint sources –Go through public review and comment process

Tier 3: outstanding waters protected Applies only to waters classified as Outstanding National Resource Waters (ONRW) –This classification overlays designated uses –Candidates include, but are not limited to, waters of National and State parks and wildlife refuges and waters of exceptional recreational or ecological significance Only minimal, or significant but short-term, decreases in WQ are allowed

303(d) process: establishing TMDLs A TMDL is.... A strategy for achieving WQS Based on the relationship between pollutant sources and the condition of a water body The amount of a specific pollutant that a waterbody can receive and still meet WQS Describes an allowable load and allocates it among point sources and nonpoint sources (plus a margin of error). TMDL = ΣWLA i + ΣLA i + MOS

TMDL process requirements Include public in the process! Submit final TMDL, with loading allocations and supporting information, to USEPA Review conducted by USEPA –If approved, begin implementation –If not approved, USEPA develops TMDL and finalizes within 30 days Provide reasonable assurance load reductions can be achieved

Leading causes & sources of impairment [ (b) Report] Causes –Siltation (sediment) –Pathogens (bacteria) –Other habitat alterations –PCBs –Organic enrichment / low DO Sources –Unknown –Agriculture –Habitat modification –Resource extraction –Urban runoff / storm sewers