DG MARE study to support Impact Assessment on the Marine Knowledge 2020 Results of assessment of the data costs related to the MSFD implementation up.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Towards the UKs MSFD Initial Assessment and Data Management M. Charlesworth (BODC)
Advertisements

Anna Donald Marine Planning and Strategy Marine Scotland
MSFD Programme of Measures Consultation Event Anna Donald Head of Marine Planning & Strategy.
Reporting on Programme of Measures (Art. 13)
The Marine Strategy Framework Directive “good environmental status” and the Water Framework Directive “good ecological/chemical status/potential” ECOSTAT.
Counselor dr. Otilia Mihail Ministry of Environment, Water and Forest Constanta 17 June
Stela Barova, senior expert, “Marine environmental protection and Monitoring” Department, “Plans and Permits” Directorate State of play of MSFD implementation.
Monitoring Fact Sheets DIKE TSG1 04. July 2013, Copenhagen Proposal for the use of web-based monitoring “fact sheets” for the purpose of MSFD reporting.
Main aims Reporting Data Agree overall approach/framework to reporting
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
1.
Marine Environment and Water Industry Unit
Project Coordination Group (PCG) for the implementation of the MSFD
Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD)
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
Marine Strategy Framework Directive: an introduction
Integrated Maritime Policy Expert Group Marine Knowledge 2020 session
DG MARE study to support Impact Assessment on the Marine Knowledge 2020 Presentation for the Marine Observation and Data Expert Group March Michael.
Marine Strategy Framework Directive: reporting in 2012
DG MARE Study to support Impact Assessment on the Marine Knowledge 2020 Interim report Michael Munk Sørensen 11 december 2012 COWI POWERPOINT PRESENTATION.
Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD)
Marine Strategy Framework Directive & Aquaculture
Annex III Annex I Qualitative descriptors Characteristics
Review of Decision 2010/477/EU and MSFD Annex III
Reporting under the Marine Strategy Framework Directive – 2012 Requirements Presentation to the Working Group on Data, Information and Knowledge Exchange.
HELCOM MORE 8 meeting outcome
EU Water Framework Directive
2. Reporting sheets Mette Wolstrup 4. July 2012
State of play with respect to MSFD programme of measures in Spain
DG MARE study to support Impact Assessment on the Marine Knowledge 2020 Questionnaire on the data costs related to the MSFD implementation up to 2020.
Technical guidance for assessment under Article 8 MSFD
Reporting for MSFD Article 13 and 14 –
19th meeting of the WG GES 22/03/2018
DG MARE study to support Impact Assessment on the Marine Knowledge 2020 Questionnaire on the data costs related to the MSFD implementation up to 2020.
European Commission DG Environment
CGBN Co-ordination Group for Biodiversity and Nature
Update on MSFD reporting
Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD)
Revision of MSFD Decision 2010/477/EU - overview
Group 2.
MSFD 2018 reporting outputs
New EU Data Collection Multi-Annual Programme (EU DC-MAP)
Technical and administrative support for the joint implementation of the MSFD in Bulgaria and Romania - Phase 3 Draft Final Report   Specific contract.
Information on projects
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
Towards integrated environmental policy for the marine environment
Marine Environment and Water Industry
1.
MEDCIS Workshops - Litter, 23rd February 2018, Athens
EU Water Framework Directive
1.
Towards integrated environmental policy for the marine environment
Questionnaire on Elaboration of the MSFD Initial Assessment
Working group on data & information sharing DIS under CIS of WFD
Responding to Changing Climate Washington State Department of Ecology
1.
Marine Reporting Units: Aegean-Levantine Sea
Marine Reporting Units: Ionian Sea & Central Mediterranean Sea
Directive on the assessment and management of flood risks - towards implementation SCG, By Maria Brättemark, European Commission, DG Environment,
European Commission, DG Environment, Marine Unit
Marine Strategy Framework Directive reporting: progress and next steps
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
Marine Environment and Water Industry
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
Assessment scales and aggregation
Marine Strategy Coordination Group 14 November 2011, Brussels
- Plans on the revision of reporting schemas/guidance -
Preparatory meeting for the establishment of the Project Coordination Group (PCG) for the implementation of the MSFD 13 November :00-13:30 European.
Marine Environment and Water Industry Unit
Presentation transcript:

DG MARE study to support Impact Assessment on the Marine Knowledge 2020 Results of assessment of the data costs related to the MSFD implementation up to 2020 Julia Teyssen and Michael Munk Sørensen February 2013 Marine Knowledge 2020

Questionnaire based assessment Objective and approach To collect information on the costs to Member States in meeting the data collection requirements of the Marine Strategy Framework Directive Approach Questionnaires submitted to Member States autumn 2012 and additional questions submitted January 2013 12 countries responded to the initial MSFD questionnaire Only three countries have replied to updated questionnaire on Article 8 tasks Key questions included in the questionnaires What has been the costs of data management for MSFD so far Gaps in existing data What will be the costs up to 2020 The following tables present the result of the survey Link to interim report where the assessment is presented: https://webgate.ec.europa.eu/maritimeforum/content/3119 February 2013 Marine Knowledge 2020

Cost of data collection up to now Assembly of existing data Collection of new data Reporting of data Total MSFD implementation costs up to now Public authority staff costs Contracted work by research institutes   700,000 € 3 man years (estimate) 250.000 (estimate) 0,3 my/year (project management) 1.000.000 per year Public authority staff costs: 0,8 my (estimate) Contracted work by research institutes: 25.000 (estimate) 1,460,000 € 1,385,000 € 145,000 € 571,574 € 0 (No new staff has been hired) 660,000 € 60,000 € 240,000 € 960,000 € 815,000 € 465,000 € 2,095,000 € 112,400 € 12,000,000 € 4 persons per year 3,300,000 € 3,560,000 € February 2013 Marine Knowledge 2020

Cost of data collection up to now – distribution by activity (additional question on Article 8 tasks)    Article 8 tasks Share of costs in % MS1 MS2 MS3 1 Gather data / information 75 15 78 2 Process and manage data (e.g. prepare data products for assessment) 8 40 20 3 Assessment (data interpretation) 12 4 Prepare report (paper) - content 5 Prepare electronic report (reporting sheets or equivalent format) - content 6 Public consultation and response (finalise report contents) 7 Transfer information (e.g. from reporting sheets or paper reports) to MSFD database (if used) or equivalent national data system Prepare XML schemas (export from MSFD database or national system) and upload to ReportNet 9 Complete validation checks (with Atkins) on XML schemas Total 100 February 2013 Marine Knowledge 2020

Cost of existing monitoring programmes February 2013 Marine Knowledge 2020

Costs of new monitoring programmes February 2013 Marine Knowledge 2020

Number of countries that reported: Data gaps Number of countries that reported: No gaps Few gaps Some gaps Many gaps Underwater noise 13 Marine litter 3 9 Habitats 2 Cost of degradation 1 8 Ecosystems 7 Use of marine waters: ecosystem services and other approaches Species Functional groups 6 Marine acidification Non-indigenous species 5 Physical loss Interference with hydrological processes Non-indigenous species inventory 4 Physical damage February 2013 Marine Knowledge 2020

Expected further data collection costs - ranking Average ranking of expected future costs Physical features (8A01) 1,4 Habitats (8A02) 1,9 Functional groups (8A03) Ecosystems (8A05) 2,3 Species (8A04) 2,4 Nutrients and organic matter enrichment (8B08) 2,7 Contamination by hazardous substances (8B06) 2,8 Underwater noise (8B03) 2,9 Microbial pathogens (8B09) 3,0 Marine litter (8B04) 3,1 Non-indigenous species (8B10) 3,2 Extraction of species (fish, shellfish) (8B11) 3,3 Other features (8A07) 3,5 Interference with hydrological processes (8B05) 3,6 Non-indigenous species inventory (8A06) 3,7 Physical loss (8B01) Marine acidification (8B12) 3,8 Use of marine waters: ecosystem services and other approaches (8C02) 3,9 Cost of degradation (8C03) 4,1 Acute pollution events (8B07) 4,2 Use of marine waters: human activities and marine water accounts approach (8C01) Physical damage (8B02) 4,5 Extraction of species (seaweed, maerl, other) (8B11) 5,0 February 2013 Marine Knowledge 2020

Estimates of costs of data collection – perspectives Estimate of total data cost for initial reporting in 22 coastal MS and Croatia based on replies received from 9-10 MS: 30-50 Million € Initial reporting costs show some correlation with GDP levels, but not with coastline length or size of the EEZ Estimated based on simple average adjusted for price/cost level differences Estimate of cost for existing and new monitoring programmes dedicated to MSFD for the period 2013-2020: 64 Million €/year. This figure is based on a the replies from 9 MS and a direct scale up to 22 coastal states Based on estimated costs of existing monitoring programmes of around 50 Million € per year and new monitoring programmes of 15 Million € per year A projection of costs for all 22 coastal MS and Croatia based on GDP levels and coastline length give much higher projected costs in the range of above 100 Million €/year Further assessment will be done Estimates of the costs of implementing the MSFD done as part of the IA of the Directive suggested that it would costs: €90 million during implementation and then around €70 million per year Previous studies in relation to marine data has estimate a total annual costs of data collection at around €1,000 million. February 2013 Marine Knowledge 2020

Issues and discussion questions We have got replies from about 12 Member States but only 3 regarding the updated questions on how the costs are distributed by the Article 8 tasks! Estimates of new monitoring programmes from only 4 countries No correlation between coastline, area of sea, population etc. => important to have data from more MS to provide an overall estimate The overall question is whether the estimated costs are of the right order of magnitude? February 2013 Marine Knowledge 2020