Volume 14, Issue 3, Pages (March 2006)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages (February 2010)
Advertisements

YidC and Oxa1 Form Dimeric Insertion Pores on the Translating Ribosome
Ross Alexander Robinson, Xin Lu, Edith Yvonne Jones, Christian Siebold 
Volume 9, Issue 2, Pages (February 2002)
Interaction of Era with the 30S Ribosomal Subunit
Volume 22, Issue 2, Pages (February 2014)
Crystal Structure of M. tuberculosis ABC Phosphate Transport Receptor
Sebastian Meyer, Raimund Dutzler  Structure 
Extension of the GlyRβ binding site on gephyrin.
Volume 16, Issue 1, Pages (January 2008)
Volume 6, Issue 10, Pages (October 1998)
The Structure of the Cytoplasmic Domain of the Chloride Channel ClC-Ka Reveals a Conserved Interaction Interface  Sandra Markovic, Raimund Dutzler  Structure 
Volume 124, Issue 1, Pages (January 2006)
Volume 14, Issue 4, Pages (April 2006)
Molecular Basis of Box C/D RNA-Protein Interactions
Volume 64, Issue 3, Pages (November 2016)
Tom Huxford, De-Bin Huang, Shiva Malek, Gourisankar Ghosh  Cell 
Tamas Yelland, Snezana Djordjevic  Structure 
Volume 23, Issue 11, Pages (November 2015)
Volume 34, Issue 4, Pages (May 2009)
Volume 28, Issue 3, Pages (November 2007)
Volume 23, Issue 7, Pages (July 2015)
Volume 13, Issue 4, Pages (February 2004)
Volume 12, Issue 1, Pages (March 2004)
Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages (February 2010)
Structure of the TPR Domain of p67phox in Complex with Rac·GTP
Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages (January 2007)
Phospho-Pon Binding-Mediated Fine-Tuning of Plk1 Activity
Nadine Keller, Jiří Mareš, Oliver Zerbe, Markus G. Grütter  Structure 
Charlotte Hodson, Andrew Purkiss, Jennifer Anne Miles, Helen Walden 
Volume 108, Issue 1, Pages (January 2002)
Solution and Crystal Structures of a Sugar Binding Site Mutant of Cyanovirin-N: No Evidence of Domain Swapping  Elena Matei, William Furey, Angela M.
Volume 31, Issue 2, Pages (July 2008)
Ross Alexander Robinson, Xin Lu, Edith Yvonne Jones, Christian Siebold 
Volume 14, Issue 2, Pages (February 2006)
Volume 15, Issue 3, Pages (March 2007)
The Monomeric dUTPase from Epstein-Barr Virus Mimics Trimeric dUTPases
Volume 124, Issue 5, Pages (March 2006)
Structure of the Cathelicidin Motif of Protegrin-3 Precursor
Andrew H. Huber, W.James Nelson, William I. Weis  Cell 
Volume 20, Issue 7, Pages (July 2012)
Jason P. Mulvenna, Lillian Sando, David J. Craik  Structure 
Daniel Peisach, Patricia Gee, Claudia Kent, Zhaohui Xu  Structure 
Volume 14, Issue 5, Pages (May 2006)
Noncatalytic Assembly of Ribonuclease III with Double-Stranded RNA
Structure of the Catalytic Region of DNA Ligase IV in Complex with an Artemis Fragment Sheds Light on Double-Strand Break Repair  Takashi Ochi, Xiaolong.
Volume 21, Issue 2, Pages (February 2014)
Structural Basis of EZH2 Recognition by EED
Conformational Flexibility in the Multidrug Efflux System Protein AcrA
Volume 6, Issue 1, Pages (July 2000)
Volume 15, Issue 2, Pages (February 2007)
Structural Basis for FGF Receptor Dimerization and Activation
Volume 23, Issue 6, Pages (June 2015)
Volume 52, Issue 3, Pages (November 2013)
Volume 11, Issue 4, Pages (April 2003)
Volume 13, Issue 4, Pages (April 2005)
Crystal Structure of the Human Myeloid Cell Activating Receptor TREM-1
Structure of the Staphylococcus aureus AgrA LytTR Domain Bound to DNA Reveals a Beta Fold with an Unusual Mode of Binding  David J. Sidote, Christopher.
Volume 14, Issue 6, Pages (June 2006)
A YidC-like Protein in the Archaeal Plasma Membrane
Ying Huang, Michael P. Myers, Rui-Ming Xu  Structure 
The Crystal Structure of an Unusual Processivity Factor, Herpes Simplex Virus UL42, Bound to the C Terminus of Its Cognate Polymerase  Harmon J Zuccola,
Volume 25, Issue 6, Pages e5 (June 2017)
Volume 13, Issue 5, Pages (May 2005)
Three protein kinase structures define a common motif
Volume 20, Issue 7, Pages (July 2012)
Sabine Pokutta, William I. Weis  Molecular Cell 
Conformational Flexibility in the Multidrug Efflux System Protein AcrA
Crystal Structure of Escherichia coli RNase D, an Exoribonuclease Involved in Structured RNA Processing  Yuhong Zuo, Yong Wang, Arun Malhotra  Structure 
Structure of the Mtb CarD/RNAP β-Lobes Complex Reveals the Molecular Basis of Interaction and Presents a Distinct DNA-Binding Domain for Mtb CarD  Gulcin.
Presentation transcript:

Volume 14, Issue 3, Pages 601-609 (March 2006) Serendipitous Discovery and X-Ray Structure of a Human Phosphate Binding Apolipoprotein  Renaud Morales, Anne Berna, Philippe Carpentier, Carlos Contreras-Martel, Frédérique Renault, Murielle Nicodeme, Marie-Laure Chesne-Seck, François Bernier, Jérôme Dupuy, Christine Schaeffer, Hélène Diemer, Alain Van-Dorsselaer, Juan C. Fontecilla-Camps, Patrick Masson, Daniel Rochu, Eric Chabriere  Structure  Volume 14, Issue 3, Pages 601-609 (March 2006) DOI: 10.1016/j.str.2005.12.012 Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 HPBP Structure (A) Ribbon representation of HPBP showing the two domains (blue and green) connected by a hinge (yellow), the phosphate molecule (red balls), and the two disulfide bridges (C113–C158 and C306–C359, orange sticks). The elongated protein structure exhibits two similar globular domains, each constituted by a five-stranded β sheet core (three parallel β strands followed by two antiparallel β strands) flanked by α helices. A hydropathy profile computed with the program DAS (Cserzo et al., 1997) indicates that HPBP is strongly hydrophobic between residues 168 and 194. This motif, located on the protein surface (H.S.), is involved in the packing of the crystallographic dimer. N and C represent the protein termini. (B) Stereoview of the Cα trace of HPBP. The orientation is the same as in (A). Every tenth α-carbon is labeled with its residue number. Rainbow coloring—from the N terminus to the C terminus—has been used. (C) Structural comparison of different known phophate-SBPs: HPBP is shown in blue, E. coli PstS protein is shown in yellow, and M. tuberculosis PstS1 is shown in green. The four HPBP-specific loops are indicated. Structure 2006 14, 601-609DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2005.12.012) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Sequence Conservation between HPBP and SBPs or DING Proteins Alignment of the amino acid sequence of HPBP deduced from the crystal structure (residues confirmed by direct amino acid sequencing are in bold characters) with various SBPs and DING proteins by using the program ALIGN (Myers and Miller, 1988) Potato, potato DING protein (A.B. et al., unpublished data); L. major, L. major Friedlin almost complete DING protein sequence translated from contigs 2206 and 2072 from the L. major Friedlin shotgun sequencing program; CAI, human CAI N-terminal and internal peptide fragments (Kumar et al., 2004); E. coli PstS (GenBank AAA24378.1); and M. tuberculosis PstS1 (GenBank M30046). Boxes indicate conserved residues; arrows indicate residues involved in phosphate binding in E. coli and M. tuberculosis PstS proteins. The position of protruding loops is indicated. ∗ and # indicate cysteines involved in disulfide bridges. Structure 2006 14, 601-609DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2005.12.012) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Binding of the Phosphate Ion (A) Stereoview of the binding site. Residues involved in the binding of the phosphate molecule are labeled. (B) Schematic representation of the hydrogen bond network involved in phosphate binding. Amino acids involved in phosphate binding in both HPBP and E. coli PstS (in italics) are indicated. Numbers represent hydrogen bonds lengths in Å. (C) In vitro HPBP phosphate binding. PON1/HPBP were purified from six plasma samples (lanes a–f) and assayed for phosphate binding with radiolabeled phosphate (see Experimental Procedures). Lanes g and h correspond to pure β-lactoglobulin and lysosyme, respectively, used as negative controls. (D) Two different PON1/HPBP-containing fractions purified from two different plasma bags (lanes a and b) separated by SDS-PAGE. Proteins were revealed by Coomassie staining (left) and phosphate binding by autoradiography (right). PON1 and HPBP have been identified by N-terminal amino acid sequencing. Structure 2006 14, 601-609DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2005.12.012) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Two-Dimensional PAGE of the Purified PON1 Fraction Identification by two-dimensional PAGE of proteins in a purified PON1 fraction obtained according to Gan et al. (1991). The first dimension corresponds to isoelectric focusing in a 3–10 pH gradient; the second dimension is 10% SDS-PAGE. PON1 and HPBP, identified by N-terminal sequencing, have similar masses (∼40 kDa), but very different pIs (∼5 and ∼8, respectively). The right lane shows molecular weight markers. Structure 2006 14, 601-609DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2005.12.012) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions