Volume 134, Issue 4, Pages (April 2008)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 131, Issue 1, Pages (July 2006)
Advertisements

Volume 133, Issue 1, Pages (July 2007)
Volume 132, Issue 5, Pages (May 2007)
Canonical Wnt/β-catenin signaling mediates transforming growth factor-β1-driven podocyte injury and proteinuria  Dan Wang, Chunsun Dai, Yingjian Li, Youhua.
Volume 131, Issue 1, Pages (July 2006)
Volume 85, Issue 2, Pages (January 2014)
Volume 134, Issue 4, Pages (April 2008)
Volume 138, Issue 1, Pages e3 (January 2010)
Large Hepatitis Delta Antigen Modulates Transforming Growth Factor-β Signaling Cascades: Implication of Hepatitis Delta Virus–Induced Liver Fibrosis 
Volume 133, Issue 5, Pages (November 2007)
Volume 142, Issue 7, Pages e6 (June 2012)
Volume 133, Issue 1, Pages (July 2007)
Volume 116, Issue 5, Pages (March 2004)
Volume 128, Issue 1, Pages (January 2005)
Takashi Tanaka, Michelle A. Soriano, Michael J. Grusby  Immunity 
Volume 129, Issue 3, Pages (September 2005)
Impaired glycolytic metabolism causes chondrocyte hypertrophy-like changes via promotion of phospho-Smad1/5/8 translocation into nucleus  T. Nishida,
The Mitochondrial Protein hTID-1 Partners With the Caspase-Cleaved Adenomatous Polyposis Cell Tumor Suppressor to Facilitate Apoptosis  Jiang Qian, Erin.
Volume 137, Issue 2, Pages e2 (August 2009)
Volume 138, Issue 3, Pages e2 (March 2010)
Qingjie Li, Sushil K. Sarna  Gastroenterology 
Volume 5, Issue 4, Pages (April 2004)
P300 Is Elevated in Systemic Sclerosis and Its Expression Is Positively Regulated by TGF-β: Epigenetic Feed-Forward Amplification of Fibrosis  Asish K.
Volume 129, Issue 1, Pages (July 2005)
Volume 125, Issue 6, Pages (December 2003)
GRIP1 enhances estrogen receptor α-dependent extracellular matrix gene expression in chondrogenic cells  M. Kato, H. Takaishi, M. Yoda, T. Tohmonda, J.
Volume 138, Issue 2, Pages (February 2010)
Yu-Hsin Chiu, Jennifer Y. Lee, Lewis C. Cantley  Molecular Cell 
Volume 138, Issue 1, Pages e3 (January 2010)
Laminin γ2 Mediates Wnt5a-Induced Invasion of Gastric Cancer Cells
Volume 137, Issue 4, Pages (October 2009)
Volume 138, Issue 5, Pages e2 (May 2010)
Volume 140, Issue 4, Pages e1 (April 2011)
Volume 122, Issue 4, Pages (April 2002)
Yongli Bai, Chun Yang, Kathrin Hu, Chris Elly, Yun-Cai Liu 
PRL-3 Promotes the Malignant Progression of Melanoma via Triggering Dephosphorylation and Cytoplasmic Localization of NHERF1  Xian-Ying Fang, Ran Song,
Volume 25, Issue 9, Pages (September 2017)
MUC1 Oncoprotein Stabilizes and Activates Estrogen Receptor α
Volume 135, Issue 3, Pages e3 (September 2008)
Differential Contribution of Dermal Resident and Bone Marrow–Derived Cells to Collagen Production during Wound Healing and Fibrogenesis in Mice  Reiichi.
Direct Interactions of OCA-B and TFII-I Regulate Immunoglobulin Heavy-Chain Gene Transcription by Facilitating Enhancer-Promoter Communication  Xiaodi.
Glucose-Induced β-Catenin Acetylation Enhances Wnt Signaling in Cancer
1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 inhibits renal interstitial myofibroblast activation by inducing hepatocyte growth factor expression  Yingjian Li, Bradley C.
Jungmook Lyu, Vicky Yamamoto, Wange Lu  Developmental Cell 
MUC1 Oncoprotein Stabilizes and Activates Estrogen Receptor α
Upregulation of Tenascin-C Expression by IL-13 in Human Dermal Fibroblasts via the Phosphoinositide 3-kinase/Akt and the Protein Kinase C Signaling Pathways 
A Novel Role of Transforming Growth Factor β1 in Transcriptional Repression of Human Cholesterol 7α-Hydroxylase Gene  Tiangang Li, John Y.L. Chiang  Gastroenterology 
Volume 3, Issue 2, Pages (February 2006)
c-Src Activates Endonuclease-Mediated mRNA Decay
Volume 61, Issue 6, Pages (June 2002)
Essential Role of TGF-β Signaling in Glucose-Induced Cell Hypertrophy
Volume 10, Issue 3, Pages (September 2006)
Inhibition of PAX3 by TGF-β Modulates Melanocyte Viability
Involvement of αvβ5 Integrin in the Establishment of Autocrine TGF-β Signaling in Dermal Fibroblasts Derived from Localized Scleroderma  Yoshihide Asano,
Cellular 5′-3′ mRNA Exonuclease Xrn1 Controls Double-Stranded RNA Accumulation and Anti-Viral Responses  Hannah M. Burgess, Ian Mohr  Cell Host & Microbe 
Volume 117, Issue 2, Pages (April 2004)
Volume 25, Issue 5, Pages (March 2007)
Volume 27, Issue 6, Pages (September 2007)
Dan Yu, Rongdiao Liu, Geng Yang, Qiang Zhou  Cell Reports 
Volume 129, Issue 2, Pages (April 2007)
Volume 57, Issue 2, Pages (October 2000)
Volume 125, Issue 4, Pages (May 2006)
Hua Gao, Yue Sun, Yalan Wu, Bing Luan, Yaya Wang, Bin Qu, Gang Pei 
Volume 33, Issue 5, Pages (November 2010)
USP15 Negatively Regulates Nrf2 through Deubiquitination of Keap1
MicroRNA-125b Promotes Hepatic Stellate Cell Activation and Liver Fibrosis by Activating RhoA Signaling  Kai You, Song-Yang Li, Jiao Gong, Jian-Hong Fang,
Volume 34, Issue 5, Pages (June 2009)
Volume 4, Issue 4, Pages (October 1999)
Volume 26, Issue 12, Pages e4 (March 2019)
A Smad Transcriptional Corepressor
Presentation transcript:

Volume 134, Issue 4, Pages 1180-1190 (April 2008) Hepatocyte Growth Factor Suppresses Profibrogenic Signal Transduction via Nuclear Export of Smad3 With Galectin-7  Yutaka Inagaki, Kiyoshi Higashi, Miwa Kushida, Yun Yu Hong, Sachie Nakao, Reiichi Higashiyama, Tadashi Moro, Johbu Itoh, Toshiyuki Mikami, Toru Kimura, Goshi Shiota, Ichiro Kuwabara, Isao Okazaki  Gastroenterology  Volume 134, Issue 4, Pages 1180-1190 (April 2008) DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2008.01.014 Copyright © 2008 AGA Institute Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Antagonistic effects of HGF over expression on TGF-β-stimulated COL1A2 transcription. (A) Schematic representation of the −2900COL1A2 promoter region with the TGF-β-responsive element (TbRE). Sp1 and phosphorylated Smad3 bind to the TbRE and interact with each other to mediate the stimulatory effect of TGF-β on gene transcription. (B) CFSC-2G cells were cotransfected with the different lengths of COL1A2 promoter/luciferase constructs and either HGF expression plasmid or empty control vector then left untreated (UNTR) or treated with 2 ng/mL TGF-β for 36 hours. Transcriptional activity was normalized against that of cotransfected pRL-CMV. The values are mean ± SD obtained from 5 independent tests and expressed relative to the activity in untreated −2900COL1A2/LUC control transfectants. The asterisk indicates that the difference between the groups is significant. RLU, relative luminescence units; NS, not significant; +1, transcription start site. Gastroenterology 2008 134, 1180-1190DOI: (10.1053/j.gastro.2008.01.014) Copyright © 2008 AGA Institute Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Effects of HGF on subcellular localization of Smad3. (A) CFSC-2G cells were untreated (UNTR) or treated with 50 ng/mL HGF for 1 hour. In some cases, cells were preincubated with 10 μmol/L PD98059 for 1 hour followed by a further incubation in the absence or presence of HGF. Subcellular localization of Smad3 (green) was determined by using rabbit anti-Smad3 antibodies and Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated anti-rabbit IgG. All images were viewed and analyzed using a confocal laser-scanning microscopy with the same conditions of identical excitation strength and detection gain. Scale bar, 20 μm. (B) Fluorescence signals present in the nucleus and the cytoplasm of CFSC-2G cells were quantified by using 3-dimensional confocal laser-scanning microscopic pictures. After being projected onto a single 2-dimensional image, the localization of cytoplasmic and nuclear fluorescence signals was determined by a transparent image and 7-amino-actinomycin D nuclear staining, respectively. In the left panel are shown representative pictures of nuclear and cytoplasmic fluorescence signals present in an HGF-treated cell. The vertical arrow means that the fluorescence on a confocal microscopic picture (upper panel) is projected onto a 2-dimensional picture (lower panel). The smaller arrow means that the fluorescence signals present in the nucleus are separated from those in the cytoplasm to semi-quantify the signals. The right histograms summarize a result of statistical analyses using 20 randomly selected cells for each group. The asterisk indicates that the difference between the groups is significant. Gastroenterology 2008 134, 1180-1190DOI: (10.1053/j.gastro.2008.01.014) Copyright © 2008 AGA Institute Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Identification of nuclear proteins interacting with phosphorylated Smad3 following HGF treatment. (A) Nuclear extracts were prepared from CFSC-2G cells treated with 50 ng/mL HGF for the indicated lengths of time. After immunoprecipitation using antiphospho-Smad2/3 antibodies, they were separated on a 10%–20% gradient SDS-polyacrylamide gel and visualized by silver staining. (B) In some experiments, cells were preincubated with 10 μmol/L PD98059 for 1 hour before HGF treatment. Arrows 1 to 3 indicate the bands corresponding to galectin-7, MRP 14, and MRP 8, respectively, which became evident following HGF treatment. Heavy (H) and light (L) chains of IgG are also shown. M, molecular weight markers. Gastroenterology 2008 134, 1180-1190DOI: (10.1053/j.gastro.2008.01.014) Copyright © 2008 AGA Institute Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Physical interaction between Smad3 and galectin-7. (A) Whole cell lysates were prepared from CFSC-2G cells treated with 50 ng/mL HGF for the indicated lengths of time. They were separated on a 12.5% SDS-polyacrylamide gel, electroblotted, and incubated with antibodies against Smad3, galectin-7, or β-actin as a control. (B) COS-7 cells were cotransfected with a Myc-tagged Smad3 expression vector and Flag-tagged expression plasmids encoding galectin-7 (G7), galectin-1 (G1), or galectin-3 (G3). After 48 hours of incubation, whole cell lysates were prepared from transfected cells, immunoprecipitated (IP) with anti-Flag antibodies, and immunoblotted (IB) with anti-Myc antibodies. They were also immunoblotted directly with anti-Myc or anti-Flag antibodies to confirm the expression of each protein in the transfected cells. Gastroenterology 2008 134, 1180-1190DOI: (10.1053/j.gastro.2008.01.014) Copyright © 2008 AGA Institute Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Subcellular localization of Smad3 and galectin-7 following HGF treatment. (A) Colocalization of Smad3 (green) and galectin-7 (red) was examined in CFSC-2G cells treated with 50 ng/mL HGF for the indicated lengths of time. Nuclei were stained with 7-amino-actinomycin D (blue). In the middle and lower panels are shown the images of only Smad3 and galectin-7, respectively. Scale bar, 20 μm. (B) Nuclear and cytoplasmic proteins were prepared from CFSC-2G cells treated with 50 ng/mL HGF for the indicated lengths of time. They were separated on a 12.5% SDS-polyacrylamide gel, electroblotted, and incubated with antibodies against phosphorylated Smad3 (pSmad3), galectin-7, lamin A/C, or β-actin. The right histograms summarize the results of statistical analyses using 3 independent preparations of nuclear and cytoplasmic extracts. Relative expression levels of phosphorylated Smad3 and galectin-7 were normalized against those of lamin A/C or β-actin. The asterisk indicates that the value is significantly different from that with untreated cell extracts. (C) Translocation of Smad3 (green) and galectin-7 (red) was also examined in primary cultures of rat HSC at day 7 after plating. Cells were either untreated (UNTR) or treated with 100 ng/mL HGF for 1 hour. In the middle and lower panels are shown the images of only Smad3 and galectin-7, respectively. Scale bar, 20 μm. Gastroenterology 2008 134, 1180-1190DOI: (10.1053/j.gastro.2008.01.014) Copyright © 2008 AGA Institute Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Effects of transfection of galectin-7 siRNA on subcellular localization of Smad3 and TGF-β-stimulated gene expression. (A) CFSC-2G cells were transfected with 0.5 μg double-stranded galectin-7 or control siRNA and incubated for 48 hours. After additional transfection with 0.5 μg siRNA for 48 hours, whole cell lysates were separated by an SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and immunoblotted with antibodies against galecin-7, phosphorylated Smad3 (pSmad3), or β-actin. (B) Following transfection with the indicated siRNA, subcellular localization of Smad3 and galectin-7 was examined in CFSC-2G cells untreated (UNTR) or treated with 50 ng/mL HGF for 1 hour. All images were viewed and analyzed using a confocal laser-scanning microscopy with the same conditions of identical excitation strength and detection gain. Scale bar, 20 μm. (C) CFSC-2G cells were transfected with the indicated siRNA then untreated (UNTR) or treated with 5 ng/mL TGF-β and/or 50 ng/mL HGF for 24 hours. Total RNA was extracted, and the steady state levels of endogenous COL1A2 and PAI-1 mRNA were measured by real-time RT-PCR. The values are mean ± SD obtained from 6 different RNA preparations, and relative expression levels of COL1A2 and PAI-1 mRNA were normalized against those of GAPDH mRNA. The asterisk indicates that the difference between the groups is significant. NS, not significant. Gastroenterology 2008 134, 1180-1190DOI: (10.1053/j.gastro.2008.01.014) Copyright © 2008 AGA Institute Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 Effects of over expression of galectin-7 on TGF-β-stimulated gene expression. (A) CFSC-2G cells were cotransfected with 0.2 μg (SBE)4-luciferase construct, 0.2 μg pRL-TK, and increasing amounts (0, 0.25, 0.5, 1, or 2 μg) of galectin-7 expression plasmid. After 6 hours of incubation, cells were either untreated (UNTR) or treated with 5 ng/mL TGF-β for 24 hours. Transcriptional activity was normalized against that of cotransfected pRL-TK. The values are mean ± SD obtained from 6 independent tests and expressed relative to the activity in untreated cells transfected with an empty control vector. RLU, relative luminescence units. (B) CFSC-2G cells were transfected with increasing amounts (0, 0.25, 0.5, 1, or 2 μg) of galectin-7 expression plasmid. After 6 hours of incubation, cells were either untreated (UNTR) or treated with 5 ng/mL TGF-β for 24 hours. Total RNA was extracted and subjected to real-time RT-PCR to determine the steady state levels of endogenous COL1A2 and PAI-1 mRNA. The values are mean ± SD obtained from 6 different RNA preparations, and relative expression levels of COL1A2 and PAI-1 mRNA were normalized against those of GAPDH mRNA. In all cases, an empty control vector was used to ensure an equal amount of DNA in each sample. The asterisk indicates that the value is significantly lower than that in control transfectants with only an empty vector. Gastroenterology 2008 134, 1180-1190DOI: (10.1053/j.gastro.2008.01.014) Copyright © 2008 AGA Institute Terms and Conditions

Figure 8 Effects of HGF over expression on activation of COL1A2 promoter. Double transgenic mice over expressing HGF driven by the mouse albumin enhancer/promoter and harboring a COL1A2 upstream sequence linked to a firefly luciferase gene (HGF Tg), as well as control reporter mice (WT), were untreated (UNTR) or treated with a single subcutaneous injection of 1 mL/kg body weight of carbon tetrachloride (CCl4). Mice were killed 72 hours after the CCl4 injection and subjected to (A) luciferase assays determining COL1A2 promoter activity in liver tissue and (B) real-time RT-PCR measuring the steady state levels of endogenous COL1A2 expression. Luciferase activity was normalized against the protein concentration of tissue homogenates, whereas relative expression levels of COL1A2 mRNA were normalized against those of GAPDH mRNA. The values are mean ± SD obtained from 7 mice in each group. The asterisk indicates that the difference between the groups is significant. RLU, relative luminescence units; NS, not significant. (C) HSC were isolated from wild-type or HGF-over expressing transgenic mice before and 24 hours after a single CCl4 injection. HSC were subjected to primary culture for 24 hours, and immunofluorescence studies were performed to determine subcellular localization of Smad3 (green) and galectin-7 (red). Nuclei were stained with 7-amino-actinomycin D (blue). In the middle and lower panels are shown the images of only Smad3 and galectin-7, respectively. Scale bar, 10 μm. Gastroenterology 2008 134, 1180-1190DOI: (10.1053/j.gastro.2008.01.014) Copyright © 2008 AGA Institute Terms and Conditions