Volume 67, Issue 5, Pages e4 (September 2017)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CREB Binding Protein Recruitment to the Transcription Complex Requires Growth Factor–Dependent Phosphorylation of Its GF Box  Kerstin Zanger, Sally Radovick,
Advertisements

Volume 49, Issue 6, Pages (March 2013)
Purusharth Rajyaguru, Meipei She, Roy Parker  Molecular Cell 
E6 Oncoprotein Represses p53-Dependent Gene Activation via Inhibition of Protein Acetylation Independently of Inducing p53 Degradation  Mary C. Thomas,
Ho-Geun Yoon, Doug W. Chan, Albert B. Reynolds, Jun Qin, Jiemin Wong 
Volume 33, Issue 2, Pages (January 2009)
Volume 13, Issue 5, Pages (March 2004)
Volume 36, Issue 2, Pages (October 2009)
Volume 57, Issue 6, Pages (March 2015)
Volume 23, Issue 1, Pages (July 2006)
NRF2 Is a Major Target of ARF in p53-Independent Tumor Suppression
Volume 63, Issue 6, Pages (September 2016)
Structural Basis for the Specific Recognition of Methylated Histone H3 Lysine 4 by the WD-40 Protein WDR5  Zhifu Han, Lan Guo, Huayi Wang, Yue Shen, Xing.
The Plasticity of the Hsp90 Co-chaperone System
Volume 17, Issue 3, Pages (February 2005)
Nithya Raman, Elisabeth Weir, Stefan Müller  Molecular Cell 
Volume 31, Issue 2, Pages (July 2008)
Volume 68, Issue 2, Pages e6 (October 2017)
Crystal Structure of Tetrameric Arabidopsis MYC2 Reveals the Mechanism of Enhanced Interaction with DNA  Teng-fei Lian, Yong-ping Xu, Lan-fen Li, Xiao-Dong.
MUC1 Oncoprotein Stabilizes and Activates Estrogen Receptor α
Ras Induces Mediator Complex Exchange on C/EBPβ
SUMO Promotes HDAC-Mediated Transcriptional Repression
Volume 43, Issue 5, Pages (September 2011)
Direct Interactions of OCA-B and TFII-I Regulate Immunoglobulin Heavy-Chain Gene Transcription by Facilitating Enhancer-Promoter Communication  Xiaodi.
Volume 55, Issue 4, Pages (August 2014)
Volume 29, Issue 4, Pages (February 2008)
Vanessa Brès, Tomonori Yoshida, Loni Pickle, Katherine A. Jones 
Volume 56, Issue 5, Pages (December 2014)
Volume 17, Issue 4, Pages (October 2016)
Volume 31, Issue 4, Pages (August 2008)
MUC1 Oncoprotein Stabilizes and Activates Estrogen Receptor α
Volume 67, Issue 6, Pages e6 (September 2017)
Volume 38, Issue 3, Pages (May 2010)
Volume 10, Issue 5, Pages (November 2002)
Joshua C. Black, Janet E. Choi, Sarah R. Lombardo, Michael Carey 
Volume 124, Issue 2, Pages (January 2006)
c-Src Activates Endonuclease-Mediated mRNA Decay
Volume 20, Issue 4, Pages (November 2005)
Volume 66, Issue 4, Pages e4 (May 2017)
Volume 28, Issue 6, Pages (December 2007)
Volume 96, Issue 3, Pages (February 1999)
Andrei Kuzmichev, Thomas Jenuwein, Paul Tempst, Danny Reinberg 
Yi Tang, Jianyuan Luo, Wenzhu Zhang, Wei Gu  Molecular Cell 
Volume 19, Issue 6, Pages (September 2005)
Selective Activation of Cognate SNAREpins by Sec1/Munc18 Proteins
Mutant and Wild-Type Tumor Suppressor p53 Induces p300 Autoacetylation
H2B Ubiquitylation Promotes RNA Pol II Processivity via PAF1 and pTEFb
Two Functional Modes of a Nuclear Receptor-Recruited Arginine Methyltransferase in Transcriptional Activation  María J. Barrero, Sohail Malik  Molecular.
Regulation of the Hippo-YAP Pathway by Glucose Sensor O-GlcNAcylation
Mst1 Is an Interacting Protein that Mediates PHLPPs' Induced Apoptosis
Amanda O'Donnell, Shen-Hsi Yang, Andrew D. Sharrocks  Molecular Cell 
Eaf3 Chromodomain Interaction with Methylated H3-K36 Links Histone Deacetylation to Pol II Elongation  Amita A. Joshi, Kevin Struhl  Molecular Cell  Volume.
Negative Regulation of Tumor Suppressor p53 by MicroRNA miR-504
Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages (July 2004)
Hua Gao, Yue Sun, Yalan Wu, Bing Luan, Yaya Wang, Bin Qu, Gang Pei 
Volume 43, Issue 1, Pages (July 2011)
Volume 66, Issue 3, Pages e6 (May 2017)
Feng Xu, Qiongyi Zhang, Kangling Zhang, Wei Xie, Michael Grunstein 
In Vitro Analysis of Huntingtin-Mediated Transcriptional Repression Reveals Multiple Transcription Factor Targets  Weiguo Zhai, Hyunkyung Jeong, Libin.
Volume 37, Issue 2, Pages (January 2010)
Transcriptional Regulation by p53 through Intrinsic DNA/Chromatin Binding and Site- Directed Cofactor Recruitment  Joaquin M Espinosa, Beverly M Emerson 
Volume 49, Issue 2, Pages (January 2013)
Phosphorylation of CBP by IKKα Promotes Cell Growth by Switching the Binding Preference of CBP from p53 to NF-κB  Wei-Chien Huang, Tsai-Kai Ju, Mien-Chie.
Volume 7, Issue 6, Pages (June 2001)
Volume 46, Issue 2, Pages (April 2012)
Volume 11, Issue 3, Pages (September 2012)
Volume 65, Issue 5, Pages e4 (March 2017)
Volume 31, Issue 2, Pages (July 2008)
Volume 41, Issue 4, Pages (February 2011)
Volume 31, Issue 5, Pages (September 2008)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 67, Issue 5, Pages 733-743.e4 (September 2017) Structural and Functional Impacts of ER Coactivator Sequential Recruitment  Ping Yi, Zhao Wang, Qin Feng, Chao-Kai Chou, Grigore D. Pintilie, Hong Shen, Charles E. Foulds, Guizhen Fan, Irina Serysheva, Steven J. Ludtke, Michael F. Schmid, Mien-Chie Hung, Wah Chiu, Bert W. O’Malley  Molecular Cell  Volume 67, Issue 5, Pages 733-743.e4 (September 2017) DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2017.07.026 Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Molecular Cell 2017 67, 733-743.e4DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2017.07.026) Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 ER Sequentially Recruits Different Coactivators (A) CARM1 recruitment to the ER complex followed behind the recruitment of SRC-3. Shown are the ChIP results of ERα, SRC-3, and CARM1 in MCF-7 cells stimulated with 10 nM E2 at different time points at the ER target gene TFF1 promoter. (B) CARM1 synergized with SRC-3 and p300 to activate ER-mediated transcription. The ER-mediated transcription activity was measured through an ERE-driven luciferase reporter in the absence or presence of 10 nM 17-β estradiol (E2). Data are represented as mean ± SEM. Molecular Cell 2017 67, 733-743.e4DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2017.07.026) Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Classification of ERE/ER/CoA Complexes (A and B) Workflow for stepwise 3D classification of ERα + SRC-3 + p300 + CARM1 (A) and of ERα + SRC-3 + p300 + CARM1 + Fab (B) datasets using new multirefine and e2refinemulti in EMAN2. Each subset was refined separately with the specified particle number. Each map was segmented to annotate different proteins: p300, blue; ER, green; SRC-3a/b, orange and red, respectively; CARM1, pink; CARM1 Fab, yellow. Molecular Cell 2017 67, 733-743.e4DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2017.07.026) Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 CARM1 Overexpression Reduced the SRC-3:ER Ratio, and Its N-Terminal Domain Mediated the Interaction with p300 (A) Raw flow-proteometric analysis data for a single ER/SRC-3 complex in HeLa cells without (left panel) or with (right panel) CARM1 overexpression. (B) Box whisker plot of SRC-3 and ERα fluorescence intensities detected in single ER/SRC-3 complexes without or with CARM1 expression. (C) The N-terminal domain of CARM1 (1–140 aa) mediated the interaction between CARM1 and p300 in vitro. Shown is the GST pull-down experiment using GST-fused CARM1 full length and different fragments to pull-down purified p300 protein. (D) CARM1 N-terminal domain deletion significantly reduced its ability to interact with p300 and ER in cells. Shown is a coIP experiment. Molecular Cell 2017 67, 733-743.e4DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2017.07.026) Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Communication between p300 and CARM1 within the ER Complex Regulates HAT and HMT Activity (A) Segmented p300 from map 1A. (B) Segmented p300 from map 1C. (C) CARM1 increased p300 autoacetylation and its HAT activity on histone H3 in vitro. Shown is the autoradiograph of 3H-labeled acetylation. (D) Coomassie blue staining of purified GST-CARM1 WT and Δ1-140 mutant from bacteria. (E) Deletion of the N-terminal domain abolished the ability of CARM1 to regulate p300 HAT activity in vitro. Top panel: the autoradiograph of 3H-labeled acetylation. Bottom panels: western blot analysis on the levels of ER, SRC-3, p300, and CARM1 WT or Δ1-140 mutant in the input. ∗, the uncleaved GST-CARM1; #, GST-removed CARM1 through thrombin cleavage. (F) CARM1 selectively increased p300 HAT activity on H3K18. Shown is the western blot analysis of the levels of histone acetylation in the in vitro HAT assay using different acetylation antibodies. (G) p300-mediated acetylation significantly increased CARM1-mediated H3R17 methylation. Shown is the autoradiograph of 3H-labeled methylation in vitro. Molecular Cell 2017 67, 733-743.e4DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2017.07.026) Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 A Working Model of the Impact of Coactivator Sequential Binding on ER-Mediated Transcriptional Activation Upon estrogen stimulation, an ER dimer binds two SRC-3 molecules which then recruit p300. The binding of p300 promotes the basal level of histone H3K18 acetylation at the ER binding sites. The recruitment of CARM1 displaces one SRC-3 molecule from the complex and induces a p300 conformational change to enhance p300-mediated H3K18 acetylation. Increased H3K18ac further promotes CARM1-mediated H3R18 dimethylation. These histone epigenetic modifications then bring in reader proteins to promote transcription. Molecular Cell 2017 67, 733-743.e4DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2017.07.026) Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions