Effective luminosity simulation for PANDA experiment

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Mitglied der Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft Beam Cooling at HESR in the FAIR Project 12 th September 2011 Dieter Prasuhn.
Advertisements

Application of cooling methods at NICA project G.Trubnikov JINR, Dubna.
Halo calculations in ATF DR Dou Wang (IHEP), Philip Bambade (LAL), Kaoru Yokoya (KEK), Theo Demma (LAL), Jie Gao (IHEP) FJPPL-FKPPL Workshop on ATF2 Accelerator.
James Ritman Univ. Giessen PANDA: Experiments to Study the Properties of Charm in Dense Hadronic Matter Overview of the PANDA Pbar-A Program The Pbar Facility.
Intensity Limits and Beam Performances in the High-Energy Storage Ring
Particle flux simulations Sergei Striganov Fermilab June 11, 2008.
A new algorithm for the kinetic analysis of intra-beam scattering in storage rings. P.R.Zenkevich*,O. Boine-Frenkenheim**, A. Ye. Bolshakov* *ITEP, Moscow,
ALPHA Storage Ring Indiana University Xiaoying Pang.
Paul Derwent 30 Nov 00 1 The Fermilab Accelerator Complex o Series of presentations  Overview of FNAL Accelerator Complex  Antiprotons: Stochastic Cooling.
Electron Cooling Expected Performance & Construction.
COULOMB ’05 Experiments with Cooled Beams at COSY A.Lehrach, H.J.Stein, J. Dietrich, H.Stockhorst, R.Maier, D.Prasuhn, V.Kamerdjiev, COSY, Juelich, I.Meshkov,
FFAG-ERIT R&D 06/11/06 Kota Okabe (Kyoto Univ.) for FFAG-DDS group.
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, N.Kazarinov.
1 Development of models of intrabeam scattering for charged beams in storage rings E. Mikhaylova Joint Institute for Nuclear Research Dubna, Russia The.
Mitglied der Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft Petersburg Nuclear Physics Institute, Russia Storage cells for internal experiments with Atomic Beam Source at the.
Results from Step I of MICE D Adey 2013 International Workshop on Neutrino Factories, Super-beams and Beta- beams Working Group 3 – Accelerator Topics.
Emittance Growth from Elliptical Beams and Offset Collision at LHC and LRBB at RHIC Ji Qiang US LARP Workshop, Berkeley, April 26-28, 2006.
Research in Particle Beam Physics and Accelerator Technology of the Collaboration IKP Forschungszentrum Jülich & JINR A.N. Parfenov for the Collaboration.
6 th International Conference on Nuclear Physics at Storage Rings May 2005, Jülich - Bonn, Germany ÖRJAN NORDHAGE GSI/Uppsala University Germany/Sweden.
October 4-5, Electron Lens Beam Physics Overview Yun Luo for RHIC e-lens team October 4-5, 2010 Electron Lens.
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, A.Drozhdin, N.Kazarinov.
Diagnostics for intense e-cooled ion beams by Vsevolod Kamerdzhiev Forschungszentrum Jülich, IKP, COSY ICFA-HB2004, Bensheim, October 19, 2004.
Beam loss and longitudinal emittance growth in SIS M. Kirk I. Hofmann, O. Boine-Frankenheim, P. Spiller, P. Hülsmann, G. Franchetti, H. Damerau, H. Günter.
1 Muon acceleration - amplitude effects in non-scaling FFAG - Shinji Machida CCLRC/RAL/ASTeC 26 April, ffag/machida_ ppt.
Luminosity of the Super-Tau-Charm Factory with Crab Waist D. Shatilov BINP, Novosibirsk TAU’08 Workshop, Satellite Meeting “On the Need for a Super-Tau-Charm.
Collective effects in EDM storage ring A.Sidorin, Electron cooling group, JINR, Dubna.
Exploring QCD with Antiprotons PANDA at FAIR M. Hoek on behalf of the PANDA Collaboration IOP Nuclear and Particle Physics Divisional Conference 4-7 April.
On the feasibility of using an extracted polarized antiproton beam of the HESR with a solid polarized target Presenters: Yu. A. Plis, A.V. Smirnov PSTP.
Numerical Model of an Internal Pellet Target O. Bezshyyko *, K. Bezshyyko *, A. Dolinskii †,I. Kadenko *, R. Yermolenko *, V. Ziemann ¶ * Nuclear Physics.
The Polarized Internal Gas Target of ANKE at COSY
Concept Preliminary Estimations A. Kolomiets Charge to mass ratio1/61/8 Input energy (MeV/u) Output energy (MeV/u)2.5(3.5) Beam.
Present MEIC IR Design Status Vasiliy Morozov, Yaroslav Derbenev MEIC Detector and IR Design Mini-Workshop, October 31, 2011.
Intra-Beam scattering studies for CLIC damping rings A. Vivoli* Thanks to : M. Martini, Y. Papaphilippou *
Marina Dolinska 28 th August, Cooling methods Electron (SIS18, ESR, RESR, NESR, HESR) Stochastic (ESR, CR, RESR, HESR) Laser (ESR ??, HESR ??).....other.
Cluster-Jet Target Target TDR Alfons Khoukaz Institut für Kernphysik, WWU Münster, Germany PANDA Collaboration Meeting December 8-12, 2008.
Numerical Simulations for IOTA Dmitry Shatilov BINP & FNAL IOTA Meeting, FNAL, 23 February 2012.
Development of a pellet tracking system for PANDA and WASA Goal:  know interaction point with a few 100  m accuracy in 3d(xyz). Method: Track pellets.
Alexei Fedotov, December 7, Beam parameters and collective effects for pEDM ring (December 7, 2009)
RF manipulations in SIS 18 and SIS 100 O. Chorniy.
Oleksiy Dolinskyy 1st December, 2014
Status of HESR 18th March Gießen Dieter Prasuhn.
Calculation of Beam Equilibrium and Luminosities for
Benchmarking MAD, SAD and PLACET Characterization and performance of the CLIC Beam Delivery System with MAD, SAD and PLACET T. Asaka† and J. Resta López‡
Beam based measurements
HIAF Electron Cooling System &
Simulation of Luminosity Variation
A.Smirnov, A.Sidorin, D.Krestnikov
Primary estimation of CEPC beam dilution and beam halo
Electron Cooling Simulation For JLEIC
Huagen Xu IKP: T. Randriamalala, J. Ritman and T. Stockmanns
The Interaction Region
“Electron cooling device in the project NESR (FAIR)"
Reconstructions with TOF for in-beam PET
Large Booster and Collider Ring
A. Plastun¹, B. Mustapha, Z. Conway and P. Ostroumov
Jeffrey Eldred, Sasha Valishev
CASA Collider Design Review Retreat Other Electron-Ion Colliders: eRHIC, ENC & LHeC Yuhong Zhang February 24, 2010.
Marcin Zieliński Paweł Moskal Andrzej Kupść
A summary of world-wide test beam facilities
Collider Ring Optics & Related Issues
Beam-Beam Effects in High-Energy Colliders:
2. Crosschecking computer codes for AWAKE
JLEIC Collaboration meeting Spring 2016 Ion Polarization with Figure-8
HESR for SPARC 25th November FAIR MAC Dieter Prasuhn.
LEPTA project Measuring lifetime of positrons
Yuhong Zhang MEIC Collaboration Meeting March 30 & 31, 2015
Transverse instability in the AD?
He Zhang MEIC R&D Meeting, 07/09/2015
Main Design Parameters RHIC Magnets for MEIC Ion Collider Ring
Option 1: Reduced FF Quad Apertures
Presentation transcript:

Effective luminosity simulation for PANDA experiment A.Smirnov, A.Sidorin, D.Krestnikov, R.Pivin Joint Institute for Nuclear Research 141980, Dubna, Russia PANDA Meeting, ITEP, October 22, 2008

Luminosity of PANDA experiment (high-luminosity mode) Pbar production / annihilation rate, s^-1 (r) 1e7 Cross-section of p - pbar, barn (b) 0,05 Maximum luminosity, cm^-2 s^-1 (L_m = r / b) 2e32 Hydrogen density, cm^-3 4,26e22 Pellet size (diameter), mm 0,028 Pellet flux radius, mm 1,25 Distance between pellets, mm 5 Effective target density, cm^-2 (n) 4e15 Revolution period, sec (T) 2e-6 Proton number (N) 1e11 Average luminosity, cm^-2 s^-1 (L_a = N * n / T)

BETACOOL application over the world (since 1995) TSL, Uppsala MSL, Stockholm JINR, Dubna ITEP, Moscow ITMP, Sarov BINP, Novosibirsk FZJ, Jülich GSI, Darmstadt Erlangen Univ. MPI, Heidelberg CERN, Geneva München Univ. Fermilab, Batavia BNL, Upton Tech-X, Boulder RIKEN, Wako NIRS, Chiba Kyoto Univ. Hiroshima Univ. Beijing Univ. IMP, Lanzhou

New algorithm is being developed BETACOOL overview General goal of the BETACOOL program is to simulate long term processes (in comparison with the ion revolution period) leading to variation of the ion distribution function in 6 dimensional phase space. New algorithm is being developed It calculates the luminosity variation via real pellet distribution and the beam profiles SO In the case of pellet target simulation the existing algorithm is based on assumption that during one step of the integration a large number of the pellets cross the beam.

Average luminosity calculation x s Pellet flux Number of events: 1) Integration over betatron oscillation 2) Integration over flux width 3) Number of turns per integration step Real models of interaction with pellet Number of events for model particle Particle probability distribution

Parameters of COSY experiment WASA@COSY experiment Deuterium beam Momentum, GeV/c 1.2 Energy, MeV/u 177 Particle number 2×1010 Horizontal emittance,  mm mrad 1 Vertical emittance 0.5 Initial momentum spread 2×10-4 Deuterium target Pellet radius, mm 15 Pellet flux radius, mm 2.5 Mean distance between pellets, mm 10 Deuterium density, atom/cm-3 6×1022 COSY Circumference, m 183.4728 Momentum slip factor,  0.533 Horizontal acceptance,  m rad 2.2E-5 Vertical acceptance,  m rad 1E-5 Acceptance on momentum deviation ±1.2×10-3 For benchmarking BETACOOL code data from COSY experiment (June 08 run) was used WASA @ COSY Parameters of COSY experiment

Experiments without barrier bucket The beam momentum spread can be calculated from measured frequency spread

Signals from detectors Green and yellow lines are signals from pellet counter Black line is number of particles Other colour lines are signals from different detectors Simulation of particle number on time Simulation of long scale luminosity on time

Vacuum conditions of COSY experiment Pellet target area Vacuum conditions inside COSY storage ring are not constant because of the pellet collector

Effective luminosity calculation Pellet distribution Pellet distribution Ion beam profile

Short scale luminosity variations r = 8 mm d = 0.03 mm Experiment r = 8 mm d = 0.03 mm Simulation r = 0.2 mm d = 0.01 mm

Effective luminosity calculation Short time-scale luminosity (signals from each pellet) Average luminosity Detector limit Long time-scale luminosity (average luminosity) Average luminosity Effective luminosity Average luminosity is the total integral from pellet signals. Detector limit is defined by the detector design (here average luminosity corresponds to 2e32 and detector limit is chosen 3e32 cm^-2 s^-1) Effective luminosity is the integral of pellet signals below the detector limit.

Designed parameters for PANDA (high-luminosity mode) Momentum, GeV/c 9 RMS momentum spread 1e-4 Transverse emittance (RMS normalized) 0,4 Average luminosity, cm^-2 s^-1 2e32 Detector limit, cm-2 s^-1 3e32 Effective target density, cm^-2 4e15 Pellet velocity, m/s 60 Pellet flux radius, mm 1,25 Pellet size (diameter), mkm 28 Distance between pellets, mm 5

Detector limit, cm^-2 s^-1 Effective to average luminosity ratio for different detector limit (high-luminosity mode) Inerpellet distance, mm  Pellet size (diameter), mkm 2,00E+32 3,00E+32 5,00E+32 1,00E+33 0,25 10 0,908074 1 2 20 7,73E-01 0,943172 5 28 4,29E-01 5,56E-01 7,32E-01 9,70E-01 Detector limit, cm^-2 s^-1 Designed parameters

Detector limit, cm^-2 s^-1 Effective to average luminosity ratio for different detector limit (high-resolution mode) Inerpellet distance, mm Pellet size (diameter), mkm Detector limit, cm^-2 s^-1 2,00E+31 3,00E+31 5,00E+31 1,00E+32 2,00E+32 0,25 10 0,765097 0,916092 1,006607 0,998266 1,001888 2 20 3,79E-01 0,561785 0,768713 1 0,99372 5 28 1,89E-01 2,63E-01 3,86E-01 6,32E-01 9,79E-01

Summary Effective luminosity is very sensitive on the pellet size in the case of high-luminosity mode. For designed pellet size 28 mkm and detector limit 50% over average luminosity 2e32 cm^-2 s^-1 the effective luminosity is about 50% of average one. To avoid this problem the pellet size should be less than 20 mkm with distance between pellets 2 mm. Insignificance increasing of the detector limit does not bring large improvement. In the case of high-resolution mode the detector limit is much higher than average luminosity and effective luminosity equal average one.