Volume 61, Issue 6, Pages 1156-1161 (June 2012) Radiofrequency Ablation Versus Partial Nephrectomy in Patients with Solitary Clinical T1a Renal Cell Carcinoma: Comparable Oncologic Outcomes at a Minimum of 5 Years of Follow-Up Ephrem O. Olweny, Samuel K. Park, Yung K. Tan, Sara L. Best, Clayton Trimmer, Jeffrey A. Cadeddu European Urology Volume 61, Issue 6, Pages 1156-1161 (June 2012) DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.01.001 Copyright © 2012 European Association of Urology Terms and Conditions
Fig. 1 Flowchart of included patients. NED=no evidence of disease; PN=partial nephrectomy; RCC=renal cell carcinoma; RFA=radiofrequency ablation. European Urology 2012 61, 1156-1161DOI: (10.1016/j.eururo.2012.01.001) Copyright © 2012 European Association of Urology Terms and Conditions
Fig. 2 (a) Overall survival and (b) cancer-specific survival for radiofrequency ablation (RFA) versus partial nephrectomy (PN). European Urology 2012 61, 1156-1161DOI: (10.1016/j.eururo.2012.01.001) Copyright © 2012 European Association of Urology Terms and Conditions
Fig. 3 Comparative (a) disease-specific survival, (b) local recurrence-free survival, and (c) metastasis-free survival for radiofrequency ablation (RFA) versus partial nephrectomy (PN). European Urology 2012 61, 1156-1161DOI: (10.1016/j.eururo.2012.01.001) Copyright © 2012 European Association of Urology Terms and Conditions