Modeling of Unwanted and Blocking Interference Modes

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Regional Information Meeting and Workshop related to the RRC-06 for the administrations of the Arab countries Damascus, Syria August 2005 Planning.
Advertisements

Regional Information Meeting and Workshop related to the RRC-06 for the administrations of the African countries Dakar, Senegal, April 2005 Planning.
Management of the SEAMCAT tool European Communications Office Jean-Philippe Kermoal (ECO) October 2010 EUROPEAN COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Nansensgade 19 DK-1366.
1. 2 Prepared by : Eng.Yasir Mohammed Bashar Interference calculations.
Principle of Monte-Carlo in a SEAMCAT environment European Communications Office Jean-Philippe Kermoal - SEAMCAT Manager (ECO) June 2012
Overview of Systems in SEAMCAT European Communications Office Jean-Philippe Kermoal - SEAMCAT Manager (ECO) June 2012
Basic functionality: Antenna Pattern Antenna positioning Reports and debug mode European Communications Office Jean-Philippe Kermoal (ECO) 05 June 2012.
Modeling of Unwanted and Blocking Interference Modes European Communications Office Jean-Philippe Kermoal/ Marc Le Devendec 05 October 2010 EUROPEAN COMMUNICATIONS.
SEAMCAT modeling system-level EMC Analysis
Summary of Path Loss in Propagation
Introduction to SEAMCAT EUROPEAN COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Nyropsgade 37, 4th floor 1602 Copenhagen Denmark Telephone: Telefax:
STEP 5: A REAL CASE European Communications Office Stella Lyubchenko October 2010 EUROPEAN COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Nansensgade 19 DK-1366 Copenhagen Denmark.
Modelling of Emission and Blocking mask European Communications Office Jean-Philippe Kermoal (ECO) October 2010 EUROPEAN COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Nansensgade.
Setting Emission and Blocking masks European Communications Office Jean-Philippe Kermoal (ECO) June 2012 EUROPEAN COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Nansensgade 19.
Radio Interference Calculations
EMI in an RQZ: the need for buffer zones Carol Wilson, CSIRO Research Consultant RFI2010, Groningen.
Introduction to SEAMCAT Example of MCA study
Quick start in SEAMCAT European Communications Office Jean-Philippe Kermoal (ECO) December 2009 EUROPEAN COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Nansensgade 19 DK-1366 Copenhagen.
Copyright 1999, S.D. Personick. All Rights Reserved. Telecommunications Networking I Lectures 14 & 15 Wireless Transmission Systems.
Introduction to SEAMCAT
24/03/2003Jacques MdM / REF France1 HF Receivers desensitisation from wideband noise spurious in HF bands (1.8 to 30 MHZ) Impact of spurious radiations.
Basic examples of setting simulations European Communications Office Jean-Philippe Kermoal (ECO) October 2010 EUROPEAN COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Nansensgade.
Basic functionality: coverage/simulation radius European Communications Office Jean-Philippe Kermoal (ECO) 05 June 2012 EUROPEAN COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE.
Management of the SEAMCAT tool European Communications Office Jean-Philippe Kermoal (ECO) October 2010 EUROPEAN COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Nansensgade 19 DK-1366.
RALI FX3 Microwave Fixed Services Frequency Coordination Glenn Odlum Senior Engineer Spectrum Engineering Section
Modeling of Unwanted and Blocking Interference Modes European Communications Office Jean-Philippe Kermoal 05 October 2010 EUROPEAN COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE.
Chapter 1 : Part 3 Noise. Noise, interference and distortion  Noise  unwanted signals that coincide with the desired signals.  Two type of noise: internal.
Doc.: IEEE m SubmissionSlide 1 September 2012 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks(WPANs) Submission.
CEPT/ECC-ETSI Co-operation Process
On-line tools and reporting an error European Communications Office Jean-Philippe Kermoal - SEAMCAT Manager (ECO) June 2012
NPSTC Meetings, November 2007 Margaret Daly and Sean O’Hara Syracuse Research Corporation New York Statewide Wireless Network Program RPC 700 MHz Interference.
SEAMCAT’s propagation model plugin Karl Koch, BNetzA, CEPT SEAMCAT Workshop Copenhagen,
Overview of CDMA – OFDMA European Communications Office Jean-Philippe Kermoal - SEAMCAT Manager (ECO) 03 June 2014
SEAMCAT 4 status and demo Jean-Philippe Kermoal 61th Meeting of WG SE Åre, Sweden, 26 – 30 March 2012.
Event Processing Plugin Interface - DEMO European Communications Office Jean-Philippe Kermoal - SEAMCAT Manager (ECO) 20 November 2013
Overview of CDMA – OFDMA European Communications Office Jean-Philippe Kermoal - SEAMCAT Manager (ECO) 27 November 2012
ALLAH ALLAH. Compiled by :Engr.Muhammad Waseem( MS Telecommunication,England,BS.(ssuet)). Assistant Professor, Telecom Eng.Deptt. Sir Syed University.
Numericals.
Basic examples of setting simulations European Communications Office Stella Lyubchenko (ECO) June 2013 EUROPEAN COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Nansensgade.
1 OFDMA Module Usage within Seamcat. Summary 2  Using generic or OFDMA model when addressing compatibility/sharing studies?  Pointing out differences.
1 70/80/90 GHz Web-Based Coordination Improving the Effectiveness of the Domestic Spectrum Management Process National Spectrum Managers Association Arlington,
1 OFDMA Module Usage within Seamcat. Summary 2  Using generic or OFDMA model when addressing compatibility/sharing studies?  Pointing out differences.
Optimisation of Radio Spectrum Usage
Management of the SEAMCAT tool
Setting Emission and Blocking masks
Workshop Terminology.
Modelling of Emission and Blocking mask
Propagation model: Built-in and plug-in
Basic functionality: Antenna (Pattern, positioning, Gain)
Introduction to SEAMCAT
Summary of the workshop
Introduction to SEAMCAT
Extensions, System Outline and Correlation Modes and
Setting Emission and Blocking masks
Basic functionality: Importing/Exporting Libraries
Basic examples of setting simulations: A REAL CASE
How to install a propagation model plug-in
Propagation model: Built-in and plug-in
Frequency Assignment Planning
MTUCI DRM- signal protection ratios for several unwanted signals. Researches and MW air tests. Защитные отношения в системе DRM при нескольких мешающих.
Cellular and Wireless Networks System Design Fundamentals
Basic examples of setting simulations: A REAL CASE
Basic functionality: Importing/Exporting Libraries
Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: LB93 Comment resolution for Transmission mask and Adjacent.
Setting Emission and Blocking masks
How to evolve regulation with technologies for the effective spectrum management Doriana Guiducci, Peter Faris, José Carrascosa – European Communications.
Frequency Assignment Planning
European Communications Office Jean-Philippe Kermoal (ECO)
Amateur Extra Q & A Study Pool
Basic examples of setting simulations
Presentation transcript:

Modeling of Unwanted and Blocking Interference Modes European Communications Office Jean-Philippe Kermoal 27 November 2012 EUROPEAN COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Nansensgade 19 DK-1366 Copenhagen Denmark Telephone: + 45 33 89 63 00 Telefax: + 45 33 89 63 30 E-mail: eco@eco.cpet.org Web Site: http://www.cept.org/eco Jukka Rakkolainen/ERO

Outline Interfering modes Unwanted emissions case Exercise #2 Blocking case Exercise #4 Jukka Rakkolainen/ERO

Interference Calculations Interfering Modes Interference Criteria Unwanted and Blocking Signals

Unwanted Emissions fI fv fI Victim Interfering System Interferer emission mask Receiver Bandwidth fv Interfering System Interfering emission mask fI

Exercise #2: Unwanted calculation Set victim link receiver (VLR) Name: VLR Exercise #2 Frequency: 910 MHz Interference criteria: I/N = 0 Noise level = -110 Bandwidth = 150 KHz Set interfering link transmitter (ILT) Name: ILT Exercise #2 Frequency: 905 MHz Power: 23 dBm Emission mask: default mask Path between VLR with ILT Propagation model:free space (no variation) Position (x,y): fixed, 10km apart

Victim link

Interference criteria Victim Link Receiver Noise floor Description Reception bandwidth Interference criteria

Interfering Link

Interfering Link Transmitter Power Emission mask

Unwanted emissions mask Default value erroneous value See the following presentations...

ILT  VLR Path Att = 32.44 + 20 x log (f (MHz)) + 20 x log (d (km)) Att = 32.44 + 20 x log (905 MHz) + 20 x log (10 km) Att = 111.57 dB

Simulations... Power in the victim bandwidth: P(dBm/Bref) = Pe(dBm) + att(dBc/Bref) + CF Pe = 23 dBm + 0 + 10*log(150/1250) Pe = 23 dBm + 0 - 9.21dBm Pe = 13.79 dBm 10 km Correction Factor (CF) needed because Vr BW < It BW IRSS Unwanted = Pe + Ge + Gr – Att (free space) IRSS Unwanted = 13.79 dBm + 0 dB + 0 dB – 111.57 dB IRSS Unwanted = - 97.78 dBm

Results N = -110 dBm IRSS Unwanted = - 97.78 dBm I/N = - 97.78 – (-110) = 12.21 dB ( Calculated by SEAMCAT) Interference Criterion was: I/N = 0 ( Input to SEAMCAT)

I/N = 0 respected for Pe < 12.5 dB at 50% Results... I/N = 0 respected for Pe < 12.5 dB at 50%

Exercise #3: SEM calculation How to check that the Spectrum Emission Mask is properly calculated? Easy tool in SEAMCAT  “Test Rel. unwanted” tool Launch the “Test Rel. unwanted” tool Df = fi-fv = 0 Vr BW = 150 kHz SEM: same as in Exercise #2 Results: __ dBm

Rejection of the receiver Blocking Victim Receiver Bandwidth Rejection of the receiver fv fI Interfering System Interferer fI

A desensitisation (N+I/N) of 3 dB is assumed Blocking: 3 Modes User Defined (dB): Rejection at the receiver AttBlocking = BlockUD Protection Ratio (dB): AttBlocking = BlockPR + C/(N+I) + 3 dB Sensitivity Mode (dBm): Maximum Acceptable Value of Power AttBlocking = BlockSens (dBm) – Sensitivity (dBm) + C/(N+I) A desensitisation (N+I/N) of 3 dB is assumed

But not so different Protection Ratio: Interfering Blocking Level = Pe + Ge + Gr – Att – AttBlocking Where: AttBlocking = BlockPR + C/(N+I) + 3 dB If C/(N+I) = - 3 dB AttBlocking = BlockPR - 3 dB + 3 dB = BlockPR ....equivalent to User Defined Mode If C/I = 0 dB Broadcast PR Mode...

Exercise # 4: blocking calculation Set victim link receiver (VLR) Blocking mode: user defined Blocking response: function Interference criteria: I/N = 0 Noise level = -110 Set interfering link transmitter (ILT) No change Path between VLR with ILT

Victim link

Should be defined at the frequency of the Interferer VLR Blocking Mask fV fI Should be defined at the frequency of the Interferer Att blocking = 50 dB (e.g. Defined in ETSI Standards)

Simulations IRSS Blocking= Pe + Ge + Gr – Att (free space) – Att block IRSS Blocking= 23 dBm + 0 dB + 0 dB – 111.57 dB – 50 dB IRSS Blocking = - 138.57 dBm

Results IRSS Blocking Level = - 138.57 dBm N = -110 dBm I/N = 0 dB (Criterion) always met

Question? Can I make simulation for unwanted and blocking in the same workspace?

Question: Can I make simulation for unwanted and blocking in the same workspace? 2 Interference Criteria / 2 runs

Question: Can I run simulations for unwanted and blocking in the same workspace in a single run? If the interference criteria are not the same... You can compensate this when defining the mask (unwanted or blocking) Blocking: PR mode + Criterion: C/I=0 dB Unwanted: Criterion C/I=10 dB Remove 10 dB from blocking mask Criterion C/I=10 dB

Questions? Thanks for your attention