SWAMP Team Members Contact Information Karen Taberski: 510-622-2424, Nelia White: 510-622-2480.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Patterns and Trends in Sediment Toxicity in the San Francisco Estuary Brian Anderson, Bryn Phillips, John Hunt University of California, Davis Bruce Thompson,
Advertisements

Regional Board Monitoring and Special Studies Related to 303d Listing and TMDLs Karen Taberski Regional Water Quality Control Board San Francisco Bay Region.
Water Monitoring and Assessment Alfred L. Korndoerfer Jr., Chief Bureau of Freshwater & Biological Monitoring Water Monitoring and Standards NJDEP Presented.
Measuring Water Pollution
1 Water Quality Monitoring on Pleasant Grove and Curry Creeks: What the data is telling us Presented by: Edmund Sullivan – Placer County Planning Department,
Ocean Vocabulary The energy is being passed through the water as a wave. 2.Wave: the movement of energy through a body of water.
Turtle Lake Water Quality Index
A GIS Lesson. What is a Watershed? +15 Million People.
Water Resources Monitoring Strategy for Wisconsin: Building on Experience Mike Staggs, WDNR Bureau of Fisheries Management and Habitat Protection Acknowledgements:
2009 Water Quality Monitoring Report – Fish Creek Vaughn Hauser, B.Sc. Naomi Parker, B.Sc., BIT, CEPIT.
Assessment of Ecological Condition in Coastal Waters Impacted by Hurricane Katrina.
Kristy Morris PhD, Senior Scientist Council for Watershed Health Regional Watershed Monitoring Programs Examples of Community Involvement.
Texas Stream Team …is a joint partnership with Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, U.S. EPA Region VI, Texas State University-San Marcos, and numerous.
Common Monitoring Parameters. Step 1 Consider purpose/objectives of monitoring Assess use attainment Characterize watershed Identify pollutants and sources.
Southern California Bight Regional Marine Monitoring Program Ken Schiff
The Importance of Coastal Waters - Recent Reports National Coastal Condition Report National Coastal Condition Report Heinz Center’s State of the Nation’s.
Water pollution. Uses of water include agricultural, industrial, householdand environmental activities.agricultural industrialhouseholdenvironmental.
SWAMP Team Members Contact Information Karen Taberski: , Nelia White:
Water Quality.
HUMAN IMPACT ON WATER BY: MR. MERINGOLO. THERE IS LOTS OF WATER, SO WHAT’S THE PROBLEM? Approximately 97 % of water is salty, which leaves only 3 % as.
Item No. 13 Recommendation to the State Water Resources Control Board Regarding the Section 303(d) List Lahontan Water Board June 19, 2014 Carly Nilson.
Department of the Environment Overview of Water Quality Data Used by MDE and Water Quality Parameters Timothy Fox MDE, Science Service Administration Wednesday.
Turbidity and Water. Turbidity is a measure of water clarity, how much the material suspended in water decreases the passage of light through the water.
Sediment Quality in the Corpus Christi Bay Sediment Quality in the Corpus Christi Bay Natalie Bartosh GIS in Water Resources, Fall 2003 Dr. Maidment, The.
Georgia Adopt-A-Stream Introduction Georgia Adopt-A-Stream 2 Martin Luther King Jr. Dr. SW Suite 1462 East Atlanta, Georgia
Currents of Change Workshop Currents of Change Environmental Status & Trends of the Narragansett Bay Region May 1, 2009.
Water Quality Planning Division Monitoring & Assessment Section Surface Water Quality Monitoring Program (SWQM)
Impacts of Land Development on Oregon’s Waters 2001.
Changing Focus on Watershed Issues < 1960’s: Water supply and flooding > 1960’s: Land use effects on water quality > 1980’s: Riparian and aquatic ecology.
WATERSHED INVENTORY AND ASSESSMENT Module 7, part A – Issues and Description.
NorCal SETAC 2001 Seafood Contamination and Consumption.
Benefits of the Redesigned RMP to Regional Board Decision Making Karen Taberski Regional Water Quality Control Board San Francisco Bay Region.
NWQMC July 26, 2005 Developing A National Water Quality Monitoring Network Design.
Water Quality Partnership Meeting LOTT Alliance Regional Service Center November 18, 2010 Rob Duff and Josh Baldi Washington State Department of Ecology.
The Meadows Center Texas Stream Team Prepared in cooperation with the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality and U.S. EPA. The preparation of this presentation.
STORET 1001 and the State of Utah Monitoring Strategy Today you will see: –What kind of attributes are available in STORET –How results, stations, and.
Chapter 11 Section 3 Water Pollution Environmental Science Spring 2011.
Clean Water Act Mrs. Perryman Mrs. Trimble. Clean Water Act “Restore and maintain the chemical, physical and biological integrity of the Nation’s waters”
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Surface Water Monitoring Pam Anderson, MPCA May 20 th, 2015.
Ch. 1: “Watersheds and Wetlands” Lesson 1.5: “Factors That Affect Wetlands and Watersheds” Part 2.
Water Quality Indicators and Monitoring Design to Support the Albemarle-Pamlico National Estuary Program: A Progress Report Dean E. Carpenter and William.
Water Quality Investigations How Does Land-Use Impact Water Quality? Mitigating Water Quality – Current Issues July 9, 2015 Jim Kipp, Associate Director.
Think about answering the questions: Who? What? Where? When? Why? How? Before your volunteers begin collecting data.
8. E and 4 Water Quality, Indicators, and Usage.
All Sewers Lead to the Ocean Exploring and Measuring Stormwater Quality SciREN Coast February 12, 2015 Kellen Lauer and Kathleen Onorevole.
Monitoring Water Quality for ecosystem health. Why Monitor? Under the Clean Water Act, EPA asks VA to enforce laws improving the quality of our streams,
Types of Aquatic Ecosystems Freshwater: lakes, rivers Salt: oceans Estuaries: where fresh meets salt Provides variety of habitats, supporting diverse animal.
State Standards Hydrology
Streams & Rivers Lakes & Ponds Groundwater Monitoring
Sustainable Development Goal for Water: Indicator 6.3.2
Tools for Tracking Healthy Watersheds
WATER QUALITY.
Water Quality Rice Creek Watershed.
Water Quality Planning Division Monitoring & Assessment Section
Water Quality.
Development of Compliance Tools for Metals
Shirley Birosik Environmental Specialist
Great Salt Lake Water Quality Strategy Update
Water Quality, Indicators, and Usage
Water Quality 8th Grade
John Tinger U.S. EPA Region IX
Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program
Water Quality 8th Grade.
Indicators of Water Quality
Pearce Creek DMCF Baseline Exterior Monitoring Spring 2017 Results
Indicators of Water Quality
Measuring Water Quality
Water Quality Planning Division Monitoring & Assessment Section
Water Quality Planning Division Monitoring & Assessment Section
Procedures to Implement the Texas Surface Water Quality Standards
Presentation transcript:

SWAMP Team Members Contact Information Karen Taberski: , Nelia White: Leslie Perry: Kim Harrison: Arnie Thompson: waterboards.ca.gov, and Matthew Cover: Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program (SWAMP) San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board Program Overview and Goals SWAMP is a statewide surface water quality monitoring program implemented in the Bay Area by the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board. The state established SWAMP in 2000 at the urging of a public advisory group representing citizens, land managers, environmentalists, industries, cities, and farmers. SWAMP facilitates science-based regulatory decision-making. Both the Federal Clean Water Act and the State Porter-Cologne Water Quality Control Act require the state to identify "beneficial uses" of water and to establish water quality objectives to protect those uses. The goal for SWAMP in the San Francisco Bay Region is to monitor and assess water quality to determine whether beneficial uses are protected. The beneficial uses we evaluate relate to human health and aquatic life. Thus, we measure physical, chemical, and biological water quality indicators in creeks, lakes, reservoirs, and bays with beneficial uses in mind. Water, sediment, and biological samples are collected to understand baseline conditions (how things are now), natural variability, and effects of land use on water quality. Beneficial Use Evaluation through measurement of Particular Water Quality Indicators Water Contact and Noncontact Recreation Total coliform bacteria, fecal coliform bacteria, E. coli Ocean, Commercial, and Sport Fishing Fish chemistry, fish lipid concentration Warm and Cold Freshwater Habitat, Preservation of Rare and Endangered Species, and Fish Spawning Continuous monitoring of temperature, pH, dissolved oxygen, and specific conductivity Water chemistry (nutrients, metals, organics) Sediment chemistry (metals, organics) Water Toxicity (algae, crustacean, and fathead minnow) Sediment Toxicity (freshwater amphipod) Pyrethoids in water using ELISA method Water hardness Total suspended solids and total dissolved solids in water Total organic carbon and dissolved organic carbon in water Water turbidity and flow Chlorophyll levels in water Year 5 sampling stations are illustrated in the map above. With SWAMP funding for fiscal year , we are monitoring nine creeks from Bolinas to San Francisco and we have selected 16 monitoring stations. We will also perform water quality monitoring at four stations in Rodeo Lake and Lagoon The SWAMP funded program in the Bay Area Region is designed to answer questions such as: Is it safe to swim in the water body? Is it safe to eat the fish from the water body? Is the water or sediment toxic to organisms? Does the water body support a reasonable level of biodiversity? Does the water, sediment, or fish tissue contain pollutants at levels that violate water quality standards? Are water quality objectives for dissolved oxygen, pH, ammonia, bacteria, and other parameters met? Poster prepared by Terri Fashing, SWAMP Alumni The map above illustrates SWAMP monitoring watersheds from past years (years 1-4) and from the current year (year 5). It also displays Toxic Substance Monitoring Program (Reservoir Fish) and Coastal Fish Contamination Program monitoring locations. Both programs are part of SWAMP. Finally, the map shows where monitoring occurs under the San Francisco Estuary Regional Monitoring Program (RMP), which is a collaborative program made up of dischargers, regulators, scientists, and citizens. SWAMP Monitoring Study Design A rotating watershed approach is used to cover the region. Sampling stations may be established above and below particular land uses such as agriculture, industry, and golf courses to evaluate the impact of these land uses on water quality. Reference stations are established and data is compared to data from more impacted stations. Spatial trends are evaluated by distributing sampling stations throughout watersheds. Sediment is sampled at the bottom of watersheds (at integrator stations) to determine whether contaminants are being contributed to receiving waters. Rapid bioassessments with concurrent measurement of basic water quality parameters and visual physical habitat assessments are conducted in the spring at a maximum number of stations. Intra-annual temporal variability is evaluated by taking water samples at a subset of stations during the wet, spring (declining hydrograph), and dry seasons. Trash assessments have been conducted three to four times a year to determine where trash is coming from and how much accumulates over a particular time period. Collaboration with local agencies and citizens groups is pursued in order to conduct follow up monitoring.