Building State Systems to Produce Quality Data on Child Outcomes

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Data, Now What? Skills for Analyzing and Interpreting Data
Advertisements

Building a national system to measure child and family outcomes from early intervention Early Childhood Outcomes Center International Society on Early.
Indicator 7 Child Outcomes MAKING SENSE OF THE DATA June
Update on Child Outcomes for Early Childhood Special Education Lynne Kahn ECO at UNC The Early Childhood Outcomes (ECO) Center The National Association.
Early Childhood Outcomes Center Orientation for New Outcomes Conference Participants Lynne Kahn Christina Kasprzak Kathy Hebbeler The Early Childhood Outcomes.
Early Childhood Outcomes ECO Institute Kathy Hebbeler, ECO at SRI Robin Rooney ECO at FPG Prepared for the Office of Early Learning and School Readiness.
1 Measuring Child Outcomes: State of the Nation. 2 Learning objective: To gain new information about the national picture regarding measuring child outcomes.
CHILD OUTCOMES BASELINE AND TARGETS FOR INDICATOR 7 ON THE STATE PERFORMANCE PLAN State Advisory Panel for Exceptional Children November 12, 2009 January.
The Results are In! Child Outcomes for OSEP EI and ECSE Programs Donna Spiker Early Childhood Outcomes Center at SRI International October 13, 2011 (CCSSO-SCASS.
Update on Part C Child Outcomes Lynne Kahn ECO at UNC The Early Childhood Outcomes (ECO) Center June 2011 Kathy Hebbeler ECO at SRI International.
The Results are In: Using Early Childhood Outcome Data Kathy Hebbeler Early Childhood Outcomes Center at SRI International August, 2011.
Presented at Division for Early Childhood National Harbor, Maryland November, Child Outcomes: What We Are Learning from National, State, and Local.
Child Outcomes Data July 1, 2008 – June 30, 2009.
Early Childhood Outcomes Center Using the Child Outcomes Summary Form February 2007.
The Current Status of States' Early Childhood Outcome Measurement Systems Kathy Hebbeler, SRI International Lynne Kahn, FPG Child Dev Inst October 17,
Early Childhood Outcomes Center 1 Christina Kasprzak Robin Rooney March 2008 The Early Childhood Outcomes (ECO) Center National Early Childhood Technical.
Partnering with Local Programs to Interpret and Use Outcomes Data Delaware’s Part B 619 Program September 20, 2011 Verna Thompson & Tony Ruggiero Delaware.
Minnesota’s Outcome Measurement System For Infants, Toddlers and Preschool Children with Disabilities and their Families, including young children with.
Target Setting For Indicator #7 Child Outcomes WDPI Stakeholder Group December 16, 2009 Ruth Chvojicek Statewide Child Outcomes Coordinator 1 OSEP Child.
DESIGN AND LAYOUT FIVE DOMAINS –LANGUAGE –SOCIAL/EMOTIONAL –MOTOR –COGNITIVE –PARENTING/WELL-BEING CHILD BEHAVIORS AND ACTIVITIES –DIVIDED BY AGE RANGE.
Delaware Alignment 619 Outcome System Jim J. Lesko, Ed.D. Delaware Department of Education
Kathy Hebbeler, ECO at SRI Lynne Kahn, ECO at FPG Christina Kasprzak, ECO at FPG Cornelia Taylor, ECO at SRI Lauren Barton, ECO at SRI National Picture.
SPP Indicators B-7 and B-8: Overview and Results to Date for the Florida Prekindergarten Program for Children with Disabilities PreK Coordinators Meeting.
Preparing the Next Generation of Professionals to Use Child Outcomes Data to Improve Early Intervention and Preschool Special Education Lynne Kahn Kathy.
UNDERSTANDING THE THREE CHILD OUTCOMES 1 Maryland State Department of Education - Division of Special Education/Early Intervention Services.
Overview to Measuring Early Childhood Outcomes Ruth Littlefield, NH Department of Education Lynne Kahn, FPG Child Dev Inst November 16,
1 Measuring Child Outcomes: State of the Nation. 2 Learning objective: To gain new information about the national picture regarding measuring child outcomes.
JANUARY 6, 2014 VERNA THOMPSON Delaware 619 Meeting.
Understanding and Using Early Childhood Outcome (ECO) Data for Program Improvement Kansas Division for Early Childhood Annual Conference Feb. 23rd 2012.
Early Childhood Special Education Part B, Section 619 Measurement of Preschool Outcomes-SPP Indicator #7 Training Sessions-2010.
Understanding and Using Early Childhood Outcome (ECO) Data for Program Improvement TASN – KITS Fall 2012 Webinar August 31 st, 2012 Tiffany Smith Phoebe.
1 Indicator 7 Child Outcomes: Changes & Updates June 2011 Indicator 7 Child Outcomes: Changes & Updates June 2011.
Presented at ECEA-SCASS Meeting Savannah, Georgia October, 2010 OSEP Initiatives on Early Childhood Outcomes Kathy Hebbeler Early Childhood Outcomes Center.
Early Childhood Outcomes Center Orientation for New Outcomes Conference Participants Kathy Hebbeler Lynne Kahn The Early Childhood Outcomes (ECO) Center.
Early Childhood Outcomes Workgroup Christina Kasprzak and Lynne Kahn ECO and NECTAC July 2009.
Building State Systems to Produce Quality Data on Child Outcomes Jim J. Lesko Director, Early Development and Learning Resources Delaware Department of.
Measuring EC Outcomes DEC Conference Presentation 2010 Cornelia Taylor, ECO Christina Kasprzak, ECO/NECTAC Lisa Backer, MN DOE 1.
Child Outcomes Measurement Tools & Process A story of 3 conversions.
Kathy Hebbeler, ECO at SRI Lynne Kahn, NECTAC and ECO at FPG
Child Outcomes Summary Process April 26, 2017
Incorporating Early Childhood into Longitudinal Data Systems:
Appleton Area School District
California's Early Learning and Development System Overview
OSEP Project Directors Meeting
Kathy Hebbeler, ECO at SRI International AUCD Meeting Washington, DC
Pat Cameron – Department of Early Education and Care and
Child Outcomes Data: A Critical Lever for Systems Change
Review of Summary Statements for Target Setting on Indicators C3 and B7 Lynne Kahn and Christina Kasprzak ECO/NECTAC June 9,
Early Childhood Outcomes Data (Indicator C3 and B7)
Integrating Outcomes Learning Community Call February 8, 2012
Christina Kasprzak, ECTA/ECO/DaSy September 16, 2013
Webinar for the Massachusetts ICC Retreat October 3, 2012
Lynne Kahn Kathy Hebbeler The Early Childhood Outcomes (ECO) Center
Why Collect Outcome Data?
The Basics of Quality Data and Target Setting
Building Capacity to Use Child Outcomes Data to Improve Systems and Practices 2018 DEC Conference.
Early Childhood and Family Outcomes
School Readiness and the Assessment of Children with Disabilities
School Readiness and the Assessment of Children with Disabilities
Researchers as Partners with State Part C and Preschool Special Education Agencies in Collecting Data on Child Outcomes Kathy Hebbeler, ECO at SRI International.
ECO Suggestions on Indicators C3 and B7 Kathy Hebbeler, ECO
ECO Suggestions on Indicators C3 and B7 Kathy Hebbeler, ECO
Review of Summary Statements for Target Setting on Indicators C3 and B7 Lynne Kahn and Christina Kasprzak ECO/NECTAC June 9,
Measuring EC Outcomes DEC Conference Presentation 2010
Measuring Part C and Early Childhood Special Education Child Outcomes
Refresher: Background on Federal and State Requirements
Child Outcomes Data July 1, 2008 – June 30, 2009
Welcome to the Workshop!
Measuring Child and Family Outcomes Conference August 2008
Early Childhood Outcomes Data (Indicator C3 and B7)
Presentation transcript:

Building State Systems to Produce Quality Data on Child Outcomes Jim J. Lesko Director, Early Development and Learning Resources Delaware Department of Education

Delaware State Perspective Sixteen LEAs 2,300 children enrolled – average Observation/Performance Based Measures Prior Approved Measures Educators Complete Assessment – Teachers, Speech/Language Pathologists, Psychologists Accept assessments completed by community providers/practitioners

Delaware State Perspective Use Child Outcome Summary Format as Mechanism for Aggregation of Data Annual Reporting on Outcomes to USDOE on Exiting Children Only

Early Childhood Outcomes Initial year of the outcomes 2006 Provided training on assessment measures Training to each LEA – teachers and administrators Locals report scores to state Two data points annually – typically fall & spring Multiple Sources of information required Two Sources are consistent statewide for funded programs State does conversion of COSF scores to progress categories

Outcome 3 Children use appropriate behaviors to meet their needs Toddler 2 may… 19-35 months Initiate action to make things happen Use simple strategies to meet their own wants and needs Use utensils to feed self Begin to dress self Preschool Child may… 36-60 months Make independent choices Begin to develop a plan for play Develop increasing independence in a range of activities, routines, and tasks Use positive behavior to solve problems Begin to show awareness and independence in hygiene, nutrition and personal care Build awareness and ability to follow basic health and safety rules

Carolina Curriculum Crosswalk With OSEP Child Outcomes

5. Attention and Memory: Visual/Spatial COGNITION Delaware Early Learning Foundations 5. Attention and Memory: Visual/Spatial   a. Points to hand that is hiding a toy (both when toy remains in IT Uncover a toy that has been hidden. hand and when toy is transferred to the other hand, out of sight) b. Recognizes the covers of several books and labels them c. Recognizes familiar signs Show increasing awareness of print, familiar signs, and labels d. Identifies (points to) object or picture shown briefly and shown IT Show increased short and long term memory and increased attention again in an array of three . e. Identifies (points to) object or picture shown briefly and shown again in an array of four f. Tells the name of an object or picture shown briefly to a group of two and then hidden g. Remembers incidental information h. Names one of several (4 or more) objects or pictures shown (or objects felt), named and then hidden i. After observing three objects being placed under separate covers, identifies the cover under which a matching object is hidden j. Remembers and names which one of three objects has been hidden

Social Emotional Description Totals Percentage A Percent of preschool children who did not improve functioning 11 2.8% B Percent of preschool children who improved functioning but not sufficient to move nearer to functioning comparable to same-aged peers 22 5.7% C Percent of preschool children who improved functioning to a level nearer to same-aged peers but did not reach it 121 31.3% D Percent of preschool children who improved functioning to reach a level comparable to same-aged peers 193 49.9% E Percent of preschool children who maintained functioning at a level comparable to same-aged peers 40 10.3%   387 100%

Outcome C: Use of appropriate behaviors to meet their needs Baseline Data for Preschool Children Exiting 2008-2009 Summary Statement Table Summary Statements % of children Outcome A: Positive social-emotional skills (including social relationships) Of those children who entered or exited the program below age expectations in Outcome A, the percent who substantially increased their rate of growth by the time they turned 6 years of age or exited the program 90.5% The percent of children who were functioning within age expectations in Outcome A by the time they turned 6 years of age or exited the program 60.2% Outcome B: Acquisition and use of knowledge and skills (including early language/communication and early literacy) 1 Of those children who entered or exited the program below age expectations in Outcome B, the percent who substantially increased their rate of growth by the time they turned 6 years of age or exited the program 92.9% 2. The percent of children who were functioning within age expectations in Outcome B by the time they turned 6 years of age or exited the program 54.3% Outcome C: Use of appropriate behaviors to meet their needs 1 Of those children who entered or exited the program below age expectations in Outcome C, the percent who substantially increased their rate of growth by the time they turned 6 years of age or exited the program 91.8% 2. The percent of children who were functioning within age expectations in Outcome C by the time they turned 6 years of age or exited the program 64.8%

Quality Not a One Shot Deal Fairly High Turnover of Staff On-Going Professional Development Requirement Practitioners Data Entry Individuals SEA – LEA Data Quality Checks – Targeted Annually

Next Steps Delve Deeper Into The Data Analyze Data by Subgroups Classification of Disability Time in Intervention Age LEA Compare COSF ratings of “outgoing-incoming” Part C populations Data Coach Support to LEAs