How the Attitudes of Producers Toward Windbreaks in Eastern Nebraska Have Changed Since 1983 By: Kim Tomczak.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Agricultural Land Use Lori Lynch, Professor Agricultural and Resource Economics University of Maryland.
Advertisements

Climate Smart Agriculture East Africa Regional Knowledge Sharing Meeting Thomas Cole June 11, 2012, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Looking at Agricultural Sustainability
Sustainability in Agriculture Jennifer Elwell Kentucky Corn Growers/Kentucky Small Grain Growers Farm PR Network.
Agricultural Practices in Kansas Comparing Agricultural Practices before and after the dust storms of the 1930’s.
Agricultural Land Use and Ecosystem Services in the Canadian Prairies Benjamin S. Rashford Agricultural and Applied Economics University of Wyoming.
New Disaster Assistance Programs in the 2008 Farm Bill: Focus on SURE Rod M. Rejesus Assistant Professor and Extension Specialist Dept. of Ag. and Resource.
Windbreak Technology Provided by: John Harrington Mora Research Center New Mexico State University.
Alabama 2003 Survey of Rural Land Issues College of Agriculture Auburn University.
INTERVIEW WITH KEVIN DONOHO DISTRICT SOIL CONSERVATIONIST NRCS: Soil Conservation in Action.
Attitudes Toward the Kansas Forest Service Conservation Tree and Shrub Seedling Program By Brett Zollinger, Ph.D. Docking Institute of Public Affairs.
 PowerPoint begins with teacher-led discussion (on next slide)  Necessary materials:  PowerPoint Guide Teacher Information!
Lake Springfield Watershed Nutrient Management Project February 11, 2015.
Chapter 17 Conservation and “Protection” of Natural Resources Rosalie Bleasdale.
Looking at Agricultural Sustainability Sustainable Small Farming & Ranching Understanding “Sustainability” and “Whole Farm” Concepts.
An agroforestry practice This presentation was developed by the USDA National Agroforestry Center.
CONTROLLING EROSION ON THE FARM Soils Ag I. Objectives*  Explain how land capability classes relate to wise soil use  Describe the main vegetation methods.
2014 Illinois Farm Economics Summit The Profitability of Illinois Agriculture: Back to the Future? 2015 Crop and Income Outlook: Conserve Cash Now Gary.
Farm Leasing Arrangements Trends Tim Eggers Field Ag Economist Iowa State University Extension.
United States Department of Agriculture National Agricultural Statistics Service American Indian Farm and Ranch Data 2012 Census of Agriculture Statistics.
Non-Industrial Private Forests Kenneth Williams Fisheries Extension Specialist Langston University Aquaculture Extension Program Elements of Forestry.
Guidelines and Applications of grant cycle Lindsay Balance Maximilian Merrill.
2005 Red River Valley Farm Averages Ron Dvergsten, Dean Management Education Keith Torgerson, NDSCS.
Improving Lives, Communities and the Environment Through Natural Resources Conservation.
Economic Importance of Agriculture Crops Agri-science Mr. Bailey.
Farmland Markets and Farm Business Finances Jennifer Ifft Farm Economy Branch Rural and Resource Economics Division USDA Economic Research Service.
Soil and Environmental Implications of Land Rolling Corn Logan Ahlers and Paul Kivlin College of Agriculture, Food, and Environmental Science University.
Lecture 2. Agricultural Pollution Control in the Baltic Sea with Special Emphasis on Manure Management Prepared by Assoc. Prof. Philip Chiverton, SLU and.
Reduce Soil Erosion Soil conservation, some methods
Dust Bowl What are 3 natural causes of the dust bowl? What are 2 man made causes of the dust bowl?
Core 4 Grower Research: An Overview Conducted by Market Directions for the Conservation Technology Information Center.
Michigan Precision Farming Survey Roger Brook, Ph.D. Agricultural Engineering Dept. Michigan State University Presentation for Agricultural Engineering.
Soil as a Resource Key idea: Soil is an important resource that can be conserved and protected.
Michigan State University Extension Michigan State University 4-H Field Staff Perceptions of Area of Expertise Teams Elizabeth Scott Doctoral Candidate.
Food Production. How is food produced? Industrial Agriculture Traditional Agriculture.
The Great Depression and the American Dustbowl. By Gemma Ingram x.
Economics of Windbreaks Leah Moore USDA-NRCS Agricultural Economist.
Land Management.
Warm-Up Review What are the 5 components in soil?
Keith Torgerson, NDSCS.
Farmland Leases: A Reset Needed
Farmer Risk Perceptions and Demand for Risk Management Education
Helping Landlords Find the Right Tenant
GAJWANI SCHOOLS & COLLEGES
Presented By AudrÉ etsitty
Ron Dvergsten, Dean Management Education
2005 Red River Valley Farm Averages
Unit 4: Environmental Science
Habits of Financially Resilient Farms - continued
Soil Ch. 12.
Alternative Farming Methods
Profits Weather – Profit – Clouds Hills Community Center
What to Expect when you’re Expecting a Farm Bill
Human Impact on Soil.
Bellringer Why does wilderness need to be preserved?
Soil Conservation.
Innovation and the online payment realm A market study
History of Rangeland Management - TIMELINE
Learning the Importance of Field Crops
Cover Crops.
FARMING The Changing Primary Industry.
Efficient farm management has always been of prime importance to farmers. It has become even more important to the economic survival of farmers in recent.
By: Emilie R. Cooper School of Forest Resources
Land Use.
US and NC Agricultural Outlook
Trends in Nebraska Cash Rent and Crop Share Leases
Flexible Grazing Land Leases and Considerations
Title of Notes: Soil and agriculture p. 16 & 17 RS
network: IHGConnect connect as guest Password: Travel
Biodiversity in Agroecosystems
Presentation transcript:

How the Attitudes of Producers Toward Windbreaks in Eastern Nebraska Have Changed Since 1983 By: Kim Tomczak

Windbreaks Lines of trees set up on farms or in urban areas to stop wind. There are three different types of windbreaks Farmstead Livestock Field

Background Around the 1900s, demand for windbreaks started being known Windbreaks became more recognized in the 1930s with the introduction of the Prairie States Forestry Project.

Uses of Windbreaks Windbreaks are used for soil conservation and as a component of crop production. Microclimate factors including wind speed soil temperature evaporation air temperature

Other Ways Windbreaks are Beneficial Public Good Support a variety of wildlife Bring beauty to the land Stop the smell from feedlots from traveling to their neighbors

Why Important? Windbreaks are being removed for different reasons such as: conflict with irrigation development condition of the windbreak conflict with other farming practices Help the environment Beneficial

Thesis Objective The purpose of this study is to learn how people use windbreaks today in Eastern Nebraska. When giving out the survey we will ask basic demographic information allowing us to determine the attitude of different people that take the survey. I will correlate attitudes between the 1983 survey and today and how people view windbreaks.

Methods Survey in 1982, Dave Dearmont, James Brandle and Bruce Johnson “The Field of Windbreak: Perceptions of Agriculture Producers and Professionals in Eastern Nebraska." 2,500 producers from 41 counties surveyed in Eastern Nebraska

2009 Survey 1500 producers in 41 counties in Eastern Nebraska The survey consists of questions that ask about the producers themselves, their perceptions about windbreak and what they use them for The addresses were purchased from the Marketing Systems Group

2009 Survey On March 16, 2009 a pre-notification letter explaining the survey was sent out to the selected farmers. One week later, the questionnaire, cover letter and self-addressed business-reply envelopes were mailed out. A reminder postcard was sent out on April 13, 2009

Responses As of April 20, 2009, the response rate was 28%. The average numbers of farmed acres per respondent was 835.86 acres. Farmers owned on average 460 acres and rented on average 619.

Responses Farmers grew mainly corn and soybeans, but also alfalfa, winter wheat or other crops (such as grass for hay, tomatoes and grapes). The percentage of producers that say they irrigated was 54.89% while those that did not irrigate was 45.11%.

Responses In 2009 In 1983 97.72% having farmstead windbreaks, 68.07 % having livestock windbreaks 40.38% having field windbreaks In 1983 86% had farmstead windbreaks 57% had livestock windbreaks 27 % had field windbreaks.

Demographic Results Mean Age………….50 60 How many years of formal education have you completed Primary………...............13 2 High School…………… 68 35 Some College………….. 8 29 College Degree……..… 12 29 Graduate Degree…… 6

Demographic Results Is farming your primary Occupation Yes…………..86 82 No……………14 18 Do you have outdoor hobbies which are enhanced by your presence of trees and wooded areas? Yes…………..59 56 No……………41 44 Do you expect any of your children or their families to someday farm all or part of the land you are farming? Yes ………………. 54 44 No…………………14 29 Don’t know………..14 27

Producer’s Perceptions How do you perceive the value of field windbreaks as a conservation practice? Definite Value…………………51 32 Some Value………………..….42 54 No Value…………………….… 7 14 How do you perceive the presence of mature field windbreaks on farmland values? Sizable yield increase……………..15 11 Some yield increase……………… 50 33 No yield effect………….………..…23 34 Some yield decrease………………12 22 Sizable economic loss………………….…. 3

Producer’s Perceptions How do you perceive the effect of mature field windbreaks on crop production yields in fields? Sizable yield increase……………..11 5 Some yield increase………………52 47 No yield effect. ……………………..21 22 Some yield decrease………………14 24 Sizable yield decrease…………….. 1 3   Are you aware of any economic incentive programs which encourage landowners to establish field windbreaks Yes………………………………… 43 No………………………………….. 56

Producer’s Perceptions Given your comments above concerning yield effects as well as consideration of farmland taken out of production by the presence of windbreaks, how do you perceive the net economic effect of establishing field windbreaks to protect cropland? Sizable economic returns……………… 8.3 6.08 Some additional returns……………….. 53.3 36.15 No effect on economic returns………. 19.9 27.70 Some economic loss…………………… 17.5 27.03 Sizable economic loss…………………... 1.1 3.04

Producer’s Perceptions How many rows of trees are necessary in a field windbreak for it to be effective? Mean Number of Rows.. 3 2.74  If you currently own a field windbreak, do you feel that the land it occupies is in its best use? Yes 73 No 27

Producer’s Perceptions Do you feel that wind erosion is a problem in your area? Yes………..44 38 No…………44 46 Not sure ….13 16   Do you have a desire to see more field windbreaks being established in your county in the coming years? Yes………… 50 37 No…………. 13 28 Indifferent….. 37 35

Producer’s Perceptions Within the next 5 to 10 years, do you plan to establish field windbreaks on land you own or encourage your landlord (s) to do so on land you rent? Yes………... 18 15 No………….. 45 50 Don’t know… 37 35

Conclusion I researched how producer’s attitudes towards windbreaks have changed from 1983 to present and looked at if there is a change in attitude, how this has or has not led to the development of more windbreaks in Eastern Nebraska.

References Brandle, J.R., Hodges, L., Zhou, X.H. (2004) Windbreaks in North American Agriculture Systems. Agroforestry Systems 61:65-78. Caborn, J.M. Shelterbelts and Windbreaks. London: Faber, 1965. Cleugh, H. A. (1998). Effects of Windbreaks on Airflow, Microclimates, and Crop Yields. Agroforestry Systems. 41: 55-84. Dearmont, David D. An Economic and Perceptual Analysis of Field Windbreaks in Eastern Nebraska. University of Nebraska Lincoln, 1984. Kort, J. Benefits of Windbreaks to Field and Forage Crops. 1988. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 22/23:165-190.

Questions?