The HELCOM Baltic Sea Action Plan, its implementation and some potential PPPs Jesper H. Andersen Head of unit (EU Water Policy) DHI Water Environment Health.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Maritime Eionet workshop
Advertisements

HELCOM, Integrated Approaches and MSP Hermanni Backer HELCOM Secretariat First Annual Forum of the EU Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region Thematic Discussion.
HELCOM Seal management in the Baltic. HELCOM Contracting parties: Denmark EC Estonia Finland Germany Latvia Lithuania Poland Russia Sweden.
What we are, what we do, what we can do together Marco Milardi – Project Researcher, HELCOM Baltic Sea FLAG Seminar, Helsinki, 3-4 April 2013.
The state of the Gulf of Finland- gaps in our present knowledge
Workshop om inddragelse af ny ter 2008 Baltic Nest Institute, National Environmental Research Institute, Aarhus University, Denmark Baltic Nest Institute.
Marine Strategy Framework Directive: Goals and Challenges
UNEP Coral Reef Unit Division of Environmental Conventions c/o UNEP-World Conservation Monitoring Centre Monitoring of coral reefs.
18-19 June 2007MARCOS 2, Ulriksdal Slott, Stockholm 1 European Marine Directives: Concepts, Overlap and Synergy Jesper H. Andersen DHI Water Environment.
1. 2 Content Principles of the Water Framework Directive WFD and Agriculture WFD and CAP.
National Environmental Research Institute MARE: Management perspective HELCOM MONAS - member of the MARE board Marine Convention focusing on the state.
Scientific Advice for the Management of Transboundary Marine Eutrophication.
HELCOM proposal on project aiming at BSAP development and implementation Baltic Sea Region Programme Conference May 2007, Hamburg HELCOM.
The Marine Strategy Framework Directive 17th March 2010, Newcastle North Sea Stakeholders Conference Leo de Vrees European Commission (DG Environment,
MSFD Interactions EMODNET Chemistry 2 Kick-off meeting Giordano Giorgi Trieste (Italy), 3-5 June 2013.
Prof. dr. F. Maes – Maritime Institute – Ghent University International Examples of Authorization for Marine Spatial Planning (MSP) Prof. dr. F. Maes UNESCO.
Implementation process at EU level Marine Strategy Framework Directive: implementation process at EU level Gert Verreet – submitted to EMECO meeting -
HELCOM as an International Tool of Environmental Protection of the Baltic Sea Mieczysław S. Ostojski, Ph.D. Mieczysław S. Ostojski, Ph.D. Chairman, Helsinki.
Implementation of TARGET 2 of the EU 2020 Biodiversity Strategy Claudia Olazábal Unit – Biodiversity DG ENV European Commission Nature Directors Meeting.
Governing Europe’s Marine Environment Kristine Kern University of Potsdam and IRS.
MSFD Programme of Measures Consultation Event Anna Donald Head of Marine Planning & Strategy.
TWReferenceNet Management and Sustainable Development of Protected Transitional Waters in Bulgaria Liliana Maslarova, PhD Nomos + Physis.
Kavala Workshop 1-2 June 2006 Legal protection of Transitional Waters [in the Cadses area]: A comparative analysis Dr. Petros Patronos / Dr. Liliana Maslarova.
Policy drivers for seabed mapping Evanthia Karpouzli Marine Ecological Adviser Scottish Executive.
Groundwater chemical status in Denmark Klaus Hinsby, GEUS Climate change and adaptive water management in EU and beyond: Themeday at ATV winter meeting.
Should we integrate assessments of the state-based descriptors? YES – Considering that the MSFD is underpinned by ecosystem management approach, it is.
The Marine Strategy Framework Directive “good environmental status” and the Water Framework Directive “good ecological/chemical status/potential” ECOSTAT.
Counselor dr. Otilia Mihail Ministry of Environment, Water and Forest Constanta 17 June
Sub-basin Management Plans for the Freshwater Pearl Mussel Dr E. Sides, J Ryan, Dr A O’Connor, Dr Colin Byrne Department of Environment, Heritage and Local.
Stela Barova, senior expert, “Marine environmental protection and Monitoring” Department, “Plans and Permits” Directorate State of play of MSFD implementation.
HELCOM Baltic Sea Action Plan Northern Dimension and the oceans and the seas Mieczysław Ostojski, Prof. WSS Chairman Helsinki Commission 15th Baltic Sea.
Biological biodiversity Is the term given to the variety of life on Earth and the variety within and between all species of plants, animals and micro-organisms.
Regulating Nitrate Pollution – European Approaches Helle Tegner Anker Faculty of Life Sciences Copenhagen University.
The Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD) The key and only legislation completely focused on the marine environment Clear ecosystem based thinking.
Legal aspects of public participation in the ecosystem-based water management in the Baltic Sea Region Maciej Nyka Economic Law and Environmental Protection.
Marine Expert Group meeting Brussels, 6 November 2015
Marine Strategy Framework Directive:
Marine Strategy Framework Directive: implementation process at EU level Gert Verreet – WFD CIS SCG meeting of 11 March 2009.
Marine Strategy Framework Directive: an introduction
Marine Environment and Water Industry Unit
Marine Environment and Water Industry Unit
EEA - EMMA Workshop November 20-21, 2006 EEA, Copenhagen
Technical guidance for assessment under Article 8 MSFD
Lena Bergström, Project Coordinator
Proposal for MSFD risk-based approach project in OSPAR region
European Commission DG Environment
Breakout groups: reporting back
Meeting of the WFD CIS Working Group on Ecological Status (ECOSTAT)
Jacques Populus – Ifremer On behalf of the EUSeaMap project team
Jannica Haldin HELCOM Professional Secretary
LIFE and the implementation of the Water Framework Directive
Draft Mandate for for the SSG on WFD and agriculture
Marine Strategy Framework Directive: implementation process at EU level Gert Verreet – WFD WG Reporting - 31 March 2009.
Towards integrated environmental policy for the marine environment
Marine Environment and Water Industry
1st Implementation Report of the Water Framework Directive
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
HOLAS II: project to develop a 2nd Holistic Assessment of the Ecosystem Health of the Baltic Sea Ulla Li Zweifel, Professional Secretary.
Geographic Assessment Scales
ECOSTAT 2013 – 2015 Tasks and Deliverables
HELCOM WORK Submitted by the Contracting Parties in HELCOM that are also EU member states Name Surname.
Towards integrated environmental policy for the marine environment
Questionnaire on Elaboration of the MSFD Initial Assessment
HELCOM Baltic Sea Protected Areas
Frequently asked questions Part II: Coordination of monitoring under WFD and BHD Workshop: Biodiversity and Water - Links between EU nature and water.
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
Assessment scales and aggregation
Head, Marine Conservation
Item 4 b) Marine Strategy Framework Directive and CIS WFD
Questionnaire on Elaboration of the MSFD Initial Assessment
Presentation transcript:

The HELCOM Baltic Sea Action Plan, its implementation and some potential PPPs Jesper H. Andersen Head of unit (EU Water Policy) DHI Water Environment Health Round table discussion seminar The environmental standing of the Baltic Sea: from political proposal to practical project 17 March 2008, Copenhagen, DK

Mission The HELCOM BSAP will neither save the Baltic Sea nor result in Good Environmental Status (sensu MSFD) Hopefully its implementation will improve environmental status as well as ecological status (sensu WFD) and conservation status (sensu HD) My mission today is to: –Focus on BSAP implementation in an adaptive management framework –Outline an ongoing PPP as well as two potentially promising PPPs

A few word on eutrophication in the Baltic Sea

The BSAP and adaptive management… Source: Andersen & Pawlak, 2006

BSAP and eutrophication… The eutrophication segment of the BSAP is largely based on scenarios made by MARE/NEST The approach is state-of-the-art Source: HELCOM, 2007

The BSAP and adaptive management… Source: Andersen & Pawlak, 2006

B, G, Y, O, and R = H, G, M, P, and B Assessment of eutrophication status Source: Andersen et al. (2007) Overall objective: Assess the eutrophication status in the whole Baltic Sea on the basis of a harmonised approach Additional objectives: Visualise and conceptualise the effects and extent of eutrophication in the Baltic Sea Describe the causes of eutrophication and quantify the inputs of nutrients to the marine environment Assess the effectiveness of already taken measures in order to indicate i) to what extent the goals are fulfilled or not, and ii) to what extent supplementary measures are required HELCOM EUTRO-PRO is a ongoing but informal PPP (MS authorities, IGO, and a private partner)

Eutrophication and the way forward… Politics seem to have over-ruled science… Source: HELCOM, 2007

A word of caution… Source: Jackson et al., 2001

Linking BSAP, WFD and HD… Eutrophication has reduced SAV density and distribution However, SAV is many areas also limited by substrate availability, especially in Germany and Denmark Examples: –Limfjorden (Denmark) – reconstruction of 2 km2 stone reef will reduce hypoxia risk in the order of 95% –Arkona Basin - O 2 inputs from the Belt Sea are significantly reduced - can we do anything to improve the situation? This could develop into a PPP …

BEACON, another PPP? Modelling of environmental issues is in general un- coordinated at a Baltic Sea-wide scale A lot of resources could be spend more effectively … and in support of the BSAP implementation … We need co-ordination, harmonisation and a Baltic Sea Ecosystem Modelling Network (BEACON): –Hydrographic ensemble modelling –Reference conditions –Hypoxia –Boundary conditions (WFD coastal vs. MSFD marine) –Habitat building species (Fucus, Mytilus, Zostera, etc.) –Implementation (products, up-stream catchments, scenarios, demonstration projects BEACON Tool Box) BEACON is a potential Public Private Partnership Currently, a consortium is being set up with participants from all Baltic Sea States (based on HELCOM EUTRO- PRO and BALANCE activities)

Wrap up (1) The HELCOM BSAP will not save the Baltic Sea However, implementation of the BSAP will improve environmental status in all parts of the Baltic Sea The eutrophication segment should be scrutinized, especially in regard to the planned nutrient reductions

Wrap up (2) Potential PPPs in support of BSAP implementation could include: –Further development of assessment tools (together with the indicator on which they run) complementing existing HELCOM tools (HEAT (eutrophication) and BEAT (biodiversity)) –Supplement REDUCTIONS with ecological engineering in order to speed up recovery without infringement of EU directives –Establish a Baltic Sea Ecosystem Modelling Network with focus on ensemble modelling, RefCon, hypoxia, boundary conditions, distribution of habitat building species, and ultimately a Tool Box Finally a word of caution: –Involve all relevant institutions (public and business) that are willing to support BSAP implementation –Tangible solutions cost a lot of money –Think BIG

Thank you for your attention