Mario Lopez Eric Mendez

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Final Steps to War. As anti- and pro-slavery forces clashed out west, Southerners began to clash with laws passed by Congress Southerners argued that.

Advertisements

Lincoln-Douglas Debates: Video (2:13)

CHAPTER 16.3: THE DREDD SCOTT DECISION. FACTS 1.Dred Scott was a slave from Missouri. (MO) 2. Scott and his owner moved to Wisconsin for four years. 3.

The Dred Scott Decision

II. Basis of Citizenship

Dual federalism 1 tyler larson christian gibbons morgan powell josh wendell branden mackinnon kayla delahoussaye.

Road to Civil War Challenges to Slavery p

Dred Scott v. Sandford (1857). Background: The Missouri Compromise 1803: U.S. purchases Louisiana Territory from France 1820: Compromise allows slavery.

Extending Rights to All present What documents and institutions protect the rights of Americans?

leading to the Civil War Lincoln/Douglas Debates

 Dred Scott v. J. A. Sanford (1857).   Who was Dred Scott?  Events Affecting Dred Scott’s fate  Timeline of Events  The Two Sides of the Issue 

Objectives:. Bellringer: What was the Missouri Compromise?

A Nation Divided Political Divisions Chapter 15, Section 3 Pages

The Court ruled that Scott's "sojourn" of two years to Illinois and the Northwest Territory did not make him free once he returned to Missouri.

The Civil War and the Constitution Unit 3, Lesson 17.

II. Basis of Citizenship. A. National Citizenship Founders let states decide who was a citizen Naturalization – Legal process by which a person is granted.

Griffin Honeycutt Block 2 October 29,  Official Name- Dred Scott v. John F. A. Sandford  The defendant’s name was actually Sanford, but was misspelled.

By Alexander M. Barker. Born as a slave in the late 1700s Owned by the Blow family Parents are unknown Lived in Southampton County, VA Moved to Alabama;

Chapter 10 – Sectional Conflict Intensifies

Dred Scott. Background Scott was the slave of an Army surgeon who took him from Missouri to posts in Illinois and modern day Minnesota. Scott was the.

Fill in your “Describing Historical Event” handout using the following PowerPoint presentation. If you need extra space use the back of your handout. Aim:

Dred Scott v Sandford Facts of the Case: Dred Scott was a slave in Missouri. From 1833 to 1843, he resided in Illinois (a free state) and in an area of.

DRED SCOTT CASE JESSI PALKOVIC - JACKSON STEPHENS - WILLIAM UNMISIG POPULAR SOVEREIGNTY on the.

APUSH – Spiconardi.   In the 1830s, Dred Scott, a slave, accompanied his owner from Missouri to Illinois and later the territory of Wisconsin  Scott.

LEHHS FOCUS: Lawyer Reconstruction to the Rise of Railroads.

Objective: To examine the importance of the Lincoln – Douglas debates and the Dred Scott decision.

Lesson 4: Attempts at Compromise Aim: What were the attempts at compromise that were made prior to the start of the Civil War?

Dred Scott v. Sandford By Chloe Sturges. Overview Dred Scott, a slave in the 1800s, was taken out of Missouri, a slave state, by his owner John Emerson.

By: Mireina Barrios. Dred Scott and Roger B. Taney Dred Scott, a slave who had his freedom at Illinois and the free territory of Wisconsin before moving.

Dred Scott.  I can explain how the Dred Scott Court decision impacted African Americans during the time before the Civil War.

WhoA Missouri slave What When Where Why Concept Development: Dredd Scott was a slave who argued for his freedom to the Supreme Court. Dredd Scott vs. Sanford.

21.6 & 21.7: The Dred Scott Case & Decision Page

 Dred Scott was a slave.  He had lived in a free territory with his owner.  His owner moved back into a slave state.  While there, the.

America’s Civil War Page 11.

The Election of 1860 The election of Abraham Lincoln prompted the

Political Divisions cause the Nations to Divide

Uncle Tom’s Cabin.

Top Ten Court Cases that have impacted law in the United States.

Political Divisions Chapter 15, Section 3.

Uncle Tom’s Cabin and Dred Scott

Dred Scott Decision 1857.

Chapter 10 – Sectional Conflict Intensifies

CH 15 ROAD TO CIVIL WAR.

The Civil War 1861 – 1865.

Events leading to the civil war

Dred Scott v. Sandford (1857)

Dred Scott v. Sandford (1857)

The Civil War 1861 – 1865.

Dred Scott Presentation created by Robert Martinez

Opener – Copy into Notebook pp. 84

The Dred Scott Case and the Election of 1860

Background: Who was Dred Scott?

Dred Scott v. Sanford.

Chapter 15: A Divided Nation

Challenges to Slavery 15-3

Famous Abolitionists.

What causes of sectional conflict led to the Civil War?

Chapter 15: A Divided Nation

Dred Scott Decision Scott was not a citizen, could not sue

Objective: To examine the importance of the Lincoln – Douglas debates and the Dred Scott decision. Abraham Lincoln Stephen Douglas Dred Scott.

Political Divisions Chapter 18 - Section 3.

CH 15 ROAD TO CIVIL WAR.

8X Tuesday Objective: Describe political developments in the US that led to Civil War. Agenda: Do Now: Explain the rise of the Republican Party.

Dred Scott Decision (1857).

The Road to Civil War A Nation Divided Aim: What were the social

Presentation transcript:

1856-1857 Mario Lopez Eric Mendez Dred Scott V.S Sandford 1856-1857 Mario Lopez Eric Mendez

Details Dred Scott was a slave in Missouri. From 1833 to 1843, he resided in Illinois (a free state) and in an area of the Louisiana Territory, where slavery was forbidden by the Missouri Compromise of 1820. After returning to Missouri, Scott sued unsuccessfully in the Missouri courts for his freedom, claiming that his residence in free territory made him a free man. Scott then brought a new suit in federal court.

Constitutional Explanation Scott's master maintained that no pure-blooded Negro of African descent and the descendant of slaves could be a citizen in the sense of Article III of the Constitution.

President James Buchanan (1791-1868), America's 15th president, was in office from 1857 to 1861. During his tenure, seven Southern states seceded from the Union and the nation teetered on the brink of civil war

Summary of decision Held portions of the Missouri Compromise unconstitutional in violation of the Fifth Amendment, treating Scott as property, not as a person. Dred Scott was a slave. Under Articles III and IV, argued Taney, no one but a citizen of the United States could be a citizen of a state, and that only Congress could confer national citizenship. Taney reached the conclusion that no person descended from an American slave had ever been a citizen for Article III purposes. The Court then held the Missouri Compromise unconstitutional, hoping to end the slavery question once and for all.

Pictures of case

Favors & against Taney Wayne Catron Daniel Nelson Grier campbell Mclean Curtis

Work cited "Dred Scott v. Sandford." Oyez. Chicago-Kent College of Law at Illinois Tech, n.d. Nov 23, 2015. https://www.oyez.org/cases/1850-1900/60us393 https://www.google.com/webhp?sourceid=chrome-instant&ion=1&espv=2&ie=UTF-8#safe=strict&q=dred+scott+v+sandford+case